Is the AQI Enough
During the discussion on the AQI, it became clear that the index can capture only the short-term health effects of a few pollutants. But that leaves out the long-term health risk assessment of these pollutants and a host of other toxic pollutants like benzene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) whose shortterm health effects are yet to be identified. Moreover, these affect a larger section of people in addition to increasing problems of the more vulnerable sections of the population and the effects can be even more severe.
To deal with these chronic effects, Kirk Smith suggested the creation of a Chronic Pollutants Index (CPI). According to him, the cpi should be structured somewhat like the daily aqi, but would rely on annual average levels of pollution. It would not be reported on a daily basis, but updated quarterly with a rolling annual average. This can further be developed into a Cancer Pollutant Index, which will be able to show the cancer risk from exposure to the ambient concentrations of pollutants like benzene and PAHs.
Related Content
- Pulling the plug on fossils in power
- Are G20 countries doing their fair share of global climate mitigation?: comparing ambition and fair shares assessments of G20 countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
- Climate and equity: a framework to guide policy action
- Solving climate displacement through proactive land policy
- The price of hope: funding education for the world’s refugee children
- Private cities: outstanding examples from Developing Countries and their implications for urban policy