`MINUTES FOR
86th MEETING OF THE RECONSTITUTED EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE
(INDUSTRY) TO BE HELD DURING 20th to 22nd OCTOBER, 2008
VENUE
: Scope
Complex, Core 6, 5th Floor, CHT Conference
Room,
Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas,
Road,
1.0 Opening
Remarks of the Chairman
2.0
Confirmation of the Minutes of 85th
Meeting of the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry) held during
23rd -25th September, 2008.
The Minutes of the 85th minutes held during 23rd
-25th September 2008 were confirmed
3.0
Consideration of the
Projects
20th October, 2008
4.0 New Proposals :
4.1 Integrated
Steel Plant at Nimidha, Dhenkanal, Orissa by M/s MGM Steels Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 69th Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 4th–6th
July, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the steel plants are listed at S.N. 3(a)(a) under Primary
Metallurgical process and appraised at Central level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s MGM Steels Ltd. have proposed to set up an Integrated Steel Plant at Motanga,
Dhenkanal, Orissa. Mahanadi Elephant reserve is at about 13 to 15 kms from the
project area. Total project area is
Production |
Capacity
|
Sponge
Iron |
2,10,000 MTPA |
Hot
Metal |
1,31,000 MTPA |
Crude
Steel |
2,50,000 MTPA |
Coal
Washery |
5,00,000 MTPA |
Power
WHRB
AFBC |
32 MW 16 MW 16 MW |
Saleable
|
|
Billet |
2,42,553 MTPA |
Pig
Iron |
62,000 MTPA |
Iron ore (DRI & BF
grade), Lime stone, Coal, Dolomite, BF Coke, Manganese, Quartzite, Burnt Lime,
Burnt Dolo and Ferro Alloy will be used as raw material. PAs informed to the
Committee about the process details of the steel plant and pollution control
methods adopted. PAs informed to the Committee that no coke oven plant will be
installed. Imported coke will be used.
Coal washery (5,00,000 TPA) will also be installed.
Air quality monitoring was carried out at 8
locations and the parameters are found to vary in the following range: SPM
(90.1-170.2 mg/m3), RPM (18.3-39.8 mg/m3),
SO2 (6.8–19.8 mg/m3) & NOx (6-17 mg/m3). ESP, fan, stack etc. will be provided
to DR kiln, Sinter plant and Blast furnace. Dust suppression system like dense
fog system and water sprinkling system will be provided at raw material
handling areas. Ash conditioners will be installed to control fugitive ash dust
pollution at loading and transport points. Dust collectors at crushers,
transfer points of conveyors, raw material and coal yard. Dust extraction
system comprising of suction hood, duct, bag filters, fan, stack etc. will be
provided to Induction Furnace, DRI screening section and coal crushing &
screening section.
Total make up water requirement from
Slag, dust and char will be generated as solid waste. Dust
collected from bag filters and ESP will be sent to nearby material handling
area. Char from DR kiln was proposed to
sold to outside customers but committee asked to use in AFBC boiler for
generating power. BF slag will be used
in slag cement production. SMS slag will be used in road making. BF dust, Sinter plant dust, Bag house dust of
SMS will be recyled to Sinter plant. Fly
ash and bottom ash generated will be used for brick and road making and cement
production. Coal middling will be used in-house. Coal rejects, accretion &
lumpy waste will be used for land filling. Other waste material which can not
be used will be dumped in separate area.
Green belt is proposed in
The Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public
Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted by the Orissa State Pollution
Control Board on 29th May, 2008. The issues raised included
upgradation of hospital, provision of adequate air pollution control measures,
local area development, employment, repair of village roads and canal bridge
have satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate
and suggested to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other
environmental conditions while considering for accord of environmental
clearance after submission of feasibility report for railway siding at mine
site to the steel plant alongwith consent from the Railway Department and
rechecking of ground level concentration (GLC) data :
4.2 Foundry Unit
(M.S. Casting, 2,800 MTPA) at Plot No. 185/A, Industrial Development
Corporation, Kalunga, District Sundergarh, Orissa by M/s Agravanshi Minerals
Pvt. Ltd. (EC)
Project authorities didn’t attend the meeting and it was decided
that proposal should be considered afresh whenever requested by the PAs.
4.3 Expansion of Integrated Steel Plant at Siltara Growth Centre, Siltara, Raipur, Chhattisgarh by M/s
Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 76th Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 28th–30th
November, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the Integrated Steel Plants are listed at S.N. 3(a) under Primary
Metallurgy Industries and appraised at the Central level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s
Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Integrated Steel Plant at Siltara Growth Centre,
Siltara,
Name of Unit |
Existing Units |
Proposed Capacity |
Blast Furnace |
-- |
0.8 MTPA with CPP of 24 MW (WHRB) |
Sinter plant |
-- |
1.20 MTPA |
Coke Oven |
-- |
0.3 MTPA with CPP of 24 MW (WHRB) |
Oxygen plant |
-- |
200 TPD |
DRI Plant |
0.15 MTPA (500 x 1 TPD) with 15 MW (WHRB + AFBC) Power Plant |
0.8 MTPA with CPP of 60 MW
(WHRB) |
Steel Making Shop |
0.40TPA |
0.80 MTPA |
Rolling Mill |
0.30 MTPA |
0.90 MTPA |
Captive Power Plant |
DRI 12 MW |
105 MW |
|
Boiler 3 MW |
24 MW (using blast furnace gas) |
|
|
18 MW (using coke oven waste gas) |
|
|
60 MW (using DRI plant waste gas) |
During
presentation, PAs informed that following will be the details of existing and
proposed facilities:
Name of Unit |
Existing Units |
Expansion units |
Total Capacity |
Blast Furnace |
-- |
0.8 MTPA |
0.8 MTPA |
Sinter plant |
-- |
1.20 MTPA |
1.20 MTPA |
Coke Oven |
-- |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Oxygen plant |
100 TPD |
200 TPD |
300 TPD |
DRI Plant |
0.15 MTPA |
0.8 MTPA |
0.95 MTPA |
Steel Melting Shop |
0.40 TPA |
0.80 MTPA |
1.2 MTPA |
Rolling Mill |
0.30 MTPA |
0.90 MTPA |
0.90 MTPA |
Captive Power Plant |
15 MW DRI gas-12 MW AFBC- 3 MW |
102 MW BF gas-24 MW CO gas-18 MW DRI gas+AFBC-60 MW |
117 MW |
The Committee
also noted that coal based sponge iron plant and captive power plant (CPP) are
not allowed in Siltara, Urla and Borjhara and, therefore, in the present
proposal also no sponge iron plant (0.8 MTPA) and CPP (60 MW) will be allowed
until and unless permission for the same is obtained from the State Govt. of
Chhattisgarh and the proposed configuration will be as follows :
Name of Unit |
Existing Units |
Expansion units |
Total Capacity |
Blast Furnace |
-- |
0.8 MTPA |
0.8 MTPA |
Sinter plant |
-- |
1.20 MTPA |
1.20 MTPA |
Coke Oven (Non-recovery type) |
-- |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Oxygen plant |
100 TPD |
200 TPD |
300 TPD |
DRI Plant |
0.15 MTPA |
- |
0.15 MTPA |
Steel Melting Shop |
0.40 TPA |
0.80 MTPA |
1.2 MTPA |
Rolling Mill |
0.30 MTPA |
0.90 MTPA |
0.90 MTPA |
Captive Power Plant |
15 MW DRI gas-12 MW AFBC- 3 MW |
42 MW BF gas-24 MW CO gas-18 MW |
57 MW |
Iron ore, coal, dolomite, quartzite,
limestone will be used as raw material.
BF to manufacture Pig Iron, Sinter Plant to manufacture sinter for the
use in BF, Coke Oven (non-recovery type) to produce low ash metallurgical coke
for use in BF, SMS and rolling mill to produce steel will be installed. WHRB of 24 MW (using BF waste gas), 21 MW (using
coke waste gas oven and 60 MW (using DRI Plant waste gas) will be
installed. Coke oven (non-recovery) gas
will be used for heating.
Air quality monitoring was carried out at 8 locations and the maen
values for SPM (162-478 mg/m3),
RSPM (76-187 mg/m3), SO2 (5.5 – 8.9 mg/m3)
& NOx
(24.6 – 51.8 mg/m3) are within the permissible
limits. ESPs will be provided
to FBC based power plant, DRI kiln, coke oven and sinter plant to control
particulate matter to 100 mg/Nm3.
ESP/Bag filters will be provided to DRI plant also. Fume extraction
system with bagfilters will be provided to SMS. Dust extraction system to BF
stock house; GCP and sludge disposal system will be provided to BF. Dust
suppression system to raw material handling area will be provided. Adequate
stack height will be provided to rolling mill and other plants. DE & DS system alongwith dust collectors
will be provided to coke oven plant.
Water quenching will also be done.
Total water requirement from
Char will be used in AFBC boiler. BF slag and fly ash will
be used for cement making. Iron ore fines, mill scales from rolling mill,
scrap, BF dust/sludge, coke breeze from coke oven plant, flue dust from SMS,
DRI and sinter plant will be used in sinter plant in making sinter, which will
be used in BF. Bottom ash will be used
for road making. SMS slag will be given for metal recovery and also used in
road making. Raw water treatment, ETP sludge, muck etc will be disposed as land
fill material and soil conditioner. Solid waste and ash will be dumped in dump
yard and ash pond.
Green belt will be developed in 33% land area. Power will be
sourced from WHRB and CPP.
The Committee noted that no public hearing/consultation is
required due to project being located in notified Siltara Industrial Area as
per Section (iii), Stage (3),
After detailed
deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate and
suggested to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other
environmental conditions while considering for accord of environmental
clearance :
1. No coal based sponge iron plant and captive power plant should be
installed without prior permission from the State Govt. of Chhattisgarh (banned
as per the order of the Govt. of Chhattisgarh dated 16th March,
2007) and Ministry.
2. Efforts should be made to reduce RSPM levels in the ambient air
and a time bound action plan should be submitted. On-line ambient air
quality monitoring and continuous stack monitoring facilities for all the
stacks and sufficient air pollution control devices should be provided to keep
the emission levels below 100 mg/Nm3.
3. Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) should be provided to AFBC
boilers, coke oven and sinter plant to control air emissions below 100 mg/Nm3.
Gas cleaning plant having dust catcher and pulse jet bag filters should be
provided to blast furnace (BF).
4. Gaseous emission levels including secondary fugitive emissions
from blast furnace and sinter plant should be controlled within the latest
permissible limits issued by the Ministry and regularly monitored. Guidelines /
Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be followed. The emission standards
issued by the Ministry in May, 2008 for the sponge plants should be followed.
5. Vehicular pollution due to transportation of raw material and
finished product should be controlled.
Proper arrangements should also be made to control dust emissions during
loading and unloading of the raw material and finished product.
6. All the standards prescribed for the coke oven plants should be
followed as per the latest guidelines. Proper and full utilization of coke oven
gases in power plant using waste heat recovery steam generators should be
ensured and no flue gases shall be discharged into the air.
7. Closed circuit cooling should be adopted to reduce fresh water
consumption. Acidic and alkaline effluent from DM water plant should be
neutralized and reused for various activities in the plant. Phenolic effluent should be treated in BOD
plant and used for quenching of hot coke.
No wastewater should be discharged outside the premises and ‘Zero’
effluent discharge should be ensured.
8. Prior permission for the drawl of 380.50 m3/h water
from
9. The water consumption should not exceed 16 m3/Ton of
Steel as per prescribed standard.
10. Continuous monitoring of Total Organic Compounds (TOC) shall be
done at the outlet of ETP (BOD plant).
11. Ground water monitoring around the solid waste disposal site /
secured landfill (SLF) should be carried out regularly and report submitted to
the Ministry’s Regional Office at
12. Char should be used in AFBC boiler. All the blast furnace (BF)
slag should be granulated and provided to cement manufacturers for further
utilization. Fly ash should be used for
cement making. Iron ore fines, mill scales from rolling mill, scrap, BF
dust/sludge, coke breeze from coke oven plant, flue dust from SMS, DRI and
sinter plant should be used in sinter plant in making sinter. Bottom ash should
be used for road making. SMS slag should be given for metal recovery and
properly used. All the other solid wastes including broken refractory mass
should be properly disposed off in environment-friendly manner. Oily waste
should be provided to authorized recyclers/reprocessors.
13. A time bound action plan should be submitted to reduce solid
waste, its proper utilization and disposal.
14. Proper handling, storage, utilization and disposal of all the
solid waste shall be ensured and regular report regarding toxic metal content
in the waste material and its composition, end use of solid/hazardous waste
should be submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at
15. Proper utilization of fly ash should be ensured as per Fly Ash
Notification, 1999 as amendment in 2003.
16. As proposed, green belt should be developed in 33 % area.
17. All the recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate
Responsibility for Environment Protection (CREP) for the Steel Sector should be
implemented.
4.4 Expansion
of Sponge Iron Plant (30,000 to 60,000 TPA) alongwith Captive Power Plant
(WHRB, 2x10 MW; AFBC, 1x35 MW) at Sy. No. 138-A/1, Belagal,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 68th Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 19th–21st
June, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the sponge iron plants are listed at
S.N. 3(a)(b) under Category ‘A’ if the capacity is 200 TPD and above. Total
capacity of the proposed plant is 200 TPD and is appraised at the Central
level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s Benaka Sponge Iron Pvt.
Ltd. have proposed
for the expansion of Sponge Iron Plant (30,000 to 60,000 TPA)
alongwith Captive Power Plant (WHRB, 2x10 MW; AFBC, 1x35 MW) at Sy. No.
138-A/1, Belagal,
Iron
ore (52,500 TPA), coal (27,000 TPA) and limestone (900 TPA) will be the basic
raw materials required for the production of sponge iron. The iron ore will be
crushed to the required size and fed to the kiln heated at predetermined
temperature and then passed to the rotary cooler for cooling. After that magnetic sponge iron and
non-magnetic char will be separated in the product separation system.
Air
emissions will be treated in Gas Cleaning Plant (GCP) etc. Air-cooled condenser
system will be adopted to reduce fresh water consumption. Total ground water
requirement is revised to 425 m3/day against the earlier proposed
175.6 m3/day. Regarding ‘Permission’ for the drawl of 175.6 m3/day
ground water, a letter from CGWA is submitted indicating location of the project
in non-critical areas. Blow down water
will be used for green belt development and dust suppression. Domestic effluent
will be treated in STP and treated water will be used for green belt
development. Solid waste will be generated in the form of sludge from wet
scrubber, bag filter etc. Char will be
used in AFBC boiler and dried sludge will be used in CPP as fuel. Dust from bag filter, ESP and fly ash will be
provided to cement & brick manufacturing plants. Green belt will be
developed in 33 % area. 500 KVA power will be required.
The Committee deliberated upon the
issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted
by the Karnataka Pollution Control Board on 19th June, 2008. The
issues like non-use of pollution control measures, water, electricity to
villagers, diseases in the nearby villagers, decrease in yield in agriculture
etc. were discussed and have satisfactorily been incorporated in the final
EIA/EMP report.
After detailed
deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate and
suggested to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other
environmental conditions while considering for accord of environmental
clearance :
4.5 Expansion of Sponge Iron Unit (32,500 to
90,000 TPA) alongwith Captive Power Plant (5 MW; WHRB 2 MW and AFBC 3 MW) at
Sy. No. 280, 281,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 73rd Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 24th–26th
October, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the Sponge Iron Plant > 200 TPD capacity have been kept at S.N.
3(a) under Category ‘A’ under Primary Metallurgy Industries and appraised at
Central level.
PAs informed to the Committee that
existing capacity of Sponge Iron plant is 125 TPD and additional 175 TPD sponge
Iron alongwith Captive Power Plant (5 MW; WHRB 2 MW and AFBC 3 MW) will be
installed. Bellary RF is located at 1.1
kms in West direction of the project site.
M/s Sigma Solid
Strips Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for the
expansion of Sponge Iron Plant Sponge
Iron Unit (32,500 to 90,000 TPA)
alongwith Captive Power Plant (8 MW) at Sy. No.
280, 281,
Iron
ore (89,400 TPA), Coal (47,400TPA) and limestone (1,312 TPA) will be used as
raw materials. Direct Reduction of Iron ore or pellets will be carried out to
manufacture sponge iron which contains 90% metallic iron and balance unreduced
iron oxide and gangue in the ore. The
process of sponge iron making will aim to remove oxygen from the iron ore to
make the ore porous/ spongy.
Ambient
air quality is monitored at 10 locations and all the values are within the
permissible limits. Flue gases from ESP will be treated in Gas cleaning plant
and ventury scrubber and passed through stack. Total ground water requirement
will be 280 m3/day and permission from Central Ground Water Board is
obtained. All the water will be used for
cooling purpose and no wastewater will be generated. Domestic wastewater will
be treated in Sewerage Treatment Plant and used for green belt development. Solid waste (10 TPD) in the form of sludge from
wet scrubber and bag filter will be generated.
Char/dolochar generated in the kiln will be used in FBC boilers to
generate power.
Out
of
The Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public
Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted by the Karnataka Pollution
Control Board on 11th July, 2008. The issues included dust and smoke
control, installtion of air pollution control measures, basic facilities and
construction of Kalyan matap to Halkundi village and employment were discussed
and have satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
After detailed
deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate and suggested
to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other environmental
conditions while considering for accord of environmental clearance :
4.6 Pig Iron
Plant (42,000 TPA) at Village Nathiya-Nawagaon, Kanker, Chhattisgarh by M/s
Jiwan Lal Jain (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 73rd Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 24th–26th
October, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
Pig iron plants are listed at S.N. 3(a) under primary metallurgy
industries under Category ‘A’.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s Jiwan Lal Jain have
proposed for the Pig Iron Plant (42,000 TPA) at Village Nathiya-Nawagaon,
Kanker, Chhattisgarh. Total project area
is revised from
Quartzite
(1,470 TPA), Iron ore (67,200 TPA), Coke (29,400 TPA), dolomite (63,000 TPA),
Manganese (19,800 TPA), Limestone (6,300 TPA) will be used as raw materials.
Pig Iron will be manufactured using conventional blast furnace. Lump iron ore,
coke limestone, dolomite, Manganese ore and quartzite will be charged from the
top and hot air at 1000oC will be blown for the bottom into the
furnace. The hot coke reaching from the
top will react with O2 of hot air and generate heat and Co and will
react with iron oxide of iron ore and will form iron which will melt in the
lower zone called hearth. SiO2
and Al2O3 of iron ore and coke ash will combine with Cao
& MgO of limestone and dolomite to form slag floating on the top of the
molten metal. Mg ore will be added to
control ‘S’ in the metal. Molten metal
will be cast in a pig casting machine to form solid pig iron. Slag is granulated by spraying water with
high presence.
Dust catcher will
be provided to the blast furnace to collect the dust, which will be used in
sinter plant. Ventury scrubber and cyclone will be provided. Covered conveyor
will be provided to the stock house, screen, feeder and discharging points. BF
gas will be used for reheating the stoves.
Total water requirement will be 10,000 m3/day. Sludge water mixture from gas cleaning plant
will be sent to clarifier, treated chemically and decanted. All the treated wastewater will be recycled
and reused in the process for dust suppression and green belt development. No wastewater will be discharged. Slag
generated will be granulated and sold to cement manufacturers.
Green belt will be developed in
The Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public
Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted by the Chhattisgarh Environment
Conservation Board on 26th May, 2008 have satisfactorily been
incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
After detailed
deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate and
suggested to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other
environmental conditions while considering for accord of environmental
clearance :
1.
On-line stack monitoring
facilities for all the stacks and sufficient air pollution control devices
should be provided to keep the emission levels below 100 mg/Nm3. All the gases from blast furnace after
cleaning in gas cleaning plant (GCP) should be used as fuel for reheating the
stoves.
2.
Secondary fugitive
emissions from blast furnace should be controlled within the latest permissible
limits issued by the Ministry and regularly monitored. Guidelines/Code of
Practice issued in this regard by the CPCB should also be followed.
3. Prior permission for the drawl of 10,000 m3/day water
should be obtained from the concerned department.
4. All the blast furnace slag should be granulated and provided to
cement manufacturers for further utilization.
All the dust from the air pollution control equipments should be
recycled and reused in the Sinter plant.
5. All the recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate
Responsibility for Environment Protection (CREP) for the Steel Plants should be
strictly implemented.
4.7 Expansion of Pelletization Plant into
Integrated Steel Plant (1.1 MTPA) alongwith WHRB Power Plant (2x30 MW) at Siltara Industrial Growth Centre, Phase-I, Mandhar, Raipur,
Chhattisgarh by M/s Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 79th Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 18th to 20th
March, 2008 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the Integrated Steel Plants are listed at S.N. 3(a) under Primary
Metallurgy Industries under Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s
Sarda Energy & Minerals Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Pelletization Plant into
Integrated Steel Plant (1.1 MTPA) and Captive Power Plant (250 MW) at Siltara Industrial Growth Centre, Phase-I, Mandhar, Raipur,
Chhattisgarh. Pelletization Plant is existing and Integrated Steel Plant (0.11
MTPA) is proposed as per details given below :
S.N. |
Project Details |
Under installation (TPA) |
Proposed Capacity (TPA) |
||
|
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
Total |
||
1 |
Palletization Plant |
6,00,000 |
-- |
-- |
6,00,000 |
2 |
Coke Oven |
-- |
-- |
5,20,000 |
5,20,000 |
3 |
Sinter Plant |
-- |
-- |
13,00,000 (2x60 m2) |
13,00,000 |
4 |
Blast Furnace |
-- |
-- |
7,90,000 (2x450 m3) |
7,90,000 |
5 |
Electric Arc Furnace |
-- |
5,00,000 (2x40T) |
6,00,000 (1x90T) |
11,00,000 |
6 |
CCM (2x3 Strand & 1x4 |
-- |
4,70,000 (2x3 |
6,00,000 (1x4 |
10,70,000 (3x7 |
7 |
Rolling Mill |
-- |
3,50,000 |
6,00,000 |
9,50,000 |
8 |
Power plant (WHRB based on coke oven & BF gases) |
-- |
-- |
2x30 MW |
60 MW |
9 |
Oxygen Plant |
-- |
-- |
2x150 TPD |
300 TPD |
During
presentation, PAs informed that power plant (60 MW, 2x30 MW) exists. Power plant and sponge iron plant proposed
earlier are withdrawn since no coal based power plant and sponge iron plant is
allowed in the Urla, Borjhara and Siltara Industrial Growth Centre in
Chhattisgarh as per the order of the Govt. of Chhattisgarh dated 16th
March, 2007. Therefore, proposal is
considered without coal based sponge iron plant and power plant.
Total land
acquired is revised from
Imported Coke (51,10,000 TPA), DRI
(15,70,000 TPA), Iron Ore fines for Sinter (12,35,000 TPA), Limestone (1,95,000
TPA) Dolomite (1,17,700 TPA), SMS Limestone (2,90,000 TPA), Scrap (1,20,000
TPA) and non-coking coal (16,63,200 TPA) will be used as used as raw material.
Coke oven (5,10,000 TPA, non-recovery type), Sinter Plant
(7,88,000 TPA), Blast Furnace (7,88,000 TPA), Billet caster Rolling Mill, Power
Plant (2x30 MW) FBC, 2x75, CFBC boiler and WHRB (1x40 MW) will be manufactured
as per conventional procedures.
Air quality monitoring was carried out at 12 locations and the
parameters are found to vary in the following range: SPM (169-350 mg/m3), RSPM (57-106 mg/m3), SO2 (6–13 mg/m3)
& NOx
(7-18 mg/m3). ESP will be provided to control flue
gas from sinter plant to 100 Mg/Nm3.
Flue gas will also be generated from BF plant, pellet plant, EAF, sinter
plant and rolling mill and cleaned in ESP to control emissions below 50 Mg/Nm3. Dust and fume extraction system will be
provided to raw material handling area and SMS. Bagfilter/deduster will be
provided to coke oven plant. ESP will be provided to Sinter plant. Gas cleaning
plant comprising of dust catcher and wet cleaning system will be provided to
Blast furnace. Fume extraction system with cyclone and bag filter will be
installed for Electric Arc Furnace. Heat
recuperator will be provided to rollling mill. ESP/bag filter will be provided
to power plant. Adequate stack height will be provided to all the plants. Water
sprinkling system will be installed to control fugitive emissions. Bag filters
and cyclones will be provided for de-dusting in material handling areas. All
internal roads will be black topped/concrete. ESP, multi-cycone, bag filter,
deduster will be provided to pellet plant.
Total water requirement from River Kharun earlier proposed as
50,160 m3/day is revised to 9,092 m3/day (2 MGD) and is
again revised to 8,780 m3/day.
Permission for the drawl of water is obtained from Water Resources
Department, Govt. of Chhattisgarh vide letter dated 27th October,
2008. All the treated wastewater will be
recycled / reused for dust suppression and green belt development and no
effluent will be discharged. ‘Zero’ discharge will be adopted.
ESP dust (10,000 TPA), GCP dust (788
TPA), dust from deducting units (5,610 TPA), BF slag (1,97,500 TPA), SMS slag
(76,800), scrap (14,583 TPA) will be generated as solid / hazardous waste. SMS slag will be reused as road ballast or
road fill material. Fly ash will be sold
to brick plants to cement plants. Scrap
will be used in SMS. GCP dust will be
used in sinter plant. BF slag will be
granulated and sold to cement plants.
Green belt will be developed in
‘Consent to Establish’ for the existing
Pelletization Plant (6,00,000 TPA) has been accorded by the Chhattisgarh
Environment Conservation Board vide letter no. 5613/TS/CECB/ 2006 dated
10.11.2006. Construction work related to
pelletisation plant is in full swing.
The Committee noted that no public hearing is required as per
Section (iii), Stage (3), Para (i)(b) of EIA Notification, 2006 since the unit
is located in the notified Siltara Industrial Growth Centre, Phase-I, Mandhar,
Raipur, Chatisgarh area.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee desired submission of action plan for the generation and utilization
of blast furnace slag alongwith the copies of MOU signed with the cement
manufacturers, which will be examined internally in the Ministry itself without
calling PAs. The Committee found the final
EIA/EMP report adequate and suggested to stipulate following specific
conditions alongwith other environmental conditions after submission of above
mentioned information:
4.8 Expansion of Pulp
and Paper Mill (2,45,000 to 4,00,000 TPA) by installation of Hard Wood Pulp
Mill (300 BD TPD) and bagasse based Pulp Mill (500 BD TPD) at Kagithapuram,
District Karur, Tamil Nadu by M/s Tamil Nadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 73rd Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 24th–26th
October, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the pulp and paper manufacturing units have been kept at SN. 5 (i)
under Category ‘A’ and are appraised at the Central Level.
PAs informed to the Committee M/s
Tamil Nadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Pulp
and Paper Mill (2,45,000 to 4,00,000 TPA) by installation of Hard Wood Pulp
Mill (2,45,000 to 4,00,000 TPA) by installation of Hard Wood Pulp Mill (300 BD
TPD) and bagasse based Pulp Mill (500 BD TPD) at Kagithapuram, District Karur,
Tamil Nadu. Environmental clearance for
the existing pulp and paper mill (2,45,000 TPA) has already been accorded vide
Ministry’s letter dated 10th April, 2006. Now, it is proposed to enhance capacity of
newsprint and printing and writing paper 2,45,000 TPA to 400,000 TPA by
installing a new paper machine (1,55,000 TPA) including Elemental Chlorine Free
(ECF) hardwood pulp mill (300 TPD) and a bagasse pulp mill (500 TPD) based on
ECF bleaching. Out of total
Bagasse pulp mill is based on the
elementary Chlorine-free (ECF) method and generated surplus 45,000 TPA pulp. It
is proposed to convert this 45,000 TPA pulp into value added paper by addition
of new paper machine of 1,55,000 TPA capacity. One new paper machine (1,55,000
TPA) and one coal fired boiler (125 TPH) will be installed. Thus, pulp and
paper production will enhanced as per details given below:
Item (s) |
Units |
Pre MEP |
Post MEP |
Chemical hardwood pulp |
TPD |
300 |
330 |
Chemical bagasse pulp |
TPD |
500 |
550 |
Paper (as per Consent) |
TPA |
2,45,000 |
4,00,000 |
PAs informed to the Committee about the raw material
requirement after Mill Development Plan (MDP).
During expansion, it is proposed to augment the following :
-
One new continuous
digester (200 BD TPD) unbleached pulp production (for baggase pulping line).
-
Replacement of
existing drum washers for brown stock washing with 3 twin roll for achieving
600 TPD unbleached pulp production (for bagasse pulping line).
-
Replacing of existing
screening plant with pressure knitters alongwith 4 stage screening and cleaning
system to achieve pulp production (600 BD TPD) unbleached pulp production (for
bagasse pulping line)
-
Augmentation of hard
wood pulping lime to achieve bleached pulp production (330 BD TPD).
-
Installation of new
power boiler (24 MW).
-
Augmentation of existing
wastewater treatment facilities.
Ambient air
quality was monitored during September, 2004–September, 2005. The power boiler
will be installed and particulate matter will be < 150 mg/Nm3. Fugitive emissions will be controlled by
sprinkling water on unpaved roads. High
efficiency ESPs have been installed to recovery boiler and new lime kiln in
September, 2007 to control particulate emissions and will also be provided to
control particulate emissions from the new paper machine and coal fired boiler
alongwith the stacks of adequate height to disperse emissions. Odour is controlled by collecting gas and
burning. Direct contact evaporating is eliminated in the new recovery boiler. H2S
and Mercaptan is monitored and report submitted to the concerned agency. On-line stack monitoring of SPM, SO2,
NOx and H2S is carried out. Dust extraction system at lime godown
and water sprinklers in coal yard and baggase yard have been provided to
control fugitive emissions. The plant generates about 15,000 m3/day
methane gas and a biomethanation plant is installed in 2003.
Total
water requirement for the existing MEP project is 66,380 m3/day,
which will enhance to 75,750 m3/day although initially, it was
informed that no additional water will be required. PWD’s consent for the drawl of 72,000 m3/day
for the drawl of water from River Cauvery is obtained. No new water treatment
plant or equipment is proposed during expansion but ETP will be augmented due
to ageing of existing secondary clarifiers.
Total wastewater discharge after MDP #2 will be 38,340 m3/day,
further revised to 31,700 m3/day by March, 2009. Existing wastewater
treatment is having adequate capacity to treat the wastewater generated during
expansion. Primary and Secondary treatment facilities have been provided. Spill
liquor from paper mill and chemical recovery areas will be collected and
properly treated. Chlorine di-oxide
plant is recently installed in May, 2008 and Elemental Chlorine-free (ECF)
bleaching method is used to bring down the pollution load. The water consumption in the existing plant
is 81 m3/T of paper against the imit of 100m3/T. and AOx
level is 0.51 Kg/T of paper against the limit of 1 Kg/T. The new paper machine
will be designed for a specific consumption of 12 m3/T of paper with
a wastewater generation of 10 m3/T of paper (Limit is 80 m3/T).
PAs also informed that Effluent Water Lift Irrigation Scheme (TWELTIS) is
continuing since 1993 and
PAs also
informed that colour in the effluent is reduced from 250 to 190 Pt-Co due to
installation of oxygen delignification and closing down of brown loop in the
hardwood line as a part of Mill Development Plan (MDP). Ferrous oxide is used to optimize the
colour. Falling film black liquor eveporation
plant is installed in September, 2007 to handle black liquor. Biomethanation
plant is installed and is in operation since September, 2007. However,
additional reactor is installed and additional gas will be generated wef
November, 2008. The water reservoirs are
used to store the treated wastewater during monsoon season to avoid discharge
of treated effluent ionto canal.
Two lime kilns with ESP have been installed as per CREP
requirement. Additional fly ash (96 TPD) will be generated and supplied to
cement manufacturers. Additional ETP
sludge (5 TPD) will be generated from the new paper machine which will be
re-burnt in the boilers and will also provided to the cement manufacturers. The
chip dust and pith will be used as fuel in the boilers. Waste pulp from WWTP
will be provided to card board and egg tray manufacturers. .
Out of total
The Committee deliberated upon the
issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted
by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board on 10th July, 2008. The
issues raised included air borne emissions, climate change, community welfare,
drinking water supply, ground water and effluent quality, sewage discharge into
Pugalur canal, effluent sludge incineration, soil quality, dust emissions,
emplyment in TNPL, road construction etc. and have satisfactorily been
incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
It was brought to the notice of the
Committee that Ministry has received telegraphic representations and a Court
case viz. T.N. Subramanian vs. TNPCB and others filed in the Madurai High Court
against the M/s TNPL and were placed before the Committee. PAs clarified that the said court case is
still not admitted in the Court and will be suitably replied whenever admitted.
At the same time, PAs claimed that they have already implemented all the
recommendations of the Justice Swamy Committee by installing ECF technology,
stopping discharge to Pulgal canal, enhancing land irrigation area etc. besudes
many more modifications to control pollution.
After detailed deliberations, the Committee found the final
EIA/EMP report adequate and suggested to stipulate following specific
conditions alongwith other environmental conditions while considering for
accord of environmental clearance :
1.
As proposed,
Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF) bleaching technology should be adopted in
hardwood pulp mill, bagasse pulp mill and paper machine.
2.
Continuous
stack monitoring facilities for all the stacks and sufficient air pollution
control devices viz. Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and bag filters etc.
should be provided to control gaseous emissions below 100 mg/Nm3.
Monitoring of H2S and Mercaptan alongwith other parameters should be
ensured and report submitted to Ministry’s Regional Office at Bangalore, TNPCB
and CPCB regularly.
3.
Secondary
fugitive emissions from all the sources should be controlled within the latest
permissible limits issued by the Ministry and regularly monitored. Guidelines /
Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be followed.
4.
AOx levels should be controlled less than 1 kg/ton
of paper manufactured as per E(P) Act.
5.
The odours and gases from cooking / stripping
column, evaporator hot well and hot condensate tank should be burnt in the
incinerator.
6.
Permission
for the drawl of 75,750 m3/day from River Cauvery water should be
obtained from the concerned department.
7.
Total water
consumption should not exceed as mentioned in the Corporate Responsibility for
Environment Protection (CREP) guidelines.
Efforts should be made to reduce the quantity of water intake and
maximize use of recycled water.
8.
The process
effluent should be treated in Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) through primary,
secondary and tertiary treatment methods.
Effluent discharged should be colour free. Treated effluent (filtrate) should be used
for the green belt development and discharge to the nearby drain only after
conforming to the standards prescribed by the TNPCB and under E(P) Act,
whichever are more stringent.
9.
Chemical
recovery plant should be installed for the treatment of black liquor. In order to achieve colour reduction,
tertiary treatment system like activated filter, multi-media filter etc. should
be explored.
10. Adequate number of influent and effluent
quality monitoring stations should be installed in consultation with the TNPCB
and controlled within the permissible limits for all the parameters. One of the water quality monitoring station
should be at
11. Efforts should be made to reduce total
dissolved solids (TDS) in the effluent and effluent discharged should not
exceed 80 m3/T of paper produced as per the norms prescribed in the
E(P) Act.
12. Action plan should be prepared for
further colour removal from the effluent and submitted to the Ministry, its
Regional Office at
13. Regular ground water monitoring should
be carried out for all the relevant parameters where effluent is discharged.
14. Efforts should be made for the
utilization of lime sludge and mud in the cement plants. Sludge dewatering
system should be installed. ETP sludge
should be used as manure.
15. Action plan for the disposal of Reverse
Osmosis (RO) rejects shoild be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s
Regional Office at
16. Proper utilization of fly ash should be
ensured as per Fly ash Notification, 1999 and subsequent amendment in 2003.
17. Green belt should be developed in 33 %
area.
18. All the commitments made to the public
during public hearing should be satisfactorily implemented.
19. All the recommendations made in the
Charter on Corporate Responsibility for Environment Protection (CREP) for Pulp
and Paper Sector should be strictly implemented.
4.9 Integrated
Steel plant (3.0 MTPA) at Nagarnar Village, Jagdalpur Tehsil, Bastar District,
Chhattisgarh by M/s National Mineral Development Corporation Limited. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft
Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Integrated steel
plants are listed at S.N. 3(a) under Primary Metallurgical Industry under
Category ‘A’ are appraised at the Central level.
M/s
National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. have proposed for the Integrated Steel Plant (3.0 MTPA) at Village Nagar
nagar, Tehsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. Total project area
is
During presentation, PAs informed that a Power Blowing Station
(3x30 MW) will be installed for power generation from BF gas in addition to the
facilities earlier proposed. No sponge
iron plant will be installed. Following
will be the facilities after revision :
S.N. |
Facilities |
Configuration |
1. |
Coke oven plant
with CDCP |
2x67 ovens, |
2. |
Sinter Plant |
1x460 m2 |
3. |
Blast furnace |
1x |
4. |
De-sulphurisation
units |
2x175 m3 |
5. |
Pig casting machine |
3x1700 TPD |
6. |
Slag granulation
plant |
Catering capacity
for production of 848,700 granulated slag |
7. |
Basic oxygen
furnace |
2x175 T |
8. |
Ladle furnace |
2x175 T |
9. |
RH-OB |
1x175 T |
10. |
Thin slab caster
coupled with hot strip mill |
2x1 strand |
11. |
Hot strip mill with
finishing train |
6 strands |
12. |
Oxygen Plant |
1x1900 TPD |
13. |
Calcination plants -
Lime Plant -
Dolo Plant |
2x500 TPD 1x300 TPD |
14. |
Power Blowing
Station (BF gas based) |
3x30 MW |
Following will be the size of the project :
-
Gross hot metal from
3.32 MTPA
-
Liquid steel from
3.00 MTPA
-
Production of
finished long product will be 2.896 MTPA HR Coils
Final saleable product mix will be :
S.N. |
Items |
Annual production
(Tones) |
A |
Pig Iron |
272,800 |
B |
Hot strip mill |
|
C |
HR coils / sheets /
plates |
|
1 |
HR Plates - (IS
2062, IS 5986, IS 8500, IS 3039) |
400,000 |
2 |
HR Plates - (IS
2002 & IS 2041) |
400,000 |
3 |
API-5L quality
plates – upto x80 |
500,000 |
4 |
HR Sheets (IS 3196) |
200,000 |
5 |
LPG cylinders (IS
6240) |
200,000 |
6 |
HR coils (IS 10748,
IS 1079) |
946,000 |
7 |
High Carbon Steel
(1100-1650) and other alloy steel |
50,000 |
8 |
Silicon Steel (DIN
46400-3) |
100,000 |
9 |
Automotive Steel |
|
|
-
1250-1524 |
50,000 |
|
-
1525-1650 |
50,000 |
|
Total |
2,896,000 |
Iron ore lump (BF grade, 1,237.000 MTPA), Iron ore fines
(4,200,500 MTPA), Iron ore lumps (SMS grade, 38100 MTPA), Lime stone fines
(292,600 MTPA), lime stone (SMS grade 584,700 MTPA), Dolomite fines for SP
(388,600 MTPA), Dolomite fines (SMS grade 172,700 MTPA) Quartzite (51,300
MTPA), Coking coal (2,591,200 MTPA) Non-coking coal (564,000 MTPA), Purchased
DRI (208,100 MTPA), Scrap (33,400 MTPA), Fe-Mn (1,500 MTPA), Fe-si (7,400
MTPA), Si-Mn (30,000 MTPA), Aluminium (6,000 MTPA) and Fluorospar (2,250 MTPA
will be used as raw materials.
Steel will be
produced through BF-BOF degasser route alongwith coke oven, sinter plant and
Rolling / Finishing. Cast house and stock house dust emission control system
will be provided to Blast furnace. Coke Oven (recovery type) will be installed
and essential by-products like ammonia, crude tar and elemental
BF gas Coke oven gas,
mixed gas (BF & CO gas), BOF will be used to generate power. Part of the BF gas will be supplied to CDP
Plant, Cast house; Co to BOF shop & CCM shop and coke oven and BF gas to
coke oven battery, hot strip mill, sinter plant hot strip mill, lime and
dolomite plant. Work zone emission will
be kept below 10 mg/m3.
Total water requirement from
Blast furnace (BF) slag (848,700 TPA) will be granulated and sold
to cement plants. BF sludge (23,000 TPA)
will be partly used in Sinter Plant and partly dumped in dump area. BF flue dust (53,140 TPA) will be 100%
reused in Sinter Plant. BOF slag
(3,15,000 TPA) will be 100% reused in construction and as rail ballast. BOF
sludge will be reused in BOF after briquetting.
Waste refractories (45,000 TPA) Dolo fines, Mill scales, lime fines and
cinder will be recycled / reused.
Green belt will be developed in 33 %. Total power requirement will
be 251 MVA instead of 251 MW proposed earlier. The power required will be
sourced from Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board (CSEB).
After deliberating on the facts presented the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as
per the following TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Location of national parks/wildlife sanctuary within
3. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed plant on the surrounding reserve forests viz.
Kanger RF (
4. Actual land requirement, classification of land, acquisition
status, rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of
Chhattisgarh should be incorporated.
5. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
6. A list of industries containing name and type in
7. Residential colony should be located in upwind direction.
8. List of raw material required and source should be included.
9. Manufacturing process details for all the plants viz. Blast
Furnace, Sinter Plant, Pellet Plant, Coke Oven Plant, Oxygen Plant, Steel
Melting Shop, Continuous Casting Machine, Rolling Mill etc. should be included.
10. A chapter on type and full details of coke oven plant including
pollution control methods and justification for installing recovery type of
coke oven should be included.
11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Impact of the transport of raw material and finished product on the
surrounding environment should be assessed and provided
14. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done.
15. Plant-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control
of gaseous emissions from all the sources should be incorporated.
16. A note on control of fugitive and secondary emissions from as per
CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be incorporated.
17. One season data for gaseous emissions during winter season is
necessary.
18. Permission for the drawl of 3,747 m3/hr make up water from
19. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
20. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
21. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants including
coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for different purposes should be included.
22. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly BF slag and fly ash and copies of MOU
signed with the Cement manufacturers regarding utilization of BF slag and
flyash should be included.
23. Generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from BF plant and
their utilization in the CPP have to be set out.
24. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
25. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
26. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
27. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
28. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project should be included.
29. An Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made
for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
30. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
31. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
32. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board (CECB) for conducting public
hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006.
On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns
set out EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental
clearance.
4.10 Integrated Steel Plant (1.0
MTPA) at Village Gidan / Sagoni, Tehsil Batiagarh, District Damoh, Madhya
Pradesh by M/s SPJ Steel & Minerals Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed
presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft Term of References for
the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Integrated steel plants are listed at S.N.
3(a) under Primary Metallurgy Industries under Category ‘A’ are appraised at
the Central level.
M/s SPJ Steel & Minerals Pvt.
Ltd. have proposed for Integrated Steel Plant at Village Gidan / Sagoni, Tehsil
Batiagarh, District Damoh, Madhya Pradesh.
Total project area is
S. N. |
Facility |
Product |
Units |
Production Quantity |
||||
1st Yr. |
2nd Yr. |
3rd Yr. |
4th Yr. |
Total production |
||||
1 |
Coal Washery (2 x 0.75 Mn TPA) |
Clean Non-Coking
Coal |
TPA |
7,50,000 |
- |
7,50,000 |
- |
15,00,000 |
2 |
DRI plant (4x350
TPD, 6x500 TPD) |
DRI |
TPA |
1,68,000 |
1,68,000 |
3,37,948 |
3,37,948 |
10,11,895 |
3 |
Ferro-Alloy Plant
(2 x 15 MVA) |
SiMn |
TPA |
22,869 |
22,869 |
- |
- |
45,738 |
4 |
|
|
TPA |
- |
- |
4,71,274 |
- |
4,71,274 |
5 |
|
|
TPA |
- |
- |
4,96,027 |
- |
4,96,027 |
6 |
Sintering Plant (1x
0.2 Mn TPA) |
|
TPA |
- |
- |
- |
1,80,246 |
1,80,246 |
7 |
SMS-1 (8x20t IF) |
Molten Metal (Crude
Steel) |
TPA |
- |
- |
2,36,286 |
2,36,286 |
4,72,572 |
8 |
SMS-2 (2 x 90t EAF,
2 x 90t LF, 2 x 90t VD) |
Steel Billets |
TPA |
- |
- |
5,10,163 |
5,10,163 |
10,20,326 |
9 |
Rolling mill (1x0.6
Mn TPA Bar Mill, 1x0.6 Mn TPA Section Mill) |
Bar, Light &
Medium Sections |
TPA |
- |
- |
4,80,000 |
4,80,000 |
9,60,000 |
10 |
Lime & Dolo
calcination plant (2 x 300 TPD) |
Calcined Lime |
TPA |
- |
- |
1,53,300 |
- |
1,53,300 |
Calcined Dolomite |
TPA |
- |
- |
- |
38,700 |
38,700 |
||
11 |
CPP (2x20MW,
2x60MW) |
Captive Power |
MW |
20 |
20 |
60 |
60 |
160 |
12 |
Blast Furnace (1x 300 Cum) |
Pig Iron |
TPA |
- |
- |
- |
1,40,831 |
1,40,831 |
13 |
Oxygen plant (1x 300 TPD) |
Oxygen |
Nm3/yr |
- |
- |
- |
90 |
90 |
During the presentation, PAs informed
to the Committee that capacity of the Coal washery capacity is revised from
2x7,50,000 TPA to 1x7,50,000 TPA. The annual production from the Oxygen plant
has been revised to 57,000 TPA. After
the proposed revision, the facilities to be installed will be as under:
S. N. |
Facility |
Product |
Units |
Production Quantity |
||||
1st Yr. |
2nd Yr. |
3rd Yr. |
4th Yr. |
Total production |
||||
1 |
Coal Washery |
Clean Non-Coking
Coal |
TPA |
- |
- |
7,50,000 |
- |
7,50,000 |
2 |
DRI plant |
DRI |
TPA |
1,68,000 |
1,68,000 |
3,37,948 |
3,37,948 |
10,11,895 |
3 |
Ferro-Alloy Plant |
SiMn |
TPA |
22,869 |
22,869 |
- |
- |
45,738 |
4 |
|
|
TPA |
- |
- |
4,71,274 |
- |
4,71,274 |
5 |
|
|
TPA |
- |
- |
4,96,027 |
- |
4,96,027 |
6 |
Sintering Plant |
|
TPA |
- |
- |
- |
1,80,246 |
1,80,246 |
7 |
SMS-1 |
Molten Metal (Crude
Steel) |
TPA |
- |
- |
2,36,286 |
2,36,286 |
4,72,572 |
8 |
SMS-2 |
Steel Billets |
TPA |
- |
- |
5,10,163 |
5,10,163 |
10,20,326 |
9 |
Rolling mill |
Bar, Light &
Medium Sections |
TPA |
- |
- |
4,80,000 |
4,80,000 |
9,60,000 |
10 |
Lime & Dolo
calcination plant |
Calcined Lime |
TPA |
- |
- |
1,53,300 |
- |
1,53,300 |
Calcined Dolomite |
TPA |
- |
- |
- |
38,700 |
38,700 |
||
11 |
CPP |
Captive Power |
MW |
20 |
20 |
60 |
60 |
160 |
12 |
Blast Furnace |
Pig Iron |
TPA |
- |
- |
- |
1,40,831 |
1,40,831 |
13 |
Oxygen plant |
Oxygen |
TPA |
- |
- |
- |
57,000 |
57,000 |
Iron ore (16,71,835 TPA), non-coking coal (31,20,000 TPA),
Dolomite (72.830 TPA), Limestone (3,03.294 TPA), Quartzite (29,222 TPA), Cokes
(1,20,640 TPA), Manganese ore (1,13,966 TPA) will be used as raw materials.
The proposed
plant will produce DRI, billets, pig iron, long steel bars / sections and ferro
alloy products and will install coal washery, DRI Plant, ferro-alloy plant, iron
ore beneficiation plant, sinter plant, steel melting shop, rolling mill, lime
and dolo calcinations plant, BF with pig caster and slag granulation pit,
oxygen plant and CPP (160 MW).
Integrated Steel
Plant will be based on DRI-IF/BF-EAF-LF-VD route to minimize dependence on
coke. Lumps and fines generated from DRI
plant will be fed to EAF and IF respectively.
Cold pig required for IF will be produced in MBF. Coal washery,
beneficiation plant and pellet plant will be provided to use low-grade material. Finally, material will pass through CCM and
subsequently to rolling mill for producing finished products like long bars and
steel sections etc. Coal washery will be provided to separate clean coal as
overflow and middling as underflow.
PAs informed to the
Committee that data for March-May, 2008 is collected but Committee emphasized
to collect the same for the winter season i.e. December, 2008-February,
2009. ESP will be provided to DRI kilns,
sinter plant, pellet plant and CPP to control emission within 100 mg/Nm3.
Hot waste gases from rotary kiln after passing through Dust settling chamber
(DSC) will be burnt in ABC and fed to WHRB for generating power. The gas will be cleaned in ESP before being
released through ID fan and stack.
Swiveling hood for fume extraction, speark arrester and dust extraction
system with bag filters will be provided to induction furnace. Cyclones will be provided to coal washery.
However, during presentation, PAs informed that dust emissions from coal
washery and Iron ore beneficiation plant will be controlled by water
sprinkling/dry fog system/bag filters.
Cyclone separator followed by two-stage venturi scrubber will be
provided to blast furnace. Adequatre
stack height will be provided to Reheating furnace of rolling mill. Dust
extraction system with pulse jet bag filter will be provided to SMS, ferro
alloy plant, pelletization plant, lime and dolo plant. Dust from raw material handling area, stock
piling and material transfer points will be controlled by dust suppression with
plain water and Dry fog dust suppression system. Dust extraction system will be
provided at screening and material transfer points.
Total water requirement will be 3,000 m3/hr and met
from nearest water source viz. Gidannala, Jam river,
Char and middlings/rejects from coal washery will be used CFBC
boiler to generate power. ESP dust will be utilized in Sinter making. Kiln
accretions and miscellaneous waste will be used for filling low-lying areas and
clay making for various purposes in steel plant. Pellet dust from Iron ore
pelletization plant will be utilized in pellet plant and sinter plant. Sinter
dust will be recycled in sinter plant. Slag from SMS and ferro alloy plant will
be used for road, building construction and filling low-lying areas. However,
during presentation PAs informed that Slag from SMS will be used in the land
fill, boulder soling of plant roads and partly in sinter making. Spent
refractory will beused for construction and filling of low-lying areas.
Granulated BF slag will be sent to nearby cement plants. Fly ash and bottom ash will be used in brick
making, cement manufacturing, road construction and land fill. Unutilized fly
ash will be disposed off in ash pond. ETP sludge will be disposed off in
low-lying areas. Flue dust from DRI, BF,
SMS, Iron ore fines, limestone, dolomite fines and rejects generated from
different shops will be recycled and reused in sinter plant. Scrap will be used
for steel making in SMS. Sewage sludge
from the septic tank will be used as manure.
Used oil and batteries will be sold to authorized recyclers /
re-processors.
Green belt will be developed in 33%
area. Total power requirement will be
130 MW and met from CPP (160 MW).
After deliberating on the facts presented the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as
per the following TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
3. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on all the surrounding reserve forests,
if any should be included.
4. Actual land requirement, classification of land, acquisition status,
rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of M.P. should
be incorporated.
5. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
6. A list of industries containing name and type in
7. Residential colony should be located in upwind direction.
8. List of raw material required and source should be included.
9. Manufacturing process details for all the plants viz. coal washery,
DRI Plant, ferro-alloy plant, iron ore beneficiation plant, sinter plant, steel
melting shop, rolling mill, lime and dolo calcinations plant, BF with pig
caster, slag granulation pit, oxygen plant and CPP etc. should be included.
10. A note on coal dust injection system in TRT (Top Recovery) should
be incorporated.
11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Impact of the transport of raw material and finished product on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided.
14. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done.
15. Plant-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control
of gaseous emissions from all the sources should be incorporated.
16. A note on control of fugitive and secondary emissions from as per
CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be incorporated.
17. One season data for gaseous emissions during winter season is
necessary.
18. Permission for the drawl of 3,000 m3/hr water from nearest
water source viz. Gidannala, Jam river, Sonar River or ground water from the
concerned department and water balance data including quantity of effluent
generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be provided. Methods
adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.
19. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
20. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
21. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle
and reuse for different purposes should be included.
22. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly char, BF slag, SMS slag, middlings and
fly ash. Assurance that 100 % char will be used in the FBC boiler and copies of
MOU regarding utilization fly ash should be included.
23. MOU signed with the Cement manufacturers for utilizing granulated
BF slag should be included.
24. Generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from BF plant and
their utilization in the CPP have to be set out.
25. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
26. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
27. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
28. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
29. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project should be included.
30. An Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made
for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
31. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
32. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
33. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board (SPCB) for conducting public hearing as
per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs
addressing all concerns set out EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for
prior environmental clearance.
4.11 Integrated Steel Plant
(2.0 MTPA) at Sy. No. 15, 16, 17 and 29, Village Kunikere, Taluka and District
Koppal, Karnataka by M/s ILC Industries Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
integrated steel plants are listed at S.N. 3(a) under Primary Metallurgy
Industries under Category ‘A’ and are appraised at the Central level.
M/s ILC Industries Ltd. have
proposed for the Integrated Steel Plant (2.0 MTPA) at Sy. No. 15,16,17 and 29,
Village Kunikere, Taluka and District Koppal, Karnataka. No National Park/Wild
life
S.N. |
Plants |
Capacity |
1 |
Blast furnace for
pig iron making |
1 x |
2 |
EOF furnace for
steel making |
1 x 25 t |
3 |
Ladle refining
furnace for secondary refining |
1 x 25t |
4 |
Billet caster for
casting liquid steel into billets |
1 x 2 strand |
5 |
Bar and rod mill
for producing TMT bars |
One |
6 |
Captive power plant |
6 MW |
During presentation, PAs have revised the configuration and
informed that following will be installed:
S.N. |
Plants |
Capacity |
1 |
Sponge Iron unit |
4 x 150 TPD |
2 |
EOF furnace for
steel making |
25 T |
3 |
Ladle refining
furnace for secondary refining |
25 T |
4 |
Billet caster for
casting liquid steel into billets (1 x 2 strand) |
25 T |
5 |
Bar and rod mill
for producing TMT bars |
2,06,000 TPA |
6 |
Captive power plant |
12 MW |
Coke (390 TPD), Iron ore (979 TPD),
Dolomite (74 TPD), Limestone (114 TPD), Manganese ore (12 TPD), Quartzite (24
TPD) and DRI (77 TPD) will be used as raw material. However, during
presentation PAs informed that Iron ore, coal and Dolomite will be used as raw
materials and have their own iron ore mine facility.
Sponge iron
plant, Energy optimization furnace (EOF) followed by continuous casting through
billet caster and rolling of the cast billets in rolling into the TMT bars will
be installed.
BF gas will be used to generate power in the CPP (6
MW). Bag filters, gas cooler, cyclones
and chimney will be provided to steel melt shop (SMS). Bag filters and stacks will be provided to
BF. Tall chimney will be provided to
CPP. Bag filters/ESPs will be provided
to DRI kilns. Bag filters will be provided to product separation/storage house,
stock house, cooler discharge building, intermediate bins, coal injection
building, coal and iron ore crusher/screen house, etc. of sponge iron
plant. Waste gases from DRI kilns will
successively passed through Dust settling chambers, After combustion chambers,
WHRB and finally ESP before venting to atmosphere through a stack of adequate
height. Fugitive emissions will be controlled by material transfer points,
product handling will be controlled by bag filters/dust suppression systems.
Water sprinkling will be carried out in loading, unloading and storage areas.
Total
water required from borewells/Tungbhadra dam backwater will be 22.33 LPD
instead of 2 MGD (68.50 LPD) proposed earlier. Cooling water re-circulation
system will be provided to minimize fresh water requirement. Domestic effluent will be treated in sewage
treatment plant and used for the green belt development. Oil and grease will be
removed from contaminated water by oil traps and skimming devices.
Char
will be used as fuel in FBC boilers or sold to brick manufacturing units. Flue
dust will be used for manufacturing Fly ash bricks. Fly ahs will be utilized in
cement making. Kiln accretions will be used as sub-base material for road
construction or landfill.
Green belt will be developed in 33 % area. Power (21,000 KVA) will
be sourced from Grid substation of KPTCL instead of GESCOM as proposed
earlier. CPP (6 MW) is proposed. Fuel oil will be used in reheating furnace of
rolling mill, SMS and power plant.
After deliberating on the facts presented the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as
per the following TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
3. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests, if
any should be included.
4. Actual land requirement, classification of land, acquisition
status, rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of
Karnataka should be incorporated.
5. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
6. A list of industries containing name and type in
7. Residential colony should be located in upwind direction.
8. List of raw material required and source should be included.
9. Manufacturing process details for all the plants viz. Sponge iron
plant, EOF, LRF, billet caster, bar and rod mill, CPP etc. should be included.
Details of facilities with their capacities proposed alongwith quantity of
products to be produced should also be included.
10. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
11. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
12. Impact of the transport of raw material and finished product on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided
13. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done.
14. Plant-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control
of gaseous emissions from all the sources should be incorporated.
15. A note on control of fugitive and secondary emissions from as per
CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be incorporated.
16. One season data for gaseous emissions during winter season is
necessary.
17. Permission for the drawl of 22.33 LPD water from
borewells/Tungbhadra dam backwater from the concerned department and water balance
data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and
discharged should be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water
conservation.
18. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
19. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
20. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants including
coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for different purposes should be included.
21. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly char and fly ash. Assurance that 100 %
char will be used in the FBC boiler and copies of MOU regarding utilization of
ash should be included.
22. Generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from DRI plant and
their utilization in the CPP have to be set out.
23. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
24. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
25. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
26. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
27. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project should be included.
28. An Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made
for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
29. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
30. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
31. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Karnataka Pollution Control Board (KPCB) for conducting public hearing as per
EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization
of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out EIA/EMP should
be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.12 Integrated Steel Plant (2.0
MTPA) at Sy. No. 156-196 & 316-38, Village Vanganuru and Sy. No.
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
integrated steel plants are listed at S.N. 3(a) under Category ‘A’ and
appraised at the Central level.
M/s Vasitva Ispat
Ltd. have proposed for the Integrated Steel Plant (2.0 MTPA) at Sy. No. 156-196
& 316-38, Village Vanganuru and Sy. No.
S.N. |
Facilities
|
Production capacity (MTPA) |
1 |
Coke-oven batteries |
0.20 |
2 |
Sinter Plant |
0.45 |
3 |
Blast furnace |
0.38 |
Pig casting machine (EOF) |
||
4 |
EOF |
0.41 (Liquid steel) |
Ladle refining furnace
|
||
5 |
Billet caster |
0.4 MTPA |
Rolling mill for TMT
|
||
6 |
One rolling mill for structural steel |
0.28 |
During
presentation, PAs informed that following facilities will be installed:
S.N. |
Facilities
|
Production capacity (MTPA) |
1 |
Coke-oven batteries |
0.275 |
2 |
Sinter Plant |
0.64 |
3 |
Blast furnace |
0.472 |
Pig casting machine (EOF) |
||
4 |
Energy Optimising Furnace (EOF) |
0.45 Liquid steel |
Ladle refining
furnace
|
||
5 |
Continuous Casting Machine |
0.441 |
Rolling mill for
TMT
|
||
6 |
Rolling mill |
0.305 |
Captive Power Plant |
||
7 |
Coke oven gas based |
12 MW |
8 |
BF gas based |
8 MW |
Iron ore lumps
(2,50,000 TPA), Iron ore fines (4,65,140 TPA), coking coal (3,67,481 TPA)
Limestone (1,00,000 TPA), Dolomite (80,000 TPA), Scrap (19,000 TPA), Ferro
Alloys (8,600 TPA), Burnt lime (36,000 TPA), Manganese ore (10,000 TPA) and
quartzite (8,000 TPA) will be the raw materials required.
Sinter (0.41 MTPA), lump iron ore (0.26 MTPA) will be used
as raw material to produce hot metal (0.38 MTPA). 95 % Hot metal (0.36 MTPA)
will be routed to EOF to produce liquid steel (0.41 MTPA) which will be sent to
LRF & CCF to produce billets (0.40 MTPA).
Billets (0.12 MTPA) will be routed to rolling mill at
Non-recovery type of coke oven batteries, sinter plant, blast
furnace, pig-casting machine, EOF, ladle refining furnace, continuous casting
machine, rolling mills will be installed. TMT bars, angles, channels, beams,
flats (0.45 MTPA) in phase-I will be manufactured. In Phase-I, technological
process route viz. (O-SP-BF-EOF-LRF-CCM-RM will be adopted. The main products
will be rolled products viz. TMT bars, Angles, Channels, Beams, flats etc.
ESP will be provided to
control dust and air pollution within 150 mg/Nm3. The furnace stack emissions will be
maintained within CPCB standards. Dust suppression system will be provided at
raw material handling plant, conveyors; fugitive emissions control at BF-SMS
etc., gas cleaning plant at sinter plant, BF, SMS etc, Coke oven gas will be
burnt at the oven itself and waste heat will be used in generation of power.
Fume extraction system consisting of hood, ducting, fan and stack will be
provided to SMS. GCP will be provided to
BF and EOF.
Total ground water requirement is revised from 2.2 MGD to
2.4 MGD from
Raw material handling fines, product
fines, ESP flue dust, sludge and slag will be generated as solid waste. Iron ore fine, coke fines, limestone fines
and burnt lime fine, mill scale, steel making slag, gas cleaning plant dust,
ETP sludge etc. will be used in sinter plant.
EOF slag will be utilized to the maximum extent possible. Granulated BF
slag (0.16 MTPA) will be used in Cement manufacture.
Out of
total power (19 MW) requirement, 1 MW will be sourced from state grid. However during presentation, PAs informed
that power requirement will be 30 MW and will be met from auxiliary generation
(20 MW) and Grid (8.0 MW). Power (20 MW) will be sourced from CPP utilizing
coke oven (12 MW) and BF gases (8 MW).
After deliberating on the facts presented
the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the
preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs :
1.
Present land
use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2.
Location of
national parks/wildlife sanctuary within
3.
Permission
and recommendations of the State Forest Department regarding impact of proposed
expansion on the surrounding reserve forests, if any, should be included.
4.
Actual land
requirement, classification of land, type of the land acquired/to be acquired,
acquisition status etc. should be incorporated.
5.
An action
plan for rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of A.P.
covering all relevant aspects should be incorporated.
6.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.
7.
A list of
industries containing name and type in
8.
Residential
colony should be located in upwind direction.
9.
List of raw
material required and source should be included.
10. Manufacturing process details for all
the plants viz. coke oven, sinter plant, blast furnace, pig-casting machine,
EOF, ladle refining furnace, continuous casting machine, rolling mills etc.
should be included.
11. A chapter on type and full details of
coke oven plant including pollution control methods and justification for
installing non-recovery type of coke oven should be included.
12. Ambient air quality at 8 locations
within the study area of
13. The suspended particulate matter present
in the ambient air must be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and for
incorporating of RSPM data.
14. Impact of the transport of raw material
and finished product on the surrounding environment should be assessed and
provided
15. Determination of atmospheric inversion
level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of
pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological
features. Air quality modeling for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to
be done.
16. Plant-wise air pollution control
measures proposed for the control of gaseous emissions from all the sources
should be incorporated.
17. A note on control of fugitive and
secondary emissions from as per CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be
incorporated.
18. One season data for gaseous emissions
during winter season is necessary.
19. Permission for the drawl of 2.4 MGD
water from
20. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
21. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
22. A note on treatment of wastewater from
different plants including coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for different
purposes should be included.
23. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste
generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly char and fly ash.
24. MOU signed with the Cement manufacturers
for utilizing granulated BF slag should be included.
25. Generation and utilization of waste/fuel
gases from coke oven and BF plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be
set out.
26. Risk assessment and damage control needs
to be addressed.
27. Occupational health of the workers needs
elaboration.
28. Green belt development plan in 33 % area
and a scheme for rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
29. Socio-economic development activities
need to be elaborated upon.
30. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
31. An Action Plan for the implementation of
the recommendations made for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be
prepared.
32. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be
included.
33. A tabular chart for the issues raised
and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be provided.
34. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposal should also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided
that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of
EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP
report is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III
and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to
the A.P. Pollution Control Board (APPCB) for conducting public hearing as per
EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization
of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out EIA/EMP should
be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.13 Integrated
Steel Plant (1.1 MTPA) alongwith Captive Power Plant (50 MW) at Block Neersa,
District Dhanbad, Jharkhand by M/s Adhunik Corporation Ltd.
Project authorities didn’t attend the meeting and it
was decided that proposal should be considered afresh whenever requested by the
PAs.
4.14 Integrated Steel Plant
(0.3 MTPA, Sponge Iron, Pelletization Plant, Beneficiation Plant, Captive Mine,
Beneficiation and Captive Power Plant (60 MW) at Gram Tarpongi, Tehsil
Dharsiwa, District
Project authorities didn’t
attend the meeting and it was decided that proposal should be considered afresh
whenever requested by the PAs.
4.15 Expansion of Steel Plant by installing
Induction Furnace (2x15 T) alongwith Continuous Casting Machine (1x2 Strands)
at P-3513, Kanjilal Avenue, Durgapur, District Burdwan, West Bengal by M/s
Bhagat Jee Steels Pvt. Ltd. (EC)
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Induction
Furnaces (< 15 TPH) are
kept under Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level. The proposed
induction furnace is of 2x15 TPH capacity.
M/s Bhagat Jee Steels Private
Limited has proposed
to expand the existing steel plant by installing Induction Furnace
(2x 15T) alongwith Continuous Casting Machine (1x2 Strands) at P-3513, Kanjilal
Avenue (Small Industrial Area developed by Asansol Durgapur Development
Authority), Durgapur, District Burdwan, West Bengal.
The proposed IF alongwith CCM will be set up within the premises of
existing plant having an area
PAs informed to the Committee that total production of
ingots is 23,040 TPA from Induction Furnace (1x3T & 1x5T). After
installation of another Induction Furnace (7 T), the production capacity will
be 43,200 TPA (23,040 TPA + 20,160 TPA). After commissioning of the proposed
Induction Furnace (2x15 T) with CCM, the total production of the plant will be
1,29,600 TPA (43,200 TPA + 86,400 TPA).
Facilities |
Existing |
Proposed expansion |
Induction Furnace |
1x3 T & 1x5 T 1x7 T |
2x15 T |
Continuous Casting Machine |
-- |
1x2 Strands |
Raw materials required will be Sponge
Iron (83,279 TPA), M.S. Scraps (20,225 TPA), Ferro Manganese/Silico Manganese
(450 TPA), Ferro Silicon (450 TPA), Aluminium Shots (12.5 TPA).
The process involves the charging of raw materials
consisting mainly of Sponge Iron, Scrap etc. into the Crucible of Induction
Furnace at a high temperature of
Emissions from Induction furnace will be controlled by bag
filters. Dry fogging system will be provided at Raw material handling area and
material transfer points to control fugitive emissions. Dust collected from
dust control systems will beused in land/road development as boulders. Dust
collected from bag filter will be sent to sinter plants for recycling.
Induction furnace will be provided with independent Spark arrestor, Bag filter
& I D fan. Telescopic fume collection hood would be provided at the top of
furnace. Flue gases from the furnace will be passed through a chimney of
adequate height. Fugitive emissions from
raw material handling, conveying and screening operations will be controlled by
bag filters. Clean BOF gas will be used as a gaseous fuel in the steel plant.
Dust extraction system will be provided at the torpedo ladle hot metal
discharging areas to avoid high fugitive emissions during unloading of hot metal.
Particulate matter from hot metal pre-treatment will be controlled by providing
fabric filters.
Water requirement of 40 KLD instead of 1,000 KLD
proposed earlier, will be supplied by Durgapur Projects Limited. Cooling water
will be recycled after settling. Water
from the scrubbing system will be recycled. No liquid effluent will be
discharged from the process. Domestic wastewater will be discharged through
septic tank followed by soak pit and used for greenbelt.
Slag generated (6,900 TPA) will be used
for land levelling and compacting of roads etc. Bag filter dust (430 TPA) will
be used in sinter plant. Mill scale (90 TPA) will be used in land development.
Steel scrap (3,600 TPA) will be re-used in steel melting unit. All the wastes
from the pollution control systems or treatment units will be re-used or
recycled.
Noise will be
generated during construction work due to movement of cranes, bulldozers,
trucks, and due to piling job and traffic movement and mainly from Induction
furnace. High noise prone areas will be earmarked and necessary care will be
taken to minimize the noise. Ear plugs or Ear muffs will be provided to
employees working in noise prone areas.
Out of
PAs informed to the
Committee that project is located in the notified industrial area and hence no
public hearing is required. However,
Committee asked PAs to submit ‘proof’ in this regard to take further decision
regarding public hearing.
After deliberating on the facts
presented, the Committee recommended the proposal for the preparation of
environment management plan (EMP) incorporating the following information which
will be internally examined before considering for final environmental
clearance:
1.
A copy of the
notification issued by the State Govt. indicating location of the project in
notified industrial area.
2.
A note on
performance of existing plant.
3.
Data on
existing ambient air quality, stack emissions and fugitive emissions and
pollution control measures proposed to control air emissions.
4.
Total water
requirement alongwith source, water balance cycle, treatment methods adopted
and disposal, if any.
5.
A note on
solid / hazardous waste generation, management, recycle/reuse and disposal.
6.
Action plan
to develop green belt development in 33 % area.
4.16 Expansion of Mini Steel
Plant by installation of Ferro Alloy Plant (30,000 TPA) and Captive Power Plant
(25 MW) at Jharsuguda Road, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh by M/s R. R. Energy
Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the steel plants are kept under Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level.
M/s R. R.
Energy Ltd. have proposed for expansion of Mini Steel Plant by installation of
Ferro Alloy Plant (10.8 MVA, 30,000 TPA) and Coal/rejects based Captive Power
Plant (25 MW) at Jharsuguda Road, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. PAs confirmed
that proposed area is not banned by the State Govt of Chhattisgarh. Total existing project area is
During
expansion, Ferro Alloy Plant (10.8 MVA), Thermal Captive Power Plant (25 MW)
and Bio-mass based power plant (14 MW) will be installed. Following are the details of existing and
proposed plants.
S.N. |
Name of product to
be expanded |
Proposed Capacity
Expansion
|
Proposed facility : |
|
|
1 |
Ferro Alloys plant |
3x3.6 MVA
(Ferro/Silico Manganese; 30,000 TPA) |
2 |
Captive Power Plant |
25 MW (Coal/rejects based Thermal Power Plant) |
3 |
Bio-Mass Power
Plant (existing 14 MW) |
1 MW Additional
through efficiency improvement |
Existing facility : |
||
4 |
Biomass Power Plant |
14 MW (Rice Husk
based Thermal Power Project) |
5 |
Semi Finished Steel
Plant under implementation |
6x16 T (Induction
Furnace with CCM 1,00,000 TPA) |
6 |
Fly Ash Bricks
Plant |
19,800 TPA |
Manganese ore, coke, Dolomite, Limestone and paste will be used as
raw materials. Coal (1,58,400 TPA),
washery rejects from the coal washeries, char, dolochar will be used as fuel to
generate power (25 MW).
During expansion,
ferro alloy plant (3x3.6 MVA) to produce 30,000 TPA ferro alloy such as ferro
Manganese, Silico Manganese, Ferro chrome or Ferro silicon will be
installed. CPP (25 MW) with AFBC route
using coal, char, dolochar and coal shales to the existing bio-mass based Power
Plant (14 MW) will be carried out to improve the efficiency to produce 25 MW
power from bio-mass based power plant.
Capacity of the biomass based CPP will be enhanced from 14 MW to 15 MW
by implementing energy efficiency measures in the existing boiler and turbine
itself without any change in the equipment or capital investment. Ingots and Billets (1,00,000 MTPA) from
Sponge Iron, Pig iron, mild steel scrap are manufactured presently. Fly ash brick manufacturing facility (19,800
MTPA) also exists.
Gaseous emissions will be generated form CPP and ferro alloy
plant. High efficiency ESP will be
provided to CPP to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3. Bag filters with conveyor will be provided at
conveyors and all the transfer points.
Bag filters will be provided to ferro alloy plant and induction
furnace. Dust extraction system with bag
filters will be provided to control fugitive emissions due to unloading and
handling of coal and ash.
Total ground water requirement is revised to 247 m3/day
instead of 400 m3/day proposed earlier, including 100 m3/day
for the existing plant and have applied for the
permission for drawl of 300 m3/day to the State Water
resources Department. Air-cooled condenser will be installed to minimize water
consumption. R.O. system will be
installed for DM Water generation.
Effluent treatment plant will be installed to treat back wash and pond
sedimentation. All the treated
wastewater will be neutralized and used for Ferro alloys slag quenching, coal
moistening, fly ash brick making and green belt development. ‘Zero’ discharge will be adopted. The sewage effluent will be treated in Septic
tank followed by soak pit and used for irrigation purpose.
Fly ash generation will increase from 22,000 TPA to 1,14,500 TPA
whereas slag generation will increase from 10,000 TPA to 24,000 TPA. Fly ash
from ESP will be used in existing fly ash brick plant to manufacture bricks and
also gives to cement plants for PPC manufacturing. Slag from ferro alloy plant after granulation
and bottom ash will be used for filling low lying areas. Used / waste oil will be sold to registered
recyclers.
After deliberating on the facts presented before the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the preparation of
EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1. Present land use based on satellite imagery should be
incorporated.
2. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
3. Location of National Park and Wild life sanctuary within
4. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests viz.
Gajmer RF (
5. List of raw material required and source should be included.
6. Design details of Submerged Arc Furnace, Bio-mass based Power
Plant and Captive Power Plant and manufacturing process details should be
included.
7. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
8. Ambient air quality modeling for Ferro Alloy plant should be
included.
9. One season data for gaseous emissions and inclusion of existing
emission data should be ensured.
10. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions
as per CPCB guidelines should be included.
11. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features.
12. ‘Permission’ for the drawl of 247 m3/day ground water
from SGWB / CGWA should be obtained and incorporated. Water balance cycle data
including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged
should be incorporated.
13. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and also near solid
waste dump zone should be carried out. Geological features and Geo-hydrological
status of the study area and ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) should
be included.
14. Solid waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal should
be included particularly related to the slag, R.O. reject and fly ash.
15. End use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
16. Provision of Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for
the slag and its end use should be included.
Proposal for the proper disposal of slag should be mentioned.
17. Commitment that no Ferro chrome will be manufactured without prior
approval of the Ministry.
18. Risk assessment and damage control should be included.
19. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated.
20. An action plan to develop green belt in 33 % area should be
included.
21. Scheme for rainwater harvesting should be incorporated.
22. Socio economic development activities should be in place.
23. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
24. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
25. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
26. Compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines
should be included.
The Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry) decided that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the
preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the
draft EIA/EMP report is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in
Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted
by the PAs to the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board (CECB) for
conducting public hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per
TORs addressing all concerns set out in EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF
for prior environmental clearance.
4.17 Expansion of Steel Plant
at Village Marakuta & Pandari Pathar, Tehsil and District Jharsuguda,
Orissa by M/s Action Ispat & Power (P) Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Integrated Steel Plants are listed
S.N. 3(a) under category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level.
M/s Action Ispat & Power (P) Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Steel
Plant at Village Marakuta & Pandari Pathar, Tehsil and District Jharsuguda,
Orissa.
Total existing land is
S.N. |
Plant |
Facilities |
Production (TPA) |
(A) Existing Phase-I |
|||
1 |
DRI |
4x350 TPD |
|
2 |
Blast Furnace |
4x100 TPD |
|
3 |
Steel Melting Shop (SMS) |
1x350 M3 |
3,00,000 |
|
Induction Furnace |
4x12T |
8,00,000 |
|
Arc Furnace |
1 x 70 T |
|
|
LRF |
1x100 T |
|
|
CCM |
1x2 Strand; 2x3 |
|
4 |
Re-rolling Mill |
|
5,00,000 |
5 |
Coal washery |
450 TPH |
|
6 |
Captive Power Plant |
|
|
|
WHRB |
40 MW |
148 MW |
|
FBB |
108 MW |
|
(B) Proposed : Phase-II |
|||
1 |
Mini Blast Furnace |
1 x |
1,00,000 |
2 |
Coke Oven Plant |
-- |
3,00,000 |
3 |
Sinter Plant |
1 x |
4,00,000 |
4 |
Ferro Alloy Plant |
4x9 MVA |
57,000 |
During
presentation, PAs informed that following will be the existing and proposed facilities:
Facilities |
Existing & Phase-I |
Phase-II expansion |
Sponge Iron |
1,800 TPD |
-- |
Power Plant WHRB AFBC |
40 MW 108 MW |
-- |
Blast Furnace |
1x350 m3 |
1x150 m3 |
SMS |
8,00,000 TPA |
-- |
Rolling
Mill |
5,00,000 TPA |
-- |
Coal
washery |
450 TPH |
-- |
Coke
Oven plant |
-- |
3,00,000 TPA |
Annular
Sinter Plant |
-- |
4,00,000 TPA (1x25 m3) |
Ferro
Alloy Plant |
-- |
57,000 TPA (4x9 MVA) |
S.N. |
Plant |
Facilities |
Production (TPA) |
(C) Existing Phase-I |
|||
1 |
DRI |
4x350 TPD |
|
2 |
Blast Furnace |
4x100 TPD |
|
3 |
Steel Melting Shop (SMS) |
1x350 M3 |
3,00,000 |
|
Induction Furnace |
4x12T |
8,00,000 |
|
Arc Furnace |
1 x 70 T |
|
|
LRF |
1x100 T |
|
|
CCM |
1x2 Strand; 2x3 |
|
4 |
Re-rolling Mill |
|
5,00,000 |
5 |
Coal washery |
450 TPH |
|
6 |
Captive Power Plant |
|
|
|
WHRB |
40 MW |
148 MW |
|
FBB |
108 MW |
|
(D) Proposed : Phase-II |
|||
1 |
Mini Blast Furnace |
1 x |
1,00,000 |
2 |
Coke Oven Plant |
-- |
3,00,000 |
3 |
Sinter Plant |
1 x |
4,00,000 |
4 |
Ferro Alloy Plant |
4x9 MVA |
57,000 |
Iron ore fines (3,63,800 MT) Limestone (48,400 MT), Dolomite
(2,96,000 MT) Coke Breeze (49,700 MT) for the Sinter Plant; Dry coal (3,90,000
TPA) for coke oven plant, iron ore lump (51,500 MT), Sinter (1,14,000 MT), Belt
Coke (61000 MT), Quartzite (40,800 MT), Coal dust (21,000 MT); Ferro Alloy (Mn
Ore 68,400 MT), Fe-Mn Slag (45,600 MT) Quartz (14,250 MT) Coal Breeze (22,800
MT), Coal (30,210 MT) and Dolomite (2,850 MT)
will be used as raw materials.
In the proposed
expansion, Pig iron through Blast Furnace, Coke through coke oven plant, Ferro
alloys (Fe-Si & Fe-Mn) through submerged Arc Furnace and Sinter Plant to
utilize iron ore fines will be installed.
In coke making process,
bituminous coal will be fed to series of oven in absence of O2. Volatile compounds are driven off and
combustible gases and other by-products will be recovered. Coke oven gas contains tar, ammonia, Pnehol
Naphthalene, light oil and sulfur which has to be removed before using coke gas
as fuel for heating the ovens. The solid
carbon remaining in the oven will be coke, which is quenched with water or by
circulating an inert gas (N2) through dry quenching. ESP will be provided to coke oven to remove
tar. Ammonia will be separated from the
tar decanter and sent to waste water treatment after ammonia recovery. Nephthlene will be removed in the
separator. Light oil will be
removed from the coke oven gas and will
be fractioned to recover benzene, toluene and Xylene. Coke breeze will
be reused in sinter plant.
Bag filters/fume
extraction system and chimney will be provided to Coke oven plant. Gas cleaning
plant, Dust extraction and suppression system will be provided to Ferro alloy
plant. Hot gas from Blast furnace will be taken into WHRB and then passed
through ESP/bagfilters for control of dust. ESP and dry fog dust suppression
system will be provided to the proposed Sinter plant. Bag filters and cyclone
will be provided to control dust emission in Raw material handling areas.
Total water requirement from the confluence of IB and
Coal char (760 TPD) will be used as fuel in FBB. Fly ash (2646
TPD) and BF slag (181 TPD) will be supplied to OCL (India) Ltd. IF/AF Slag,
Ferro alloys slag will be used for road repairing/ for filling low lying area.
Coal washery rejects /Fines will be directly used in FBB. BF slag will be
further used for manufacturing ceramics.
FA slag will be used for road repairing.
Coal tar will be used for making black top road. Sludge from wastewater treatment plant will
be disposed off at designated disposal site.
Coke breeze will be used in sinter plant.
Out of
After deliberations, PAs requested Committee for the exemption
from the public hearing due to expansion of the proposal in the same
campus. The Committee informed to the
PAs that it is a major expansion involving installation of blast furnace, coke
oven, ferro alloy plant, sinter plant etc. and public hearing is
necessary. PAs also requested to
consider the proposal for ferro alloy plant only and other items including
blast furnace, coke oven and sinter plant separately. The Committee asked PAs to submit the
proposal independently alongwith Form I and Pre-feasibility Report and will be
considered in next meeting. The Committee also agreed to use the data collected
last year for the existing plant for which environmental clearance was accorded by the Ministry in September,
2008. The EIA/EMP should include
description of all the existing and proposed plants and data on air, water and
solid waste should be updated to assess cumulative impact of the existing and
proposed units. The proposal is differed till the revised proposal is
submitted.
4.18 Steel Plant (Sponge Iron 1,20,000
TPA, Liquid Steel 1,25,000 TPA, Billets 1,20,000 TPA and Captive Power Plant
(12 MW) at Village Benipur, District Purulia, West Bengal by M/s AIC Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Integrated Steel plants are listed S.N. 3(a) under category ‘A’ and appraised
at the Central level.
M/s AIC
Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for the Steel Plant (Sponge Iron 1,20,000 TPA, Liquid Steel
1,25,000 TPA, Billets 1,20,000 TPA and Captive Power Plant (12 MW) at Village
Benipur, District Purulia, West Bengal. Total land acquired for the proposed
project is
Units |
Capacity |
DRI Plant |
4x100 TPD |
Captive Power Plant |
12 MW |
Induction Furnace |
2x15 Tonne |
LRF |
2x15 Tonne |
Continuous casting for
billets |
|
Following
will be manufactured :
Unit |
Capacity |
DRI Plant |
1,20,000 TPA |
Power Plant WHRB (2x4 MW) AFBC (1x4 MW) |
8 MW 4 MW |
Liquid Steel |
1,25,000 TPA |
Continuous casting for billets |
Finished Billet 1,20,000 TPA |
DRI Unit, Steel Melting
shop (SMS), continuous casting machine (CCM) and Captive Power Plant (CPP) will
be installed. The sponge iron will be
manufactured through DRI kilns, which will be used for making steel in
Induction furnace. Waste heat of kiln
gases will be used in WHRB – CPP.
ESP will be provided to Captive power
plant to restrict the particulate matter within 100 mg/Nm3. The
waste gases of DRI kiln will be used in WHRB based CPP (2x4 MW). The gases from DRI kiln will pass through
dust settling chamber (DSC) and after burning chamber (ABC) before being used
in WHRB. The fugitive dust emissions due
to iron ore fines, coal fines and dolomite fines from the stock piles of raw
material will be controlled by dust suppression system by water sprinkling.
Primary emissions from the Induction furnace and Ladle furnace will be
collected by fume extraction systems and taken through ductwork to a bagfilter.
Suitable canopy willl be provided to induction furnace to minimize the fugitive
emission. Dust extraction systems comprising of bag filters will be installed
at material transfer points.
Total water requirement from River
Damodar will be 664 m3/day instead of 4,735 m3/d proposed
earlier and PAs have applied for permission of the same. Effluent treatment plant will be installed to
remove suspended solids, neutralization of acidic water from DM plant and
removal of oil and grease etc. PAs vide letter dated 28th August, 2008
informed that Zero effluent discharge will be maintained.
Major quantity of Char from DRI kiln will be used in AFBC
based CPP (1x4 MW). Excess char will be disposed for brick manufacturing. Slag
will be sent to storage yard where it will be disoosed suitably. Ash, slag,
dust, refractory debris, sludge etc. will be generated as solid waste. Dense phase ash handling system will be
adopted.
After deliberating on the facts presented the
Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the
preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
3. ‘Proof’ / ‘Notification’ issued by the State Govt. if the project
is located in notified industrial area.
4. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests viz.
Panchet RF, Bheti RF and Muktipur RF should be included.
5. Actual land requirement, classification of land, acquisition
status, rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of West
Bengal should be incorporated.
6. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
7. A list of industries containing name and type in
8. Residential colony should be located in upwind direction.
9. List of raw material required and source should be included.
10. Manufacturing process details for all the plants viz. DRI Plant,
Captive Power Plant, Induction Furnace, LRF, CCM etc. should be included.
11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Impact of the transport of raw material and finished product on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided
14. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done.
15. Plant-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control
of gaseous emissions from all the sources should be incorporated.
16. A note on control of fugitive and secondary emissions from as per
CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be incorporated.
17. One season data for gaseous emissions during winter season is
necessary.
18. Permission for the drawl of 4,735 water from River Damodar from
the concerned department and water balance data including quantity of effluent
generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be provided. Methods
adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.
19. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
20. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
21. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants including
coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for different purposes should be included.
22. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly char and fly ash. Assurance that 100 %
char will be used in the FBC boiler and copies of MOU regarding utilization of
fly ash should be included.
23. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
24. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
25. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
26. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
27. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project should be included.
28. An Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made
for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
29. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
30. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
31. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the West
Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA
Notification, 2006. On finalization of
EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out EIA/EMP should be
submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.19 Integrated Steel Plant [Pig Iron (500 TPD), Sponge Iron (600 TPD),
M.S. Bars / Structures (1,200 TPD), Ingots Billets (7,200 TPD)] alongwith
Captive Power Plant (50 MW) at Sy. No. 32, 57-60, Village Wadaparthi, Mandal
Bhongir, District Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Novus Steels and
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Integrated Steel plants are listed S.N. 3(a) under category ‘A’ and appraised
at the Central level.
M/s Novus Steels
and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for the Integrated Steel plant Pig Iron (500 TPD), Sponge Iron (600 TPD),
M.S. Bars / Structures (1,200 TPD), Ingots Billets (7,200 TPD) alongwith
Captive Power Plant (50 MW) at Sy. No. 32, 57-60, Village Wadaparthi, Mandal
Bhongir, District Nalgonda, A. P. Total
land acquired is
S.N. |
Units |
Capacity |
Products |
Production (TPD) |
1 |
Blat Furnace |
2x125 m3 |
Pig Iron/Molten metal |
500 |
2 |
Sponge Iron |
3x100 TPD |
Sponge Iron |
300 |
3 |
Re-rolling Mill |
4x300 TPD |
M.S. Bars |
1,200 |
4 |
Induction Furnace |
6 TPH x 6 with 12 crucibles one as stand-by |
Ingot / Billets |
7,200 |
During presentation, PAs informed that following will be installed
and manufactured:
S.N. |
|
Capacity |
Products |
Production (TPD) |
1 |
Blat Furnace |
2x128 m3 |
Pig Iron/Molten metal |
500 |
2 |
Sponge Iron |
6x100 TPD |
Sponge Iron |
600 |
3 |
Re-rolling Mill |
4x300 TPD |
M.S. Bars |
1,200 |
4 |
Induction Furnace |
10 TPH x 6 with 12 crucibles one as stand-by |
Ingot / Billets |
7,200 |
5 |
Captive Power Plant |
AFBC -1x27 TPH WHRB -1x10 TPH |
Power |
50 MW |
Hot metal will be produced in Blast furnace in counter current
reactor where solid descends and hot gases ascend. Iron ore / lumps will be reduced in DRI kiln
to produce sponge iron. In re-rolling
mill, raw material will be fed to pre-heating furnace at 1150-
ESP will be provided to
Sponge iron plant and FBC boiler to control particulate emission within 100
mg/Nm3. Bag filters will be
provided to product separation/storage house, stock house, cooler discharge
building, intermediate bins, coal injection building, coal and Iron ore
crusher/screen house, etc. of Sponge iron plant. The hot gases from the IF will
be controlled by special de-dusting equipment and then cooled in ventury
scrubber and let out to atmosphere through a chimney.
Total water requirement from APIIC will be 798 m3/day.
Heat exchanger will be provided for cooling.
No sludge or liquid effluent is expected. Total power consumption will
be 21.7 KW. Coal (143 TPD) will be used as fuel in FBC alongwith Coal char.
After deliberating on the facts presented the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as
per the following TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
3. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests, if
any should be included.
4. Actual land requirement, classification of land, acquisition
status, rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of A. P.
should be incorporated.
5. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
6. A list of industries containing name and type in
7. Residential colony should be located in upwind direction.
8. List of raw material required and source should be included.
9. Design details and manufacturing process details for all the
plants viz. Blast Furnace, Sponge Iron Plant, Induction Furnace, Re-Rolling
Mill and Captive Power Plant (WHRB abd AFBC) etc. should be included.
10. Break-up of annual capacity of all the plants should be
incorporated.
11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Impact of the transport of raw material and finished product on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided
14. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done.
15. Plant-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control
of gaseous emissions from all the sources should be incorporated.
16. A note on control of fugitive and secondary emissions from as per
CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be incorporated.
17. One season data for gaseous emissions during winter season is
necessary.
18. Permission for the drawl of 798 m3/day water from APIIC
from the concerned department and water balance data including quantity of
effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be provided.
Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.
19. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
20. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
21. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle
and reuse for different purposes should be included.
22. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly char and fly ash. Assurance that 100 %
char will be used in the FBC boiler and copies of MOU regarding utilization of
ash should be included.
23. MOU signed with the Cement manufacturers for utilizing granulated
BF slag should be included.
24. Generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from DRI and BF
plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be set out.
25. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
26. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
27. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
28. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
29. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project should be included.
30. An Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made
for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
31. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
32. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
33. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) for conducting public hearing as
per EIA Notification, 2006. On
finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out
EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.20 Expansion of Steel Plant at Gopalpur, Bamunara
Industrial Estate, Gopalpur, Durgapur, District Burdwan, West Bengal by M/s Shyam
Steel Industries Ltd (TOR)
Project authorities didn’t attend the meeting
and it was decided that proposal should be considered afresh whenever requested
by the PAs.
4.21 Expansion of
Sponge Iron Plant (190 TPD to 290 TPD) and CPP (10 MW) at Angadpur,
PAs informed vide letter
dated 16th October, 2008 that they will not be going ahead with the
proposed unit of 100 TPD. Project authorities didn’t attend the meeting. In view of the fact mentioned, file may be
closed.
4.22 Sponge Iron Plant (66,000
TPA) alongwith Captive Power Plant (8 MW) at Survey No. 13, Village Nemakal,
Mandal Bommanahal, District Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh by M/s S.L.V. Steels and
Alloys Private Limited (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Sponge iron Plants with > 200 TPD
have been listed at S.N. 3(a) under Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central
level. Capacity of the proposed sponge
iron plant is 200 TPD.
M/s S.L.V.
Steels and Alloys Private Limited has proposed to set up a Sponge Iron Plant
(66,000 TPA) alongwith Captive Power Plant (8 MW) at Survey No. 13, Village
Nemakal, Mandal Bommanahal, District Ananthapur, A. P. Total land acquired for
the proposed project will be
Sponge
Iron Kiln (2x100 TPD), WHRB (2x10 TPH) and FBC Boiler (1x30 TPH) will be
installed. Rotary Kiln will be provided for reduction of Iron ore into Sponge
Iron at a temperature of
Iron ore (400 TPD), Coal
(200 TPD), and Dolomite (8 TPD) will be the raw materials required for Sponge
Iron plant. Coal requirement for power plant will be 90 TPD).
Hot gases from the kiln will pass through a Dust settling chamber.
Thereafter, the flue gases pass through an After burning chamber (ABC) where
any combustibles present will be completely burnt in presence of excess air.
The gases will then be led to a WHRB to generate steam for power generation.
The gas will be cleaned in an ESP before letting them into the atmosphere
through ID fan and a tall common stack. Flue gases from power plant will pass
over various heat transfer surfaces to ESP and then finally discharged to
chimney by ID fan. Fugitive dust will be collected by bag filters will be
collected by bag filters at transfer points and by water sprinkling for
transport related dust. The kiln and
boiler stack emissions will be maintained at APPCB standards. Bag filters will
be provided to raw material crusher, coal junction point, stock house, cooler
discharge and product house to control dust emissions. Particulate emission from bag filters will be
<50 mg/Nm3.
Total ground water requirement will be 170 KLD. Water requirement
of cooling water circulation for Sponge Iron plant and power plant will be 100
KLD and 50 KLD, respectively. Blow down from the process are sent to ETP.
Domestic effluent shall be sent to septic tank followed by soak pit. There will
be no effluent from the process.
Dolochar (70 TPD) will be consumed in FBC boiler. Iron ore fines
(32.5 TPD) will be reused in the process or sold to cement plants. Ash from
boilers (83.6 TPD) will be sold to cement plants / fly ash manufacturers. Sludge from wet scrapper (2.3 TPD), solid
waste generated from kiln and dust from bag filters (13.5 TPD) will be sold to
brick manufacturers or used for landfill. Construction waste will be reused for
filling. Used batteries and waste oil will be sent to authorized dealers.
Domestic and commercial solid waste will be collected, segregated and disposed
for reuse and to dumping yard.
Green belt will be developed in
After detailed
deliberations, the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the
proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Actual land requirement, classification of land, current status of
acquisition of land with break-up details (Government / Private /
3. Current status of construction activities should be included.
4. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
5. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests viz.
Bellary RF (
6. A list of industries containing name and type in
7. List of raw material required and source should be included.
8. Manufacturing process details of the Sponge Iron Plant should be
included.
9. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
10. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
11. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
12. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features.
13. Air quality modeling for Sponge Iron Plant and Captive Power Plant
for specific pollutants needs to be done.
APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be
included.
14. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided.
15. An action plan to control secondary fugitive emissions as per
latest standards issued by the Ministry in May, 2008 and monitoring should be
included.
16. One season data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is
necessary.
17. Permission for the drawl of 170 KLD ground water and water balance
data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and
discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water
conservation.
18. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
19. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
20. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly use of Char in FBC boiler should be
included.
21. A plan for the utilization of gases in the WHRB for generating
power should be incorporated.
22. Energy balance data for Sponge Iron Plant should be included.
23. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
24. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
25. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
26. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
27. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project.
28. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
29. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
30. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
31. Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for
the Sponge Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
The Expert Committee (Industry) recommended that the PAs
may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the combined draft EIA/EMP report
is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and
IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) for conducting public hearing as
per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs and
addressing and incorporating all concerns raised by public hearing / public
consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental
clearance.
4.23 Sponge Iron Plant (66,000
TPA) alongwith Captive Power plant (8 MW) at Survey No. 17A & 17B, Village
Nemakal, Mandal Bommanahal, District Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh by M/s
Ramanjaneya Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities
and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Sponge iron Plants with > 200 TPD have been listed at S.N. 3(a) under
Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level. Capacity of the proposed sponge iron plant is
200 TPD.
M/s Ramanjaneya Ispat
Pvt. Ltd. has proposed to set up a Sponge Iron plant (66000 TPA) alongwith
Captive Power plant (8 MW) at Survey No. 17A & 17B, Village Nemakal, Mandal
Bommanahal, District Ananthapur, A. P. The land acquired for the proposed
project will be
Sponge Iron Kiln (2x100
TPD, 66000 TPA), WHRB (2x10 TPH, 4 MW) and Biomass based FBC Boiler (1x30 TPH,
4 MW) will be installed in the proposed plant.
Rotary Kiln will be provided for reduction of Iron ore in to
Sponge Iron at a temperature of
Iron ore (400 TPD), Coal
(200 TPD), and Dolomite (8 TPD) will be the raw materials required for Sponge
Iron plant. Coal requirement for power plant will be 90 TPD).
Hot gases from the kiln will pass through a Dust settling chamber
and then through After burning chamber (ABC) where any combustibles present will
be completely burnt in presence of excess air.
The gases will then be led to a WHRB to generate steam for power
generation. The gas will be cleaned in an ESP before letting them into the
atmosphere through ID fan and a tall common stack of height
Total ground water requirement will be 170 KLD. Water requirement
of cooling water circulation for Sponge Iron plant and power plant will be 100
KLD and 50 KLD, respectively. Blow down from the process are sent to ETP.
Domestic effluent shall be sent to septic tank followed by soak pit. There will
be no effluent from the process.
Sludge from wet scrapper (2.3 TPD), solid waste generated from
kiln and dust from bag filters (13.5 TPD) will be sold to brick manufacturers
or used for landfill. Construction waste will be reused for filling. Any
redundant machinery or equipment will be scrapped and disposed off to scrap
dealers. Used batteries and waste oil will be sent to authorized dealers.
Dolochar (70 TPD) will be consumed in FBC boiler. Iron ore fines (32.5 TPD)
will be reused in the process or sold to cement plants, Ash from boilers (83.6
TPD) will be sold to cement plants /
fly ash manufacturers.
Green belt will be developed in
After detailed
deliberations, the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the
proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Actual land requirement, classification of land, current status of
acquisition of land with break-up details (Government / Private /
3. Exact location of the project Survey No. 16 B2 &
4. Current status of construction activities should be included.
5. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
6. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests viz.
Bellary RF (
7. A list of industries containing name and type in
8. List of raw material required and source should be included.
9. Manufacturing process details of the Sponge Iron Plant should be
included.
10. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features.
14. Air quality modeling for Sponge Iron Plant and Captive Power Plant
for specific pollutants needs to be done.
APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be
included.
15. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided.
16. An action plan to control secondary fugitive emissions as per
latest standards issued by the Ministry in May, 2008 and monitoring should be
included.
17. One season data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is
necessary.
18. Permission for the drawl of 170 KLD ground water and water balance
data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and
discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water
conservation.
19. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
20. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
21. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly use of Char in FBC boiler should be
included.
22. A plan for the utilization of gases in the WHRB for generating
power should be incorporated.
23. Energy balance data for Sponge Iron Plant should be included.
24. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
25. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
26. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
27. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
28. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project.
29. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
30. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
31. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
32. Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for
the Sponge Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
The Expert Committee (Industry) recommended that the PAs
may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the combined draft EIA/EMP report
is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and
IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) for conducting public hearing as
per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs and
addressing and incorporating all concerns raised by public hearing / public
consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.24 Sponge Iron plant (66,000
TPA) alongwith Captive Power plant (8 MW) at Survey No. 14/15A/15B/16A, Village
Nemakal, Mandal Bommanahal, District Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Venkata
Sai Ispat Industries Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Sponge iron Plants with > 200 TPD have been listed at S.N. 3(a) under
Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level. Capacity of the proposed sponge iron plant is
200 TPD.
M/s Venkata Sai Ispat Industries Pvt. Ltd. has proposed to set up a
Sponge Iron plant (66000 TPA) alongwith Captive Power plant (8 MW) at Survey
No. 16B2, 17A, 18A, 26A, Village Nemakal, Mandal Bommanahal, District
Ananthapur, A. P. The land acquired for the proposed project will be
Sponge
Iron Kiln (2x100 TPD, 66000 TPA), WHRB (2x10 TPH, 4 MW) and Biomass based FBC
Boiler (1x30 TPH, 4 MW) will be installed in the proposed plant. Rotary Kiln
will be provided for reduction of Iron ore in to Sponge Iron at a temperature
of
Iron ore (400 TPD), Coal (200 TPD), and Dolomite (8
TPD) will be the raw materials required for Sponge Iron plant. Coal requirement
for power plant will be 90 TPD).
Hot gases from the kiln will pass through a Dust settling chamber
and then through After burning chamber (ABC) where any combustibles present
will be completely burnt in presence of excess air. The gases will then be led to a WHRB to
generate steam for power generation. The gas will be cleaned in an ESP before
letting them into the atmosphere through ID fan and a tall common stack of
height
Total ground water requirement will be 170 KLD. Water requirement
of cooling water circulation for Sponge Iron plant and power plant will be 100
KLD and 50 KLD, respectively. Blow down from the process are sent to ETP.
Domestic effluent shall be sent to septic tank followed by soak pit. There will
be no effluent from the process.
Excavated soil will be used for filling the basement of buildings
and unleveled area. Domestic and commercial solid waste will be collected,
segregated and disposed for reuse and to dumping yard. Sludge from wet scrapper
(2.3 TPD), solid waste generated from kiln and dust from bag filters (13.5 TPD)
will be sold to brick manufacturers or used for landfill. Construction waste
will be reused for filling. Any redundant machinery or equipment will be
scrapped and disposed off to scrap dealers. Used batteries and waste oil will
be sent to authorized dealers. Dolochar (70 TPD) will be consumed in FBC
boiler. Iron ore fines (32.5 TPD) will be reused in the process or sold to
cement plants, Ash from boilers (83.6 TPD) will be sold to cement plants / fly
ash manufacturers.
After detailed
deliberations, the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the
proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Actual land requirement, classification of land, current status of
acquisition of land with break-up details (Government / Private /
3. Exact location of the project Survey No. 16 B2 &
4. Current status of construction activities should be included.
5. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
6. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department
regarding impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests viz.
Bellary RF (
7. A list of industries containing name and type in
8. List of raw material required and source should be included.
9. Manufacturing process details of the Sponge Iron Plant should be
included.
10. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
11. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
12. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features.
14. Air quality modeling for Sponge Iron Plant and Captive Power Plant
for specific pollutants needs to be done.
APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be
included.
15. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided.
16. An action plan to control secondary fugitive emissions as per
latest standards issued by the Ministry in May, 2008 and monitoring should be
included.
17. One season data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is
necessary.
18. Permission for the drawl of 170 KLD ground water and water balance
data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and
discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water
conservation.
19. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
20. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
21. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly use of Char in FBC boiler should be
included.
22. A plan for the utilization of gases in the WHRB for generating
power should be incorporated.
23. Energy balance data for Sponge Iron Plant should be included.
24. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
25. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
26. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
27. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
28. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project.
29. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
30. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
31. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
32. Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for
the Sponge Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
The Expert Committee (Industry) recommended that the PAs
may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the combined draft EIA/EMP report
is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and
IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board (APPCB) for conducting public hearing as
per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs and
addressing and incorporating all concerns raised by public hearing / public
consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental
clearance.
4.25 Expansion of Sponge Iron
Plant into Integrated Mini Steel Plant at Plot No. 202, Kalunga Industrial
Esate, Tehsil Kalunga, District Sundergarh, Orissa by M/s Seeta Integrated
Steel & Energy Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Integrated Steel Plants are listed at S.N. 3(a) under Primary Metallurgy
Industry under Category ‘A’ and are appraised at Central Level.
M/s Seeta Integrated Steel & Energy
Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Sponge Iron Plant into Integrated Mini Steel Plant at Plot No. 202, Kalunga
Industrial Industrial Esate, Tehsil Kalunga, District Sundergarh, Orissa. Total land acquired is
Project |
Production |
||
|
Existing |
Proposed |
Total |
Sponge Iron Plant |
45,000 TPA |
60,000 TPA |
1,05,000 TPA |
Captive Power Plant WHRB AFBC |
|
||
-- -- |
7 MW 63 MW |
70 MW |
|
Iron ore crusher |
1,44,000 TPA |
1,92,000 TPA |
3,36,000 TPA |
Induction furnace |
-- |
3,00,000 TPA |
3,00,000 TPA |
Coal Washery |
-- |
1,92,000 TPA |
1,92,000 TPA |
Blast Furnace |
-- |
1,59,000 TPA |
1,59,000 TPA |
Concast |
-- |
3,00,000 TPA |
3,00,000 TPA |
Rolling Mill |
-- |
1,50,000 TPA |
1,50,000 TPA |
During presentation, PAs
informed that following will be the existing and proposed facilities :
Project |
Production |
||
|
Existing |
Proposed |
Total |
Sponge Iron Plant |
45,000 TPA (1x50 TPD+1x100
TPD) |
1,80,000 TPA (6x100 TPD) |
2,25,000 TPA |
Captive Power Plant
WHRB
AFBC |
-- -- |
15 MW 55 MW |
70 MW |
Iron ore crusher |
1,80,000 TPA (1x30 TPH) |
4,20,000 TPA (70 TPH) |
6,00,000 TPA |
Induction furnace |
-- |
3,00,000 TPA |
3,00,000 TPA |
Coal Washery |
2,40,000 TPA (1x40 TPH) |
3,60,000 TPA |
6,00,000 TPA |
Blast Furnace |
-- |
1,59,000 TPA |
1,59,000 TPA |
Concast |
-- |
3,00,000 TPA |
3,00,000 TPA |
Rolling Mill |
-- |
1,50,000 TPA |
1,50,000 TPA |
During expansion, Rotary
kiln (200 TPD), IF, Coal Washery, Iron ore crusher, BF, Concast and Rolling
Mill, WHRB (7 MW) and AFBC (63 MW) will be installed DR-IF route will be
adopted. In Iron ore crusher,
lumps of iron ore will be crushed in Jaw Crusher and discharged into screen and
collected at Stockpile. Coal washing
will be done by dry process by jigging the coal where clean coal i.e. land
density coal will flow from the top of the bed through a separate chute and
secondary roll crusher will recycle the crushed coal again. The rejected coal will be disposed off to the
rejected coal stockyard. Sponge Iron
manufacturing will involve reduction of iron ore with solid carbonaceous
material such as coal in a rotary kiln at high temperature. The products will be magnetically separated
int9o char and sponge iron. Iron ore and
sinter will be melted in BF and liquid hot iron and slag will be collected
separately. Scrap and sponge iron will
be melted in IF to manufacture pencil ingots. Billets will be manufactured
from the scrap by casting the moulds.
Billets will be reheated in the –reheating furnace to manufacture bars
and rods and also rolled products in Rolling Mill. The flue gas from DRI will be used in waste
heat recovery boiler (WHRB). Char, coal
fines, coal middling from coal washery will be used in atmospheric Fluidized
Combustion Boiler (AFBC).
The flue gases from the
DRI will be passed through dust settling chamber (DBC) and After burning
Chamber (ABC) and then used in WHRB boiler. Bag house/filter will be provided
to coal washery and blast furnace. Fume
extraction system will be provided to IF. Electrostatic precipitator will be
provided to WHRB and AFBC boiler to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3. Dust Dust extraction with bag filters will be
provided to control fugitive emission in work zone environment and Induction
furnace. Dry fog system will be provided at all material transfer points.
Earlier, it was informed
that the total water requirement from
Dolochar, Washery rejects and fresh coal will be used in FBB. Iron
ore fines will be sold to outside agencies & Cement units. Flue dust, fly
ash from AFBC, Bed ash and slag from BF will be used in manufacturing
cement. Waste oil, oil sludge and dry
cell batteries will be sold to authorized recyclers / re-processors.
Green belt will be developed in 33 % area. Power (52.5 MW) for the
proposed expansion will be sourced from CPP (70 MW). This makes the total power
requirement after the proposed expansion to be 53.45 MW. HSD (135 KLD) and coal
(0.702 MTPA) will be used as fuels.
Excess power will be transferred to M/s Chari of Cement Co.
After deliberating on the facts presented the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as
per the following TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
3. ‘Proof’ / ‘Notification’ issued by the State Govt., if the project
is located in notified industrial area.
4. Permission and recommendations of the State Forest Department regarding
impact of proposed expansion on the surrounding reserve forests viz. Sagjov RF
(
5. Actual land requirement, classification of land, current status of
acquisition of land with break-up details (Government / Private /
6. Current status of construction activities should be included.
7. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
8. A list of industries containing name and type in
9. Residential colony should be located in upwind direction.
10. List of raw material required and source should be included.
11. Manufacturing process details for all the plants viz. Sponge Iron
Plant, Induction furnace, Iron ore crusher, Coal Washery, Blast Furnace, Coal
Washery, Concast, Rolling Mill, Captive Power Plant (WHRB & AFBC) etc.
should be included.
12. Data on existing ambient air, stack emissions and fugitive
emissions should be included.
13. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
14. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
15. Impact of the transport of raw material and finished product on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided
16. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done.
17. Plant-wise air pollution control measures proposed for the control
of gaseous emissions from all the sources should be incorporated.
18. A note on control of fugitive and secondary emissions from as per
CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be incorporated.
19. One season data for gaseous emissions during winter season is
necessary.
20. Permission for the drawl of 1000 m3/day water from IDCO
supply and no water from Brahmani River or bore wells from the concerned
department and water balance data including quantity of effluent generated,
recycled and reused and discharged should be provided. Methods adopted/to be
adopted for the water conservation.
21. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
22. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
23. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plants including
coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for different purposes should be included.
24. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly char and fly ash. Assurance that 100 %
char will be used in the FBC boiler and copies of MOU regarding utilization of
ash should be included.
25. MOU signed with the Cement manufacturers for utilizing granulated
BF slag should be included.
26. Generation and utilization of waste/fuel gases from DRI and BF
plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be set out.
27. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
28. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
29. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
30. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
31. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project should be included.
32. An Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made
for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
33. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
34. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
35. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Orissa Pollution Control Board (OPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA
Notification, 2006. On finalization of
EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out EIA/EMP should be
submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.26 Expansion of Sponge Iron
Plant (100 TPD to 200 TPD) alongwith Captive Power Plant (8 MW; WHRB, 4 MW;
AFBC 4 MW) at Plot No. 84, Industrial Estate,
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft
Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. Sponge Iron plants (>200
TPD) have been kept at S.N. 3(a)(b) under category ‘B’ but due to non-existent
of SEIAA/SEAC in Orissa, proposal is being appraised at Central level.
M/s Maa Vaishnavi Sponge Limited has
proposed to expand its existing Sponge
Iron Plant (100 TPD to 200 TPD) alongwith Captive Power Plant (8 MW; WHRB, 4
MW; AFBC 4 MW) at Plot No. 84, Industrial Estate, P.O. Kalunga, District Sundergarh,
Orissa. Proposed expansion will be done
within the existing plant premises of
S.N |
Unit |
Project Configuration |
Total capacity after expansion |
|
Existing capacity |
Proposed capacity
|
|||
1 |
DRI |
30,000 TPA (2x50 TPD) |
30,000 TPA (1x100 TPD) |
60,000 TPA |
2 |
Induction Furnace |
8,400 TPA (3 TPH) To be commissioned |
- |
8,400 TPA |
3 |
Rolling mill |
72,000 TPA To be commissioned |
- |
72,000 TPA |
4 |
Captive Power plant |
- |
4 MW (WHRB) 4 MW (AFBC) |
8 MW |
The existing plant has 2x50 TPD DRI kilns, Induction furnace (8,400 TPA)
and Rolling mill (7,200 TPA). DRI plant
(1x100 TPD) and Power Plant (WHRB, 4 MW; AFBC 4 MW) will be installed in the
proposed expansion.
Raw materials required for sponge iron
production (100 TPD) will be Iron ore (48,000 TPA), Coal (54,000 TPA), Dolomite
(2,400 TPA). Sponge Iron will be
manufactured by SL/RN process following typical rotary kiln operations. Iron
ore, coal and flux will be charged into rotary kiln which will rapidly heated
up by the combustion of coal volatiles released in the charge. Reduction of
Iron ore to metallic Iron will take place at about 1000oC. The
products will be cooled in a rotary cooler and the cooler discharge will be
magnetically separated as Sponge Iron and char.
WHRB will be coupled to the kilns and the steam generated from the
boiler will be sent to steam turbine for power generation.
Off gases from rotary kiln will initially pass through dust settling
chamber. Later, combustibles like Carbon particles and CO apart from oxides of
Total water requirement after proposed
expansion from IDCO supply will be 552 m3/day instead of 32 m3/hr
proposed earlier. Chemical wastes from laboratory will be neutralized before
discharging into the sanitary sewerage treatment system. The treated effluent
will be reused / recycled. The cooling tower blowdowns and boiler blowdowns
will be treated in settling tanks and utilized for dust suppression and
plantation etc. Domestic waste water will be treated in septic tank followed by
soak pit. Back wash of soft water plant will be treated in settling cum
neutralization tank.
Char / Dolochar will be used in
Fluidized bed boilers. Coal fines will be used for injection in DRI kilns. ETP
sludge will be disposed off in low lying areas. Used oil (600 LPA) and oily cotton
waste (200 kg/annum) generated will be disposed as per CPCB guidelines. Sewage
sludge will also be utilized as manure. The manure will be used for green belt
and green cover. Canteen solid waste (6 TPA) will be dumped in a pit to convert
it to manure by vermin-composting. ESP dust alongwith dust from other APC
devices will be used in filling low lying areas. Induction furnace slag and
Kiln accretions will be used in road making.
Green belt will be developed in 33 %
area. Noise isolators, Siliencers / Rubber padding will be provided to modulate
the noise generated by plant machinery. Ear muffs/ Ear plugs will be provided
to employees who are exposed to noise prone areas.
Power
requirement for Sponge Iron plant (100 TPD) will be 0.65 MW and will be sourced
from WESCO. 4 MW of power will be
generated from CPP. A DG set of adequate
capacity will be provided to cater to the emergency power requirement of the
plant. LDO will be used in burners of DRI kilns for initial start-up. HSD (16
KLD) will be used as fuel in Vehicles for the proposed project.
After
detailed deliberations, the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended
the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1.
Present land
use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2.
Actual land
requirement, classification of land, current status of acquisition of land with
break-up details (Government / Private /
3.
Location of
national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
4.
Permission
and recommendations of the State Forest Department regarding impact of proposed
expansion on the surrounding reserve forests, if any, should be included.
5.
A list of
industries containing name and type in
6.
List of raw
material required and source should be included.
7.
Manufacturing
process details of the Sponge Iron Plant and Captive Power Plant (WHRB and
AFBC) should be included.
8.
Data on air
emissions, wastewater generation and solid waste management for the existing
plant should be incorporated.
9.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.
10. Ambient air quality at 8 locations
within the study area of
11. The suspended particulate matter present
in the ambient air must be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and
incorporating of RSPM data.
12. Determination of atmospheric inversion
level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of
pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological
features.
13. Air quality modeling for Sponge Plant
and Captive Power Plant (WHRB and AFBC) for specific pollutants needs to be
done. APCS for the control of emissions
from the kiln and WHRB should also be included.
14. Impact of the transport of the raw
materials and end products on the surrounding environment should be assessed
and provided.
15. An action plan to control secondary
fugitive emissions as per latest standards issued by the Ministry in May, 2008
and monitoring should be included.
16. One season data for gaseous emissions
other than monsoon season is necessary.
17. Permission for the drawl of 552 m3/day
water from IDCO supply and water balance data including quantity of effluent
generated, recycled and reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods
adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.
18. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
19. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
20. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste
generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly use of Char in FBC
boiler should be included.
21. A plan for the utilization of gases in
the WHRB for generating power should be incorporated.
22. Energy balance data for Sponge Iron
Plant should be included.
23. Risk assessment and damage control needs
to be addressed.
24. Occupational health of the workers needs
elaboration.
25. Green belt development plan in 33 % area
and a scheme for rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
26. Socio-economic development activities
need to be elaborated upon.
27. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project.
28. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be
included.
29. A tabular chart for the issues raised
and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be provided.
30. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposal should also be included.
31. Action Plan for the implementation of
the recommendations made for the Sponge Plants in the CREP guidelines must be
prepared.
The Expert Committee (Industry)
recommended that the PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the
preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the
draft EIA/EMP report is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in
Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted
by the PAs to the Orissa Pollution Control Board (OPCB) for conducting public
hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as
per TORs and addressing and incorporating all concerns raised by public hearing
/ public consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for prior
environmental clearance.
4.27 Expansion of Sponge Iron Plant (3,00,000 MTPA to 6,00,000 MTPA), Ferro Alloy
Plant (72,000 MTPA) at Village Jitusole, District Paschim Medinipore,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Primary metallurgical industries have been kept at S.N. 3(a) under primary
metallurgical industry under category ‘A’ and appraised at Central level.
M/s Rashmi Cement Limited has proposed for the expansion of Sponge
Iron plant (3,00,000 MTPA to 6,00,000 MTPA), alongwith addition of Ferro Alloy
Plant (72,000 MTPA) at Village Jitusole, District Paschim Medinipore,
Sponge Iron Plant consisting of Rotary kilns (4x100 TPD & 2x350 TPD)
and Submerged Arc furnace (6x9 MVA) for the Ferro Alloy Plant will be
installed. Sponge Iron (3,00,000 MTPA) and Ferro Alloy (72,000 MTPA) will be
manufactured during expansion.
Plant |
Exisiting (TPA) |
Proposed (TPA) |
Total capacity (TPA) |
|
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
|||
DRI |
3,00,000 (10x100 TPD) |
1,20,000 (4x100 TPD) |
1,80,000 (2x350 TPD) |
6,00,000 |
Submerged Arc Furnace |
- |
36,000 (3x9 MVA) |
36,000 (3x9 MVA) |
72,000 |
Power Plant |
25 MW |
- |
- |
25 MW |
Sponge iron will be produced using reducing Iron ore with coal or
lignite. The reduction will be carried out in a Rotary kiln at a pre-determined
temperature and controlled atmosphere. Iron ore, Coal and Limestone will be fed
into the rotary kiln. The kiln discharge after cooling will be fed to magnetic
separators to separate Sponge Iron from Char. Ferro alloys will be produced in
a Submerged Electric Arc Furnace.
Iron ore (50,000 MTPM), Coal (48,000
MTPM), and Dolomite (1,500 MTPM) will be the raw materials required for Sponge
Iron plant. Quartz (46,800 TPA), Manganese ore (15,000 MTPM), Dolomite, Coke
breeze (3,600 MTPM), Electrode casing (90 MTPM), Quartz etc. will be the raw
materials required for Ferro alloy plant.
Bag filters will be installed at material transfer points to
control the emissions. Flue gases from Submerged Arc Furnace will successively
pass through heat exchanger, bag filter system and then finally vented to
atmosphere through a stack of adequate height. Fumes generated from furnace
during tapping will be collected by an exhaust hood and then cleaning will be
done by passing them through a bag house. Emission level at the outlet of bag
house for furnace fumes and tapping fumes will be less than 50 mg/Nm3.
Dust settling chambers, After Burning chambers followed by ESPs will be
provided to DRI kilns to bring down the SPM blow permissible limit. Bag filters
will also be provided to dedusting stacks. Water sprinkling, black topping of
internal roads and greenbelt development will be carried out to control the
fugitive dust emission due to vehicular movement. Dust suppression and
extraction system comprising of Bag filters, spray nozzles dry fog system etc.
will be provided to control secondary fugitive emission during raw material
handling and preparation.
Total water requirement after the proposed expansion from
Solid waste @ 150 MTPD will be generated from the plant. Coal char
generated will be used in Power plant (AFBC boiler). Bag filter dust will be approximately 150
MTPM. Slag will be disposed off to slag dumping area. However, during presentation PAs informed
that Char and ESP dust from DRI Kilns will be disposed in mooram mines or for
road making and land filling. Kiln accretion and slag will be used in Cement
plant. Iron ore fines and Coal fines will be used in Sinter plant. Stabilized
STP sludge will be used as manure in greenbelt development.
Green belt will be developed in
PAs informed to the Committee that
environmental clearance for the existing sponge iron plant (10x100 TPD) and
captive power plant (25 MW) is accorded by the Ministry on 17th
March, 2008 with public hearing held on 17th March, 2008. During proposed
expansion, Sponge Iron Plant (4x100 TPD & 2x350 TPD) and Submerged Arc
furnace (6x9 MVA) for the Ferro Alloy Plant will be installed. Since the
environmental clearance for the existing sponge iron plant is recently
accorded, the Committee agreed for the preparation of revised and updated
EIA/EMP incorporating following as additional TORs :
1. Actual land requirement, classification of land, current status of
acquisition of land with break-up details (Government / Private /
2. Data on air emissions, wastewater generation and solid waste
management for the existing plant should be incorporated.
3. Point-wise compliance to the specific and general conditions
stipulated in the environmental clearance for the existing plant.
4. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on
the surrounding environment after expansion should be assessed and provided.
5. An action plan to control secondary fugitive emissions after
expansion as per latest standards issued by the Ministry in May, 2008 and
monitoring should be included.
6. Permission for the drawl of 3,180 m3/day water from
Jhargram Municipality / PHE department and water balance data including quantity
of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged is to be provided.
7. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation should be
included.
8. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly use of Char in FBC boiler should be
included.
9. A plan for the utilization of gases in the WHRB for generating
power should be incorporated.
10. End use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
11. Provision of Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for
the Chrome slag and its end use should be included. Proposal for the recovery of the Ferro chrome
from the slag and its proper disposal should be mentioned.
12. Commitment that no Ferro chrome will be manufactured without prior
approval of the Ministry.
13. Energy balance data for Sponge Iron Plant, Ferro Alloy Plant and
Captive Power Plant should be included.
14. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
15. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project.
16. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
17. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
18. Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for
the Sponge Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
The Expert Committee (Industry) recommended that the PAs may be
communicated the above additional ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the final EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA in
the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the MOEF
for prior environmental clearance. Due to expansion of the proposed unit in the
same campus, the Committee recommended the proposal as per Section 7 (ii) of
EIA Notification, 2006 requiring no public hearing.
4.28 Expansion of Sponge Iron Plant (42,000 TPA to 1,02,000 TPA) and Captive Power Plant (7.5 MW) at
Lohamellya, P.O. Montipa Mohanpur, Jhargram, District Paschim Medinipur, West
Bengal by M/s Aryavrata Trading Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Sponge iron Plants with > 200 TPD have been listed at S.N. 3(a) under
Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level. Capacity of the proposed sponge iron plant is
300 TPD.
M/s Aryavrata Trading Pvt. Ltd. has proposed to expand its Sponge Iron Plant (42,000 TPA to 1,02,000 TPA) finished product by installing 2x100 TPD
Rotary kiln and 7.5 MW CPP unit at Lohamellya, P. O. Montipa Mohanpur,
Jhargram, District Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal. During presentation, PAs informed that the
capacity of Sponge Iron plant is being enhanced from 42,000 TPA to 1,02,000
TPA. The proposed expansion will be taking place within existing premises
covering an area of
Existing plant consists of three lines with 40 TPD, 50 TPD and 50
TPD Rotary kilns. Proposed expansion will be carried out in 3 phases continuously
by installing one 100 TPD rotary kiln in the Phase-1 and another in
Phase-2. Phase-3 involves setting up of
WHRB (2 x 11 TPH, 5 MW) & AFBC (24 TPH, 2.5 MW) based CPP of capacity 7.5
MW. Installation of WHRB and AFBC in Phase 3 is not acceptable to the Committee
and asked to install simultaneously.
Main raw materials required are Iron ore (93,000 TPA) and Dolomite
(2,400 TPA). Coal (84,000 TPA) will be used as a fuel as well as ore reductant.
Waste gases from the kiln will pass through a dust settling
chamber where heavier particles will settle down. Thereafter, the flue gases
pass through an After Burning Chamber (ABC) where un-burnt CO will be
completely burnt in presence of excess air. Water is sprayed in ABC where the
dust particles coagulate and settle in Dust settling tank. After the ABC, the
kiln off gases will be carried through a duct to the gas-conditioning tower
(GCT), where water will be sprayed to settle the SPM as well as to cool down
and then passed through an ESP and finally vented in to atmosphere through a
chimney. After the installation of WHRB, the waste gases from ABC will passed
through the WHRB to recover the sensible heat and thereby, cool the gases
before entering the ESP. Water sprinkler arrangement will be used in the proposed
expansion for wetting the dry ash. ESP dust from hoppers will be conveyed
through a pug mill where it is sprayed with water. ESP will be provided to
WHRB, AFBC and Kilns. Gaseous emissions from AFBC boiler will be passed through
ESP and disposed through high stack. Particulate matter will be generated from
various sources like rotary kilns, CPP, vehicles and DG sets etc. Dust
suppression system comprising of bag filters with cyclones will be installed in
raw material handling and product handling sections. Dry fogging/misting system
will be installed at all the material transfer points to restrain the fugitive
dust from escaping in to surrounding area. All the internal roads will be
either asphalted or concreted.
Total ground water requirement for the rotary kiln and CPP will be
340 m3/day and 1,320 m3/day respectively for make-up and
the required permission is under the process of approval. Thus, total ground
water requirement will be 1,660 m3/day. Wastewater from water treatment plant and
cooling tower blow down will be collected and used for dust suppression. Boiler blow down and backwash from CPP will
be neutralized and treated before recycling or use in gardening/ dust
suppression. Kiln cooling water will be recirculated. The gas conditioning tower
quenching water will also be re-circulated after settling the SPM. The ablution
/ domestic use water will be discharged through septic tanks and soak pits
within the boundary of the plant. A guard drain will be provided around the
plant to collect rain water and disposed outside through a single outlet
through a holding tank for gravity separation of particulates.
Dolochar will be used as fuel in AFBC alongwith coal fines.
PAs also informed that green belt will be developed in
Total power requirement after the proposed expansion is revised to
1100 KVA instead of 1500 KVA proposed earlier and will be sourced from
WBSEB. 280 TPD of coal as fuel will be
used in the rotary kiln. In the CPP, WHRB utilizes the waste gases from the
kiln, whereas the AFBC will utilize fresh coal (8120 TPA), coal fines (9477
TPA) and Char (9758 TPA) from Sponge Iron plant. DG sets of capacity 500 KVA
and 750 KVA will be installed and will run on HSD.
After detailed
deliberations, the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the
proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Actual land requirement, classification of land, acquisition
status should be incorporated.
3. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests
within
4. A list of industries containing name and type in
5. List of raw material required and source should be included.
6. Manufacturing process details of the Sponge Iron Plant should be
included.
7. Data on air emissions, wastewater generation and solid waste
management for the existing plant should be incorporated.
8. ‘Consent to Establish’ issued by the WBPCB for the existing plant.
9. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
10. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
11. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical characterization
of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
12. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features.
13. Air quality modeling for Sponge Plant, WHRB and AFBC for specific
pollutants needs to be done. APCS for
the control of emissions from the kiln, AFBC and WHRB should also be included.
14. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided.
15. An action plan to control secondary fugitive emissions as per
latest standards issued by the Ministry in May, 2008 and monitoring should be
included.
16. One season data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is
necessary.
17. Permission for the drawl of 1,660 m3/day ground water
from the SGWB/CGWA and water balance data including quantity of effluent
generated, recycled and reused and discharged is to be provided.
18. Justification for the use of 1,660 m3/day ground water
and methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation should also be
included.
19. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
20. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
21. A commitment regarding installation of WHRB and AFBC simultaneously
and not in Phase 3 as proposed should be included.
22. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly use of Char in FBC boiler should be
included.
23. A plan for the utilization of gases in the WHRB for generating
power should be incorporated.
24. Energy balance data for Sponge Iron Plant should be included.
25. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
26. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
27. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
28. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
29. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project.
30. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
31. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
32. Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for
the Sponge Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
The Expert Committee (Industry)
recommended that the PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the
preparation of final EIA/EMP. As soon as the final EIA/EMP report is prepared
as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA
Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the MOEF for prior
environmental clearance. The Committee noted that no public hearing is required
due to expansion of the proposed unit in the same campus as per Section 7 (ii)
of EIA Notification, 2006.
4.29 Expansion of Steel Plant at Topadihi, P.O. Barbil, District Keonjhar,
Orissa by M/s Deepak Steel & Power Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
steel plants have been listed at S.N. 3(a) under Category ‘A’ and appraised at
the Central level.
M/s Deepak Steel & power Ltd. has
proposed for Phase-I &
Phase-II expansion of Sponge Iron Plant at Topadihi, P.O. Barbil, District
Keonjhar, Orissa. The land acquired for the proposed project will
be
Facilities |
Existing |
Phase-I |
Phase-II
|
Combined Phase-I & II |
DRI Plant |
2x50 TPD 2x100 TPD 1x350 TPD |
-- |
1x350 TPD |
1x350 TPD |
Mini Blast Furnace |
-- |
1,50,000 TPA ( |
-- |
1,50,000 TPA ( |
Induction Furnace |
-- |
1x7T; 2x15T |
2x20 T |
1x7T, 2x15T, 2x20 T |
CCM |
-- |
1,10,000 MTPA (7/11 meter) |
-- |
1,10,000 MTPA (7/11 meter) |
Captive Power Plant WHRB AFBC |
4 MW 4 MW |
-- |
8x2 MW 12x2 MW |
8x2 MW 12x2 MW |
The existing plant has 2x50 TPD (12,000
TPA capacity each) and 2x100 TPD (24,000 TPA capacity each) sponge Iron kilns.
During presentation, PAs informed that another 1x350 TPD Sponge iron plant is
under construction. Sponge Iron plant (1x350 TPD), WHRB based power plant (2x8
MW), Concast (7/11 meter, 110000 TPA), Induction furnace (1x7T, 2x15T and 2x20
T) and Mini blast furnace (
Raw materials required will be Iron ore
lumps, Coke/coke, Quartzite, Dolomite, Sponge Iron, Pig Iron and hot
metal.
ESP and bag filters will be provided to
Sponge iron plant. Bag filters with cyclone will be provided to Mini Blast
Furnace. Pulse jet bag filters will be provided to Induction furnace. ESP will
be provided to Power plant. Fume extraction system followed by exhaust through
stack will be provided to Continuous Casting Machine. Dust will be generated
during transportation of raw materials and construction. Coal/iron ore
screening zone, raw material stock yards, ground hoppers, converyor belts and
solid waste dumpyards will be provided with water sprinklers and water foggers.
All internal plant roads will be asphalted and plant surface will be concreted
to avoid fugitive emissions.
Total water requirement from Topadihi
nala, a tributary of Karo river will be 200 m3/hr. No industrial
effluent will be generated as the exhaust water is recirculated through cooling
tower and water basin. Domestic effluent will be discharged to soakpit via
septic tank. STP is also proposed. Domestic wastewater will be used for
hardening purposes inside the plant itself. Zero discharge will be adopted.
Char, Slag and Flyash will be dumped in a land area of
Green belt will be developed in 33 %
area. Noise generated from Rotary kiln and vehicular movement will be within
permissible limits. Adequate measures will be taken to minimize sound pollution
below the pollution norms.
Power required will be sourced from CPP (WHRB & AFBC)
and Grid, respectively. Coal (1,30,000 TPA) for DR plant and Light Diesel oil
(2000 LPD) will be used as start-up fuels for DR Kiln and FBB.
After deliberating on the facts
presented the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal
for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs :
1.
Present land
use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2.
Location of
national parks / wildlife sanctuary within
3.
Permission
and recommendations of the State Forest Department regarding impact of proposed
expansion on the surrounding reserve forests, if any, should be included.
4.
Actual land
requirement, classification of land, current status of acquisition of land with
break-up details (Government / Private /
5.
Current
status of construction activities for phase I and phase II should be included.
6.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed
and direction and rainfall should be collected.
7.
A list of
industries containing name and type in
8.
Residential
colony should be located in upwind direction.
9.
List of raw
material required and source should be included.
10. Manufacturing process details for all
the plants viz. DRI Plant, Blast Furnace, Induction Furnace, Continuous Casting
Machine, Captive Power Plant (WHRB & AFBC) etc. should be included.
11. Data on air emissions, wastewater
generation and solid waste management for the existing plant should be
incorporated.
12. Ambient air quality at 8 locations
within the study area of
13. The suspended particulate matter present
in the ambient air must be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and for
incorporating of RSPM data.
14. Impact of the transport of raw material
and finished product on the surrounding environment should be assessed and
provided
15. Determination of atmospheric inversion
level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of
pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological
features. Air quality modeling for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to
be done.
16. Plant-wise air pollution control
measures proposed for the control of gaseous emissions from all the sources
should be incorporated.
17. A note on control of fugitive and
secondary emissions from as per CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be
incorporated.
18. One season data for gaseous emissions
during winter season is necessary.
19. Permission for the drawl of 200 m3/hr
water from Karo river from the concerned department and water balance data
including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged
should be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.
20. Surface water quality of nearby rivers (
21. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
22. A note on treatment of wastewater from
different plants including coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for different
purposes should be included.
23. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste
generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly char and fly ash.
Assurance that 100 % char will be used in the FBC boiler and copies of MOU
regarding utilization of ash should be included.
24. MOU signed with the Cement manufacturers
for utilizing granulated BF slag should be included.
25. Generation and utilization of waste/fuel
gases from BF plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be set out.
26. Risk assessment and damage control needs
to be addressed.
27. Occupational health of the workers needs
elaboration.
28. Green belt development plan in 33 % area
and a scheme for rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
29. Socio-economic development activities
need to be elaborated upon.
30. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
31. An Action Plan for the implementation of
the recommendations made for the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be
prepared.
32. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be
included.
33. A tabular chart for the issues raised
and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be provided.
34. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposal should also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided
that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
Orissa Pollution Control Board (OPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA
Notification, 2006. On finalization of
EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out EIA/EMP should be
submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.30 Expansion of Sponge Iron Plant (Phase-II) at Topadhi, P.O. Barbil,
District Keonjhar, Orissa by M/s Deepak Steel & power Ltd. (TOR)
The Committee asked PAs to merge proposal
for phase II with the phase I so that both the proposal are considered together
since both are located in the same campus. Therefore, this file is closed after
merging proposal for phase II with phase I.
4.31 Expansion of Sponge Iron Plant (57,600 TPA) with Captive Power Plant (15 MW), MS
ingot (1,72,800 TPA) & Ferro Alloy Plant (23,460 TPA) at Village & Post Barjora, District Bankura, West Bengal by M/s M.
B. Ispat Corporation Limited (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Sponge iron Plants (<200 TPD) have been listed at S.N. 3(a) under Category
‘A’ and appraised at the Central level due to non-existent of SEIAA/SEAC at the
State level in the State of Orissa. Capacity
of the proposed sponge iron plant is 300 TPD.
M/s M. B. Ispat Corporation Limited has proposed to expand its existing Sponge Iron unit at Village & Post Barjora, District
Bankura,
Sponge iron plant (2x100 TPD) exists in the present premises.
Proposed expansion involves the setting up of Sponge Iron plant (3x100 TPD,
90,000 TPA), Captive Power Plant (15 MW; AFBC 1x11 MW; WHRB 2x2 MW), Ferro
Alloy Plant (2x9 MVA, 23,460 TPA), Induction furnace (4x15T, 1,72,800 TPA),
Ladle Refining Furnace (1x18T), AOD
Converter (1x25 T), Continuous Casting Machine (1x3 Strands). Following are the
details of the existing and proposed facilities:
S.N |
Facilities |
Existing |
Proposed expansion |
1 |
Sponge Iron plant |
(2x100 TPD) |
(3x100 TPD) |
2 |
Ferro alloys Plant |
-- |
(2x9 MVA) |
3 |
Induction Furnace |
-- |
4x15 T |
4 |
Ladle Refining Furnace |
-- |
1x18 T |
5 |
AOD Converter |
-- |
1x25 T |
6 |
Continuous Casting Machine |
-- |
1x3 Strands |
7 |
Captive Power Plant AFBC WHRB |
-- |
15 MW 1x11 MW 2x2 MW |
Following will be the products from the
existing and proposed facilities:
S.N |
Products |
Existing |
Proposed |
1 |
Sponge Iron |
57,600 TPA |
90,000 TPA |
2 |
Ferro alloys |
-- |
23,460 TPA |
3 |
Ingots |
-- |
1,72,800 TPA |
4 |
Power |
-- |
15 MW |
Raw materials required will be Iron ore
(1,44,000 TPA), Coal (14,400 TPA),
Manganese ore (33385 TPA for the production of Fe-Mn & 17812 TPA for the
production of Si-Mn) and Dolomite (4500 TPA).
ESPs will be installed in DRI plant, AFBC boiler to bring down the
particulate matter in the exhaust gas to <100 mg/m3 to comply
with CREP recommendations. Bag filters
will be provided to control the fugitive emissions from Ferro alloys plant and
Raw material handling section. Bag filters will be utilized to control the
particulate matter emissions from Induction furnace. Clean BOF gas after
primary de-dusting and scrubbing will be used as a gaseous fuel in the steel plant.
Centralized vacuum cleaner for cleaning dust
depositions in the upper floors of converter where bulk material handling
operations take place. De-dusting units
will be connected to After Burning Chamber (ABC) and finally emitted through
common stack with kiln off-gas emissions. All the de-dusting units will be
connected to a stack having a minimum height of 30m. Fugitive emission from material handling,
conveying and screening operations will be controlled by Fabric filters or
ESPs. Water sprinkling arrangement will be provided at raw material heaps and
on land around crushing and screening units for dust suppression. Fume
extraction system will be provided to the smelting unit. Fumes generated will
be sucked through a hood/canopy suitable located above the main furnace and
shall be carried by means of a blower through ducting system and bag filter to
the chimney for discharging it to the atmosphere. Dry fogging system will be
installed to control fugitive emissions.
Total water requirement for the unit will be 2,190 KLD and will be
sourced from Barjora Panchayet Samity, which receives water from
At present, the char generated in the plant is being partly stored
and partly sold as briquettes. After installation of AFBC, the Char (36,000
TPA) generated will be used in AFBC boiler for power generation. Ferro
Manganese Slag (20,640 TPA) generated will be used in the manufacture of
Silico-Manganese. Silico-Manganese slag (25,806 TPA) will be used as boulders
for road / land development. Induction furnace slag (16,000 TPA) will be used
for land leveling, compacting of roads. Bag filter dust (100 TPA) will be sent
to sinter plants. Mill scales (200 TPA) will be used for land development.
Steel scarp (2400 TPA) will be re-used in the SMS. Fly ash (25,000 TPA) will be
used for cement or brick manufacturing. Collected dusts and/or sludge from IF
will be re-cycled. All the wastes from pollution control systems will be
re-used or recycled to the extent possible.
Existing green belt sprawls over a
Noise
will be generated from Induction furnace, DRI plant, AFBC, WHRB, Turbo
generator and Ferro alloys plant. Ear muffs / ear plugs will be provided to
employees working in high noise prone areas. Over exposure of employees to high
noise will be avoided. Total power requirement of 25 MW, instead of 15 MW
proposed earlier, will be sourced from Captive power plant as well as West
Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. A 1x900 KVA DG set
running on Diesel (150 lit/hr) will be installed to provide the necessary
power-backup.
After
detailed deliberations, the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended
the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1. Present land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery.
2. Actual land requirement, classification of land, acquisition
status, rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of West
Bengal should be incorporated.
3. Location of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests
within
4. A list of industries containing name and type in
5. List of raw material required and source should be included.
6. Manufacturing process details of the Sponge Iron plant, Ferro
Alloy Plant, Induction Furnace, Ladle Refining Furnace, AOD Converter,
Continuous Casting Machine, Captive Power Plant (AFBC & WHRB) etc. should
be included.
7. Data on air emissions, wastewater generation and solid waste
management for the existing plant should be incorporated.
8. Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature,
relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall should be
collected.
9. Ambient air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
10. The suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must
be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene
soluble fraction. Chemical
characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
11. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site
and assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack
emission based on site-specific meteorological features.
12. Air quality modeling for all the plants proposed for specific
pollutants needs to be done. APCS for
the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be included.
13. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on
the surrounding environment should be assessed and provided.
14. An action plan to control secondary fugitive emissions as per
latest standards issued by the Ministry in May, 2008 and monitoring should be
included.
15. One season data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is
necessary.
16. Permission / copy of MOU signed with the Samity for the drawl of
2,190 m3/day water from Barjora Panchayet Samity and water balance
data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and
discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water
conservation should also be included.
17. Surface water quality of nearby river (
18. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid
waste dump zone, Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study
area are essential as also. Ecological
status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
19. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal particularly use of Char in FBC boiler should be
included.
20. End use of solid waste and its composition should be covered.
Toxic metal content in the waste material and its composition should also be
incorporated particularly of slag.
21. Provision of Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for
the slag and its end use should be included.
Proposal for the recovery of the Ferro chrome from the slag, if proposed
to be manufactured, and its proper disposal should be mentioned.
22. Commitment that no Ferro chrome will be manufactured without prior
approval of the Ministry.
23. A plan for the utilization of gases in the WHRB for generating
power should be incorporated.
24. Energy balance data for Sponge Iron Plant, Ferro Alloy Plant and
Captive Power Plant should be included.
25. Risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed.
26. Occupational health of the workers needs elaboration.
27. Green belt development plan in 33 % area and a scheme for
rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
28. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon.
29. A note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit
project.
30. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
pollution control measures should also be included.
31. A tabular chart for the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
32. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
33. Action Plan for the implementation of the recommendations made for
the Steel Plants in the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
The Expert Committee (Industry) recommended that the PAs
may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA
in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the West
Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA
Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs and
addressing and incorporating all concerns raised by public hearing / public
consultation, the same should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental
clearance.
4.32 Ferro Alloy Plant (70,372 TPA) alongwith
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Ferro Alloy Plants are kept at S.N. 3(a) under primary metallurgical industry under
category ‘A’ and appraised at Central level.
M/s M. B. Ispat Corporation Limited has proposed to set up Ferro Alloy Plant (4x9 MVA) alongwith Iron Ore Screening Plant (1x50 TPH; 1,80,000 TPA) at Village Bamunara, Bamunara Industrial Area, District Burdwan,
Ferro Manganese (40,059 TPA),
Silico-Manganese (30,313 TPA), Iron ore (>
Main Raw materials required for Ferro
Manganese production will be Manganese ore (100148 TPA) and Dolomite (10815.93
TPA). For Silico-Manganese production, the raw materials required will be
Manganese ore (1,00,148 TPA) and Dolomite (8,185 TPA). Iron ore lumps required
for Screening Plant will be 1,80,000 TPA.
Fugitive emission from material handling, conveying and screening
operations will be controlled by Fabric filters or ESPs. Fugitive emissions will be treated by
dampening and / by the use of crust formers.
Fume extraction system will be provided to the smelting unit. Fumes
generated will be sucked through a hood/canopy suitable located above the main
furnace and shall be carried by means of a blower through ducting system and
bag filter to the chimney for discharging it to the atmosphere. Bag filters
will be provided to Iron screening plant. During presentation, PAs informed
that Dry fogging system will be provided at raw material handling area and
material transfer points to control fugitive emissions.
Total water requirement of 80 KLD will
be met from ADDA/borewell and PAs have applied to the Ground Water Authority
for necessary permission. ‘Zero’ discharge will be adopted in the plant. Domestic effluent will be used in greenbelt
and for dust suppression.
Ferro Manganese slag (35,252) will be
consumed in the production of Silico-Manganese.
Silico-Manganese Slag (33,344 TPA) will be used for road / land
development. All efforts will be made to minimize the generation of wastes and
maximize utilization of wastes. Wherever it becomes unavoidable, except
resorting to option of dumping, in that cases, the wastes will be disposed
under controlled conditions. All the
wastes from pollution control systems will be re-used or recycled to the extent
possible.
Green belt is proposed in
After deliberating on the facts
presented before the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the
proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
1.
‘Proof’ /
‘Notification’ issued by the State Govt. indicating location of the project in
notified Bamunara Industrial Area should
be incorporated.
2.
Present land
use based on satellite imagery should be incorporated.
3.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
4.
Location of
National Park and Wild life sanctuary within
5.
Permission
and recommendations of the State Forest Department regarding impact of proposed
expansion on the surrounding reserve forests, if any, should be included.
6.
List of raw
material required and source should be included.
7.
Design
details of Submerged Arc Furnace and Iron Ore Screening Plant and manufacturing
process details should be included. Provision of close type of Iron Ore Screening
Plant should be included.
8.
Ambient air
quality at 8 locations within the study area of
9.
Ambient air
quality modeling for Ferro Alloy Plant and Iron Ore Screening Plant should be
included.
10. Methods to control emissions from the
Submerged Arc Furnace and Iron Ore Screening Plant should be included.
11. One season data for gaseous emissions
and inclusion of existing emission data should be ensured.
12. An action plan to control and monitor
secondary fugitive emissions as per CPCB guidelines should be included.
13. Determination of atmospheric inversion
level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of
pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological
features.
14. ‘Permission’ for the drawl of 80 m3/day
water from from ADDA / borewell from the concerned department/SGWB/CGWA should
be included. Water balance cycle data
including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged
should be incorporated.
15. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and also near solid waste dump zone should be carried out. Geological
features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area and ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) should be included.
16. Solid waste generation, storage,
utilization and disposal from ferro alloy plant and iron ore screening plant
should be included.
17. End use of solid waste and its
composition should be covered. Toxic
metal content in the waste material and its composition should also be
incorporated particularly of slag.
18. Provision of Toxic Chemical Leachability
Potential (TCLP) test for the Chrome slag and its end use should be
included. Proposal for the recovery of
the Ferro chrome from the slag and its proper disposal should be mentioned, if
applicable.
19. Commitment that no Ferro chrome will be
manufactured without prior approval of the Ministry.
20. Risk assessment and damage control
should be included.
21. Occupational health of the workers
should be incorporated.
22. An action plan to develop green belt in
33 % area should be included.
23. Scheme for rainwater harvesting should
be incorporated.
24. Socio economic development activities
should be in place.
25. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum
for environmental pollution control measures should also be included.
26. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposal should also be included.
27. Compliance to the recommendations
mentioned in the CREP guidelines should be included.
The
Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be communicated the above
‘TORs’ for the preparation of final EIA/EMP.
As soon as the final EIA/EMP report is prepared as per the ‘General
Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006,
the same may be submitted by the PAs to the MOEF for prior environmental
clearance. It is also noted that no public hearing/consultation is required due
to project being located in notified Bamunara Industrial Area as per Section (iii), Stage (3),
4.33 Setting up of Ferro Alloy Plant
(High Carbon Ferro Manganese, 15,224 TPA & Silico Manganese 11,455 TPA) in
existing M.S. Ingot Plant at Mouza Nacrajoria, P.S. Salanpur, District Burdwan,
West Bengal by M/s Hira Concast (Pvt.) Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
All the Ferro Alloy Plants are kept at S.N. 3(a) (b) under Primary
Metallurgical Industry under Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level.
M/s Hira Concast (Pvt.) Ltd. have
proposed for setting up of Ferro Alloy Plant (High Carbon Ferro Manganese,
15,224 TPA & Silico Manganese 11,455 TPA) in existing M.S. Ingot Plant at
Mouza Nacrajoria, P.S. Salanpur, District Burdwan, West Bengal. The proposed expansion by
installation of submerged Arc Furnace (7.5 MVA) will be carried out in the
existing campus and no additional land will be required. Total land acquired is
Product |
Installed
Capacity (TPA) |
1st
Year |
2nd
Year |
3rd
year |
High Carbon
Ferro Manganese |
15,225 |
12,180 |
12,941 |
13,702 |
Silico
Manganese |
11,455 |
9,164 |
9,737 |
10,310 |
Mn ore (42,000 TPA), Coke Coal (15,000 TPA) and Dolomite (5,000
TPA) will be used as raw material.
One Submerged Arc Furnace (7.5 MVA) will be provided during the
expansion to manufacture High Carbon Ferro Manganese. M.S. Ingot manufacturing
facility (2x7 MT) Induction Furnace) exist and SAF (7.5 MVA) will be installed
to make use of product in ingot manufacturing unit. Metallic ore (Oxides of Fe,
Si, Mn) and carbon-source reducing agent (coke, charcoal), a flux material
(Limestone) will be fed to SAF. The
carbon source reacts with metal oxides to form CO and to reduce the ores to
base metal. The hot metal liquid will be
tapped into a sand bed prepared moulds or cast iron pans. Slag will be
collected separately. Silico-Manganese (11,450 MTPA) or Ferro-Manganese (15,225
MTPA) will be manufactured.
Bag filters will be provided to the submerged arc furnace to
control gaseous emissions within 150 mg/Nm3. Smoke hood, heat exchanger, bag filter,
inducted dust (ID) fan and stack (
Total ground water
requirement will be 6 m3/day.
No water will be discharged from the cooling system due to use for slag
cooling, dust suppression etc. Softener
back wash will be neutralized and used for dust suppression. No industrial waste will be generated due to
recycle/reuse of the treated wastewater.
Domestic wastewater will be treated in septic tank followed by soak pit.
Slag will be
generated as solid waste and disposed by filling low lying area and making
roads within the factory premises. Dust collected from bag filter will be
collected and recharged in the furnace.
Green belt will be
developed in 33 % area. Power (8000 KVA) will be sourced from Damodar Valley
Corporation (DVC). 1x125 KVA DG sets
will be installed.
Due to expansion of
the proposed unit in the same campus, the Committee recommended the proposal as
per Section 7 (ii) of EIA Notification, 2006 requiring no public hearing. The
Committee recommended the proposal for environment clearance subject to
stipulation of following specific conditions alongwith other environmental
conditions:
4.34 Expansion of Ferro Alloy Plant
(installation of 9 MVA SAF, Ferro Manganese 18,000 MTPA, Silico–Manganese, 13,540 MTPA) at Village Ghutgoria, P.O. Barjora, District Bankura, West
Bengal by M/s Cosmic Ferro Alloys Ltd. (EC).
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Ferro Alloy Plants are kept at S.N. 3(a) (b) under Primary Metallurgical
Industry under Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level.
M/s Cosmic Ferro Alloys Ltd. have
proposed for the expansion of Ferro Alloy Plant (installation of 9 MVA SAF,
Ferro Manganese 18,000 MTPA, Silico–Manganese, 13,540 MTPA) at Village
Ghutgoria, P.O. Barjora, District Bankura,
Product |
Installed
capacity |
1st
year |
2nd
year |
3rd
year |
High Carbon
Ferro-Manganese |
18,000 |
14,400 |
15,300 |
16,200 |
Silico -
Manganese |
13,540 |
10,832 |
11,509 |
12,186 |
Mn ore (42,000 TPA), Coke Coal (15,000 TPA) and Dolomite (5,000
TPA) will be used as raw material. Ferro
alloy manufacturing will involve melting of Manganese ore and reduction
smelting of the ore with coal / coke.
The molten alloy will be poured into mould with the help of ladle. The mould will be cooled by circulation of
cold water with the help of cooling tower.
Hot metal will be tapped in a sand bed prepared moulds or cast iron
pans. The alloy remains in the ladle
while slag is skimmed. The slag will be
collected separately.
Gaseous emissions from Submerged Arc
Furnace will be controlled by providing smoke hood, heat exchanger, bag filter,
inducted draft fan and stacks of adequate height (
Total ground water requirement will be 6
m3/day. The water will be used for slag cooling. The softener back wash will be neutralized
and used for dust suppression on. No
liquid effluent will be disposed outside the premises. Domestic wastewater will be treated in septic
tank followed by soak pit.
All the solid waste will
be 100% utilized. The slag will be used
as raw material for manufacturing Silico-Manganese. Slag will also be used for
land filling and road constructions.
Dust collected from bag filter will be collected and recharged in the
furnace.
Out
of
Due to expansion of the proposed unit in
the same campus, the Committee recommended the proposal as per Section 7 (ii)
of EIA Notification, 2006 requiring no public hearing. The Committee
recommended the proposal for environment clearance subject to stipulation of
following specific conditions alongwith other environmental conditions:
1.
Continuous
monitoring facilities for all the stacks and sufficient air pollution control
equipments viz. fume extraction system with bag filters, I D fan and stack of
adequate height to submerged arc furnace should be provided to control
emissions below 100 mg/Nm3.
2.
Secondary
fugitive emissions from all the sources should be controlled within the latest
permissible limits issued by the Ministry and regularly monitored. Guidelines /
Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be followed.
3.
Prior
permission for the drawl of 6 m3/day ground water should be obtained
from State Ground Water Board/Central Ground Water Authority (SGWB/CGWA).
4.
Proper
handling, storage, utilization and disposal of all the solid waste shall be
ensured and regular report regarding toxic metal content in the waste material
and its composition, end use of solid/hazardous waste should be submitted to
the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhuvaneswar, WBPCB and CPCB.
5. All the ferro alloy slag should be used
for land filling inside the plant or used as building material only after
passing through Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test. Otherwise, hazardous substances should be
recovered from the slag and output waste and be disposed in secured landfill as
per CPCB guidelines.
6.
Slag produced
in Ferro Manganese (Fe-Mn) production should be used in manufacture Silico
Manganese (Si-Mn).
7.
Green belt
should be developed in at least 33 % area.
8.
All the
recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate Responsibility for Environment
Protection (CREP) for the Ferro Alloy Units should be strictly implemented.
4.35 Expansion of Ferro Alloys manufacturing
unit (1,800 TPA) at Sector-II, Falta Special Economic Zone, P. O. Panarhat, PS
Falta, District 24-Pargana, West Bengal by M/s DRK metallurgical Pvt. Ltd.-
(EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
Ferro Alloy Plants are kept at S.N. 3(a) (b) under Primary Metallurgical
Industry under Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level.
M/s
DRK metallurgical Pvt. Ltd. has proposed to expand the
existing Ferro Alloys
manufacturing unit (1,800 TPA) at Sector-II, Falta Special Economic Zone, P. O.
Panarhat, P.S. Falta, District 24-Pargana, West Bengal. The project is located in the Falta SEZ developed by the Govt. of
India. Out of
The existing unit is manufacturing Ferro Vanadium (450 MTPA),
Ferro Molybdenum (300 MTPA), Ferro Tungsten (96 MTPA), Ferro Nickel (70 MTPA)
and Cobalt oxide (19.20 MTPA). Out of Ferro Titanium (360 TPA), Ferro
Manganese-LCAMC (360 TPA), LC Ferro Chrome (360 TPA), Ferro Nickel (480 TPA),
Molybdenum Oxide (240 TPA), any one or two product will be manufactured at a
time during proposed expansion.
Raw materials required will be Aluminium powder (700 MTPA), Lime
(80 MTPA), Mill scale (800 MTPA), Fluorspar (60 MTPA), Silico Manganese (360
MTPA),
Proposed products will be manufactured by a pyrometallurgical
process. Raw materials will be charged into sand pits lined with refractory
materials. Reaction is set in with a Magnesium sparkler. Aluminous thermic
reaction is highly exothermic and temperature shoots up to 2500oC in
the molten condition. Reaction time is
hardly 2 minutes. Slag and metals are separated after cooling and
solidification.
Dust collection system will be
provided for arresting dust. Fumes generated during the charging process will
be taken to the multi-cyclone through a hood connected with duct line using an
ID fan. Particulate matter will be separated in the multi-cyclone and gaseous
substance will be scrubbed in the wet scrubber, where water is sprayed and
finally the clean gas will be vented to atmosphere through a chimney of height
Water
requirement of 15.34 m3/day (existing) is being supplied by SEZ
Authority. No additional water is required for the proposed expansion. Water
from the scrubbing system will be recycled. No liquid effluent is discharged in
the process. Domestic wastewater will be discharged to septic tank and
secondary filter media. Industrial waste
water us recyled in the process.
All the product related wastes will be re-used in the process.
Only solid slag will be disposed off as per present practice.
Green
belt will be developed in 33% of project area. Noise from construction
machinery will be in the range of 85-95 dB(A) at source and 70 dB(A) at the
factory boundary. Existing sanctioned
power from WBSEB is 48 MW. No additional power/fuel will be required for the
proposed expansion. LDO/ FO (500 ltrs/day) is being used for combustion in the
furnaces.
The Committee (Industry) noted that no public hearing/consultation
is required due to project being located in notified Falta Special Economic Zone, P. O.
Panarhat, P.S. Falta, District 24-Pargana, West Bengal as per Section (iii), Stage (3), Para (i)(b) of EIA Notification,
2006 and recommended stipulation of following specific conditions alongwith
other specific and general conditions :
4.36 Cement Plant (2.5 MTPA Clinker Plant, 1.0 MTPA Grinding Plant),
Captive Power Plant (25 MW) at Village Lodhava, Tehsil Sutrapda, District
Junagarh,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
cement plants (> 1.0 MTPA) are listed at S.N. 3(b) under Category ‘A’ and
appraised at the Central level.
M/s Binani Cements
Ltd. have proposed for the Cement Plant (2.5 MTPA, Clinker Plant, 1.0 MTPA
Grinding Plant), Captive Power Plant (25 MW) at Village Lodhava and Captive
Limestone Mine (3.75 MTPA,
Limestone (3.75
MTP) from Captive mining lease, imported coal (1150 TPD)/ or lignite (600 TPD)
from Gujarat Lignite Mines, gypsum (0.07 MTPA), Sand stone, Laterite clay, iron
ore, fly ash etc. will be used as raw materials. OPC (35-40%) and PPC (60-65%)
will be manufactured.
A satellite grinding unit (1.0 MTPA) is proposed near Bharuch,
Particulate matter will be generated from cement plant and
CPP. High efficiency bag filters and ESP
will be provided to clinker cooler and CPP to control particulate matter. Adequate stack height will be provided to
disperse pollutants. Fugitive emissions will be generated from material
handling and transportation areas. Dust
emissions will be controlled by water spraying Bag house will be provided to
raw mill. ESP will be provided to
clinker cooler, coal mill, cement mill and CPP.
Bag filters will be provided at all unloading, Storage & transfer
points. Water sprinkling systems will be
provided in raw material storage areas and haul roads and dust generating
areas. On-line dust monitors will be provided. Dust collectors will be provided
for control of Kiln and Cooler emission.
Total ground water requirement will be 1,500 m3/day and
the necessary approval is under processing.
No wastewater will be generated from the cement plant. Domestic effluent will be treated in sewage
treatment plant (STP) followed by soak pits. Water treatment plant effluent
will be utilized for greenbelt development. PAs vide letter dated 23rd
July, 2008 informed that hydro geological studies will be carried out to
inspect the effect of limestone mining on ground water and will be reported in
the EIA report.
No solid waste will be generated from the process. Fly ash generated from CPP will be used in
cement plant for manufacturing Pozzolana Portland Cement (PPC). Bed ash will be used in the raw mix for
clinker production. Used oil will be sent to registered recyclers. Material from ESP and bag filter will be
stored in cement storage silo.
Green belt will be
developed in 33% of plant area. Power (30 MW) will be required from cement
plant and mine. A CPP (25 MW) will be
installed and 5 MW power will be sourced from state grid. Coal and lignite will be used as fuel.
During the discussion, PAs informed to the Committee that they
have yet to prepare mine plan. Mine
lease is also yet to be approved by the Indian Bureau of Mines. Therefore,
Committee decided to exclude mine from the proposed proposal and consider only
for the Cement Plant (2.5 MTPA, Clinker Plant, 1.0 MTPA Grinding Plant) and
Captive Power Plant (25 MW). Proposal for Lime stone mine may be considered
seperately by the Mining Committee as and when mining plan is prepared and
approved by the PAs.
After deliberations and considering the facts mentioned above, the
Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the
preparation of revised EIA/EMP excluding limestone mine as per the following
TORs :
1. Revised Form I and Pre-feasibility Report for the Cement plant and
captive power plant with all the necessary annexures.
2. Present land use based on satellite imagery should be included.
3. Information on National Park/Sanctuary/Reserve Forests within
4. Actual land requirement, classification of land and acquisition
status should be included.
5. Rehabilitation and resettlement as per the policy of the Govt. of
Gujarat incorporating all relevant aspects should be incorporated.
6. Total cost of the cement plant and captive power plant; capital
cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures.
7. A list of industries containing name and type in
8. List of raw material required and source should be included.
9. Process and manufacturing details for the cement plant and captive
power plant should be included.
10. Site specific micro-meteorological data including inversion height
and mixing height should be incorporated.
11. Air quality modeling for the cement plant and captive power plant
should be incorporated.
12. Sources of secondary emissions, its control and monitoring as per
the CPCB guidelines should be included.
13. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on
the surrounding environment including agricultural land.
14. A write up on use of high calorific hazardous wastes in kiln and
commitment regarding use of hazardous waste should be included.
15. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporation of RSPM data.
Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction should be included.
16. One-month data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season
should be included.
17. Permission for the drawl of 1,500 m3/day ground water
from SGWB/CGWA should be incorporated. Water balance cycle data including
quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be
included.
18. Efforts made to minimize use of ground water should be
included. A chapter on hydrology study
by the State Govt. should be included. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations should be included.
19. Surface as well as roof top rain water harvesting and ground water
recharge should be included.
20. Scheme of proper storage of fly ash, gypsum, clinker should be
included.
21. Risk assessment and damage control should be incorporated.
22. Occupational health of the workers should be incorporated.
23. Green belt development plan for 33 % as per CPCB guidelines should
be incorporated.
24. Socio-economic development activities should be included.
25. Compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines
should be included.
26. A tabular chart of the issues raised and addressed during public
hearing/public consultation should be provided.
27. Any litigation / court case pending against the proposal should
also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP for the cement
plant and captive power plant. As soon
as the draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs
to the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) for conducting public hearing as
per EIA Notification, 2006. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs
addressing all concerns set out in EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for
prior environmental clearance.
The Committee
also decided to exclude Lime stone mine proposal from the proposed proposal and
consider only for the Cement Plant (2.5 MTPA, Clinker Plant, 1.0 MTPA Grinding
Plant) and Captive Power Plant (25 MW) due to mining plan still under
preparation and yet to be approved by the concerned authorities.
4.37 Expansion of Cement Plant
(Cement 0.30 MTPA to 0.90 MTPA; Clinker 0.60 MTPA to 1.60 MTPA) and Limestone
Mine (0.90 MTPA to 2.55 MTPA) at Village Mattapally Mandal Mattampally,
District Nalgonda, A. P. by M/s NCL Industries Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
cement plants with > 1.0 MTPA and limestone mine projects >
M/s NCL
Industries Ltd. have
proposed for the expansion of Cement Plant (cement 0.30 MTPA to
0.90 MTPA; Clinker 0.60 MTPA to 1.60 MTPA) and Limestone Mine (0.90 MTPA to
2.55 MTPA) at Village Mattapally Mandal Mattampally, District Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh. Increase in limestone (0.90 to 2.55 MTPA) in
captive lime stone mines will involve increase in lime production capacity in
following 3 mining leases :
1. Mining lease I at Mettapalli – 0.78 to 1.5 MTPA
2. Mining lease II at Sultanpur Thanda – 0.02
to 0.05 MTPA
3. Mining lease III at Gundlapalli – 0.10 to 1.0 MTPA
Total project area for cement plant is
Limestone (2.55 MTPA) will be sourced from Captive limestone mines
located at Mettapalli, Sultanpur, Thanda and Gundlapalli village. Laterite 10.048 MTPA), Gypsum (0.045 MTPA)
and coal (0.32 MTPA) will be used as raw material
Cement manufacturing process will involve limestone crushing, raw
mix preparation, homogenization, coal preparation, calcinations and
clinkerization, cement grinding and packing etc. Production capacity of cement plant will
incease by 0.6 MTPA and clinker by 1.0 MTPA.
Mining :
Sultanpur RF (adjacent), Tangeda RF (
Dust emissions will be generated from various units of cement
plant and mining activities. SO2
and NOx emissions from the kiln of cement plant will also be generated. All the pollution control equipments will be
designed to control emissions less than 50 mg/Nm3. Bag filters will be provided to Raw mill,
Coal mill, Cement mill, LS Crushers, Fine coal Bins and Silos, Preheater top
dedusting equipment, Kiln feed extraction equipment and packing plant. ESP will
be provided to Clinker cooler and Preheater waste gas equipment. Bag house and
ESP will be provided to Kiln and cooler.
Total water requirement after expansion will be 670 m3/d
instead of 1,7000 m3/d proposed earlier and sourced from River
Krishna. Permission for drawl of above quantity of water is awaited. No
wastewater will be generated from the cement plant. Domestic wastewater is presently treated in
septic tanks followed by soak pits but STP will be provided after expansion. In
mine workshop area, an oil separation tank will be provided to segregate oil
and grease from the outlet water of source camp. Treated wastewater will be used for
plantation etc. The water from mine pits
will be used for dust suppression at faces, on haul roads, cleaning and washing
HEMM and plantation etc.
No solid waste will be generated from cement plant. All the dust
collected from the process or pollution control equipments will be recycled /
reused in the process itself.
Out of
After deliberations and considering the facts mentioned above, the
Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal for the
preparation of revised EIA/EMP as per the following TORs:
TORs for Cement
Plant:
1
Revised
form-1 alongwith the earlier questionnaire for including cement and mining
sectors should be submitted while submitting EIA/EMP.
2
Present land use based on satellite
imagery. Study area should be 10Km radius.
3
Site-specific micro-meteorological data
including inversion height and mixing height.
4
Data on existing air, water, soil &
noise etc.
5
Ambient air quality monitoring modeling
for cement plant and CPP (If any).
6
Sources of secondary emissions, its
control and monitoring as per the CPCB guidelines.
7
A write up on use of high calorific
hazardous wastes including BF slag in kiln and commitment regarding use of
hazardous waste.
8
Chemical characterization of RSPM and
incorporation of RSPM data. Location of one AAQMS in downwind direction.
9
One-month data for gaseous emissions
for winter season.
10 Water balance cycle data including quantity of effluent to be
generated, recycled and reused and discharged.
11 Efforts made to minimize use of ground water. A chapter on
hydrology study by the State Govt. may be included. Ground water monitoring
minimum at 8 locations.
12 Surface as well as roof top rainwater harvesting and ground water
recharge.
13 Scheme of proper storage of fly ash, gypsum, clinker, coal.
14 Impact of transportation of raw materials
15 Risk assessment and damage control.
16 Occupational health of the workers.
17 Green belt (33%) development plan as per CPCB guidelines.
16 Socio-economic development activities.
17 Compliance to the recommendations mentioned in the CREP
guidelines.
18 Details of location of wildlife sanctuary and national parks
within
19 Detailed Environment management Plant (EMP) with specific
reference to air pollution control system, water management, monitoring
frequency, responsibility and time bound implementation plan.
20 EMP should include the concept of waste minimization, recycle /
reuse / recover techniques, energy conservation, and natural resource
conservation.
21 EMP should include a clear map for plantation/green belt.
TORs for Mines:
1.
The study area should comprise of
2.
Land use of the study area delineating forest area,
agricultural land, grazing land, wildlife sanctuary and national park,
migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human settlements and other ecological
features.
3.
Land use plan of the mine lease area should be
prepared to encompass pre-operational, operational and post operational phases.
4.
A copy of the approval of the mine lease area and
approved mine plan should be included.
5.
Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere
Reserves,
6. A detailed
biological study for the study area [core zone and buffer zone (
7. Impact of
change of land use particularly agriculture land and gaucher / grazing land, if
any.
8.
R & R plan / compensation details for the
project affected people, if any.
9.
Collection of one season (non-monsoon) primary
baseline data on ambient air quality, water quality, noise level, soil and
flora and fauna. Site-specific meteorological data should also be
collected. The location of the
monitoring stations should be justified.
10.
Air quality modeling should be carried out for
prediction of impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should
also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of
mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modeling
should be provided. The air quality contours may be shown on a location map
clearly indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive receptors,
if any and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant wind direction
may also be indicated on the map.
11.
The water requirement for the project, its
availability and source to be furnished. A detailed water balance should also
be provided. Fresh water requirement for
the project should also be indicated.
12.
Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for
drawl of 1,700 m3/day water from River Krishna for the project
should be provided.
13.
Details of water conservation measures proposed to
be adopted in the project.
14.
Impact of the project on the water quality both
surface and groundwater should be assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if
any required should be provided.
15.
Action plan for the protection of River Krishna
flowing at
16.
A chapter on the impact of mining activities on the
River Krishna and proposed remedial measures should be included.
17.
Monitoring of heavy metals and fluoride levels in
the ground water should be incorporated.
18.
Details of rainwater harvesting proposed, if any, in
the project area to be provided.
19.
Information on site elevation, working depth, ground
water table should be provided both in AMSL and BGL. A schematic diagram may also be provided for
the same. In case the working will
intersect groundwater table, a detailed hydro-geological study should be
undertaken and report furnished.
20.
Quantity of solid waste generation to be estimated
and details for its disposal and management be provided.
21.
The reclamation plan, post mine land use and
progressive greenbelt development plan should be prepared in tabular form
(prescribed format) and submitted.
22. Impact on
local transport infrastructure due to the project. Projected increase in truck
traffic as a result of the project in the present road network (including those
outside the project area) and whether it is capable of handling the increased
load. Arrangement for improving the
infrastructure, if contemplated including action to be taken by other agencies
such as State Government, if any, should be
covered.
23.
Details of the
infrastructure facilities to be provided for the mine workers.
24.
Conceptual post mine land use and Reclamation and
Rehabilitation of mined out area (with plans and with adequate number of
sections).
25.
Phase-wise plan of green belt development, plantation
and compensatory afforestation clearly indicating the area to be covered under
plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already
done should be given.
26.
Occupational health impact of the project should be
provided.
27.
Measures of socio economic influence to the local
community proposed to be provided by project proponent. As far as possible, quantitative dimension to
be given.
28.
Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate
the environmental impacts, which, should inter-alia also include the impact due
to change of land use, due to loss of agricultural land and grazing land, if
any, besides other impacts of the projects should be provided.
29.
Public hearing issues/public consultation raised and
commitment of the project proponent on the same alongwith time bound action
plan to implement the same should be provided.
30.
Any litigation pending against the project and /or
any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so,
details thereof should be provided.
The Expert
Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for
the preparation of EIA/EMP for the cement plant and captive power plant. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP report is
prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the A.P. Pollution Control
Board (APPCB) for conducting public hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006. On
finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out in
EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
4.38
Expansion of the Cement Plant (1.80 MTPA to 2.40 MTPA) at BharataparaVillage
Rawan Tehsil Baloda Bazar, District
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
cement plant with > 1.0 MTPA production capacity have been kept at S.N.
3(b) under Category ‘A’. In the instant
case, total capacity of the cement plant after expansion will be 2.40 MTPA and
is appraised by the central Govt.
M/s Ambuja Cements Ltd. have
proposed for the capacity enhance of Cement Plant (1.80 MTPA to 2.40 MTPA) by
installing a pre-grinder before cement mill within the existing premises at
Village Rawan, Tehsil Baloda Bazar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Existing cement mill area is
Clinker (0.384 MTPA) from existing cement plant, fly ash (0.192
MTPA) from NTPC, Korba and Gypsum (0.024 MTPA) from
It
is proposed to use clinker produced at the existing unit. Fly ash and gypsum will also be available
from the existing source. Existing plant
is of 1.80 of cement grinding and 1.20 clinker production capacity and capacity
will be enhanced by 0.60 MTPA by adding fly ash grinding.
Ambient air quality was monitored during July, 2007 to December,
2007 at 4 locations and data submitted indicated SPM (172-308 ug/Nm3),
RPM (43-85 ug/Nm3), SO2 (10–18 ug/Nm3) and NOx
levels (9-17 ug/Nm3) and are within the permissible limit. ESPs have
been installed to kiln stack, cooler stack and cement mills of existing plant.
It is proposed to install glass bag house to kiln. Bag filters will be provided to coal mill to
control gaseous emissions from the stack within 50 mg/Nm3. Fugitive
emissions will be generated from material handling and transportation areas due
to vehicular movement. Cement and ash
will be stored in silos. PAs vide letter dated 20th August, 2008
informed that existing ESPs will be replaced by glass bag house in December,
2009.
Total water requirement will be 50 m3/day and sourced
from the water stored in mines pit. No
surface or ground water will be tapped for the purpose. No liquid effluent will
be generated from the cement plant due to use of dry process. Sewage water will be treated in sewage water
Reclamation Plant (SWRP) and treated waste water will be 100% used for greener
development, spraying on haul road and also for plant cooling make up.
No solid waste will be generated.
All solid materials collected through bag filters will be recycled to
the process. SWRP sludge will be used as manure for plantation. Fly ash will be
used for making PPC. Waste oil will be
disposed off as per Hazardous Waste
(Management & Handling) Rules.
Green belt will be developed in
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for
environmental clearance subject to stipulation of following specific conditions
alongwith other environmental conditions
:
1. Continuous stack monitoring facilities to monitor gaseous
emissions from all the stacks should be provided. After expansion, limit of SPM should be
controlled within 50 mg/Nm3 by installing adequate air pollution
control system viz. glass bag house and bag filters etc. Data on ambient air,
fugitive and stack emissions should be submitted to the Ministry’s Regional
Office at
2. Secondary fugitive emissions shall be controlled and should be
within the prescribed limits and regularly monitored. Guidelines / Code of
Practice issued by the CPCB in this regard shall be followed.
5.0 Reconsideration :
5.1 Asbestos
Cement Products (1,50,000 MTPA) and Fiber Reinforced Plastic Products (FRP 3,60,000
Metre, FRP Pipes and/other products) at Village Akbarpur
Urd, Tehsil Laksar, District Haridwar, Uttranchal by M/s Aqua Infra Projects
Ltd. (EC)
The proposal was discussed at length with the PAs, Consultants and
Representative of the State Government at the 83rd EAC (I) meeting
held during 14th-16th July, 2008 and the committee
decided to deliberate further on the matter at the next meeting to satisfy
itself that all aspects are duly addressed having regard to the apparent
gravity and number of representations received and developments reported at the
public hearing.
The matter was further discussed in the 84th EAC (I)
meeting held during 19th-21st August, 2008. The committee was unanimous that proposed
plant is technically sound and pollution control measures proposed are
adequate. The Committee was informed that the Ministry has sought comments of
the State Government on a number of representations received from various
sources and on the public hearing and that the response of the State Government
is awaited. The Committee, therefore,
decided to make its final recommendation after the response of the State
Government is received and placed before it.
The State Govt. has submitted his
comments vide letter dated 4th September, 2008 and were placed
before the Committee for further consideration of the matter. The Committee
perused the comments on public hearing sent by the State Govt. and having
regard to the views expressed in the previous meetings and as appraised in the
previous meeting, the Committee was of the view that there is no ground to
withhold approval to the projedt and decided to recommend the proposal for the
grant of environmental clearance subject to following specific conditions
alongwith other environmental conditions :
1. The project proponent should adhere to the prescribed BIS
standards and laws regarding use and handling of asbestos, safety of employees
etc. Raw materials like asbestos fibre and cement should be transported in
closed containers. Asbestos fibre should be brought in palletized form in
impermeable bags and under compressed condition.
2. Only Chrysotile white asbestos fibre should be used. Blue asbestos
should not be utilized as raw material in the manufacturing process. A written
commitment in this regard should be furnished within a period of one month.
3. There should be no manual handling/opening of asbestos fiber bags.
The company should install fully automatic asbestos fiber debagging system
before commissioning the unit.
4. Fugitive emissions should be controlled by bringing cement in
closed tankers, fly ash in covered trucks and asbestos in impervious bags
opening inside a closed mixer. Bag filters should be provided at bag opening,
bag shredder, fibre mill and to cement silo. Fugitive emissions generated from
hopper of Jaw crusher and Pulverizer should be channelized through hood with
proper suction arrangement, bag filter and stack. Proper air pollution control
system should be installed to control fugitive and air emissions at cement, fly
ash, and asbestos fibre handling area.
5.
The Company should comply with total
dust emission limit of 2 mg/Nm3 as notified under the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986. Adequate measures should be adopted to control the
process emission and ensure that the stack emission of asbestos fibre should
not exceed the emission limit of 0.2 fiber/cc.
Asbestos fibre in work zone environment should be maintained within 0.1
fibre/cc.
6.
Bags containing asbestos fibre should
be stored in enclosed area to avoid fugitive emissions of asbestos fibre from
damaged bags, if any. The cut and damaged fibre bags should immediately be
repaired.
7.
Proper house keeping should be
maintained within the plant premises. Process machinery, exhaust and ventilation
systems should be laid in accordance with Factories Act. Better house keeping
practices should be adopted for improvement of the environment within the work
environment also. These include:
(a) All monitoring
transfer points should be connected to dust extraction system.
(b) Leakages or dust from
machines and ducts should be plugged.
(c)
Floor should be
cleaned by vacuum cleaner only.
(d)
Enclosed belt conveyer should be used
instead of manual transportation of
asbestos within the
premises.
(e)
Cement and fly ash should be stored in silos.
8. Regular measurement of pollutants (SPM, asbestos fibre count) in
the work zone area and stack(s) should be undertaken by the Project proponents.
In addition, the asbestos fibre count in the work zone area should be monitored
by an Independent monitoring agency like NIOH / ITRC / NCB or any other
approved agency and reports submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at
9. Total water requirement from ground water should not exceed 140 m3/day
as per the permission accorded by the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA).
All the recommendations of the CGWA should be implemented in time bound manner.
All the treated effluent should be recycled and reused in the process. No
process water should be discharged outside the premises and ‘zero’ discharge
should be maintained. All the domestic wastewater should be treated in the
Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) and used for green belt development.
10. The Company should ensure that the entire solid waste generated
including process rejects, cement, fly ash, dust from bag filters and empty
asbestos bag should be recycled in the manufacturing process. Process sludge
should be 100% recycled and reused in the process. Hazardous waste should be ground in dust
proof pulverizer with integrated bag filter and recycled back to the
process. Asbestos fibres which can not
be further recycled due to contamination of iron dust should be stored in HDPE
lined secured landfill. The disposal facilities for asbestos waste should be in
accordance with the Bureau of Indian Standard Code.
11. Regular medical examination of the workers and health monitoring
of all the employees should be carried out and if cases of asbestosis are
detected, necessary compensation should be arranged under the existing laws. A
competent occupational health physician should be appointed to carry out
medical surveillance. Occupational health of all the workers should be
monitored for lung function test, chest x-ray, sputum for acid-fast-bacilli
(AFC) and asbestos body (AB), urine for sugar and albumen, bloat tests for TLC,
DLC, ESR, Hb and records maintained for at least 40 years from the beginning of
the employment or 15 years after the retirement or cessation of employment
whichever is later. Occupational Health Surveillance should be carried out as
per the directives of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
12. To educate the workers, all the work places where asbestos dust
may cause a hazard should be clearly indicated as a dust exposure area through
the use of display signs which identifies the hazard and the associated health
effects.
13. The company should also undertake rain water harvesting measures
and plan of action should be submitted to the Ministry of Environment and
Forests within three months.
14. Green belt should be developed in 33 % area with local species in
consultation with DFO as per CPCB guidelines.
The Committee was
also informed about the vigilance case in pending in the Ministry for which
Committee expressed the view that appropriate action may be taken by the
Minstry but it has nothing to do with the decision of the Cepert Appraisal
Committee (Industry).
7.0 Any Other Item :
7.1 Steel plant
(5,00,000 TPA, MBF & SMS) at Shyamraipur, Gokulpur, Kharagpur, Paschim
Medinipur, West Bengal by M/s Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. (Change in location).
PAs vide their letter dated 14th
October, 2008 have informed to the Ministry that they could not procure
The Committee examined the matter and discussed at length. It is
noted that proposed steel plant will be located at Mouza Kismatpur, J.L. No. 114, Shyamraipur, Gokulpur, Kharagpur, Paschim
Medinipur, W. B. which is
Since the PAs have carried out Environment Impact Assessment
within
7.2 Mini Steel Plant
(1.5 LTPA), Sponge
Iron Plant (1.2 LTPA),
PAs vide their letter dated 10th
October, 2008 have represented to the Ministry that they are unable to get
finances from different financial institutions for implementation of specific
condition no. (viii) since time requirement for the
commissioning of sponge Iron plant and AFBC is 6 months and 18 months
respectively. Due to difference in time
requirement, sponge iron plant can not be installed one year in advance or
otherwise commissioning of sponge iron plant will be withheld (for almost one
year) till the AFBC plant is installed viz:
“AFBC Plant shall be
installed before installation of Sponge Iron Plant so that utilization of char
in the AFBC boiler is ensured. All the
char from DRI plant shall be utilized in AFBC boiler of power plant after its
commissioning and no char shall be disposed off anywhere else. Kiln accretions
and SMS slag shall also be properly utilized. Mill scales/cuttings/scrap from
Re-rolling mill shall be used as raw material in induction furnace (IF). Dust
from bag filters shall be recycled into DRI Plant. Pellet plant dust shall be reused in the pellet
plant itself. All the other solid waste including broken refractory mass shall
be properly disposed off in environment-friendly manner”.
The Committee examined the matter and agreed to amend the
specific condition no. (viii) as follows:
“Construction of sponge iron plant and AFBC plant shall be started simultaneously so that char generated
from the sponge iron plant is used in the AFBC boiler directly, or otherwise,
char generated from the sponge iron plant shall be provided to char processing
industries as proposed or stored properly at the project site as per CPCB
guidelines till the AFBC boiler is commissioned. All the char from DRI plant shall be utilized
in AFBC boiler of power plant after its commissioning and no char shall be
disposed off anywhere else. Kiln accretions and SMS slag shall also be properly
utilized. Mill scales/cuttings/scrap from Re-rolling mill shall be used as raw
material in induction furnace (IF). Dust from bag filters shall be recycled
into DRI Plant. Pellet plant dust shall
be reused in the pellet plant itself. All the other solid waste including
broken refractory mass shall be properly disposed off in environment-friendly
manner”.
7.3 Expansion
of Integrated Steel Complex [Pig Iron Plant (1,75,000 to 5,25,000 TPA), Ductile
Iron Spun Pipes Plant (1,20,000 to 4,00,000 TPA), Slag Cement (90,000 to
3,90,000 TPA), Coke Oven Plant (1,62,000 to 4,62,000 TPA) and Captive Power
Plant (14.5 MW to 40.5 MW)] at Village Rachagunneri, Mandal Srikalaharti,
District Chitoor, A. P. by M/s Lanco Industries
Ltd. (Amendment).
Environmental clearance has been accorded to above mentioned
project vide letter dated 25th July, 2008. Now, PAs vide their
letter dated 22nd August, 2008 have requested for the following
amendments mentioned in the following Specific Conditions :
i) The hot exhaust
gas shall be diverted to WHRB to generate 20 MW power instead of 12 MW
mentioned in the environmental clearance letter.
vii) PAs want to use 7,750 m3/day primary treated sewage
water of Tirupati Municipal Corporation for the proposed expansion project
instead of 11,130 m3/day water from Kandaleru reservoir.
viii) Prior permission for the drawl of 7,750 m3/day water
from the primary treated sewage of Tirupati Municipal Corporation for the
expansion shall be obtained from the concerned department instead of for the
drawl of 11,130 m3/day water from Kandaleru reservoir.
The Committee noted that use of exhaust gases in WHRB for
generation of 20 MW instead of 12 MW is for the betterment of environment and
utilization of 7,750 m3/day water from the primary treated sewage of
Tirupati Municipal Corporation instead of 11,130 m3/day water from
Kandaleru reservoir will save precious fresh water from the reservoir and at
the same time ensure utilization of treated wastewater in the process.
Therefore, Committee has no objection for the use of hot
exhaust gas in WHRB to generate 20 MW power instead of 12 MW and utilization of
7,750 m3/day water from the primary treated sewage of Tirupati
Municipal Corporation for the expansion project instead of drawl of 11,130 m3/day
water from Kandaleru reservoir.
21st October,
2008
8.0 New Proposals
8.1 Exploratory Drilling of Hydrocarbons in
Namsai, PEL Block in Lohit District in Arunachal Pradesh by M/s Oil India Ltd.-
Environmental Clearance
The above proposals was considered by the Expert Appraisal
Committee in its 77th meeting held on 21st
to 24th January, 2008. The Committee
prescribed the. TORs for incorporation in the EIA/EMP report and advised the
project proponent to submit the EIA/EMP report to the State Pollution Control
Board for conducting public hearing. The issues emerged during the
PH/PC shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report and the report submitted to
the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
Public hearing for the project was conducted on 23rd
July, 2008.The issues raised were regarding, drilling at safe distance from the
villages or human habitation including their farm lands so as to avoid the
adverse impacts. Adequate compensation for the rehabilitation to the affected
people should be provided. The liquid effluent and solid waste should not be
discharged in to the nearby streams, rivers and water bodies. Such waste should
be treated and discharged properly. Cutting of trees should be avoided as far
as possible. Abandoned or dead wells should be properly capped and sealed.
Employment should be provided to the
local people and socio- economic development of the area should be
undertaken.Oil refinery be set up at the
Namsai, if oil is found. All the
above issues were addressed by the project proponent.
M/s Oil India Ltd have proposed for exploratory Drilling in Namsai, PEL Block, location- NSA, in Lohit
District of Arunachal Pradesh in an area of 370 sq. Km. An area of
Water
requirement of 30-40 m3/day will be sourced from the ground water . Sources of
liquid effluents during drilling and production testing will be waste drilling
fluids-WBM, drainage discharges, recovered formation water and domestic
wastewater. Waste drilling fluids and WBM, drainage discharges will be stored
in HDPE lined shallow pits. Formation water (if any) will be treated in
the water clarification system to meet
onshore discharge standards . Domestic effluent will
be disposed through septic tank and soak pits.
The main air emission
source will be the DG set at well site.
Flaring of gases during the drilling testing phase will contribute to
additional air pollution. Adequate stack height will be provided for DG set and flaring of gases. Air quality
monitoring was carried at 8 locations for the parameters RSPM, SPM, SO2,
NOx, Total HC (CH4). The values for all the parameters were well
below the stipulated standards.
Solid waste generation will be Drill cutting (170-200 m3l), which will be
retained in the retainer pit.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures undertaken and recommended the proposal for grant of
environmental clearance subject to stipulation of following
specific conditions:
I.
II.
Hydrocarbon Monitoring shall be carried
and data submitted to the Ministry.
8.2. Expansion of drilling & production in
two wells one each in NELP – II &
NELP – III and one well in NELP – IV at district Bikaner, Rajasthan by M/s Oil
India Ltd. – EC/TOR
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken. All the projects
related to offshore and onshore Oil and Gas exploration, development and
production are listed in para 1(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006
covered under category “A” and appraised
at centre level.
M/s Oil India Limited (OIL) ventured
out of North East in the early Eighties after its transition from a Joint
venture Company to a National Oil Company. The Company expanded its operations
from the Eastern to Western frontier of the Country. OIL began to explorate on
hydrocarbon in the deserts of Rajasthan and OIL discovered Natural Gas in
Jaisalmer
A. Drilling &
Production in one well in Bikaner district, Rajasthan in the area of 1072.5
Sq.Km in block acquired in NELP IV (RJ-ONN-2002/1) by M/S Oil
M/S Oil India Limited Rajasthan proposes for drilling &
production of one well in
The Expert Appraisal Committee (I)
prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA Study:
1.
Executive
summery of the project.
2.
Project
Description and Project Benefits
3.
Site
details including satellite imagery for
4.
Land
use along with maps & cropping pattern, vegetation Ecology, Flora & Fauna
5.
Demography
& Socio-economics of the area.
6.
Process
details for survey and drilling.
7.
Baseline
data collection for air, water and soil for 5 weeks leaving the monsoon season
in an area of
·
Ambient
Air Quality monitoring at 8 locations for SPM, RPM, SO2, NOx
·
Background
levels of hydrocarbons (HC) and VOCs (5 samples)
·
Soil
sample analysis at 10 locations
·
Base
line underground and surface water quality in the vicinity of
·
Climatology
& Meteorology including wind speed, wind direction, temperature, rainfall
etc.
·
Measurement
of Noise levels at 10 locations in the block
8.
Detailed
water balance, waste water generation and discharge.
9.
Treatment
and utilization of produced water.
10.
Detailed
solid waste generation, collection, segregations, its recycling and reuse,
treatment and disposal
11.
Estimation
and computation of air emissions resulting out of drilling operations
12.
Assessment
of impact on air , water, soil, solid/hazardous waste and noise levels
13.
Evaluation
of the adequacy of the proposed pollution control measures to meet the air
quality emission standards, water discharge norms, solid/hazardous waste
generation and disposal
14.
Estimation
of Noise level due to operation of drilling , its associated equipments and
vehicular movement & prediction and evaluation of impacts due to increase
in noise levels arising out of the proposed activities on the surrounding
environment. Proposed mitigation measures for noise pollution
15.
Storage
of chemicals at the site, proposed preventive measures for spillage and accident.
16.
Environmental
Management Plan
17.
Risk
Assessment & Disaster Management Plan
·
Identification
of hazards
·
Consequence
Analysis
·
Risk
Presentation & proposed measures for
Risk Reduction
·
Disaster
Management Plan (DMP)
·
Oil
Spill Contingency Plan and Emergency Response Plan
18.
Measures
for decommissioning of the rigs and projects
19.
Post
project closure and monitoring programme for minimum 10 years
20.
Documentary
proofs for Memberships of common disposal facilities, if any.
21.
Details
of proposed occupational Health Surveillance program for the employees and
other labour.
22.
Environmental
Monitoring program while survey and drilling is undertaken.
23.
Information
as per the Questionnaire on industrial projects as earlier devised by the
Ministry.
The Committee decided that after
preparing the EIA/EMP covering the above mentioned TORs, the report will be
submitted to the Ministry along with requisite documents for consideration by
the Expert Appraisal Committee (I) for obtaining environmental clearance in
accordance with procedure laid in the Environmental Impact Assessment
Notification, 2006. The Committee exempted the proposal from public hearing/public
consultation as per para 7(i) of the EIA Notification, 2006.
B. Drilling & Production in NELP III
(RJ-ONN-2001/1) by one well at
M/S Oil India Limited proposed for expansion of Drilling & Production in NELP III
(RJ-ONN-2001/1) for one well at
Location / site alternatives under
consideration: |
Block
RJ-ONN-2001/1 Exploratory Block under NELP-III, District: |
Size of the Project |
Oil & Gas Exploration Block RJ-ONN-2001/1, covering an area
of 255.43 sq. km. |
Total Number of Exploratory &
Appraisal Wells |
1 (one) |
Depth of Well |
Approx.
range from |
Total Estimated Drilling Period for each well |
45
days |
Total Estimated Testing Period for each well |
15
days |
Type of hydrocarbon expected |
Oil/Gas |
Proposed Drilling Fluid for each well |
Water Based KCL Polymer System |
Anticipated Volume of Drill
Cuttings (without oil)for each well |
250-500
cu. metres (approximately) |
Expected Cost of the Project |
Approximately
Rs. 420 lakhs per well |
The Committee found the
presentproposal as an extension of existing activity and recommended the
proposal for grant of environmental
clearance in accordance with para 7(ii)
of the EIA Notification 2006 dispensing with requirement of EIA/EMP and public
hearing subject to general and specific conditions and submission of compliance
of the environmental stipulations made in the environmental clearance issued by
the Ministry vide letter No. J-11011/58/2007-IA(I) dated 01.08.2007.
C. Drilling & Production in NELP II (RJ-ONN-2000/1)
for one well in District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan by M/S Oil India Limited – EC/TOR
M/S Oil India Limited proposed for expansion of Drilling & Production in NELP II
(RJ-ONN-2001/1) by one well at Jaisalmer district, Rajasthan. The area of the block
is 390.6 sq. km. The project area in falls in the same area of NELP-II Block
(RJ-ONN-2001/1) in which Environmental Clearance has been accorded for drilling
of one well in above block vide letter No. J-11011/57/2007-IA(I) dated
07.08.2007. M/S Oil India Limited have also obtained NOC’s from Rajasthan State
Pollution Control Board for drilling of three wells falling in the same area.
The EIA study for these locations was already carried out in 2006-07. The area
of NELP-III block falls in great Thar Desert near the international border of
Location / site alternatives under consideration: |
Block
RJ-ONN-2000/1 Exploratory Block under NELP-II District: Jaisalmer, State:
Rajasthan |
Size of the Project |
Oil & Gas Exploration Block RJ-ONN-2000/1, covering an area
of 390.6 sq. km. |
Total Number of Exploratory & Appraisal Wells |
1 (one) |
Depth of each
Well |
Approx.
range from |
Total Estimated Drilling Period for each well |
45
days |
Total Estimated Testing Period for each well |
15
days |
Type of hydrocarbon expected |
Oil/Gas |
Proposed Drilling Fluid for each well |
Water Based KCL Polymer System (Environmental
friendly system) |
Anticipated Volume of Drill Cuttings (without oil)for each well |
250-500
cu. metres (approximately) |
Expected Cost of the Project |
Approximately
Rs. 420 lakhs per well |
The Committee found that proposal is
an extension of existing activity and recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance in accordance
with the para 7(ii) of the EIA
Notification 2006 dispensing with requirement of EIA/EMP and public hearing
subject to general and specific conditions and submission of compliance of the
environmental stipulations in the environmental clearance issued by the
Ministry vide letter No. J-11011/58/2007-IA(I) dated 01.08.2007.
C. Drilling of two wells at Location RJBD and
RJBE in Tanot, Dandewala and Bagitibba Mining Lease Area (250 Sq Km) in
Jaisalmer District in Rajasthan by M/s Oil India Limited – EC/TOR
M/s Oil India Limited have
proposed for drilling of two wells at location RJBD and RJBE in Tanot,
Dandewala and Bagitibba Mining Lease Area (250 Sq Km) in Jaisalmer district in
Rajasthan. M/s Oil have
granted environmental clearance for Six drilling locations (Location- RJAZ,
RJBA, RJAS, RJAR, RJAT & RJAQ) in Tanot, Dandewala and Bagitibba Mining
Lease Area (250 Sq Km) in Jaisalmer district located in great Thar desert and
is near International Boarder of India and Pakistan vide letter No
–J-11011/252/2007-IAII(I) dated 7th August 2007 and letter No
–J-11011/252/2007-IAII(I) dated 1st February 2008. There is no human
habitation with in
The drilling locations were proposed in the above mining lease area to sustain gas
production and supply to Rajasthan Rajyik Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited
(RRVUNL), a State owned thermal power plant at Ramagrh which generate
electricity for the State of Rajasthan. For effective operation of the plant,
continuous supply of desired quantity of gas is required as the shortage of gas
supply to the plant may affect power generation.
At present few wells in the above mining lease area have
stopped producing gas. Therefore, to sustain the gas production and supply of
gas to RRVUNL M/s OIL have proposed to drill two new wells as an extension to
the existing project. These new wells will be located in the same ML area where
drilling of six wells is in progress against which OIL have obtained the Environmental
Clearance.
The Committee found the proposal as
an extension of existing activity and recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance in accordance
with the para 7(ii) of the EIA
Notification 2006 dispensing with requirement of EIA/EMP and public hearing subject to general
and specific conditions and submission of compliance of the environmental
stipulations in the environmental clearance issued by the Ministry vide letter
No –J-11011/252/2007-IAII(I) dated 7th August 2007 and letter No
–J-11011/252/2007-IAII(I) dated 1st February 2008.
8.3 Expansion of Exploratory Drilling
(Phase-II) for coal bed methane in
The above
proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 76th meeting held on 26th – 28th December, 2007. The Committee noted that EIA/EMP report was prepared earlier in 2003 for the
existing activity. NOC was obtained from the Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board
on 10th January, 2004. Since the proposed activity is an expansion
of existing activity, the Committee exempted the proposal for preparation of
EIA/EMP report and from conducting public hearing as per Para 7(ii) of the
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. The Committee however,
suggested that the EIA/EMP report should be updated based on monitoring of
one-month data and report be submitted
to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
M/s ONGC Limited have proposed for expansion
of exploratory Drilling for coal bed methane in north Karanpura, CBM block
(NK-CBM-2001/1) in Jharkhand. The area of the block
is 340.54 km2. M/s ONGC have earlier drilled 9 bore wells and 2 exploratory
wells. It is proposed to drill 5 pilot wells (1successful well from Phase-I
Carried forward to phase-II as pilot well). The wells will be drilled up to the
depth of 1000m-
About 800m3/day of
water per well will be used. The source
of water is usually bore well or tanker from the nearby river. Two DG set will
be installed for supply of power at the drilling location. The waste water generated
during drilling operations will be 5-10 m3/day which will be collected in lined
waste pit and solar evaporated. Produced water may vary from 3-5 m3/day and
will be used for inland application. However,
disposal of Produced water will
be reviewed on regular intervals as its
quality may change during the life of the CBM well.
Air quality
monitoring was carried out in winter season for 9 locations for RSPM, SPM, SO2,
NOx, MHC & NMHC. The arithmetic mean and 98th
percentile values of 24 hourly SPM at all the stations ranged between 45-364
ug/m3 & 240-456 ug/m3 respectively. The arithmetic mean and 98th
percentile values of 24 hourly RSPM at all the locations ranged between 24-308
ug/m3 and 93-407 ug/m3 respectively. The arithmetic mean and 98th
percentile values of 24 hourly SO2 are observed to be 3 ug/m3 and 3 ug/m3
respectively. The arithmetic mean and 98th percentile values of 24
hourly NOx was ranged between 6-7 & 7 ug/m3 respectively. The
non methane hydrocarbon concentration close to the project site were observed
to be varying in the range of 2.6-4.8 ppm & methane hydrocarbon
concentration varied in the range of 1.7-2.8 ppm. Adequate stack height is
proposed to control air emissions from DG set and during test flare in event of
gas discovery.
The drill cuttings (
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) recommended the proposal for
grant of environmental clearance subject to stipulation of specific condition
that monitoring of Hydrocarbon shall be carried and data submitted to the
Ministry.
8.4 & 8.43 Environmental
Clearance for Redevelopment of Baramura, Agartala Dome & Konaban in
Tripura and development of Sonamura
field in Tripura by M/s ONGC.(EC)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken. All the projects
related to offshore and onshore Oil and Gas exploration, development and
production are listed in para 1(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and
are covered under category “A” and
appraised at centre level.
Proposals regarding redevelopment of
Baramura, Agartala Dome & Konaban in Tripura and development of Sonamura field in Tripura
by M/s ONGC were placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee (I)in its 76th
meeting held during 28th – 30th December 2007 to
prescribe the TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study. For this purpose, M/s
ONGC submitted form -1 and pre-feasibility reports for each of the project. It
was noted that in total six development wells will be drilled of which 2 each
in Baramura field,
Since the proposed activity is envisaged in the existing
area already developed through exploratory drilling, M/s ONGC authorities
requested the Committee to exempt them from public hearing and preparation of
EIA/EMP report. In case of proposal regarding redevelopment of Baramula,
Agratala dome and Konabona fields, committee exempted the proposal from
preparation of EIA/EMP report and conducting public hearing. However, it was decided
that the proponent may submit detailed appraisal report for record
and recommended the project for environmental clearance. In case of
Sonamura field in Tripura, Committee decided that EIA/EMP report and risk assessment report based on the standards
TORs shall be submitted to the Ministry for consideration of Expert Appraisal Committee . The report will be
placed before the Expert Appraisal
Committee without inviting the proponent. The proposal was exempted from public
hearing.
The project authorities have
submitted the desired appraisal report to the Ministry with respect to proposal regarding redevelopment
of Baramula, Agratala dome and Konabona fields and circulated among the Expert
appraisal Committee (Industry).
The discovery of gas in Tripura region in 1970s raised the
hope for development of this remotely located State, which received further
fillip in 1986-87 when gas production commenced in Tripura. Out of existing 60
gas wells (as on 01.01.07), only 22 to 25 are kept on regular production while
others are either temporarily abandoned or closed due to lack of consumers. The
current gas production stands at 1.4-1.5 MMSCMD is mainly utilized in power
sector within the State of
With a view to monetize the idle gas reserves and improve
the poor power scenario of the North-East, ONGC took the lead to set up a power
plant of 740 MW at Palatana in
One of the activities planned to produce and supply
additional 3.0 MMSCMD gas for the proposed power plant is to redevelop the
existing Gas producing fields of Baramura, Agartala Dome and Konaban.
Redevelopment of Baramura field: The Asset had initiated the work of
Baramura GGS up-gradation from existing handling capacity of 0.2 MMSCMD to 0.5
MMSCMD for technology up-gradation and enhancement of safety system as per
latest OISD guidelines. Two new wells are planned to be drilled in Baramura
field, which will be connected to this upgraded GGS through flow lines, to be
laid upon well drilling and completion(around
Redevelopment of Agartala Dome Field: The up-gradation of Agartala Dome
field is being done to transport gas from this field to the proposed Power
plant at Palatana. This includes
drilling of 5 development wells, ( 3 drilled and 2 wells to be drilled),
up-gradation of gas processing facility in Gas Group gathering station from
existing 0.4 MMSCMD to 2.2 MMSCMD and dispatch through future gas grid.
Drilling of 3 new wells completed.
Agartala Dome Field |
|||||||
Facilities |
Wells |
Flow
lines (KM) |
GGS Handling facility |
Consumers/consent |
|||
Gas (MMSCMD) |
Condensate (M3/Day) |
water(M3/Day) |
Land (Acres) |
||||
Existing |
13 (9 connected) |
52.17 |
0.40 |
1.7 |
3.3 |
8.23 |
NEEPCO TNGC |
Under upgraddation( by Oct 2007) |
|
|
2.20 |
20 |
20 |
9.91 |
Consent to establish obtained before 14th sep2006 |
Present proposal |
2 |
20 |
-
|
- |
- |
- |
OTPC |
Total |
15 |
72.17 |
2.2 |
20 |
20 |
9.91 |
|
Redevelopment of Konaban Field: Redevelopment of Konaban field is being done to transport gas from
this field to the proposed Power plant at Palatana. This includes drilling of 3 development wells, (2
wells to be drilled), up-gradation of
gas processing facility in Gas Group gathering station from present 0.5 to 1.5
MMSCMD and dispatch through future gas grid. Drilling of 1 new well completed
and up gradation of GGS work is being
proposed.
Konaban Field |
|||||||
Facilities |
Wells |
Flow lines (KM) |
GGS Handling facility |
Consumers/ consent |
|||
Gas (MMSCMD) |
Condensate (M3/Day) |
water(M3/Day) |
Land (Acres) |
||||
Existing |
16 |
51.31 |
0.5 |
5 |
4.0 |
17.48 |
NEEPCO |
Present Proposal |
2 |
8 |
1.0
|
8
|
30
(add) |
Nil
(use
existing land) |
NEEPCO OTPC |
Total |
18 |
59.31 |
1.5 |
13 |
34 |
17.48 |
|
Agartala Dome, Konaban and Sonamura GGSs are planned to be
connected to Palatana power plant by laying approximately
Based on gas profile
, additional gas producers as brought
out above are required to be drilled to
produce established as well as projected reserves. At present 4 development wells have already
been drilled, and 6 balance wells are to be completed by Dec
Sl. No. |
Name of
Field |
Required
Number of wells to be drilled |
Balance
Number of wells to be drilled |
Expected During (Year) |
1 |
Baramura |
2 |
2 |
Before Dec 2010 |
2 |
Agartala Dome |
5 |
2 |
Before Dec 2010
|
3 |
Konaban |
3 |
2 |
Before Dec 2010 |
|
Total |
10 |
6 |
|
The environmental impact and safety
issues of the proposed projects and facilities are as detailed below: :
§
Gathering
and processing of produced well fluid.
§
Utilities
requirement
§
Disposal
of waste product
The
produced water will be treated to make it suitable for disposal. The air
pollutants emitted are suspended particulate matter (SPM), sulphur Dioxide
(SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S), Carbon
Monoxide (CO) and Hydrocarbons (HC) emitted from diesel generators at Rigs
(during drilling period) and flue gas/gas flares at gas processing
installations. Flare header will be provided to transport the flare gas to
flare system of gas processing installations. All designs will be made to
ensure zero/technical gas flaring. All kinds of gas vents will be taken into
process system for their utilization/evacuations. There will be drill cuttings at rigs and domestic wastes from
galley and laundries and sanitary wastes. Various methods for corrosion
mitigation have been studied Cathodic protection for the pipeline will be
provided for design life of 25 years. All piping material shall be carbon steel
suitable grade for hydrocarbon system.
The
toxicity of water-based drilling fluids used in ONGC operations is low.
Concentration of drilling fluid and drill cuttings in the water column decline
rapidly due to dilution and dispersion. Bioassy tests for toxicity of produced
water carried out by NEERI,
Safety
is built into the installation design on the basis of risk analysis and
standards laid down by various agencies. Life saving appliances are provided on
installations as per OISD requirements. Personal protective equipments like
hard hats, safety shoes, safety goggles, breathing apparatus and ear muffs etc.
are provided. Safety operating procedures have been established. Safety
training of personnel is mandatory.
The proponent informed the Committee that there is no
ecological sensitive area and National Parks/Wildlife sacnturies within these
areas. After detailed deliberations, the Committee noted the details of the
appraisal report with respect to
proposal regarding redevelopment of Baramula, Agratala dome and Konabona fields
and EIA/EMP & RA for Sonamura field in Tripura and found EIA/EMP complete
and adequate and recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance
subject to specific and general conditions.Public hearing was exempted during
TOR presentation during 76th Meeting of the EAC(I) under para 7(ii)
of the EIA Notification 2006.
8.5 Exploratory drilling and seismic
survey in GV-ONN-67/1 block in Jhirna Hoshangabad M.P. under PEL block by M/s
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken. All the projects
related to offshore and onshore Oil and Gas exploration, development and
production are listed in para 1(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006
covered under category “A” and appraised
at centre level.
M/s ONGC proposes for exploratory
drilling and seismic survey in GV-ONN-67/1 block in Jhirna Hoshangabad M.P.
under PEL block in
Electrical Drilling rig comprising of 4 Power Gen-sets of
1200bhp through AC/SCR system, Top drive, Mud pumps, Draw-works, Rig Mast with
accessories, LMSS, LMMC, Mud agitators, Desander, Desilter, Mud logging unit,
Air compressor, ETP, BOP and cementing unit etc.. The rig is proposed to be
taken through Contractor. The rig crew 50 Nos, will be on 14 Days ON/OFF duty
with 12 hours shift.
Modeling –
test flare (
Public
hearing meeting was conducted by Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 8th June, 2008 at village
Pipalpura, Itarsi in District Hoshangabad (Madhya Pradesh). The Committee took
note of the concerns raised by the public and response given by the Project
Authorities. The same have been incorporated in the EIA/EMP report.
After detailed deliberations, the Committee satisfied with the
environmental measures taken and found EIA/EMP complete and adequate and
recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance subject to
specific and general conditions.
8.6 Expansion of
Gas field Development in Tengakhat - Naharkatiya Jorajan, Dumduma-Pengri,
Moran-Sapekhati,
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken. All the projects
related to offshore and onshore Oil and Gas exploration, development and
production are listed in para 1(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006
covered under category “A” and appraised
at centre level.
M/s Oil India Ltd have proposed for expansion of Gas field
Development in Tengakhat–Naharkatiya-Jorajan,
Tinsukia-Dhola, Dumduma-Pengri, Moran-Sapekhati, Khowang-Shalmari areas
in Assam and Arunachal area in Arunachal
Pradesh. The details of locations are as given below:
1. Tengakhat-Naharkatia-Jorajan Area
:
–
In
Dibrugarh & Tinsukia Districts of
–
Lies
between 94º54´e & 95º35´e longitude
and 27º17´n & 27º32´n latitude
–
Discovery
well nhk-1 was drilled in the year 1953
2. Tinsukia-Dhola area :
In
tinsukia district of Assam
Lies
between 94º55´e & 95º48´e longitude
and 27º28´n & 27º50´n latitude
–
Discovery
well hapjan-29 was drilled in the year 1998
3. Dumduma-Pengeri area :
–
In
tinsukia districts of
–
Lies
between 95º28´e & 95º55´e longitude
and
27º16´n & 27º40´n latitude
–
Discovery
well Pengeri-1 was drilled in the year 1999
4. Khowang-Shalmari area :
In
Dibrugarh District of
Lies
between 94º48´e & 95º23´e Lngitude
and
27º04´n & 27º24´n latitude
–
Discovery
well shalmari-1 was drilled in the year 1986
5. Moran-Sapekhati area :
–
In Dibrugarh & tinsukia districts of
–
Lies between 94º42´e & 95º15´e longitude
and
26º55´n & 27º19´n latitude
–
Discovery well maoran-1 was drilled in the year 1956
6. Arunachal area :
In arunachal pradesh
Lies between 95º47´e & 96º19´e longitude
and 27º22´n & 27º47´n latitude
–
Discovery well kharsang-1 was drilled in the year
1968
The project
extends in two states of the North East India. The details of the each project
area as given below:
1.
Gas Field Development in
Tengakhat-Naharkatia- Jorajan Area : The project comprises of :
A. Gas
Compressor Stations (GCS) :
a) Tengakhat b) Bhogpara
The objective of these are to utilize the associated gas
produced at Tengakhat / Bhogpara Region
for distribution and artificial lifting.Each of the GCSs will have the
following capacities –
a) Gas
Boosting Capacity : 280,000 SCMD
b) Gas
Lifting Capacity : 230,000
SCMD
c) Gas Dehydration
Capacity : 280,000 SCMD
The cost of the project will be approx Rs
9,000.00 Lakhs and land area will be
B. Field
Gathering Station :
a) Jorajan b) OCS-4 c) Kathaloni d) Hapjan e) Ushapur
Objective
of these facilities will be to produce NA Gas from Jorajan, OCS-4, Kathaloni,
Hapjan and Ushapur region. The Capacity of each FGS will be 0.75 MMSCMD and
total cost will be approx Rs 12,500.00 Lakhs. The land requirement will be
C. GAS TRANSMISSION
PIPELINES:
Description
of the Pipeline(s) |
Land (ha) |
Estimated Cost (Rs in Lakhs) |
a) W/50
to LPG Off take : 3 nos. : 600mm
X 10Km (2Nos.) : 500mm X 10Km (1No.) |
25 |
5800 |
b) W/50
to Location NKF : 2 Nos. : 400mm X
7Km (1No.): 300mm X 7Km (1No.) |
2 |
1750 |
c)
Location NKF to Shalmari Approach via GCS-2, OCS-8 : 300mm X 33Km |
20 |
3250 |
d) OCS-3
to W/50 OT : 400mm X 8Km |
4.8 |
1085 |
e)
Tengakhat OCS to Tengakhat Approach : 2 Lines : 300mm X 0.8Km (1No.)
: 100mm X 0.8Km (1No.) |
0.5 |
150 |
f)
Hatiali Scrapper Trap to 250mm X
4Km |
2.4 |
350 |
g)
Hatiali Scrapper Trap to W/263 : 100mm X
1Km |
0.3 |
50 |
h)
Hatiali Scrapper Trap to Dikom OCS : 150mm X
5.6Km |
3.4 |
330 |
i)
Tengakhat Approach to Kathloni OCS : 100mm X
4.5Km |
1.4 |
215 |
j) 200mm X
0.8Km |
0.5 |
60 |
k)
Bengenabari to Bhekulajan EPS : 150mm X
3.2Km |
1.9 |
201 |
l) OCS-2
to GCS-7 : 150mm X 3.2Km |
1.9 |
202 |
m) GCS-7
to OCS-6 : 100mm X 0.8Km |
0.25 |
38 |
n) LPG OT
to OCS/GCS-5 : 250mm X 1Km |
0.6 |
90 |
o) W/50
OT to OCS-4 : 150mm X 4Km |
2.4 |
237 |
p) W/319
to GCS-1 : 150mm X 2.5Km |
1.5 |
159 |
q) GCS-1
to OCS-1 : 100mm X 1Km. |
0.3 |
59 |
r) Hapjan
OCS to Makum OCS : 150mm X 6.5Km |
3.9 |
395 |
s)
Nagajan OCS to Hapjan OCS : 200mm X 13.5Km |
8.1 |
1020 |
t)
Kathalguri OCS to Nagajan OCS/GCS : 200mm X 7.6Km |
4.5 |
570 |
u)
Jorajan Approach to Jorajan OCS/GCS : 150mm X 0.8Km |
0.5 |
59 |
v)
Extension/Augmentation of Existing Gas Flow P/L Network: 50mm to 250mm :
Approx. 50Kms. |
15 |
4000 |
Total |
101.15 |
20070 |
D. CENTRAL GAS
GATHERING STATION AND OFFTAKE POINT: AT NHK W/50
Central gas gathering station will be set up to collect all
the natural gas produced at Upper Assam Field of OIL and to distribute the
collected gas to the Assam Gas Cracker Plant and other external and internal
consumers. The capacity of the plant will be 12.5 MMSCMD. The cost of
the unit will be approx. Rs. 14,400.00 Lakhs and land requirement will be
2. GAS FIELD
DEVELOPMENT IN TINSUKIA-DHOLA AREA: The project envisages :
A. GAS COMPRESSOR STATION (GCS) :a) Dikom b) Chabua c) Barekuri d)
Baghjan and e) Makum. The objective of
the facility will be to utilize the associated gas produced at Dikom / Chabua /
Barekuri / Baghjan for distribution and artificial lifting. The GCSs will have the i) Gas Boosting Capacity (280,000 SCMD),
ii) Gas Lifting Capacity (230,000 SCMD)
and iii) Gas Dehydration Capacity
(280,000 SCMD). The total cost of the project will be approx
Rs 20,500.00 Lakh. The land area requirement will be
B. FIELD GATHERING STATION : a) Dikom b) Chabua, c) Baghjan and
d) South Chandmari . The objective of the project is to produce NA Gas from
Dikom, Chabua, Baghjan and
C. GAS TRANSMISSION
PIPELINES :
Description
of the Pipeline(s) |
Land (Ha) |
Estimated Cost (Rs in lakhs) |
a) Chabua
to W/50 CGGS : 400mm X 20.8Km |
31.2 |
3750 |
b) Baghjan to W/50 CGGS : 400mm X 41.5Km |
74.2 |
7850 |
c) W/263
to Hatiali EPS : 2 nos. : 100mm X 1.5Km each |
0.9 |
165 |
d) Makum
OCS to TF : 100mm X 14Km |
4.5 |
658 |
e)
Hatiali EPS to Hatiali Scrapper Trap : 100mm X 3Km |
0.9 |
159 |
f)
Extension/Augmentation of Existing Gas Flow Pipeline Network : 50mm to 250mm : Approx.
50Kms |
15 |
4000 |
TOTAL |
126.7 |
16582 |
3. Gas Field
Development in Dumduma-Pengri Area: The project envisages -
A. Field Gathering
Station at Borhapjan
: The objective of this project is to produce NA Gas from Borhapjan region. The
capacity of the unit will be (1.5 MMSCMD). The cost of the project is approx.
Rs. 2500.00 Lakhs. The land requirement will be
B. GAS TRANSMISSION
PIPELINES :
Description of the Pipeline(s) |
Land Area (Ha) |
Estimated Cost (Rs in Lakhs) |
a) Kushijan-2 Approach to DDGG : 200mm X 1Km |
0.6 |
88.00 |
b) Extension/Augmentation of Existing Gas Flow Pipeline
Network : 50mm to 250mm : Approx. 30Kms |
9 |
2500.00 |
Total |
9.6 |
2588.00 |
4. Gas Field
Development in Moran-Sapekhati Area: The project envisages -
A. FIELD GATHERING
STATION at MORAN. The objective of the project is to
produce NA Gas from Moran region. The capacity of the FGS plant will be
0.75 MMSCMD. The cost of the project is approx. Rs. 2500.00 Lakhs. The land
required will be
B. GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES :
Description of the Pipeline(s) |
Land (Ha) |
Estimated Cost (Rs in Lakhs) |
a) Extension/Augmentation of Existing Gas Flow Pipeline
Network : 50mm to 250mm : Approx. 30Kms |
9 |
2500.00 |
Total |
9 |
2500.00 |
5. GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENT IN KHOWANG-SHALMARI AREA: The project comprises of only Gas Transmission
Pipelines as detailed below:
Description
of the Pipeline(s) |
Land Area (Ha) |
Estimated Cost (Rs in lakhs) |
a)
Shalmari Approach to Shalmari OCS1/GCS : 150mm X 8.5Km |
5.1 |
515.00 |
b)
Shalmari OCS-1/GCS to Shalmari OCS-2 :
100mm X 5.7Km |
1.75 |
268.00 |
c)
Extension/Augmentation of Existing Gas Flow Pipeline Network : 50mm to 250mm : Approx. 30Kms |
9 |
2500.00 |
Total |
9.6 |
3283.00 |
6. GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENT IN ARUNACHAL AREA: The project comprise of Gas Transmission
Pipelines as detailed:
Description of the Pipeline(s) |
Land Area (Ha) |
Estimated Cost (Rs in lakhs) |
a) Kumchai- Doomduma-Hapjan Gas Pipeline: 150mm X |
45 |
4500.00 |
b)Extension/Augmentation of Existing Gas Flow Pipeline
Network
:
50mm to 250mm : Approx. 5Kms |
1.5 |
350.00 |
Total |
46.5 |
4850.00 |
The committee discussed the projects and the process and
decided that the activity attracts the provisions of the EIA Notification,
2006. PAs have informed that in the proposed areas no Eco-sensitive areas/Wild
life sanctuaries/National parks are situated within
1. The details of each project site,
land area, ownership of land, ROW, status of land, etc should be incorporated.
2. Monitoring shall be carried out at
each site for VOCs, HC (Methane and non Methane)
3. Certificate from wildlife
warden/State Forest Department regarding no ecologically sensitive areas and
Wild life sanctuary/National parks within
4. Safety details for the each pipeline
5. Details of spillage/leakage control
The committee decided that the EIA/EMP based on the above
and other information as per the generic structure given in the EIA
Notification 2006, may be prepared and submitted to the Ministry for
consideration for prior environmental clearance. The public hearing issue will
be considered after submission of the EIA/EMP based on the above TORs and
information.
8.7 Development of three marginal fields at
cluster -7 located on the south west of Mumbai by M/s Prize petroleum company
Limited-- Environmental Clearance regd.
The above proposal
was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 82nd meeting
held on 10th & 12th June, 2008. The Committee
prescribed the. TORs for incorporation in the EIA/EMP report and advised the
project proponent to submit final EIA/EMP report to the Ministry
for obtaining environmental clearance. Public hearing
is not applicable to the project, as the project is located in the offshore,
M/s Prize petroleum company Limited
have proposed for development of three offshore marginal fields (
platforms B-192, B-45 and WO-24 ) under the name of Cluster 7 located at West
coast Mumbai offshore. Cluster 7 is located
Water requirement of 50 m3/day
will be met from the desalination plant. Domestic wastewater (40 m3/d) generated
on drilling rigs will be treated in modular treatment units before releasing to
the sea. Produced water (10,000 b/d) will be treated for oil removal and
disposed in to the sea. Apart from the flue gases from generators, the flare
gases from handling of crude and associated gas contribute to the emission of
carbon dioxide, water vapors and traces of oxides of nitrogen. The impact of
emissions from flare on marine environment is not significant.
Waste oils (5-10 barrels/month)
that cannot be treated onboard the rig , will
be collected and sent to shore base for appropriate reuse/recycle or
disposal. Biodegradable wastes will be discharged to the sea. Non-degradable waste will be properly
segregated and brought to shore for on-land disposal. Drill cuttings,
thoroughly washed and separated from WBM/SBM, will be brought to shore for
disposal in authorized hazardous waste disposal sites.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures undertaken recommended the proposal for grant of
environmental clearance.
8.8 Exploratory
drilling in block AA-ONN-2004/4 in
The
proposal regarding exploratory drilling in block AA-ONN-2004/4 in Assam by M/s
NaftoGaz India Pvt. Ltd. was considered by the Expert
Appraisal Committee in its 76st
meeting held on 26th – 28th December, 2007.The Committee prescribed the. TORs for undertaking EIA
study and advised the project proponent
to submit the EIA/EMP report to the State Pollution Control Board for
conducting public hearing. The issues emerged during the PH/PC shall be
incorporated in the EIA/EMP report and the report submitted to the Ministry for
obtaining environmental clearance.
Public hearing for the project was on 08th August, 2008
and issues raised were regarding,
compensation for trees cutting in forests, loss of agricultural field,
drilling locations from reserved forest, and provision of employment etc.
All the
above issues were addressed by the project proponent. The project proponent informed that if there be any tree
cutting in the local forest they are committed to go for compensatory
plantation through forest Department, Govt. of Assam. The drilling location is
yet to be finalized. It will be ensured that drilling locations will be away
from the sensitive locations. Local people/ vehicles will be hired. Public
hearing for the seismic survey is not required.
M/s NaftoGaz India Pvt. Ltd. have
proposed for exploratory drilling for oil & gas in block AA-ONN-2004/4 in Assam The block
is located in District Tinsukia of Assam and covers an area of
On completion of
activities, the well will be either plugged and suspended or will be killed and
permanently abandoned. To suspend the well, it will be filled with a brine
solution containing very small quantities of inhibitors to protect the well.
The well will be sealed with cement plugs and some of the wellhead equipment
will be left on the surface. If the well is abandoned, it will be sealed with a
series of cement plugs and all the wellhead equipment will be removed leaving
the surface clear of any debris and the site will be restored.
Power requirement will be met through the four DG sets of capacity
448 kW each. Three generators will be used at a time and one will be kept as
standby and one DG set of 63 kW is
proposed for the residential camp. It is estimated that approx. 15-20 Kl/day of
fuel (HSD) will be required during the drilling operation for generation of
7000KW power for each well.
Total water requirement per drilling site will be 1200
The main air
emissions will be from the DG set at well site. Flaring of gases during the
drilling testing phase will contribute to additional air pollution. However as
the flaring will occur only for intermittent phases and will not last for more
than a few days, the impact on air quality will not be significant. The air
emissions from DG set will be controlled by burning of diesel with low
After
detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) recommended the proposal for grant of
environmental clearance subject to stipulation of environmental safeguards.
8.9 Exploratory drilling in block
CB-ONN-2004/5 at village: Palej, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat by M/s NaftoGaz
The
proposal regarding exploratory drilling in block CB-ONN-2004/5 at village: Palej, Dist. Bharuch, Gujarat by M/s NaftoGaz
India Pvt. Ltd. was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 70th meeting held on 6th
– 8th August, 2007.The Committee prescribed the, TORs for
undertaking EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit the EIA/EMP
report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing. The
issues emerged during the PH/PC shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report and
the report submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental
clearance.
Public
hearing for the project was held on on
18th September 2008 and issues raised were regarding prevention of
accidents, impact of blasting and benefit to the local people due to discovery
of oil etc. In general people welcomed
the project.
All the
above issues were addressed by the project proponent. The project proponent
have informed that they will close the
wells after drilling by proper casing and will not leave abandoned wells
open. They will provide proper fencing at drill site and security to avoid such
accidents. There will be no blasting in the
proposed project drilling. Distribution of oil & gas will be as per
the Govt. Policy.
M/s NaftoGaz India Pvt. Ltd. have
proposed for exploratory drilling for hydrocarbon in block CB-ONN-2004/5 near
village: Palej in Dist. Bharuch in
Total
water requirement per drilling site will be 1500 KL, which will be sourced from
the nearby local water source. In case
need arises ground water will also be used.
The wastewater will be generated because of domestic use and from drilling
operations. The wastewater from the domestic sewage (1.5 KLD) will be disposed
through soak pit/septic tank system. The wastewater from the waste pit along
with fresh water will be used in preparation of drilling fluid. The drilling
fluid (mud) after recirculation will be collected in the lined pit at the end
of the operation and solar evaporation and solid waste retained will be
disposed to the authorized landfill
site. Power requirement will be met through the DG sets of capacity 2250 KW (2
nos.) and 120 KW (1 nos). HSD will be used as fuel for DG set.
Source of air emission
will be the DG sets and test flaring for short period of time and other
activities during drilling and well testing. Adequate stack height is proposed
for DG sets and test flaring through vertical flare system along with provision
of adequate stack height for proper dispersion of pollutants. Air quality
monitoring was carried out for a period from 19th March, 2007 to 12th
June, 2007, for 10 locations for the parameters SPM, RSPM, SO2, NOx, CO and HC
(Toluene and Benzene). Values for SPM, RSPM, SO2 and NOx were observed within
the permissible limits. The results of HC were found below detectable limit for
all the locations where as CO varied from 0.710-0.976 ppm.
Solid
waste generated in the form of drill cuttings during the drilling phase (20
MT/well) will be collected and covered with native earth and disposed off
either in onsite pits lined with
impervious layer or disposed to a approved secured landfill site. Used
oil/waste oil will be collected and disposed of to the registered recycler
authorized by MoEF. Construction
material waste will be used as a filler material. Kitchen waste will be
composted. Sewage sludge will be used as manure. Drilling mud will be disposed
of in drilling fluid collection pit. Hydrocarbon waste will be collected in drums
and disposed to authorized waste oil recyclers.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance.
8.10 Proposed synthetic organic chemical
products unit in existing pesticide unit at plot no. 6301-10A, GIDC estate, Ankleshwar,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In
instant case the plant is located within the notified industrial area GIDC
Ankleshwar and covered under category “B” but the Ankleshwar is an identified
critically polluted area hence as per general condition the proposal was
appraised at centre.
M/s. Bayer crop science have
Proposed for synthetic organic chemical unit in existing pesticide unit at plot
no. 6301-10A, GIDC estate,
Ankleshwar-393002,
Details
of products along with their roduction are given below:
Sr. No. |
Existing Product |
Quantity (T/Annum) |
A.Technical |
||
01 |
Anilophos |
300 |
02 |
Triazophos |
3000 |
03 |
DMTA |
255 |
04 |
DETA |
800 |
05 |
Deltamethrin |
30 |
06 |
Flumethrin |
10 |
07 |
Benfuresate |
80 |
08 |
Phenocyanol |
18 |
09 |
Oxadiargyl |
150 |
10 |
Ethoprophos |
3000 |
11 |
Permethrin |
20 |
B. Formulation |
||
12 |
Isoproturon |
350 |
13 |
Diuron |
50 |
14 |
Carbendazim |
150 |
15 |
Sevin |
550 |
16 |
Endosulfan |
700 |
17 |
Anilophos |
300 |
18 |
Triazophos |
1600 |
19 |
Deltamethrin |
50 |
20 |
Fenoxaporp- Ethyl |
50 |
21 |
Glufosinate Ammonium |
20 |
22 |
Monocrotophos |
600 (150)* |
23 |
Ethion |
100 |
24 |
Quintol |
150 |
25 |
Alliet |
50 |
26 |
Cypermethrin |
800 (80)* |
27 |
Methyl Parathion |
1300 KL (900)* |
28 |
Oxydemeton Methyl |
630 KL (150)* |
29 |
Quinolphos |
630 KL (150)* |
30 |
Ediphenphos |
200 KL (100)* |
31 |
Fenthion |
300 KL (250)* |
32 |
Propoxur |
100 KL (20)* |
33 |
Baytex Gr. |
100 (3)* |
34 |
Imidachloropid |
400 (85)* |
35 |
Acephete |
450 (350)* |
* Equivalent technical quantity has bee mentioned |
||
Proposed Products |
||
1 |
Desmodur L 75 |
12000 |
2 |
Desmodur N 75 |
12000 |
3 |
Desmodur N 3390 |
12000 |
4 |
Power (CPP) |
1.4 MW |
Power requirement of 4880 KW will
be met from the DGVCL. Fuel requirement will be Natural gas (15428 nm3/day) and
lube oil (500 lts/month).
Water requirement of 865 m3/d
will be met from GIDC water supply. Effluent generation will be 450
m3/d. Waste water streams will be
according to the pollution load. Process
streams will be neutralized and pretreated at plant level, and further treated
in existing biological waste water treatment plant. The non process streams
would be treated in existing Biological waste water treatment plant. Toxic
streams generated from the process will be incinerated in own incinerator. No
additional process waste water will be generated due to the proposed expansion.
To
control the process emissions from the existing unit water, acid, caustic and
ventury scrubbers are provided. In the proposed unit there will be no addition of process stack or
vent. Vent gas will be connected to existing incinerator plant.
Solid/Hazardous
waste generated will be in the form
of used lube oil (2 T/annum) will be
sold to MoEF registered reprocessors/incineration within the premises. Oil
filter (0.5 T/annum), spent solvent (40 T/annum),waste from containment/clean
up of spills (18 T/annum), contaminated cotton waste containers/liners (15
T/annum), distillation waste (33 T/annum), date expired/off specification
product (50 KL/annum), used liners (15 T/annum), waste from containment/clean
up of spills (2 T/annum) and flue gas cleaning residue/waste carbon (2.5
T/annum) will be incinerated within the premises. Discarded asbestos (5
T/annum), waste from surface preparation for painting (3 T/annum), waste
insulation lining material (25 T/annum), ETP sludge (1200 T/annum), used PPE (2
T/annum), broken glass (5 T/annum), incineration ash (40 T/annum) and brick
refractory (12 T/annum) will be disposed at BEIL- TSDF. Discarded empty
containers (24000 nos/annum) will be sold to GPCB authorized vendors. Ammonium
Sulphate (700 T/annum), NaSH (947 T/annum) and sulphuric Acid (350 T/annum)
will be sold to end users.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) considering the technical
aspects of the project recommended the proposal for grant of environmental
clearance subject to stipulation of following additional specific
conditions along with specific and general conditions:
i.
The Unit
shall carry out VOC monitoring in the
work zone.
ii.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
iii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
iv.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate.
8.11 Proposed expansion of organic intermediates
unit at plot no 27, phase I, GIDC,
industrial estate VAPI , Dist Valsad , Gujarat by M/s Chemiesynth (Vapi) Ltd. - Environmental Clearance
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In
instant case the plant is located within the notified industrial area GIDC Vapi
and covered under category “B” but the Vapi is an identified critically
polluted area hence as per general condition the proposal was appraised at
centre.
M/s Chemiesynth (Vapi) Ltd. have
Proposed for expansion organic intermediates unit at plot no 27, phase I, GIDC, industrial estate VAPI , Dist Valsad ,
Gujarat – 396195 The unit is located in
GIDC Vapi, which is identified as critically polluted by CPCB. No eco-sensitive areas are located within
Details
of products along with their production capacities are given below:
Sr. |
Name of the product |
Remarks |
Capacity, MT / month |
Remarks |
|
||||||||
existing |
proposed scenario |
Diff. |
|
||||||||||
|
GROUP A |
|
|||||||||||
1 |
Naphthalene 1:8 Dicarboxylic
anhydride 4 sulphonic acid ( 4 SNA ) |
old |
3 |
3 |
|
All the three products shall be
alternatively manufactured against their rated capacity only. |
|
||||||
2 |
OR 4 - Chloro Anthranilic Acid |
new |
0 |
or 1 |
|
||||||||
3 |
OR 4 - Amino -3-methyl Benzoic
acid methyl ester. |
new |
0 |
or 0.6 |
|
||||||||
|
Maximum production capacity of
Group A |
|
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
|||||||
|
GROUP B |
|
|||||||||||
4 |
DEMAP Aldehyde |
old |
2 |
2 |
|
All the three products shall be
alternatively manufactured against their rated capacity only. |
|
||||||
5 |
OR
5 Nitro Indazole (Grade- III ) |
old |
or 1 |
or 1 |
|
||||||||
6 |
OR BTL II |
new |
0 |
or 1 |
|
||||||||
|
Maximum production capacity of
Group B |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|||||||
|
GROUP C |
|
|||||||||||
7 |
FEN - 04 OR { 5 - [ 2 - Chloro
- 4 - Trifluoromethyl ) - Phenoxy] -2- Nitrobenzoic Acid} |
new |
40 |
40 |
|
no change |
|
||||||
|
Total production capacity of
Group C |
|
40 |
40 |
0 |
|
|
||||||
Sr. |
Name of the product |
Remarks |
Capacity, MT / month |
Remarks |
|||||||||
existing |
proposed scenario |
Diff. |
|||||||||||
|
GROUP D |
||||||||||||
8 |
Meta Systox R or Oxydemeton-
methyl,or |
new |
0 |
90 |
|
Both the products shall be alternatively
manufactured against their rated capacity only. |
|||||||
9 |
OR Ethyl Ptenyl Glyoxylate (
EPG ) |
new |
0 |
or 60 |
|
||||||||
|
maximum production capacity of Group D |
|
0 |
90 |
90 |
||||||||
|
GROUP E |
||||||||||||
10 |
|
old |
10 |
10 |
|
All the three products shall be
alternatively manufactured against their rated capacity only. |
|||||||
11 |
OR 2 Methyl 5 Amino Phenol |
old |
or 4.5 |
or 4.5 |
|
||||||||
12 |
OR
2:6 Di Chloro P Amino Phenol |
new |
0 |
or 6 |
|
||||||||
|
maximum production capacity of
Group E |
|
10 |
10 |
0 |
||||||||
|
GROUP F |
||||||||||||
13 |
4 -
nitro Ortho Phenyl Di Amine |
new |
0 |
1 |
|
New product |
|||||||
|
Total production capacity of
Group F |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|||||||
|
GROUP G |
||||||||||||
14 |
Puralide |
new |
0 |
5 |
|
New product |
|||||||
|
Total production capacity of
Group G |
|
0 |
5 |
5 |
|
|||||||
|
GROUP H |
||||||||||||
15 |
DMPAT |
new |
0 |
200 |
|
New product |
|||||||
|
Total production capacity of
Group H |
|
0 |
200 |
200 |
|
|||||||
|
Total Net production of all
groups |
|
55 |
351 |
296 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
And byproduct
Sr. |
Name of the |
Capacity, MT / month |
||
existing |
proposed |
Total after
expansion |
||
1 |
30% HCl |
3.18 |
3.4 |
6.58 |
2 |
acetic acid |
123.5 |
0.0 |
123.50 |
3 |
Crome Oxide |
4.87 |
0.0 |
4.87 |
4 |
20% Sodium Bisulfite |
0 |
31.7 |
31.70 |
5 |
Spent Acid |
37.92 |
0.0 |
37.92 |
6 |
Hexane |
0 |
0.43 |
0.43 |
7 |
AlCl3 Soln. |
0 |
8.16 |
8.16 |
8 |
Ammonium Chloride |
0 |
75.2 |
75.20 |
9 |
Sodium Chloride |
0 |
248.41 |
248.41 |
|
Total |
169.47 |
367.3 |
536.76 |
Power requirement of 475 KVA will
be met from DGVCL. DG set, 1 no of 125 KVA is proposed for emergency power back
up. Fuel requirement for the boiler will be FO (1600 L/day) and bagasse/coal
(400 Kg/hr.). fuel for DG set will be LDO (20 lt/hr.)
Water requirement of 251 m3/d
will be met from GIDC water supply. Effluent generation will be 125.435
m3/d. The normal stream will be treated in effluent treatment plant for
primary, secondary and tertiary treatment. High TDS effluent will be treated in
Tripple Effect Evaporation system. The treated effluent will be sent to CETP for further treatment and
disposal.
Stack
height of 30m for the Boiler. and 11m
for the DG set is proposed. Two stage water and Caustic Scrubber, two
stage alkali Scrubber and two stage
water scrubber and single stage water scrubbers are proposed to control process
emissions.
Solid/Hazardous
waste generation will be, waste/used oil (40 kgs/month) will be sold to registered recyclers .
Discarded containers (4360 nos/month)
will be utilized for packing of HW or sold to authorized recyclers.
Sludge from ETP (10 MT/month), evaporated Salt (77.4 MT/month), Calcium
phosphate from the process (5.12 MT/month),
Iron Oxide from the process (26.85 MT/month), Calcium Sulphate from the
process (10.00 MT/month), magnesium sulphate from the process (0.18 MT/month)
and ammonium Sulphate salt from the process (2.15 MT/month) will be disposed
off to TSDF, Vapi. Spent carbon (12.16 MT/month) and residue from the process
(28.24 MT/month) will be sent to common incineration facility, Vapi. Gypsum from
the process (0.3 MT/month) will be disposed of in the TSDF, Vapi or to the
cement industries.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) recommended the proposal for
grant of environmental clearance subject to
stipulation of following additional specific conditions along with specific and
general conditions:
I.
Solvents shall be stripped before the effluent are sent to
Effluent Treatment Plant to control the VOC emissions.
II.
Monitoring of VOCs shall be
carried out in ambient and work zone.
III.
The ETP shall be upgraded and the
treated effluent shall meet the required standards specific discharge standards
notified under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986..
IV.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
V.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
VI.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid / hazardous
waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for fire
fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate
8.12 Proposed specialty oils & chemicals manufacturing
unit at plot no 3113, GIDC, industrial estate, Panoli in Dist. Bharuch in
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case, the plant is located within the notified industrial area, GIDC
Panoli and covered under category “B” . But the Panoli is an identified
critically polluted area, hence as per general condition the proposal was
appraised at centre.
M/s Prime Chemicals have proposed
for a specialty oils & chemicals
unit at plot no 3113, GIDC, industrial estate, Panoli, Dist. Bharuch
,
Sr. No |
Name of Products |
Capacity, (MT/Month) |
|
Primex-001 |
|
I |
Printing Ink Based Process Oil |
200 |
II. |
Thinner Based Products |
150 |
2. |
Primex-002 |
|
I |
Speciality Oil |
250 |
II |
Rubber Process Oil |
260 |
III |
Aromatic Pesticides Solvent |
150 |
3. |
Primex-003 |
|
I |
Alumini. um Rolling Oils |
150 |
II. |
Textile Oils |
150 |
4. |
Primex – 004 |
400 |
Total |
1710 |
Details
of products along with their production capacities are given below:
The power requirement of 20 Hp
will be met from the Daxin Gujrat Vij Company Limited. No DG set will be
provided in the proposed unit. Natural gas @ 120.0 M3/day will be
used for Thermic Fluid Heater.
Fresh water requirement of1.015
m3/d will be met from the GIDC water supply. No process effluent will be
generated. The domestic wastewater
generation will be 0.4 m3/day, which will be discharged into soak pit through
Septic Tank.
Stack height of
25 Nos. /Annum of discarded drums from raw
material storage and handling will be decontaminated and reused or sold to
approve vendors. 5 Lit/Annum of spent oil from the plant and machinery will be
sold to MoEF Approved Recycler.
After detailed deliberations, the
EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed pollution control measure to be undertaken
recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance subject to
stipulation of following additional specific conditions along with specific and
general conditions:
i.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate.
8.13 Proposed
Dyes intermediates unit at plot
no 285, 286/1, a-1-322/1 and 2 II phase
, GIDC Vapi, dist. Valsad, Gujarat by M/s
Aarti industries Ltd. reg Environmental Clearance
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) and 5(b) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” category and was appraised at
centre
M/s Aarti industries Ltd. (Amine
Division) have Proposed for a dyes intermediates unit at plot no 285, 286/1, a-1-322/1 and 2,
II phase, GIDC Vapi, Dist. Valsad, Gujarat-396195. The unit is located in GIDC
Vapi, which is identified as critically polluted area by CPCB. No eco-sensitive
areas are located within
Details of products and their
production capacities are given below:
Sr. No. |
Product |
Present capacity
(MTPM) |
Proposed capacity (MTPM) |
Total capacity (MTPM) |
GROUP –A : AMMONOLYSIS
PRODUCTS |
||||
1 |
4-Nitro Aniline (PNA) |
125 |
545 |
1100 |
2 |
2-Nitro Aniline (ONA) |
170 |
||
3 |
2-Chloro 4-Nitro Aniline
(OCPNA) |
130 |
||
4 |
|
130 |
||
AND/OR |
||||
5 |
Di Chloro Ortho Nitro Aniline
(DCONA) |
-- |
1100 |
1100 |
|
TOTAL |
555 |
1100 |
1100 |
GROUP-B : NITRATION
PRODUCTS |
||||
1 |
2,5 DCNB |
NIL |
3500 |
3500 |
2 |
3,4 DCNB |
|||
3 |
2,3,4 TCNB |
|||
4 |
2,4,5 TCNB |
|||
5 |
NCB |
|||
6 |
DNCB |
|||
|
TOTAL |
NIL |
3500 |
3500 |
REDUCTION PRODUCTS |
||||
1 |
3,5 DCA |
NIL |
150 |
150 |
2 |
MCA |
|||
3 |
OPDA |
|||
4 |
PPDA |
|||
BY-PRODUCTS |
||||
1 |
Mixture of 2,3,4 & 2,4,5
TCNB |
-- |
700 |
700 |
2 |
CaCl2 Solution |
-- |
620 |
620 |
3 |
Dilute Sulphuric Acid |
-- |
3857 |
3857 |
|
Ammonium Chloride (NH4Cl) |
2 |
-- |
-- |
4 |
Sodium Thiosulphate |
-- |
519 |
519 |
DG set
of 750 KVA is proposed for stand by power supply. Fuel requirement for the
boiler will be 834 kg/hr of coal and/or gas 700 m3/hr. Fuel requirement for the
DG set will be 120 lts/hr.
Total water requirement of 484 m3/d
will be sourced from the GIDC water supply. Total wastewater generation
will be 84 m3/d. No process effluent
will be generated. The other effluent will be treated in existing effluent
treatment plant which will be modified to treat the effluent for primary,
secondary and tertiary treatment and treated effluent will be sent to CETP for
further treatment and disposal. Domestic effluent will be treated through
septic tanks/ soak pits.
Multicyclone dust
collector system and stack height of 37m is proposed for the coal/gas fired 10
TPH boiler and stack height of 11m is proposed for the DG set. Three stage scrubber and two stage scrubber are proposed
for ammonia recovery.
Hazardous waste/solid wastes will be in the form of ETP waste (110
MT/month) which will be disposed off to TSDF, VAPI. Used oil (50 lts/year) will
be reused in the plant for lubrication purposes. Process waste (NH4Cl)
(2 MT/month) Ammonium Chloride will be treated with Calcium hydroxide to obtain
Ammonia & Calcium which will be recycled and sold to actual users.
Discarded material plastic bags/drums/liners will be sold to actual users.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance subject to stipulation of
following additional specific conditions along with specific and general
conditions:
i.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
ii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge from new industries or expansion
of existing industries in the area that lead to CETP until the said CETP meet
the required standards and meet the hydraulic capacity.
iii.
Monitoring of VOC shall be carried in
the wourk zone anddata submitted to the Ministry.
iv.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate.
8.14 Proposed
dye & dyes intermediates unit at plot no 902, III phase , GIDC Vapi,
dist. Valsad,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case, the plant is located within the notified industrial area
GIDC Vapi and covered under category “B” . But the Vapi is an identified critically
polluted area, hence, as per general condition the proposal was appraised at
centre.
M/s Aarti industries Ltd.
(Alchemic Organics Division) have
Proposed for a dye & dyes intermediates unit at GIDC Vapi in
Dist. Valsad in
Details of products and production capacities are given below:
Sr. No. |
Product |
Present Capacity
(MTPA) |
Proposed Capacity (MTPA) |
Total Capacity (MTPA) |
1 |
Dichloro Banzedine Hydro
Chloride (DCBH) |
1000 |
3000 |
4000 |
2 |
Dichloro Phenol (DCP) |
100 |
500 |
600 |
3A |
|
0 |
300 |
300 |
3B |
|
|||
|
3,5 Di Flouro Bromo Benzene |
|||
3D |
3,4 Di Flouro Bromo Benzene |
|||
3E |
3,4,5 Tri Flouro Bromo Benzene |
|||
4A |
3,5 Dichloro Nitro Benzene |
0 |
750 |
750 |
|
And/Or |
|||
4B |
Trichloro Benzene |
|||
5A |
3,5 Dichloro Aniline |
0 |
900 |
900 |
|
And/Or |
|||
5B |
|
|||
|
And/Or |
|||
|
OCPPDA |
|||
6A |
Quinalphos 25% EC (Diethyl
2-Hydroxy Thiophosphoryl Chloride) |
840 |
0 |
840 |
And/Or |
||||
6B |
Triazophose 40% EC |
0 |
2250 |
2250 |
7A |
QP |
1500 |
-- |
1500 |
|
And /or |
|
|
|
7B |
Triazophose |
-- |
1500 |
|
8 |
2,3 Dichloro 4 Amino Phenol |
0 |
300 |
300 |
9 |
Ortho Chloro Aniline |
0 |
400 |
400 |
|
Total |
3440 |
9900 |
11000 |
|
By-Products |
|
|
|
1 |
Dilute Sulphuric Acid |
1232 |
25199 |
26431 |
2 |
NaBr. Solution |
-- |
2004 |
2004 |
|
Sodium Thiosulphate |
-- |
7591 |
7591 |
Fuel
requirement for the boiler will be 321 lts/hr. of LDO/FO and/or 31 Ton/day of
coal and/or gas 625 m3/hr. fuel requirements for the Thermopack and
Incinerators will be LDO/FO (113 lt/hr.)
Total water requirement will be 601 m3/d,
which will be sourced from the GIDC water supply. Total wastewater generation
will be 371.10 m3/d. The effluent will be treated in the existing effluent
treatment plant for primary, secondary and tertiary treatment and treated
effluent will be sent to CETP for further treatment and disposal. Domestic
effluent will be treated through septic tanks/ soak pits.
Stack height of 20m
is proposed for the boiler and Thermopack heater. Ventury Alkali scrubber are
proposed for the incinerator. HCl & Alkali scrubber and Two stage scrubber
are proposed to control the process emissions.
Hazardous solid waste generation will be in the form of
ETP waste (19479 Kg/day) and will be disposed off to TSDF, VAPI. Distillation
residue (74 Kg/day) will be incinerated in own incineration system. Date
expired and off Specification Pesticides (200 Kg/annum) will be incinerated in
own incineration system. Spent solvent (1200 Kg/annum) will be reused or
incinerated in own incineration system. Spent catalyst (15700 Kg/annum) will be
sent to suppliers for regeneration. Spent Filter (700 nos/annum) will be
incinerated in own incineration system. Incineration Ash (3248 Kg/day) will be
disposed to common TSDF site where it will be used for land filling. Used oil
(60 lts/month) will be reused in the plant for lubrication purposes. Discarded material (34000 nos/month) will be
sold to actual users.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance subject to stipulation of
following additional specific conditions along with specific and general
conditions:
i.
The unit shall carry out monitoring of VOC and data
should be submitted to the Ministry.
ii.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
iii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
iv.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate.
8.15 Organic Specialty chemicals intermediates
unit at plot no 1713, III phase, GIDC
Vapi, dist. Valsad, Gujarat-396195 by
M/s Yasho industries Pvt. Ltd (Unit-II) - Environmental Clearance.
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In
instant case the plant is located within the notified industrial area GIDC Vapi
and covered under category “B” but the Vapi is an identified critically
polluted area hence as per general condition the proposal was appraised at
centre.
M/s. Yasho Industries PVT. Ltd. have
proposed for organic Specialty
chemicals intermediates unit at plot no 1713, III phase , GIDC Vapi,
Dist. Valsad in
Details of the products to be manufactured and their production capacities include the following:
S. no |
Products |
Quantity (MTPM) |
01 |
5-Methoxy-2-Mercaptobenzimidazole (5-MMBI) |
5 |
02 |
Tetra Methyl Thiuram
Monosulfide (TMTM) |
5 |
03 |
Diphenyl Guadinidine (DPG) |
5 |
04 |
Butylated Hydroxy Anisole (BHA) |
15 |
05 |
4,4-Dithiodimorpholine (DTDM) |
2 |
06 |
Copper Dimethyl Dithiocarbamate
(CDMC) |
1 |
07 |
Nickel DiButyl Dithiocarbamate
(NDBC) |
2 |
08 |
Zinc Dibenzyl Dithiocarbamate
(ZBEC) |
20 |
09 |
Copper DiButyl Dithiocarbamate
(CDBC) |
20 |
10 |
2-Mercaptobenzimidazole (2-MBI) |
10 |
11 |
Tertiary Butyl Hydroquinone
(TBHQ) |
50 |
12 |
4,5 Methyl
2-Mercaptobenzimidazole (2-MMB) |
40 |
13 |
Aromatic Derivative of
Diphenylamine ( |
20 |
14 |
Ethylene Thiourea (ETU) |
5 |
15 |
Octylated Diphenylamine (OCD) |
100 |
16 |
Tetra Methyl Thiuram Disulfide
(TMT) |
5 |
17 |
Zinc DiButyl Dithiocarbamate
(ZDBC) |
20 |
18 |
Zinc Diethyl Dithiocarbamate
(ZDC) |
20 |
19 |
Zinc Salt of 4&5, Methyl 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole (ZMMB) |
40 |
20 |
Dimethyl Diphenyl Thiuram
Disulfide (MPTD) |
10 |
21 |
Zinc Salt of 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole (ZMB) |
5 |
22 |
Caprolactum Di Sulphide (DTDC) |
10 |
|
Total |
410.00 |
|
By-Products |
|
01 |
Sodium Bisulphide |
4.40 |
02 |
Methyl Hydrogen Sulphide |
13.20 |
03 |
Hydrochloric acid |
11.50 |
04 |
Sodium Sulphide |
12.35 |
The total power requirement for
the proposed unit will be 750 HP which will be sourced from the Dakshin Gujarat
Vij. co. Ltd. DG set of 500 KVA is also proposed in case of power failure from
DGVCL. Fuel requirement for the non-IBR
boiler and Thermo pack boiler will be FO, 75 lts/day and fuel for DG sets will be LDO 20 lts/Hr.
The total water requirement for
the proposed unit will be 148.5 m3/day and will be sourced from the GIDC water
supply. The effluent generation will be 101 m3/day (94 m3/day industrial +7
m3/day domestic). The effluent will be treated in ETP and treated effluent will
be disposed to CETP, Vapi.
To control process emissions
water and alkali Scrubbers in series with stack height of 11 mts. are proposed. Stack height of
Solid /hazardous waste
will be generated in the form of ETP waste (200 kgs/month) stored and finally
disposed to CSWD site of VWEMCL, Vapi.
Spent carbon (1.85 MT/month) will be stored and sent for incineration at GEPIL site,
The committee deliberated
in detail regarding the measures of odour control. The proponent informed that
odour nuisance is due to the sulphure compound. To control the odour reactions
will be carried in the closed reactors and exhaust with proper ducting and
odour control filters will be provided.
Ventury scrubber will be installed.
As desired by the
committee, the proponent also submitted the compliance report for the existing
unit manufacturing the similer product. The company has installed solvent recovery
system to recover the solvent and
secondary condenser with chilled brine to recover the solvents have been
provided. Further, regular monitoring of HCl and VOC’s is being carried out
within the plant.
The Committee after detailed deliberations, recommended the proposal for
grant of environmental clearance subject to
stipulation of following specific conditions:
i.
The solvent from the effluent shall be stripped
before sending to ETP.
ii.
Measures for odour control shall be taken
iii.
Monitoring of VOC in ambient and work zone.
iv.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
v.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
vi.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate.
8.16 Proposed diversification of existing unit
by introduction of colourformer & developer (pergafast & pergascript
range of products) & its intermediates unit at plot no 8001, phase-VI, GIDC, industrial estate, Ankleshwar-393002
Dist. Bharuch , Gujarat by M/s
Diamond Dye-Chem Ltd. (unit-II) -
Environmental Clearance
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case, the plant is located within the notified industrial area, GIDC
Ankleshwar and covered under category “B”. But the Ankleshwar is an identified
critically polluted area, hence as per general condition the proposal was
appraised at centre.
M/s Diamond Dye-Chem Ltd.
(unit-II) have proposed for
diversification of existing unit by introduction of colourformer & developer (Pergafast
& Pergascript range of products) & its intermediates unit at GIDC, industrial
estate, Ankleshwar in Dist. Bharuch
in Gujarat. The unit
will be located in the notified industrial
area, GIDC Ankleshwar. As per CPCB, Ankleshwar has been identified as
critically polluted area. No protected forests/eco-sensitive areas are located
within
Details of Products and their production capacities are given below:
Sr. No. |
Product |
Present Capacity (MTPA) |
Proposed Capacity (MTPA) |
Total Capacity (MTPA) |
1 |
Pergascript
Red I-6B and/or Pergascript
Red MC-30 |
180 |
- |
180 |
2 |
Pergascript
Blue SRB-P |
120 |
- |
120 |
3 |
Pergascript
Green I-2GN |
180 |
- |
180 |
4 |
Pergascript
Orange I-G |
60 |
- |
60 |
5 |
Pergascript
201 And/or Pergascript
201 Dispersion (on 100% Basis) |
1080 |
- |
1080 |
6 |
BB Acid and/or Pergascript
Blue-1-2G |
60 |
- |
60 |
7 |
Optical Whiteners (on 100%
Basis) |
- |
500 |
500 |
|
Total |
1680 |
500 |
2180 |
By Products |
||||
1 |
Sodium Acetate (on 100% basis) |
125 |
- |
125 |
2 |
Sodium Acetate liq. (on 100% basis) |
75 |
- |
75 |
The existing power requirement of
1524 KW will fulfill the requirement for the proposed expansion. DG set of 1010
KVA as stand for power requirement will be installed. 17280 Nm3/day of natural gas will be utilized
as fuel for the boiler and 600 lts/day of LDO will be utilized as fuel for DG
set.
Existing water requirement of 300
m3/day will be met from GIDC water supply. The wastewater generation will
remain the same i.e 250 m3/day. The
existing effluent after the primary treatment would be sent to M/s Environ Technology Ltd. (ETL), Ankleshwar
for final treatment and disposal. After the proposed expansion, the same scheme
will be followed. The existing treatment facility for primary treatment would
be improved. The TDS will besolidified by using isolation method and
filteration and then biological treatment would be given. Domestic effluent
will be disposed through septic
tank/soak pit.
Stack height of 32m is proposed
for two steam boilers and stack height of
Process waste (20 MTPA) and Tar
waste (12 MTPA) will be sent to Common incineration facility at BEIL. Spent
Solvent (5872 MTPA) will be sold to M/s Daxesh Petrochem Pvt. Ltd for
Distillation and Spent Solvent (2021 MTPA) will be sent to Common incineration
facility at BEIL. Used/Spent oil (2 MTPA) will sold to registered refiners.
Discarded containers (160 MTPA) and barrels/liners (10 MTPA) will be collected,
stored and decontaminated. Non recyclable plastic waste (20 MTPA), used PP
equipments (0.2 MTPA), waste insulation material (1 MTPA), broken glass wares
etc. (0.2 MTPA) and ETP sludge (410) will be
disposed at TSDF of BEIL.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measure to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance subject to stipulation of
following additional specific conditions along with specific and general conditions:
i.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
ii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge from new industries or
expansion of existing industries in the area that lead to CETP until the said
CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic capacity.
iii.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate.
8.17 Proposed expansion of dyes manufacturing
unit at plot no 6713, 6714/1 GIDC,
industrial estate, Ankleshwar-393002 Dist. Bharuch ,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case, the plant is located within the notified industrial area, GIDC
Ankleshwar and covered under category “B”. But the Ankleshwar is an identified
critically polluted area, hence, as per general condition the proposal was
appraised at centre
M/s Jay Yogeshwar Chemical Industries have
proposed for expansion of dyes manufacturing unit at plot no 6713, 6714/1 GIDC, industrial estate, Ankleshwar-393002
Dist. Bharuch , Gujarat The unit will be located within the notified
industrial area, GIDC Ankleshwar. As
per CPCB, Ankleshwar has been identified as critically polluted area. No
protected forests/eco-sensitive areas are located within
Details of Products and their production capacities are given below:
Sr. No. |
Product |
Present Capacity (MTPM) |
Proposed Capacity (MTPM) |
Total Capacity (MTPM) |
1 |
Auramine ‘O’ (Basic Yellow-2) |
12.500 |
62.500 |
75.00 |
By-Product |
||||
1 |
Mechlor’s Ketone |
03.125 |
15.625 |
18.75 |
Raw Material requirement will be
DMA (62.50 MT/M), Formaldehyde (25.00 MT/M), Sulphanilic Acid (00.625 MT/M),
Sulphur (22.750 MT/M), Urea (109.50 MT/M), Acetic Acid (37.50 MT/M), Salt
(220.00 MT/M) and Sulphamic Acid (28.00 MT/M),
The power requirement of 63 KVA
will be met through Dakshin Gujarat Vij. Company Limited (DGVCL). DG set will
be installed for stand by power requirement.
800 Nm3/day of natural gas will be utilized as fuel for the boiler.
Stack height of 10m is proposed for the boiler and thermic fluid heater. Stack
height of 9m is proposed for the DG set. Scrubbers (2 nos) are proposed to
control process emissions.
Water requirement of 411.75
m3/day will be met from the GIDC water supply. The effluent generation will be 30.38 m3/day which will be sent to CETP
for treatment and disposal. Domestic effluent will be disposed off through
septic tank/soak pit.
Discarded bags (1600 nos/month)
will be reused for packing of finished products and excess, if any will be sold
to the authorized scrap vendor. Used lubricating oil (10 lts/annum) will be
reused for lubrication, if excess will be sold to MoEF registered recycler.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) recommended the proposal for
grant of environmental clearance subject to
stipulation of following additional specific conditions along with specific and
general conditions:
i.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment (Protection)
Act, 1986.
ii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
iii.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial estate.
8.18 Proposed
Resins manufacturing unit at plot
no 13 Survey no. 46/1, Shed No. C&D
Daman
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case, the unit is located within the Daman Ganga industrial area, hence it is ‘B’ category project..
M/s. Orson Chemicals have
proposed for Resins manufacturing unit at
Daman Ganga Industrial Estate Athal , Silvasa. The unit is located in
Daman Ganga Industrial Estate.
Details
of products and their production capacities are given below:
Sr. No. |
Name of Product |
Quantity in MTPM |
1. |
Unsaturated Polyester Resin |
600 |
2. |
Vinyl Ester Resin |
50 |
|
Total |
650 |
Average water
consumption of 3.5 m3/d will be met from the ground water. About 4.108 m3/d of
effluent will be generated of which 1.0 m3/d of domestic effluent will be sent
to soak pit through septic tank. The
process effluent (3.108 m3/d) will be treated in effluent treatment plant for
primary, secondary & tertiary treatment and followed by evaporation system.
The condensate from the evaporator and treated effluent will be utilized for plantation or recycled
in cooling tower. Thus there will be no discharge of any industrial effluent
out side the factory premises. Power
requirement of 150 KVA will be sourced from the Daman Ganga Industrial Estate,
Athal. Fuel for thermopak will be FO (300 kg/day). One D G set of capacity 125
KVA is proposed for standby power supply. Fuel for DG set will be 16 lts/hr of
HSD. There will be no process gas emission. Thermopack will be provided
with a stack height of
The solid /hazardous waste will be generated
in the form of ETP (500 kgs/month) and salt from evaporation system (1500
kgs/month) will be sent to TSDF of M/s. GEPIL. Discarded containers (250
Nos/Month) will be sold to authorized recycler. Waste oil/used oil (10
kgs/year) will be sold to registered re-refiner.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance.
8.19 Proposed expansion synthetic organic
chemicals manufacturing unit at Survey no. 677- Mahuvad & Survey no. 494-
Ekalbara, Padra Taluka , Dist: Vadodara
in Gujarat by M/s. Tarak Chemicals
Private Limited reg Environmental Clearance
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case, the unit is located outside the notified industrial area and
covered under category “A”, the proposal was appraised at centre.
M/s. Tarak Chemicals Private Limited have proposed for expansion of
synthetic organic chemicals unit at Mahuvad and
Details of Products and
their production capacity are given below:
S. No. |
List
of Product |
Quantity in MT/Month |
||
Existing |
Proposed |
Total |
||
1. |
Oil
Field Chemicals |
500 |
- |
500 |
2. |
Acid
Chlorides |
50 |
- |
50 |
3. |
Ultrazol
BA |
6 |
- |
6 |
4. |
Zinc
Benzoate |
10 |
- |
10 |
5. |
Phenyl
Acetyl Glutamine |
- |
50 |
50 |
6. |
Acid/Alkyl
Chlorides |
- |
200 |
200 |
28% HCl: (By product) |
- |
250 |
250 |
|
SO2:
(By product) |
- |
100 |
100 |
|
7. |
Friedel Craft - Derivatives
of Acid Chloride |
- |
50 |
50 |
AlCl3 solution : (By product) |
- |
600 |
600 |
|
8. |
Solvent Reducible
Polymer |
- |
750 |
750 |
Power requirement will be met from the Madhya
Gujarat Vij Company Limited (MGVCL). Present connected load is 165 KVA and
additional 200 KVA load will be required for expansion. Existing 150 kVA DG set
will be replaced by 500 KVA . D.G set will be used in case of emergency during
power failure. Fuel Requirement will be HSD
(1,200 Liters/day), LDO (1050 Liters/day) for Thermic Fluid Heaters and FO
(2,510 liter/day) for boiler. Stacks height of 15m is proposed
for DG set and 35m for Boiler. Process vent and vent attached to distillation
unit will be further attached to central scrubbing system to reduce emission in
atmosphere.
Total water requirement after the proposed
expansion will be 156.9 m3/day. Water will be sourced from existing bore well
at site. Total Effluent generation after the expansion will be 55.5 m3/day. The
Unit proposes to modify its existing effluent treatment plant for primary and
secondary treatment. Treated effluent will be sent to CETP for further
treatment.
Solid/hazardous
waste generation will be in the form of ETP Waste/ Sludge (55.0 kg/month)
and will be disposed of in the Secured
Landfill facility (GEPIL). Used oil (27.1 lit/month) will be sent to authorized
reprocessors. Discarded container/barrels (1367 Nos./month) and Lined
paper/LDPE bags (7600 Nos./month) will be sold to scrap vendors. Filter Cloth (
The committee noted
that the public hearing for the earlier expansion was carried out on 4.4.2008.
Public in general welcomed the project. After detailed deliberation, the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) satisfied with the safety and environmental
protection measures taken by the company recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance under
para 7(ii) EIA Notification, 2006 exempting the project from public hearing.
8.20 Proposed expansion of existing chemicals
& bulk drugs unit at plot no.
4801/A/12, GIDC estate, Ankleshwar-393002,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case, the plant is located within the notified industrial area, GIDC
Ankleshwar and covered under category “B”. But the Ankleshwar is an identified
critically polluted area, hence, as per general condition the proposal was
appraised at centre
M/s. Glindia Chemicals have Proposed
for expansion of existing chemicals, pharmaceutical & bulk drugs unit
from capacity from 2.75 MTPM to 107.75 MTPM. The unit is located in GIDC Ankleshwar, which is identified as
critically polluted area by CPCB. No
eco-sensitive areas are located within
Details
of products and their production capacities are given below:
Sr. No. |
Product |
Present capacity (Mt/Month) |
Proposed capacity (Mt/Month) |
Total capacity (Mt/Month) |
01 |
Hexa Methyl Disilazone (HMDS) |
0.35 |
50.0 |
50.35 |
02 |
Tri Methyl Chlorosilane (TMCS) |
2.4 |
25.0 |
27.4 |
03 |
Sodium-2 Ethyl Haxonate |
Nil |
15.0 |
15.0 |
04 |
Isopropyl Alcohol.HCl |
Nil |
20.0 |
20.0 |
05 |
Methyl Alcohol.HCl |
Nil |
10.0 |
10.0 |
|
Total |
2.75 |
120.0 |
122.75 |
Power requirement of 75 HP will
be met from the Gujarat Electricity Board. Fuel requirement for the boiler will
be natural gas (300 m3/day) and LDO (400 lts/year) for the DG set.
Total Water required of
15 m3/d will be sourced from the
GIDC water supply. Effluent generation will be 2.5 KLD.
The effluent will be treated in own ETP for primary treatment and Treated effluent will be sent to
CETP for further treatment and disposal. Domestic effluent (.7 KLD) will be
treated through septic tanks/ soak pits.
Stack height of 11m is proposed for the gas
fired boiler. Process emissions will be in the form of HCl & Ammonia and
will be controlled by HDPE scrubbers.
Solid/Hazardous
waste generation will be in the form of ETP sludge (0.8 MT/year) and will be
disposed at near by TSDF site. Process residue (1.0 MT/year) will be sent to
BEIL for incineration. Used oil (60
lts/year) will be sold to MoEF authorized agency. Discarded PP bags (25.00
Kg/year) and liners/empty drums (500 nos/year) will be reused & returned
back to the actual suppliers for similar use.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measure to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance subject to stipulation of
following additional specific conditions along with specific and general
conditions:
i.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment (Protection)
Act, 1986.
ii.
VOC monitoring shall be carried in the
work zone and data submitted to the ministry.
iii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
iv.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial
8.21 Proposed expansion of synthetic organic
Dyes unit at plot no.
640,100 Shed area, GIDC industrial estate, Vapi, Dist. Valsad ,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case the plant is located within the notified industrial area, GIDC
Vapi and covered under category “B”. But the Vapi is an identified critically
polluted area, hence, as per the general condition the proposal was appraised
at centre.
M/s. Satya aromatic industries have proposed for expansion of
synthetic organic Dyes unit at plot no.
640,100 Shed area, GIDC industrial estate, Dist. Valsad ,
Details of products and their
production capacities are given below:
S. No. |
Product
|
Existing Quantity (TPM) |
Total After Expansion |
1. |
Brown
Base Crude |
0.5 |
15.0 TPM |
2. |
Crysodine
Y crude |
0.5 |
|
3. |
Crysodine
Y Base Crude |
0.2 |
|
4. |
Acid
Scarlet 3R Crude |
0 |
|
5. |
Acid
Fast Red A Crude |
0 |
|
6. |
Acid
Crystal Orange Crude |
0 |
|
7. |
Acid
Crude |
0 |
|
8. |
Acid
Tartrazine Crude |
0 |
|
9. |
Acid
Black 10 BX Crude |
0 |
|
10. |
Acid
Violet 4 BS Crude |
0 |
|
11. |
Acid
Violet 5 BN Crude |
0 |
|
12. |
Acid
Blue FF Crude |
0 |
|
13. |
Brown
G Crude |
0 |
|
14. |
Direct
SE Crude |
0 |
|
15. |
Direct
Red 12B Crude |
0 |
|
16. |
Direct
Scarlet 4 BS Crude |
0 |
|
|
Total |
1.2 |
15.0 |
The raw
material used will be CPC Blue Crude (102.08 MTPM), Sodium Hydroxide (6.66
MTPM) and Butyl Alcohol Fresh (1.45 MTPM)
Power
requirement for the proposed expansion will be 45 KW which will be sourced from
the DGVCL. DG set of 45 KVA for stand by power supply. Fuel requirement will be, wood (115 kgs/hr.)
and natural gas (150 m3/hr.) for spray drier, LDO (50 lts/hr.) or natural gas
(70 m3/hr.) for the boiler. HSD (5 lt/hr.) will be used for DG set.
Total water requirement after the proposed
expansion will be 18.55 m3/day and will be sourced from the GIDC water supply. Waste water generation will be 16.044 m3/d.
Unit proposes to modify its own existing effluent treatment plant for primary,
secondary and tertiary treatment. Treated effluent will be sent to CETP for
further treatment. Domestic effluent will be treated through septic tanks/ soak
pits.
There will be no
process gas emission from the proposed unit. No solvents will be used. Stack
height of 11m is proposed for the boiler and DG set. Spray drier has built in
wet scrubber.
Solid /Hazardous waste generation will be in the form of ETP waste (2
MTPA) and Process waste (60 MTPA.) and will be disposed of in the TSDF,
Vapi for final disposal. Discarded
containers (800 Nos/yr.) will be sold to authorized recyclers. Spent oil/used
oil (12 kgs/year) will be sold to registered re-refiner.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC
(I) recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance subject to stipulation of following additional specific conditions
along with specific and general conditions:
i.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
ii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
iii.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial
8.22 Proposed expansion of pesticide
manufacturing unit at village: Chharodi,
Taluka- Sanand, Dist. Ahemdabad,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(b) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and is ‘A’
category project and appraised at the
centre.
M/s Meghmani industries Limited have proposed
to expand its existing pesticide
manufacturing unit capacity from 2748 MTPA to 5561 MTPA at village: Chharodi, Taluka- Sanand, Dist.
Ahemdabad, Gujarat. No protected forests/eco-sensitive areas are located
within
Details of Products and their production capacities are given below:
s.no |
Produc Product |
Existing (MTPA) |
Proposed (MTPA) |
Total (MTPA) |
01 |
Atrazine Technical |
300 |
- |
300 |
02 |
OPDA |
480 |
- |
480 |
03 |
ONA |
300 |
- |
300 |
04 |
Pendimethalin Technical |
- |
480 |
480 |
05 |
Hexaconazole Technical |
- |
60 |
60 |
06 |
Tebuconazole Technical |
- |
15 |
15 |
07 |
Propiconazole Technical |
- |
90 |
90 |
08 |
Thiophanate Methyl Technical |
- |
48 |
48 |
09 |
Tricyclazole Technical |
- |
48 |
48 |
10 |
Terbutryne
Technical |
- |
144 |
144 |
11 |
Ametryne Technical |
- |
72 |
72 |
|
Total |
1080 |
957 |
2037 |
|
Formulation Products |
|
|
|
01 |
Atrazine 50% WP |
128.4 |
231.6 |
360 |
02 |
Tricyclazole 75% WP |
15.6 |
104.4 |
120 |
03 |
Carbendazim 50% WP |
300 |
- |
300 |
04 |
Sulfur 80% WDG |
720 |
900 |
1620 |
05 |
Hexaconazole 5% EC |
216 |
- |
216 |
06 |
Hexaconazole 5% SC |
- |
200 |
200 |
07 |
Pendimethalin 30% EC |
264 |
- |
264 |
08 |
Propiconazole 25% EC |
24 |
- |
24 |
09 |
Propanil 36% EC |
- |
120 |
120 |
10 |
Glyphosate 41% SL |
- |
240 |
240 |
11 |
Thiophanate Methyl 70% WP |
- |
60 |
60 |
|
Total |
1668 |
1856 |
3524 |
The total power requirement for
the proposed expansion will be 500 HP, which will be sourced from the Meghmani
Energy Ltd. Two DG sets of 250 KVA will be used for stand–by power supply.
The total water requirement after
the proposed expansion will be 51 m3/day and which will be sourced
from the bore well. The process effluent (25 m3/d) will be collected in
collection tanks and incinerated. Domestic effluent will be disposed through
Soak pit/Septic tanks.
Process emissions will be in the
form of NH3, NOx and sodium methyl mercaptant. To control process emissions,
water scrubber, alkali scrubber and urea Scrubber are proposed. Alkali Scrubber
is proposed for incinerator. Stack height of 33 mts is proposed for the boiler
and incinerator.
Sludge from ETP/Incinerator ash
(2.5 MT/month) will be sent to secured Land Fill site approved by GPCB.
Discarded drums (300 Nos./month), liners (3.0 MT/month) and used lubricating
oil (1.0 Kl/year) will be reused or sold to registered recyclers.
The Committee
suggested the following TORs for the preparation of EIA/EMP Report for the
project:
A. Project
Description
·
Executive
summery of the project
·
Compliance
status to the conditions stipulated while according environmental clearance to
the existing project/NOC granted.
·
A
filled in Questionnaire on the Industry sector as devised earlier
·
Justification
of the project.
·
Promoters
and their back ground
·
Project
site location along with site map of
·
Project
cost
·
Regulatory
framework
·
Project
location and Plant layout.
·
Existing
infrastructure facilities including power sources.
·
Existing
environmental scenario, stack emission data
·
Total
cost of the project along with cost for environment protection measures.
·
Water
source and utilization including existing and proposed water balance.
·
Product
spectrum (Existing and proposed products along with production Capacity) and
processes
·
List
of hazardous chemicals with their toxicity levels.
·
Storage
and Transportation of raw materials and products.
·
Mass
balance of each product along with the batch size
·
Pollution
potential from the proposed products
·
Detailed
scheme for waste water treatment along with characteristics of inlet and outlet
waste water. The treatment scheme to meet discharge norms of GPCB. Final
discharge point.
B. Description
of the Environment and Baseline Data Collection
·
Demarcation
of Impact boundary (
·
Micrometeorological
data for wind speed, direction, temperature, humidity and rainfall in
·
Study
of Data from secondary sources.
·
Topography,
drainage and soil characteristics. Local area hydrology, storm water drainage
etc.
·
Details
of the water source available in the impact area (Depth of ground water table,
data from the available secondary sources)
·
Other
industries in the impact area
·
Prevailing
environment quality standards
·
Existing
environmental status vis a vis air, water, noise, soil in
·
Periodic monitoring of vents from
condensers in the existing plant.
C. Socio
Economic Data
Existing socio-economic status, land use
pattern and infrastructure facilities available in the study area were
surveyed.
D. Impacts
Identification and Mitigatory Measures
·
Identification
of impacting activities from the proposed project during construction and
operational phase.
·
Impact
on air (Organic and inorganic pollutants) and mitigation measures including
green belt
·
Impact
on water environment and mitigation measures (Details of ETP design will be in
EMP). Location of final disposal and downstream usages of disposal point.
·
Soil
pollution source and mitigation measures
·
Noise
generation and control.
·
Ground
water abstraction and its impact on water sources.
·
Solid waste quantification and disposal.
·
Control of fugitive emissions
E. Environmental
Management Plan
§
Details
of pollution control measures
§
Environment
management team
§
Proposed
schedule for environmental monitoring including post project monitoring for
Air, Water, Soil and Noise.
§
Chillers should be provided for chilled
brine circulation to condensate the solvent vapors and reduce solvent losses.
§
Solvent recovery plant should be
installed to recover the solvents and solvents generated from the vents and in
the work zone environment should be monitored
§
Solvent should be stripped from the
effluent before discharging into the evaporation pond for their maximum
recovery.
§
Industry should treat the effluent and
treated effluent shall comply with the industry specific standards.
F. Risk
Assessment
·
Objectives,
Philosophy and methodology of risk assessment
·
Details
of manufacturing process of proposed products
·
Details
on storage facilities
·
Process
safety, transportation, fire fighting systems, safety features and emergency
capabilities to be adopted.
·
Identification
of hazards
·
Compatibility
studies and special hazards
·
Consequence
analysis through occurrence & evaluation of incidents
·
Selection
of incidents and consequence calculations
·
Recommendations
on the basis of risk assessment done
·
Disaster
Management Plan.
·
Safety
precautions for the storage of Chemicals and vapour condensation.
·
Safety
precaution for handling and transportation of Bromine.
G. Occupational Health and Safety Program for
the Project.
H. Information on
Rain Water Harvesting
I. Green Belt
Development plan
J. Public Hearing
Action plan in the
tabular form to the issues/suggestions made during the public hearing along
with the implementation plan and allocation of funds.
It was decided that
the proponent shall prepare EIA/EMP/Risk Assessment Report based on the above
TORs and submit the same to the concerned SPCB for conducting Public
Consultation. The EIA/EMP Report should be as per the generic structure given
in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006. The concerns emerged during the
Public Consultation may be incorporated in the EIA/EMP Report and the final
EIA/EMP may be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
8.23 Proposed expansion of chemical unit in existing
unit at plot no. B-1/1/2/3, GIDC estate, phase II, opp. Dipak oil mill,
Naroda, Ahemdabad- 382330,
The proponent did not attend the meeting. It was
decided that proposal will be considered as and when requested by the
proponent.
8.24 Expansion of existing bulk drugs and drug intermediates
unit by M/s Aventis Pharma
Limited at Plot Nos. 3501, 3503-15, 6310B-14,
GIDC Ankleshwar in district Bharuch in Gujarat- TOR/EC
The project authorities and their
consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project
and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the proposed
Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. The synthetic organic
chemical manufacturing units are listed at S.N. 5(f) in Category ‘A’ & ‘B’
of EIA Notification, 2006 depending upon the location in/outside the notified
industrial area. The instant unit is
located inside the GIDC notified industrial area and as such fall under
Category ‘B’ but due to location within the critically polluted area
Ankleshwar hence as per General
Condition of Schedule of EIA Notification 2006, the proposal has been appraised
at the centre.
M/s Aventis Pharma Limited proposes for expansion of
existing bulk drugs and drug intermediates manufacturing at Plot Nos. 3501, 3503-15, 6310B-14, GIDC
Ankleshwar in district Bharuch in
Sl.
No |
Name
of product |
- |
Existing
Capacity (TPA) |
Proposed
Capacity
(TPA) |
Total
Capacity (TPA) |
1. |
Pentoxifylline
|
Bulk
drug |
44 |
206 |
250 |
2. |
Phenaramine
Maleate |
Bulk
drug |
72 |
38 |
100 |
3. |
Frusemide
|
Bulk
drug |
60 |
80 |
140 |
4. |
Ciclopiroxlamine |
Bulk
drug |
0.167 |
-0.167 |
0 |
5. |
Glibenclamide |
Bulk
drug |
11 |
14 |
25 |
6. |
Ramipril
Substance |
Bulk
drug |
0.3 |
-0.3 |
0 |
7. |
Tonophosphan |
Bulk
drug |
1 |
-1 |
0 |
8. |
Articaine
HCl |
Bulk
drug |
22 |
8 |
30 |
9. |
ACME
(RP II 3) |
Intermediate |
28 |
7 |
35 |
10. |
Phenoxypiretan |
Intermediate |
2 |
8 |
10 |
11. |
Hydrochlorothiazide |
Bulk
drug |
5 |
35 |
40 |
12. |
Ketoprofen |
Bulk
drug |
2 |
13 |
15 |
13. |
ABAP |
Intermediate |
5 |
75 |
80 |
14. |
Acebutolol |
Bulk
drug |
0 |
25 |
25 |
15. |
Buprenorphine
HCl |
Bulk
drug |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
16. |
TDPA |
Intermediate |
0 |
40 |
40 |
17. |
TOTAL
(Ton per annum) |
Bulk
drug & intermediate |
252 |
538 |
791 |
18. |
Pharma
Formulations (Solid) mio tablets/annum |
|
5577 |
0 |
5577 |
The company have proposed for change in product mix for
future details are as given below:
Sl. No. |
Name of product |
Capacity TPA |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
1.
|
Pentoxifylline |
250 |
44 |
44 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
250 |
2.
|
Phenaramine Maleate |
100 |
72 |
72 |
85 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
3.
|
Frusemide |
140 |
60 |
60 |
100 |
140 |
140 |
140 |
4.
|
Ciclopiroxlamine |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5.
|
Glibenclamide |
25 |
11 |
11 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
25 |
6.
|
Ramipril Substance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7.
|
Tonophosphan |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8.
|
Articaine |
30 |
22 |
22 |
25 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
9.
|
ACME (RP II 3) |
35 |
28 |
28 |
30 |
30 |
35 |
35 |
10. |
Phenoxypiretan |
10 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
11. |
Hydrochlorothiazide |
40 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
30 |
40 |
40 |
12. |
Ketoprofen |
15 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
13. |
ABAP |
80 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
50 |
80 |
14. |
Acebutolol |
25 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
25 |
15. |
Buprenorphine |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
16. |
TDPA |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
40 |
17. |
TOTAL
(Ton per annum) |
791 |
251 |
251 |
391 |
541 |
678 |
791 |
18. |
Pharma Formulation(Solid) mio tablets/annum |
5577 |
5577 |
5577 |
5577 |
5577 |
5577 |
5577 |
The water
requirement will be increased from 400 KLD to 800 KLD and will be met from the
GIDC water supply. PAs have bore well for additional water supply. The waste water
generation will increase from 260 KLD to 560 KLD. The wastewater will be
treated in the ETP and treated effluent will be sent to ETL and finally to BAIL
for treatment and disposal in sea. The Committee asked the project authorities
that they have to comply with the industry specific discharge norms since the
CETP/FETP Ankleshwar is not working satisfactorily. The PAs agreed to comply
with the industry specific discharge standards. Natural Gas will be used for steam
generation, which will be supplied by GGCL. Furnace oil provision has been made
in case of short supply of Natural Gas. Power supply will be from State
Electricity Board. No air pollution is envisaged from the plant. HSD (630 Ltr)
will be used for back-up power generation. Ambient air
quality monitoring was carried out the resuls indicated the SPM (136 to 257 mg/m3), RSPM ( 51 to 96 mg/m3), NOx (14 to 32 mg/m3), SO2 (29
to 61 mg/m3), HCl (7 to 17 mg/m3) and NH3
(Below Detectable Level). The air quality was found within prescribed limits.
The company has the memberships of
BEAIL (Bharch Eco-Aqua Infrastructure Limited) for Polishing plant &
conveyance of effluent to deep sea; ETL (Enviro Technology Limited) for
treatment of effluent; BEIL (Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Limited) for Secured
land filling & Incineration of Hazardous waste; DPMC (Disaster Prevention
& Management Centre) for emergency mitigation and GEPIL (Gujarat Enviro
Protection & Infrastructure Limited) for Secured land filling &
Incineration of Hazardous waste
The hazardous wastes (spent solvent)
will increase from 50 T/year - 2400 T/year which will be given to distillation
agency for further usage and in second priority for incineration. Other
hazardous wastes will be given to Authorized TSDF (BEIL) either for secured
land filling or for incineration.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the
environmental protection measures proposed by the project authorities and
recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance dispensing with
public hearing and EIA/EMP as per para 7(ii) of the EIA Notification, 2006
subject to the following specific conditions along with other specific and
general conditions:
1. The company shall install
full-fledged ETP to treat the wastewater as per the industry specific discharge
norms specified in EPA or stipulated by the GPCB.
2. The company shall install solvent
recovery system for control of fugitive emissions.
8.25 Proposed
expansion of pigments/dye intermediates
manufacturing unit at Plot no.780/1 & 2, 40 shed area, GIDC Vapi, District
Valsad, in Gujarat by M/s Hemani Intermediates
Private Limited -ENVIRONMENTAL
CLEARANCE .
M/s Hemani Intermediates Private Limited have
Proposed for expansion of
pigments/dye intermediates manufacturing unit at GIDC Vapi, in District Valsad,
in
Details of products and their
production capacity are given below:
Sr. No. |
Product |
Present capacity (Mt/Month) |
Proposed capacity (Mt/Month) |
Total capacity (Mt/Month) |
01 |
3,3 Dichlorobenzidine- HCl |
203 |
797 |
1000 |
02 |
Quinine Sulphate |
5 |
- |
5.0 |
03 |
Artesunate |
.8 |
- |
0.8 |
04 |
Arteether |
0.5 |
- |
0.5 |
05 |
Artemether |
0.5 |
- |
0.5 |
06 |
Liquid/solid Alum |
- |
1000 |
1000 |
Fuel used for the boiler will be
Bark/Coal (5 MT/day). 2 DG sets of capacity 380 KVA each . fuel for DG set will be 80 lts/hr.
Total water requirement of 949.76
m3/d will be sourced from the GIDC
water supply.
The wastewater generation will be 457.6 m3/d.
The effluent will be treated in effluent treatment plant and treated effluent
after primary, secondary and tertiary treatment will be sent to GIDC drain.
Domestic effluent will be treated through septic tanks/ soak pits.
To
control the particulate emissions, multi cyclone dust collector & bag
filters are proposed for the coal fired boiler and stack height of 11m for DG
set and 20m for boiler for dispersion of gaseous emissions.
The
hazardous waste generation will be the ETP Sludge (145.15 MT/month) and will be
disposed to Ambuja cement Kodinar or TSDF site, Vapi. Process waste (60
MT/month) will be disposed to TSDF site, Vapi. Used oil (152 lt/year) will be
reused for lubricating purpose. Discarded material (1020 nos/month) will be
decontaminated and sold to actual users. Boiler ash (32 MT/month) will be given
to brick manufacturers. Activated carbon (0.1 MT/month) will be disposed to
TSDF site, Vapi
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) recommended the proposal for
grant of environmental clearance subject to
stipulation of following additional specific conditions along with specific and
general conditions:
i.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment (Protection)
Act, 1986.
ii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
iii.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid /
hazardous waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for
fire fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial
8.26 Proposed expansion of specialty chemical manufacturing
unit at plot no. 427/1-2, 429,
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the
location of the plant outside or inside the notified industrial area. In the
instant case the plant is located within the notified industrial area, GIDC
Ankleshwar and covered under category “B”. But the Ankleshwar is an identified
critically polluted area, hence, as per general condition the proposal was appraised
at centre
M/s Navdeep Chemicals Private Limited have proposed for expansion of capacity from 240 MT
to 1686 MT/month for Speciality Chemicals manufacturing unit at GIDC Estate Ankleshwar in Dist. Bharuch in
Gujarat The unit will be located in the notified industrial area, GIDC Ankleshwar. As per CPCB,
Ankleshwar has been identified as critically polluted area. No protected
forests/eco-sensitive areas are located within
s.no |
Product |
Existing capacity (MTPM) |
Proposed capacity (MTPM) |
Total capacity (MTPM) |
1. Textile Chemicals |
||||
a. |
Cross
Linking Agents (Polymaleate-Resin) |
nil |
15.00 |
15.00 |
b. |
Navdeelose-T/Navdeetext-01 |
nil |
5.00 |
5.00 |
c. |
DMEU
(Navdeep EU-1) |
nil |
5.00 |
5.00 |
d. |
Sandupress-2 |
nil |
10.00 |
10.00 |
e. |
Softner |
|
|
|
|
(i)
Nevamine S/CTK 100 |
nil |
5.00 |
5.00 |
|
(ii)Indsoft
170 |
nil |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
(iii)Nevamine
S/CTSK 75 |
nil |
5.00 |
5.00 |
f. |
Flame
Retard (Semalfon SDU) |
nil |
5.00 |
5.00 |
g |
Navdeefix |
nil |
5.00 |
5.00 |
2. Alkyl Aryl Sulphonic Acid
& Its Derivatives |
||||
a. |
(1)
P.T.S. Acid Monohydrate & its various grade |
200 |
700 |
900 |
|
(2)
P.T.S. Acid Monohydrate & its conc. Solution |
|||
|
(i)
PTSA-52 Grade |
|||
|
(ii)
PTSA-58 Grade |
|||
|
(iii)
PTSA-70 HS Grade |
|||
|
(iv)
PTSA-65 Grade |
|||
|
(v)
PTSA- 70% AN |
|||
|
(vi)
PTSA-70 Grade |
|||
|
(vii)
PTSA-75 Grade |
|||
|
(viii)
PTSA-65 Grade |
|||
|
(ix)Navdeeptrope
TL/TS |
|||
b |
Xylene
Sulphonic Acid/XSA-701 |
nil |
100 |
100 |
c |
Navcusol-40 |
nil |
100 |
100 |
d |
Navcusol-90 |
nil |
30 |
30 |
e |
Navdeeptrope
XL/XS |
nil |
10 |
10 |
f |
Methyl
Ester or PTSA |
nil |
20 |
20 |
g |
Phenol
Sulphonic Acid |
nil |
50 |
50 |
3. Biocides |
||||
a |
Navdeepol
87/97 |
nil |
110 |
110 |
b |
Navdeepol
L/L1 |
|||
c |
Navdeepol
|
|||
d |
Navdeecide
AL5014 |
|||
e |
Navdeecide
91 |
|||
f |
Navdeesan
164 |
|||
g |
Navdeepol
SL |
|||
h |
Navdeecide
AM-5014 |
|||
I |
Navdeepol-35TKP |
|||
J |
Navdeecide-B-1100 |
|||
k |
Navdeecide-B-8515 |
|||
4. |
DMI (1-3dimethyl-1,2-imidazolidinone) |
nil |
25 |
25 |
5 |
Aklyl Sulphonic Acid (MSA) |
nil |
40 |
40 |
6 |
Methyl Sulphonyl Methane (MSM) |
nil |
20 |
20 |
7 |
Ethylene Glycol Diacetate (EGD) |
nil |
20 |
20 |
8 |
Glysrol Triacetate (Triacitine) |
nil |
20 |
20 |
9 |
Scale Inhibitors |
nil |
20 |
20 |
|
(i)Navdeescale
|
|||
|
(ii)Navdeescale
11 |
|||
|
(iii)Navdeescale
CTW |
|||
10 |
Oil Field Chemicals |
nil |
100 |
100 |
|
(i)Navdemulsifier |
|||
|
(ii)Navdeoiler |
|||
|
(iii)Navdeewax |
|||
|
(iv)Acid
demulsifier |
|||
11 |
(i)Navdegreaser |
nil |
12.5 |
12.5 |
|
(ii)Navdeecleaner C-1 |
nil |
12.5 |
12.5 |
|
Sodium Formate (by product) |
nil |
8 |
8 |
The power requirement of 225 KVA
will be met through Dakshin Gujarat Vij. Company Limited (DGVCL). 250 KVA DG
set will be installed for stand by power requirement.
Water requirement of 39.8 m3/day will be met from GIDC water supply.The effluent generation will be 4.1 m3/day
which will be treated in own effluent treatment plant and treated effluent will be sent to CETP
managed by Enviro Technology Limited, Ankleshwar for further treatment and or
will provide sychometric evaporation system to achieve Zero discharge. Domestic
effluent will be disposed of through septic tank/soak pit.
Stack height of 12m is proposed
for the thermic fluid heater. Alkali Scrubber is proposed to control process
emissions in the form of HBr.
The solid/ hazardous waste
generated in the form of spent activated carbon (3.14 MT/annum) and organic
waste (20.04 MT/annum) will be sent for incineration at BEIL, Ankleshwar.
Inorganic process waste (NaCl) (4.53 MT/annum) will be sent for to TSDF at
BEIL, Ankleshwar. Discarded material and used oil will be reused or sold to
authorized dealers.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance subject to stipulation of
following additional specific conditions along with specific and general
conditions:
i.
The unit shall install own ETP and meet
the industry specific discharge standards notified under Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
ii.
GPCB shall not permit any new discharge
from new industries or expansion of existing industries in the area that lead
to CETP until the said CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic
capacity.
iii.
The company shall obtain Authorization
for collection, storage and disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous
Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes
and prior permission from GPCB shall be obtained for disposal of solid / hazardous
waste in the TSDF. The concerned company shall undertake measures for fire
fighting facilities in case of emergency.
Public hearing is not
required as the unit is located in the notified industrial.
8.27 Expansion of Bulk Drug Unit and Captive Power
Plant (4.8 MW) at village Sundhara, P.O. Mubarakpur, Tehsil Derabassi, District
Mohali, Punjab by M/s Parabolic Drugs Limited- (EC)
The above proposal was considered in
77th meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held
during 21-24 January,2008 to prescribe the Terms of Reference. The project falls in the notified Free
Enterprises Zone of Govt. of
M/s Parabolic Drugs Ltd. have proposed for
expansion of Bulk Drug Unit and
Captive Power Plant (4.8 MW) at Village Sundhara, P.O. Mubarakpur, Tehsil Derabassi, in District
Mohali in
Details
of the products along with the production capacity are given below.
S.NO |
PRODUCT |
KG/DAY |
KG/DAY |
KG/DAY |
KGPM |
|
|
NEW |
EXISTING |
TOTAL |
TOTAL |
|
Cefepime Hydrochloride |
30 |
0.00 |
30.00 |
750 |
|
Cefpirome sulphate |
20 |
0.00 |
20.00 |
400 |
|
Cefpodoxime
proxetil |
100 |
0.00 |
100.00 |
2500 |
|
Cefditoren pivoxil |
54 |
0.00 |
54.00 |
540 |
|
Cefprozil |
20 |
0.00 |
20.00 |
520 |
|
Cefotaxime Acid |
150 |
0.00 |
150.00 |
3750 |
|
Ceftriaxone sodium |
100 |
0.00 |
100.00 |
2500 |
|
Ceftadizime pentahydrate |
24.00 |
0.00 |
24.00 |
200 |
|
Ceftiofur |
10.00 |
0.00 |
10.00 |
100 |
|
Cefonicid |
10.00 |
0.00 |
10.00 |
100 |
|
Cefuroxime Axetil Crystaline |
440 |
0.00 |
440.00 |
11000 |
|
Cefuroxime Axetil Amorphous |
127 |
0.00 |
126.67 |
3167 |
|
Cefuroxime Acid for steriles |
120 |
0.00 |
120.00 |
3000 |
|
Cefixime |
80 |
0.00 |
80.00 |
2000 |
|
cefdinir |
10 |
0.00 |
10.00 |
100 |
|
Ampicillin Sodium |
50 |
51.28 |
101.28 |
2600 |
|
Amoxycillin Sodium |
110 |
50.84 |
160.84 |
2750 |
|
Cloxacillin Sodium |
10 |
50.00 |
60.00 |
1500 |
|
Amoxy/clav(sterile) |
5 |
0.00 |
5.00 |
125 |
|
Oxacillin sodium(sterile) |
8.0 |
0.00 |
8.00 |
200 |
|
Flucloxacillin sodium(sterile) |
20 |
0.00 |
20.00 |
417 |
|
salbactum Sodium |
50 |
0.00 |
50.00 |
600 |
|
Ceftriaxone Disodium |
0 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
2500 |
|
Cefotaxime Sodium |
0 |
150.00 |
150.00 |
3750 |
|
Cefepime HCL(sterile) |
20 |
0.00 |
20.00 |
440 |
|
Cefuroxime sodium(sterile) |
32 |
0.00 |
32.00 |
800 |
|
Ampicillin Trihydrate |
663 |
23.00 |
686.00 |
16575 |
|
Amoxycillin Trihydrate |
1000 |
100.00 |
1100.00 |
27500 |
|
Cloxacillin Sodium |
840 |
40.00 |
880.00 |
21000 |
|
Dicloxacillin sodium |
400 |
0.00 |
400.00 |
10000 |
|
Flucloxacillin sodium |
90 |
0.00 |
90.00 |
2200 |
|
Oxacillin sodium |
8 |
0.00 |
8.00 |
200 |
Total
water requirement of 705 m3/day will be met from the
existing bore wells. ‘Permission’ for
drawl of ground water has been
obtained from CGWA. About 120 m3/day of effluent will be generated. The effluent will be nutralized in the
equilazation tank and flocculants will added by taking the effluent to the
flash mixture. To separate the sludge the effluent will be taken to settler.
The clarified effluent will be taken to ORG scrubber where steam will be passed
through for effluent for separation of solvents. The separated sludge in the
tube settler will be incinerated. The effluent will be evaporated in the multiple
effect evaporator. The residue from the evaporator will beincinerated and
condensate will be taken for two stage aerobic treatment where domestic
effluent would also be mixed at the inlet of the first stage aeration tank. The
entire water after treatment shall be used as cooling water makeup (87 m3/d)
and for green belt development (30 m3/d).
The process emissions will be
scrubbed and the scrubber effluent would be sent to equalization tank for
treatment. The industry already has 2 x 380 KVA, 1 x 210 KVA and 1 x 500 KVA
D.G. Sets. New 4 D.G. Sets of 500 KVA each are proposed for the expansion. To
disperse the gaseous emissions, adequate stack height for boiler and D.G. Sets
will be provided. Two new rice husk fired boilers of 30 TPH and 6 TPH steam capacity
are proposed. Out of the two boilers,
one will be required for Captive power plant and other for steam generation.
One 4.8 MW co-generation (Extraction/Condensing) Steam Turbine will be provided
for 30 TPH boiler to meet power and steam (extraction) requirement of expansion
project. To control the particulate emissions, CPP boiler will be provided with
ESPs and 6 TPH boiler with multi-cyclones.
Solid
waste including sewage sludge (2.462 TPD) will be incinerated in 2-stage
incinerator. Ash (
The
committee after deliberation decided to defer the project and sought the
following information.
1. Design details of incinerator.
2. Data on monitoring of solvents in
the work zone.
3. Chemical analysis of the rejects.
4. Monthly consumption of raw material.
The
Committee also decided that the Representative of the Ministry or Regional
Office of the Ministry at
8.28 Proposed 60 KLPD Distillery Unit at
District Ariyalur Tamilnadu by M/s Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Limited. ?
(Addl.TOR)
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting.
8.29 120 KLPD Molasses Based Distillery unit in
Thanjavar Taluk & District Tamilnadu
by M/s King India Chemicals Corporation Limited ? (TOR)
Project authorities didn’t attend the meeting and it was decided
that proposal should be considered afresh whenever requested by the proponent.
8.30 Grain Based 30 KLPD Distillery unit
at village Gourgaon, Tehsil Kalamb in District Osmanabad Maharashtra by M/s
Adlers Bio-Energy Limited – (EC)
M/s. Adlers
Bio-Energy Ltd., has submitted a proposal to set up a grain based 30 KLPD distillery
unit at village Gourgaon, Tehsil Kalamb in District Osmanabad in
The committee noted that the public
hearing of the project was held in on 24th August, 2006 based on the
EIA Report as per EIA Notification, 1994. The proponent explained that due to
financial constraint they could not approach the Ministry for obtaining
environmental clearance. The Committee decided that the proponent should follow
procedure as per EIA Notification, 2006 for obtaining environmental clearance.
The Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA study:
1. Executive summary of the project.
2. Detailed break up of the
project cost.
3. Present land use based on satellite imagery.
4. Details of site and information related to environmental setting
within
5. Information regarding eco-sensitive area such as national park /
wildlife sanctuary / biosphere reserves within
6. Source of raw material.
7. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for three months except monsoon.
8. Mathematical modeling for calculating the dispersion of air
pollutants and ground level concentration along with emissions from the
baggase fired boiler.
9. Details of the use of steam from the boiler
10. Hydrology of the area especially down stream.
11. Ground water quality around the unit and spent wash storage lagoon. Detailed water
balance indicating the input and output along with measures for water
conservation.
12. Noise levels monitoring at five locations within the study area.
13. List of flora and fauna in the study area.
14. Number of working days of the distillery unit.
15. Details of the spent wash treatment.
16. Proposed effluent treatment system and scheme for achieving zero
discharge.
17. Treatment system and scheme for achieving zero discharge. Water
drawl permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground Water Board.
18. Source of raw material
19. Details of solid waste management including management of boiler
ash.
20. Green belt development as per the CPCB guidelines.
21. Environment Management Plan.
22. Rainwater harvesting measures
23. Details of occupational health surveillance programme.
24. Details of socio economic welfare activities.
25. Post project environmental monitoring.
26. Water drawls permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground
Water Board.
27. Action plan in the tabular
form to the issues/suggestions made during the public hearing along with the
implementation plan and allocation of funds.
The Committee decided that after
preparing the draft EIA/EMP covering the above mentioned issues, the proponent
shall submit the EIA/EMP Report to the State Pollution Control Board for Public
hearing. The issues raised during the public hearing along with the response
shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report. The final report shall be submitted
to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance .
8.31 Proposed Expansion of existing sugar mill capacity from 7500 TCD to 10000
TCD and expansion of Bagasse based Co-generation power from 8 MW to 57 MW/hr.
at Dist: Haridwar , Uttarakhand by M/s
Rai Bahadur Narain Singh sugar mills Ltd. reg EC/ TOR
Project authorities didn’t attend the meeting and it was decided
that proposal should be considered afresh whenever requested by the proponent.
8.32 Proposed expansion of distillery unit from 30
KLPD to 60 KLPD at PO: Kisanveer nagar, Tal Wai, Dist. Satara,
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken. The project
activity is listed at serial no. 5(g) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and
categorized under “A” Category and was
appraised at central level.
M/s Kisan veer Satara Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. have
proposed for expansion of Molasses based Distillery Unit from 30 KLPD to 60
KLPD to manufacture Rectified Spirit in Dist.
Satara, in
The main raw materials will be
Molasses (240 MT/d), Super phosphate (0.028 MT/d), Sulfuric
Acid (0.1 MT/d) and Turkey Red Oil (TRO) (0.12 MT/d).
The fresh water requirement will
be 961 m3/day and will be met from nearest water reservoir. The spent wash generation will be 600
m3/day.The spent wash treatment will be by Bio-methanation followed by
evaporation. The concentrated spent wash (250 m3/d) will be composted with
press mud to achieve zero discharge. Spent wash storage capacity will be 30
days. Press mud to spent wash ratio will be 1:2.5. Annual requirement of press
mud will be 27000 MT. An area of
CO2
generated in the fermentor will be scrubbed with water. SPM and CO emissions from the boiler will
be controlled by providing dampers, ID fans, CO2 meter, Fly ash
arrester.
The solid
waste generated from this unit will be yeast sludge residue and it will be
used in Bio-composting.
After
detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) recommended the proposal for grant of
environmental clearance as per para 7(ii) of EIA Notification, 2006 exempting
from preparation of EIA and public hearing. The method of treatment of spent
wash is as per the CPCB guidelines.
8.33 Sugar (2500
TCD) and Co-generation Power Plant 15 MW at Gat No. 588, 589, 590, 592 &
645 Bhandar Kavathe village, Taluk South
Sholapur, District, Sholapur, Maharashtra by M/s Lokmangal Sugar Ethanol and
co-generation Industries Ltd. –EC after TOR
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed
environment protection measures to be undertaken along with the EIA/EMP
prepared based on the TORs awarded during 74th meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry) held on 13th – 14th November 2007. All the
sugar units (>5000TCD) are covered at Sr. No. 5(j) of Schedule of EIA
Notification
M/s Lokmangal Sugar Ethanol and co-generation Industries
Limited have proposed to set up a
Sugar (2500 TCD) and Co-generation Power Plant of 15 MW at Gat No. 588, 589,
590, 592 & 645 Bhandar Kavathe village, Taluk South Sholapur,
District, Sholapur, Maharashtra. River Bhima is passing at distance of
Sugar cane 75000 Tonnes/Month, Lime 150 Tonnes/Month,
Phosphoric acid 1.80 Tonnes/Month lubricants 15tonne/month and other auxiliary
raw materials like washing soda, caustic soda and bleaching powder are the raw
materials for the project.
Total water requirement of the plant is 444m3/day
and will be sourced from the
Boiler stack of power plant will be the main source of
emission. For proper dispersion of emissions, 71m high stack has been
proposed. Electrostatic precipitator
will be installed to control particulate emissions from the boiler.
ETP sludge (2 Tonnes/month), flyash (470MT/M), chemical
sludge from waste water treatment (1.5 tonne/month) and press mud (2600
tonne/month) will be generated as solid waste and spent oil 3 tonne/month will
be generated as hazardous waste. Fly ash will be given to bricks manufacturing
units and cement grinding units. Press mud will be given to Lokmangal group’s
distillery about 30km from the plant.
Total power requirement of the plant will be 15 MW and will
be met from bagasse fired captive power plant.
The fuel required for the power plant for running the 80 TPH boiler will
be the bagasse generated as by-product.
Excess power will be transmitted to Maharashtra State Electricity
Board.
The
Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public
Consultation conducted by the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board on 29th
February 2008. It was noted that all the
issues have satisfactorily been addressed and incorporated in the final EIA/EMP
report.
The Expert Appraisal Committee found EIA/EMP complete and
adequate and recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance
subject to compliance of all the commitments made during public hearing
alongwith specific and general conditions.
8.34 Expansion
of Dyes intermediate Unit at Plot 193/1, 2nd Phase, GIDC,
District Vapi, Gujarat by M/s Apex Pharma Chem Private Limited – TOR/EC
The project authorities and their
consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project
and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken. All the dye
and dyes intermediate units have been listed at S.N. 5(f)of schedule of EIA
Notification,
M/s Apex Pharma Chem Private Limited have proposed for expansion of Dyes intermediate Unit at Plot
193/1, 2nd Phase, GIDC, District
Vapi,
Sr. No. |
Name of Product |
Quantity/ Month (Existing) |
Quantity/ Month (Proposed) |
Total Quantity/ Month |
Remarks |
|
Group A Product |
||||
1 |
2- Chloro 5- Chloro Methyl
Thiazole (MAX) |
|
----- |
|
|
2 |
2-Diazo 1-Napthol 5- sulphonic
acid sodium salt (NAS) |
|
----- |
|
|
|
Group B Product ( Sulphonation ) |
||||
1 |
(EBASA) --
Ethyl Benzyl Aniline Meta Sulphonic Acid |
----- |
|
|
Manufacturing of either one
product or more than one product as per the requirement, but total quantity will not exceed 100 MT
per month |
2 |
(PCOSA) --
Para Cresidine Ortho Sulphonic Acid |
||||
3 |
(PNTOSA) ---
Para Nitro Tolyl Ortho Sulphonic Acid |
||||
4 |
(PNCBOSA) -- Para Nitro Chloro benzene Ortho
Sulphonic Acid |
||||
5 |
(ONCBPSA) -- Ortho Nitro Chloro benzene Para
Sulphonic acid |
||||
6 |
(OPDASA)
– Ortho Phenydine Diamine Sulphonic Acid, |
||||
|
Group C Product ( Specialty
Chemical ) |
|
|||
1 |
2, 7 Di
Chloro 4- ( (2- di butyl amine ) Ethanol) Fluorene |
----- |
|
|
Manufacturing of either one product or more than one product
as per the requirement, but total
quantity will not exceed 50 MT per
month. |
2 |
Guaiacol
--- 2- Methoxy Phenol |
||||
3 |
Veratrole
--- 1,2 Dimethoxy Benzene |
||||
5 |
ONA
–Ortho Nitro Anisole |
||||
6 |
PCA/OCA HCL
-- Para Chloro Aniline / Ortho Chloro Aniline Hydrochloride |
||||
7 |
PCD -- |
||||
|
Total Group A, B & C |
|
|
185.0M T / Month |
|
Detail on By- Product
Sr. No. |
Name of By - Product |
MT/ Month (Existing) |
Quantity/ Month (Proposed) |
Quantity/ Month (Total) |
Remark |
1.
|
Dilute
Sulphuric Acid |
--- |
661.9 MT |
661.9 MT |
Sold to actual users |
2.
|
HCl |
9.17 MT |
102 MT |
111.17 |
Reuse in process/ Sold to actual
users |
3.
|
AlCl3 |
--- |
464 MT |
464 MT |
Sold to actual users |
4.
|
Veratrole |
--- |
2.90 MT |
2.90 MT |
Reuse in Veratrole process |
5.
|
Spent
Nitric Acid |
--- |
146 MT |
146 MT |
Sold to actual users |
6.
|
Sodium
Thio Sulphate |
59.80 MT |
----- |
59.80 MT |
Sold to actual users |
The water consumption of the
plant will increase from 45.73 KLD to 188.030 KLD which includes domestic
consumption of 5 KLD. The total wastewater generation
will increase from 9.963 KLD to 52.163 KLD which will be sent to ETP for
treatment. Concentrated effluent 11.65 KLD will be sent to evaporator. The generation of wastewater will increase hence the
capacity of ETP will be augmented accordingly. The treated effluent will be
drained through the GIDC underground drainage system and will go to CETP for
further treatment. Domestic wastewater will go to soak pit/septic tank.
Besides
existing non IBR Boiler – (2x600kgs/hr) and
Thermopac 2.0 lakh Kcal only one boiler of 2 MT/hr capacity will be
installed. D.G Set of 125 KVA will be used when GEB power supply is failure
otherwise it will be in stand by mode. Stacks of suitable height as per the
CPCB norms will be provided with boilers, thermopac and D.G. Set. For control
of fugitive emissions, 4 stage scrubber system will be installed out of which
first and 2nd scrubber will recover HCl and 3rd and 4th
stage scrubber will absorb the SO2 gas in alkali media. The fuel
(LDO/FO) consumption will be 220Ltr/hr.
The hazardous wastes generated from the plant are as
given below:
Particulars |
Existing |
Expansion |
After Expansion |
Remarks |
ETP waste |
500 Kg/ Month |
1500 Kg/ Month |
2000 Kg/ Month |
The ETP sludge will be filled up in plastic bags &
disposed to TSDF, VAPI |
Spent Oil |
|
|
|
Reused in process plant for lubricating purpose. |
Discarded Material |
1100 Nos./month |
2900 Nos./month |
4000 Nos./month |
Decontaminate and sold to actual users or will be reused
in plant. |
Process Waste |
---- |
|
750 Kg/month |
Process Waste will be filled up in plastic bags &
disposed to TSDF, VAPI |
Evaporated salt |
|
---- |
|
Evaporated salt will be filled up in plastic bags &
disposed to TSDF, VAPI |
Distillation residue |
|
|
7765 Kg/month |
send to Common Incineration System at BEIL, Ankleshwar |
Spent Carbon |
|
--- |
|
|
Sludge from wet scrubber |
|
--- |
|
Sludge from wet scrubber will be filled up in plastic bags
& disposed to TSDF, VAPI |
After detailed deliberations the Committee found the
environmental protection measures satisfactory and recommended the proposal for
grant of environmental clearance
dispensing with EIA/EMP as per para 7(ii) and Public hearing is not
required as per para 7(i)IIIStage(3)(b) of the EIA Notification 2006 subject to
specific condition for monitoring of VOCs and compliance of industry specifc
discharge standards for treated effluent along with other specific and general
conditions.
8.35 Expansion of molasses based distillery (from 20 KLD to 60 KLD)
at Block No. 459/1, Garag, District Dharwad, Karnataka by M/s Sri Lakshmi Narshimha Distilleries Private Limited – TOR
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft
TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. All molasses based distilleries are listed at
Sl. No. 5(g) (i) of schedule of EIA notification under category ‘A’ and will be
appraised at central level.
M/s Sri Lakshmi Narshimha
Distilleries Private Limited has proposed for expansion of molasses based
distillery (from 20 KLD to 60 KLD) at Block No. 459/1, Garag, District Dharwad,
Karnataka. No
eco-sensitive areas are located within
The water requirement of 1500 KLD
will be met from the bore wells. The
major source of water pollution from distilleries is the spent wash. Presently
the wastewater is being treated in biodigester, Aeration, Clarifier extended
aeration. Sludge drying beds has been provided for bottom sludge from
clarifier. The treated wastewater is being used for ferti-irrigation. The
wastewater generation will be 600KLD after expansion which will be subject to
Evaporation by spray drying and powder will be used as fuel or bio fertilizer.
The carbon-di-oxide generated during fermentation reaction will be compressed
and sold out for further use. The steam requirement is met from a high pressure
boiler (4TPH) and the high pressure (3Kg/cm2) utilized to generate
400 KW of electrical energy for captive consumption. The steam leaving the
turbines at 1.5 kg/cm2 back pressure is supplied for further
distillation processes which are generally practiced at
The solid waste will be generated
in the form of Yeast sludge (7.5 TPD). ETP sludge (10 TPD) would be reused in
compost making process. Sewage sludge will be used as manure fro green belt
composted along with other solid wastes.
The fuel wood and methane gas
(recovered from bio-digester) are used as fuels in the boiler house. The off
gases are passed through bag filters for the removal of particulate matter to
meet the prescribed standards.
The Committee discussed the wastewater treatment technology.
The PAs requested for bio-methanation followed by bio-composting. The committee
did not agree as this is a stand alone distillery. The PAs agreed on the spray
drying technology to maintain zero discharge. After detailed deliberation, the
committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1. Executive summary of the project.
2. Present land use based on satellite
imagery.
3. Details of site and information
related to environmental setting within
4. Details and source of raw materials,
manufacturing process.
5. Information regarding eco-sensitive
area such as national park / wildlife sanctuary / biosphere reserves within
6. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for
three months except monsoon.
7. Mathematical modeling for
calculating the dispersion of air pollutants and ground level concentration
along with emissions from the bagasse / coal fired boiler.
8. Details of the use of steam from the
boiler.
9. Ground water quality around the
unit.
10. Detailed water balance indicating
input and output of waste water.
11. Noise levels monitoring at five
locations within the study area.
12. List of flora and fauna in the study
area.
13. Number of working days of the
distillery unit.
14. Details of the spent wash treatment.
15. Proposed effluent treatment system
and scheme for achieving zero discharge.
16. Water (1500 KLD) drawl permission
from the State Ground Water Board.
17. Details of solid waste management
including management of boiler ash.
18. Green belt development as per the
CPCB guidelines.
19. Environment Management Plan.
20. Post project environmental
monitoring.
21. Plan for prevention of odour
neusance.
The
Committee decided that after preparing the EIA/EMP covering the above mentioned
TORs and as per the generic structure given in the EIA Notification 2006. The
proponent shall submit the EIA/EMP Report to the MOEF for consideration for
prior environmental clearance. Public hearing/public consultation is exempted
as per para 7(ii) of the EIA Notification 2006.
8.36 Setting up of
100 KLPD distillery & Co-generation Plant in (50 MW) at SF No. 82,
83(part), 84(part), 86(part), 87(part), 113(part), 114(part), 115(part) 116(part),
117(part) and 118(part), Edaikkal
Village, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli district, Tamilnadu by M/s. Empee
Sugars and Chemicals Ltd., (distillery unit) – TOR
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft
TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. All molasses based distilleries are listed at
Sl. No. 5(g) (i) of schedule of EIA notification under category ‘A’ and will be
appraised at central level.
M/s.Empee Sugars and Chemicals
Ltd.,
(distillery unit) have proposed for setting up of 100 KLPD distillery &
Co-generation Plant in (50 MW) at SF No. 82, 83(part), 84(part), 86(part),
87(part), 113(part), 114(part), 115(part) 116(part), 117(part) and 118(part), Edaikkal Village, Ambasamudram
Taluk, Tirunelveli district, Tamilnadu. The total land required for the Unit
will be
Raw Material required for co-gen plant are Bagasse , Biogas,
Bio Mass and for distillery is Cane Molasses, Nutrients, Antifoam Oil, Sulfuric
Acid. The distillery will run for 330 days in a year.
The total water requirement of
1997m3/day (Distillery - 846 KLD + Cogen – 1151 KLD) will be met
from bore wells inside the factory. The
effluent from the cogen and domestic will be treated in ETP of sugar plant. The
distillery spent wash (1000KLD) will be subjected to evaporation and concentrated spentwash will be
incinerated in boiler. The condensate will be used for process dilution. The
effluent from co-gen will be 361 KLD which will be treated in conventional ASP
and treated wastewater will be utilised for green belt development. Emissions
from the co-gen will be controlled by ESP followed by stack of
Settled yeast sludge -6 T/day will
be collected and used in bio- composting. Fly ash (15 TPD) generated from the
boilers will be used as manure in the cane fields. The power generation will be
50 MW during the season. At the proposed production capacity, the average power
demand for the sugar plant is 9.4 MW and for the distillery plant 1.0 MW per
hour respectively. The balance surplus power of 39.6 MW will be exported to
TNEB grid during the season.
After detailed deliberation the committee prescribed the
following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1. Executive summary of the project.
2. Present land use based on satellite
imagery.
3. Details of site and information
related to environmental setting within
4. Source of raw material
5. Information regarding eco-sensitive
area such as national park / wildlife sanctuary / biosphere reserves within
6. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for
three months except monsoon.
7. Mathematical modeling for
calculating the dispersion of air pollutants and ground level concentration
along with emissions from the bagasse / coal fired boiler.
8. Details of traffic density vis-à-vis
impact on the ambient air.
9. Details of the use of steam from the
boiler.
10. Ground water quality around the
unit.
11. Detailed water balance indicating
input and output of waste water.
12. Noise levels monitoring at five
locations within the study area.
13. List of flora and fauna in the study
area.
14. Number of working days of the
distillery unit.
15. Details of the spent wash treatment.
16. Proposed effluent treatment system
and scheme for achieving zero discharge.
17. Water drawl permission from the
Irrigation Department/State Ground Water Board.
18. Details of solid waste management
including management of boiler ash.
19. Green belt development as per the
CPCB guidelines.
20. Environment Management Plan.
21. Post project environmental
monitoring.
22. Plan for prevention of odour
nuisance.
23. Action plan in the tabular form to
the issues/suggestions made during the public hearing along with the
implementation plan and allocation of funds.
After
preparing the draft EIA/EMP covering the above mentioned issues and as per
information in the generic structure given in the EIA Notification 2006 the
proponent shall submit the EIA/EMP Report to Tamil Nadu PCB and get the public
hearing/public consultation conducted. On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as
per TORs addressing all concerns and incorporating in EIA/EMP should be
submitted to the MOEF for consideration of prior environmental clearance. A
letter may be written to Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board for conducting the
public hearing as per the procedure laid down in the EIA notification 2006.
8.37 Expansion of
integrated Sugar Complex (5000 TCD Sugar Plant, 24 MW Co-Gen Power Plant, 7 MW
Power Plant, 200 KLPD Distillery &
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft
EIA/EMP already prepared. All molasses based distilleries are listed at Sl. No.
5(g) of schedule of EIA notification, 2006 under category ‘A’ and will be
appraised at central level.
M/s. Alagwadi Bireshwar Sugar Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for
expansion of of integrated Sugar Complex
(5000 TCD Sugar Plant, 24 MW Co-Gen Power Plant, 7 MW Power Plant, 200 KLPD Distillery &
Sugar - 5000
TCD
Co-Gen Power Plant - 24 MW
Power Plant - 7 MW,
Distillery - 200 KLPD
Medium Dense Fibre-
Sugar cane will be procured from
nearby farmers and will be transported through trucks. Molasses requirement
will be 840 TPD which will met from inhouse 200 TPD and remaining from market.
Bagasse (1145 TPD) will be used in Co-gen power plant as fuel. Coal (112 TPD)
will be used as fuel for 7 MW Power generations. Coal will be imported and brought to the site
through covered trucks. 450 TPD bagasse will be required for MDF plant.
Dust generation near raw material
handling and transfer points will be suppressed through water spray.
The total water requirement for
proposed integrated Sugar Complex will be 10300 KLD and will be met from
The fly ash generated from cogen will be used
as manure and fly ash generated from power plant will be given to brick
manufactures .Sludge from neutralization tank will be used for landfilling.
After detailed deliberation,the Committee prescribed the
following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1. Executive summary of the project.
2. Present land use based on satellite
imagery of study area of
3. Details of site and information
related to environmental setting within
4. Source of raw material,
linkages/agreement for supply of deficit bagasse & molasses should be
provided.
5. Information regarding eco-sensitive
area such as national park / wildlife sanctuary / biosphere reserves within
6. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for
three months except monsoon.
7. Mathematical modeling for calculating
the dispersion of air pollutants and ground level concentration along with
emissions from the bagasse / coal fired boiler.
8. Details of traffic density vis-à-vis
impact on the ambient air.
9. Details of the use of steam from the
boiler.
10. Ground water quality around the
unit.
11. Detailed water balance indicating
input and output of waste water.
12. Noise levels monitoring at five
locations within the study area.
13. List of flora and fauna in the study
area.
14. Number of working days of the
distillery unit.
15. Details of the spent wash treatment.
16. Proposed effluent treatment system
and scheme for achieving zero discharge.
17. Water drawl permission from the
Irrigation Department/State Ground Water Board.
18. Details of solid waste management
including management of boiler ash.
19. Green belt development as per the
CPCB guidelines.
20. Environment Management Plan.
21. Post project environmental
monitoring.
22. Plan for prevention of odour
nuisance.
23. Action plan in the tabular form to
the issues/suggestions made during the public hearing along with the implementation
plan and allocation of funds.
After
preparing the draft EIA/EMP covering the above mentioned issues alongwith the
other information as per generic structure given in the draft EIA Notification
2006. The proponent shall submit the Draft EIA/EMP Report to Karnataka PCB and
get the public hearing/public consultation conducted. On finalization of
EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns and incorporating in
EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for consideration of prior environmental
clearance. A letter may be written to Karnataka Pollution Control Board for
conducting the public hearing as per the procedure laid down in the EIA
notification 2006.
8.38 New Pesticide Technical Manufacturing
Unit at GIDC Nandesari Tehsil Vadodara District
Vadodara Gujarat by M/s GSP Crop
Science Private Limited ? (TOR)
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting.
8.39 Grain
based 45 KLPD Distillery unit at Sansarpur Terrace, Tehsil Jaswan Kotla
District Kangra Himachal Pradesh by M/s Premier Alcobev Pvt. Ltd.– (TOR).
M/s Premier Alcobev (P) Ltd. (PAPL)
proposes to set up a 45 KLPD capacity
grain based distillery unit at Sansarpur Terrace, Tehsil Jaswan
Kotla in District Kangra, in Himachal
Pradesh. Bottling plant consisting of 6 Lines for 5000 IMFL Cases
per Day & 6 Lines for 4000 Cases per Day of Country Liquor is also proposed. The distillery unit will run for
330 days in a year. No R & R is
involved. The Company has already acquired
The water requirement of 1100 m3/day will be met from
bore well. The total spent wash discharge is estimated to be 479 m3/d which
will be first taken to Centrifuge
decanter where the suspended
solids would be removed as wet
cake. A part of the 419 m3/d of thin slop thus separated after decantation will
be recycled back to process and 147 m3/d
and the balance thin slop would be evaporated. The thick syrup,
estimated to be 36 m3/d will be dried and sold as cattle feed. The process condensate
generated after cooling will be used as cooling tower make up water.
The power requirement of 1300 KW which will
be met from 14 TPH boiler and 1.3 MW
turbine. To control the particulate
emissions from the rice husk fired boiler, multi-cyclones will be
installed. Ash from the boiler will be used for land
filling. Wet cake and thick syrup will be used as cattle feed. No hazardous waste will be generated.
The Committee prescribed
the following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study:
1. Executive summary of the project.
2. Detailed break up of the
project cost.
3. Present land use based on satellite imagery.
4. Details of site and information related to environmental setting
within
5. Information regarding eco-sensitive area such as national park /
wildlife sanctuary / biosphere reserves within
6. Source of raw material.
7. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring for three months except monsoon.
8. Mathematical modeling for calculating the dispersion of air pollutants
and ground level concentration along with emissions from the rice husk fired boiler.
9. Details of the use of steam from the boiler
10. Hydrology of the area especially down stream.
11. Ground water quality around the unit and spent wash storage lagoon. Detailed water
balance indicating the input and output along with measures for water
conservation.
12. Noise levels monitoring at five locations within the study area.
13. List of flora and fauna in the study area.
14. Number of working days of the distillery unit.
15. Details of the spent wash treatment.
16. Proposed effluent treatment system and scheme for achieving zero
discharge.
17. Treatment system and scheme for achieving zero discharge. Water
drawl permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground Water Board.
18. Source of raw material
19. Details of solid waste management including management of boiler
ash.
20. Green belt development as per the CPCB guidelines.
21. Environment Management Plan.
22. Rainwater harvesting measures
23. Details of occupational health surveillance programme.
24. Details of socio economic welfare activities.
25. Post project environmental monitoring.
26. Water drawl permission from the Irrigation Department/State Ground
Water Board.
The Committee decided that after preparing the draft EIA/EMP
covering the above mentioned issues, the proponent shall submit the EIA/EMP
Report to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance in accordance with
the procedure prescribed in the EIA Notification. Public hearing is not
required in this case as the unit is located in the Notified industrial area.
8.40. Setting up of manufacturing of PU Molded Pads (50 MTPM) for
automobile seats Plot No. 52, Near Manjusar GIDC Vadodara - Salvi Road,
Manjusar, District Vadodara Gujarat by M/S Spack Automotives Ltd. – TOR
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along
with the EIA/EMP already prepared. The project activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of
EIA Notification, 2006 under “A” as the plant is located out side the notified
industrial area, hence the proposal was appraised at central level.
M/s. Spack Automotives ltd.
setting up of a plant for manufacturing of PU Molded Pads (50 MTPM) for the
Automobile Seats at Plot No. 52, Near Mukut Nagar, Sama-Salvi Road, Manjusar,
Taluka Salvi, in distt. Vadodara,
The various raw materials will be
used for the proposed plant are Polyol 70 Mt/Month, Isocyanate 30 Mt/Month,
Release Agent 2 Mt/Month, Insert Wires 10 T/Month, Non-woven Cloth 5000 Mtr.
/Month.
To control process emissions, air
exhaust system will be provided. The plant will be provided with exhaust fans
fitted on vent ducting. The water requirement unit will be 10 KLD. The bore
wells will be the source of water supply. There will be no industrial waste
water generation from the plant. Around 2.84 KLD of domestic sewage will be
generated and will be treated in existing STP of capacity 10 KLD.
The solid waste generated from the
project after the plant is functional shall mainly be domestic waste and
byproduct of the manufacturing process comprising of polyurethane pads reject
and trimming of pads at parting line, the estimated quantity of the same will
be approx. 80 kg/day. Maximum amount of solid waste will be recyclable and sold
of to authorised vendors. The remaining solid waste so generated shall be first
segregated as plastic, glass, paper and other waste separately and disposed off
as per MSW rule, 2000. Waste other than plastic, paper and glass shall be
collected and disposed off at the municipal waste sites.
The total power requirement for
proposed plant will be 55 KVA. To cater for power failure one DG set of 100 KVA
capacity will be installed. The fuel consumption for the DG set is around 1000
Lt/day.
The Committee after detailed deliberation suggested that the
draft EIA/EMP should be prepared as per the generic structure given in the EIA
Notification, 2006 for TORs presented before the committee for the study area
of
8.41 Expansion of
Polyester Film production (5000TPA - 7500 TPA) at Plot No.12 Rampura Ramnagar road District Kashipur
Uttrakhand by M/S SRF Limited –
TOR/clarification
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a brief presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken.
M/S SRF Limited have proposed for expansion of Polyester Film production from 5000TPA to
7500 TPA at Plot No.12 in District Kashipur in Uttarakhand. The total
cost of the project will be Rs. 25Lakhs. The total land available with the
project is
The raw material required for
manufacturing polyester chips commonly called PET. This is a harmless product
obtained from petrochemical industry. In order to produce
The Committee found that the manufacturing process does not
involve any chemical reaction or synthesis. The activity does not fall in any
of the project activity listed in schedule of EIA Notification 2006, hence the
committee decided that the project does not attract the provision of the EIA
Notification, 2006 and PAs may be communicated acoordingly.
8.42 Setting up of Chlor Alkali
complex at Kona Village, Machilipattinam, Krishna District, Andhra
Pradesh by M/s Bharat Salt Refineries
Ltd. -TOR
PAs did not attend the meeting and requested for
postponement of presentation till further request.
8.44 KLPD Distillery unit at Udumbiyam Village Veparthattai District
Tamilnadu by M/s Dhanlakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The above
proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 81st meeting
held on 12th – 14th May, 2008. The Committee prescribed
the TORs for undertaking EIA study and advised the project proponent to submit
the EIA/EMP report to the State Pollution Control Board for conducting public
hearing. The issues emerged during the PH/PC shall be incorporated in the
EIA/EMP report and the report should be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining
environmental clearance.
Public
hearing for the project was held on 07th August 2008 at
Veellupuram in Tamilnadu.
The issues raised were regarding,
measures for control of water
pollution, air pollution from incinerator and odour problem and availability
of Sewedha Nathi river water to the
nearby farmers etc.
All the above issues were addressed by the Project
proponent. The Project proponent informed that the spent wash will be
concentrated in the Multi Effect Evaporator followed by incineration in boiler
and there will be no discharge of waste water from the unit on the land. Due to
this technology, potassium rich ash will be obtained and will be utilized by the farmers as manure.
There will not be any odour problem due to the proposed unit. To control air pollution
from the boiler, stack height of
M/s Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for a 60 KLPD Distillery unit
to manufacture, Rectified spirit (RS) (10 KLPD) Extra neutral alcohol (ENA)
/Anhydrous Alcohol (40 KLPD) and Ethanol (10 KLPD) at Udumbiyum village,
Veppanthattai Taluk, Perambalur Dist. , Tamilnadu No protected
forests/eco-sensitive area located with
in
The main raw materials used will be
cane molasses (225 MT/d), nutrients (97 kgs/d), Sulphuric Acid (110 kgs/d)
and Antifoam Oil (115kgs/day).
The power requirement of the
plant will be 900 KW/hr. the power requirement will be met from the
Co-generation power Plant.
The total water requirement of
794 m3/day will be sourced from the Swetha Nathi. The wastewater
from the domestic usages (3.2 KLD) will be sent directly to the septic tank of
size 3mx2mx2m followed by the dispersion trench of size 5mx2mx2.5m. The spent
wash (658.5 KLD) will be concentrated in Multi Effect Evaporator followed by
incineration in specially designed boiler to achieve zero discharge.
To control the particulate
emission from the boiler, stack height
of
The solid waste generation from
this unit will be settled yeast sludge (3.0 T/day) and will be burnt in the
boiler along with spent wash. Boiler Ash (18 T/day) collected & disposed as
fertilizer since it is rich in potash.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed pollution
control measures to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant of
environmental clearance. The method of treatment of spent wash is as per
the CPCB guidelines.
8.45 Proposed
laminate sheet manufacturing plant of capacity 69000 nos./month at Survey
no.148 Part, Rajpar, Khanpar Road, Near Sadguru Cotton Mill, village Rajpar,
MORBI Gujarat-363641 M/s Arc Lamicraft Pvt Limited reg TOR
The proposal was
considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) to determine the Terms
Of Reference (TOR) for undertaking detailed EIA Study for obtaining
environmental clearance in accordance with the provisions of EIA Notification,
2006. For the purpose, the proponent had submitted information in the
prescribed format (Form-1) along with the pre-feasibility report. The project
activity is listed at serial no. 5(f) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and
categorized under “A” or “B” category depending upon the location of the plant
outside or inside the notified industrial area. Since the proposed unit is located outside the industrial area and the proposal appraised at central level.
This is a “A’ category project.
M/s Arc lamicraft Private Limited have
Proposed for laminated sheets manufacturing plant of capacity 69000 nos/month and
Resins (Melamine formaldehyde resin and
Phenol formaldehyde resin) at in
Dist.:
Raw
material requirement will be Kraft paper (160 MTPM), design paper (20 MTPM),
tissue paper (5 MTPM), wrapping paper (7 MTPM), Phenol (45 MTPM), Melamine (30
MTPM), formaldehyde (75 MTPM), Methanol (20 MTPM), BOPP film (1 MTPM), caustic
soda (1 MTPM) and HCl (0.5).
Power requirement will be met
from the PGVCL. Fuel requirement for the boiler will be coal (15 T/day) and
Diesel (40 lts/hr) for DG set.
Total Water required will be
30.70 m3/day and will be sourced from the ground water supply. Rain water
harvesting scheme is proposed for recharge of ground water. Total effluent
generation will be 3.6m3/day. Waste water from the process (0.2 cu.m/day)
having high COD and highly acidic will be sent to Multiple Effect Evaporator.
The concentrated effluent will be sent to Common Hazardous Waste Incinerator.
Domestic effluent will be treated through septic tanks/ soak pits.
Multi
cyclone and stack height of 30m is proposed for the boiler. Stack height of 12m
is proposed for the DG set. There will be no process emissions due to the
proposed activity.
Solid/Hazardous
waste generation will be in the form of process waste (50 lt/day) and will be sent to BEIL for incineration. Spent
oil (50 lts/year) will be sent to authorized recyclers. Empty drums (10
nos/month) will be sent to authorized recyclers or returned back to the actual
suppliers. Used plastic bags (25 bags/month) will be sent to authorized
recyclers.
The Committee prescribed the following TORs for the preparation of
EIA/EMP Report for the project:
A. Project
Description
·
Executive
summery of the project
·
Compliance
status to the conditions stipulated while according environmental clearance to
the existing project/NOC granted.
·
A
filled in Questionnaire on the Industry sector as devised earlier
·
Justification
of project.
·
Promoters
and their back ground
·
Project
site location along with site map of
·
Project
cost
·
Regulatory
framework
·
Project
location and Plant layout.
·
Existing
infrastructure facilities including power sources.
·
Existing
environmental scenario, stack emission data
·
Total
cost of the project along with cost for environment protection measures.
·
Water
source and utilization including existing and proposed water balance.
·
Product
spectrum (Existing and proposed products along with production Capacity) and
processes
·
List
of hazardous chemicals with their toxicity levels.
·
Storage
and Transportation of raw materials and products.
·
Mass
balance of each product along with the batch size
·
Pollution
potential from the proposed products
·
Detailed
scheme for waste water treatment along with characteristics of inlet and outlet
waste water. The treatment scheme to meet discharge norms of GPCB. Final
discharge point.
B. Description
of the Environment and Baseline Data Collection
·
Demarcation
of Impact boundary (
·
Micrometeorological
data for wind speed, direction, temperature, humidity and rainfall in
·
Study
of Data from secondary sources.
·
Topography,
drainage and soil characteristics. Local area hydrology, storm water drainage
etc.
·
Details
of the water source available in the impact area (Depth of ground water table,
data from the available secondary sources)
·
Other
industries in the impact area
·
Prevailing
environment quality standards
·
Existing
environmental status vis a vis air, water, noise, soil in
·
Periodic monitoring of vents from
condensers in the existing plant .
C. Socio
Economic Data
·
Existing
socio-economic status, land use pattern and infrastructure facilities available
in the study area were surveyed.
D. Impacts Identification
and Mitigatory Measures
·
Identification
of impacting activities from the proposed project during construction and
operational phase.
·
Impact
on air (Organic and inorganic pollutants) and mitigation measures including
green belt
·
Impact
on water environment and mitigation measures (Details of ETP design will be in
EMP). Location of final disposal and downstream usages of disposal point.
·
Soil
pollution source and mitigation measures
·
Noise
generation and control.
·
Ground
water abstraction and its impact on water sources.
·
Solid waste quantification and disposal.
·
Control of fugitive emissions
E. Environmental
Management Plan
§
Details
of pollution control measures
§
Environment
management team
§
Proposed
schedule for environmental monitoring including post project monitoring for
Air, Water, Soil and Noise.
§
Chillers should be provided for chilled
brine circulation to condensate the solvent vapors and reduce solvent losses.
§
Solvent recovery plant should be
installed to recover the solvents and solvents generated from the vents and in
the work zone environment should be monitored
§
Solvent should be stripped from the
effluent before discharging into the evaporation pond for their maximum
recovery.
§
Industry should treat the effluent and
treated effluent shall comply with the industry specific standards.
F. Risk
Assessment
·
Objectives,
Philosophy and methodology of risk assessment
·
Details
of manufacturing process of proposed products
·
Details
on storage facilities
·
Process
safety, transportation, fire fighting systems, safety features and emergency
capabilities to be adopted.
·
Identification
of hazards
·
Compatibility
studies and special hazards
·
Consequence
analysis through occurrence & evaluation of incidents
·
Selection
of incidents and consequence calculations
·
Recommendations
on the basis of risk assessment done
·
Disaster
Management Plan.
·
Safety
precautions for the storage of Chemicals and vapour condensation.
G. Occupational Health and Safety Program for
the Project.
H. Information on Rain Water Harvesting
I. Green Belt Development plan
J. Public Hearing
Action plan in the tabular form to the issues/suggestions made
during the public hearing along with the implementation plan and allocation of
funds.
It was decided that the Proponent should prepare EIA/EMP Report
based on the above TORs and submit the same to the Gujarat PCB for conducting
Public Consultation. The EIA/EMP Report should be as per the generic structure
given in Appendix-III of EIA Notification, 2006. The concerns emerged during
the Public Consultation may be incorporated in the EIA/EMP Report and the final
EIA/EMP may be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
8.46 Exploratory drilling in CB-ONN-2004/3 (NELP
- VI) in
The above
proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 67th meeting
held on 19th – 21st June 2007. The Committee prescribed
the TORs for undertaking EIA study and
advised the project proponent to submit the EIA/EMP report to the State
Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing. The issues emerged
during the PH/PC shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report and the report
should be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
Public hearing for
the project was held on 05th September 2008 at Dist: Anand,
The issues were addressed by the project proponent. The
proponent have assured about the employment and social development of the
area. If any well get successful and
when commercial production of oil and gas starts then royalty will be paid to
central /state Govt. as per standard prevailing rules. Wages will be as per the
standard prevailing rules. Compensation will be paid for damage of standing
crops as per the rules. Regarding the Colored water in the wells, the case will
be investigated by GPCB
M/s ONGC Limited have proposed for exploratory
drilling in Block CB-ONN-2004/3
(NELP-VI) in Bharuch,
The total water
requirement of 50 m3/day/ well will be sourced from the nearest available water
source. The effluent generated during the drilling operations will be 25
m3/day from a single well. The effluent
generated will be discharged in HDPE lined evaporation pit. Domestic effluent
will be disposed through septic tanks and soak pits. DG set of 380 and 350 KVA will be installed
to meet the power requirement. 150 lts/hr of HSD will be consumed for Diesel
engines max. for 1 month per well and 20 lts/hr. of HSD will be consumed for
lighting purposes.
The main air
emissions will be from the DG set at well site. Flaring of gases during the
drilling testing phase will contribute to additional air pollution. Adequate
stack height is proposed for DG set and flaring of gases. Air quality
monitoring was carried out in summer season for 10 locations for the parameters
RSPM, SPM, SO2, NOx, HC and CO. The average concentration
for RSPM at all the locations ranged from
45.8 to 72.8 ug/m3. The average concentration for SPM was observed to be
84.6 to 151.6 ug/m3. The values for SO2
was observed to be in the range of 8.2 to 10.2 ug/m3 and for NOx ranged between 14-17.7 ug/m3. The values
of CO ranged from 840.1 to 1020 ug/m3 and the
concentration of HC was observed to be varying from 913.1 to 1391.6 ug/m3.
Solid waste generation will be drill cutting (30-50 MT/well), Oil Sludge
(0.15 MT/well) and drilling mud (250-400 m3/well). Solid waste will be disposed
of at TSDF site. Drilling mud will be
sent to central mud plant of ONGC for treatment and reuse.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures to be undertaken recommended the proposal for grant
of environmental clearance.
8.47 Exploratory drilling in CB-ONN-2004/4 (NELP-VI) in
The above
proposal was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee in its 67th meeting
held on 19th – 21st June 2007. The Committee prescribed
the TORs for undertaking the EIA study
and advised the project proponent to submit the EIA/EMP report to the
State Pollution Control Board for conducting public hearing. The issues emerged
during the PH/PC shall be incorporated in the EIA/EMP report and the
report submitted to the Ministry for
obtaining environmental clearance.
Public hearing for the
proposed project was held on 29th August
2008 at Dist: Bharuch in
The issues raised were addressed by the project proponent. The
company has assured provision for the employment, drinking water facilities
and social development of the area.
M/s ONGC Limited have proposed for exploratory
drilling in Block CB-ONN-2004/4
(NELP-VI) in Bharuch Dist.,
DG set will be
installed to meet the power requirement. 150 lts/hr of HSD will be consumed for
diesel engines max. for 1 month per well and 20 lts/hr. of HSD will be consumed
for lighting purposes.
The total water
requirement will be 50 m3/day/ well. The water will be sourced from the nearest
available water source. The effluent generated during the drilling operations
will be 25 m3/day during the drilling operation from a single well. The
effluent generated will be discharged in HDPE lined evaporation pit. Domestic
effluent will be disposed through septic tanks and soak pits.
The main air
emissions will be from the DG set at well site. Flaring of gases during the drilling testing phase will
contribute to additional air pollution. Adequate stack height is proposed for
DG set and flaring of gases. Air quality monitoring was carried out in summer
season for 10 locations for the parameters RSPM, SPM, SO2 and NOx,
All the parameters ware well with
in the permissible limits.
Solid waste generation will be in the form of drill cutting (30-50 MT/well), Oil Sludge (0.15 MT/well)
and drilling mud (250-400 m3/well). Solid waste will be disposed off at TSDF
site. The drilling mud will be sent to central mud plant of ONGC for treatment
and reuse.
After detailed deliberations, the EAC (I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures undertaken and recommended the proposal for grant of
environmental clearance.
9.0 Reconsideration
9.1 Expansion of Dyes Manufacturing Unit along with CPP from 700 MTM
to 7500 MTM at Plot No. 390A, 390B, 391A, 391B, 393,394-A2, 394-B1, 394-B2 396,
399, 400A, 400B, 401, 402, 403 and 404A in Village Dudhvada, Padra Taluka,
Vadodara District in Gujarat by M/s Kiri Dyes and Chemicals Ltd - EC after
TOR - consideration of CPCB visit report reg.
The proposal was considered in the 84th
meeting of the Expert Apprasal Committee held during 19th – 21st August 2008. The
Committee was decided that a subcommittee of following shall visit the Plant
for spot inspection and submit detailed report on water, Air and soil pollution from the plant before reconsideration of
the proposal:
1. Sh. R.K.Garg- Vice Chairman EAC(I)
2. Representative of the Ministry
3. Zonal officer CPCB Vadodara
It was informed by the
Member Secretary that a team of scientists from the Zonal office of CPCB
Vadodara has visited the plant in September, 2008. The committee decided that
the inspection report along with recommendations may be sought from the CPCB to
decide the proposal and now visit by the sub committee will not be required.
The report of CPCB shall be placed before the committee as and when received.
The report of CPCB
received and placed before the Committee. The committee noted that as per the
observations of the CPCB team, the ETP and incinerator were not functioning
satisfactory and not complying the standards. The Committee decided that
observations of subcommittee may be communicated to the proponent that the
proponent should send performance report to the Ministry for placing in the
Committee and deciding the visit to the plant. The proposal will be
reconsidered by the Committee after the submission of visit report.
9.2 Proposed
Synthetic Organic Chemicals manufacturing unit at plot no. 3133 to 3139, 3231 to 3245,
3330 to 3351, 3517 to 3524 , GIDC Panoli, Dist: Bharuch, Gujarat. By M/s P.I .
Industries Limited- EC after TOR- consideration of CPCB visit report reg.
The proposal regarding Synthetic
Organic Chemicals manufacturing unit
at GIDC Panoli in Dist: Bharuch in
A team from the CPCB, ZO- Vadodara inspected the unit on
02.09.2008 and 13.09.2008. The Committee discussed the tour report in detail
and agreed to the recommendations made in the site inspection report regarding
upgradation of ETP and control the odour from the existing unit.
The Committee recommended the proposal for grant of environmental
clearance subject to stipulation of following specific conditions.
1. The unit shall undertake
measures to minimize the leakages of odorous gases so as to minimize odour
problem in the plant area and near by
area.
2. The unit shall install own ETP and meet the industry specific
discharge standards notified under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
3. GPCB shall not permit any new discharge from new industries or
expansion of existing industries in the area that lead to CETP until the said
CETP meet the required standards and meet the hydraulic capacity.
4. The company shall obtain Authorization for collection, storage and
disposal of hazardous waste under the Hazardous Waste (Management and Handling)
Rules, 2003 for management of Hazardous wastes and prior permission from GPCB
shall be obtained for disposal of solid / hazardous waste in the TSDF. The
concerned company shall undertake measures for fire fighting facilities in case
of emergency.
10.0 Any other item:
10.1
Bulk Drug
unit at SIPCOT Industrial Area Hosur, Krishnagiri Andhra Pradesh by M/s Calcitech India Private Limited ? EC
condition- continuos monitoring system for Bromine amendment regd.
The
above projects were granted environmental clearance vide letters No- J-1 No-
J-11011/411/2006-IA-II (I) Dated 1st August 2007 to M/s Global Calcium Pvt Ltd and
1011/411/2006-IA-II (I) Dated 18th
July 2007 to M/s Calcitech India
Private Limited. Both companies have requested for amendment in EC conditions.
1. M/s Global
Calcium Pvt Ltd have
requested for amendment in specific condition No. iv regarding - “The
ambient air quality monitoring stations will be set up in consultation with the
State Pollution Control Board. It will be ensured that at least one monitoring
station is set up in up-wind & in down-wind direction along with those in
other directions. On-line data for air emissions shall be transferred to the
CPCB and SPCB regularly. The instruments used for ambient air quality
monitoring shall be calibrated regularly.”
The company has requested to delete “On-line data for air emissions
shall be transferred to the CPCB and SPCB regularly.” From the above condition.
The matter was discussed by the committee and the committee decided that
instead of online data transfer, PAs may transfer the data to CPCB and SPCB
monthly.
2. M/s Calcitech India Private Limited have
requested for amendment in specific condition No. ii “A periodic monitoring of
Bromine at salient location within the plant premises as well as out side the
plant shall be carried out. A continuous monitoring system for bromine shall
be installed.”
The
company has requested to delete “A continuous
monitoring system for bromine shall be installed.”
The
matter was discussed by the Committee and the committee agreed that it can be
deleted.
10.2
Expansion
of Nitro-Tolune and Addition of New Product SMIA at GIDC Chemical Complex, Nandesari Baroda,
The proposal was considered in 67th and
reviewed in 78th meeting EAC(I) and as per the recommendation of the
Committee environmental clearance was accorded on April 9th
2008.
The PAs have requested for corrections in the
environmental clearance for products and emission limits.
The committee discussed the issue and found that the
product Nitro-xylene and Nitro-cumene may be shifted from list of existing
products to proposed products. Regarding emission limit for the nitrogen
oxides, the committee suggested that limit should be fixed as 25ppm.
10.3 Setting up of Cement Plant (200 TPD) at
Modertoli Village, Doboka Revnue Circle, Hojai Sub Division, Nagaon District, Assam
by M/s Mahabali Cement Limited – EC
The proposal was considered in 83rd meeting of
the Expert Committee (Industry) held during 14th – 16th
July 2008. The Committee noted that:
1. The
project is small scale industry.
2. The
project Authorities prepared EIA/EMP
3. The
public hearing was suomoto conducted by the Assam Pollution Control Board under
EIA Notification 2006 on 2nd February 2008.
4. The Penal
of public hearing headed by Additional Deputy Commissioner, recommended the
proposal for setting up of the plant.
5. Assam
Pollution Control Board has granted NOC on 12th February 2008.
6. Proceeding
of public hearing was forwarded to the Ministry on 12th February
2008.
The
committee had suggested that State Pollution Control Board may be directed by
the Ministry to act as per the provisions and procedure of the EIA Notification
2006 regarding public hearing. However, considering the small scale unit, above
facts and recommendation of the public hearing panel, the committee recommended
the proposal for grant of environmental clearance subjected to specific and
general conditions after submission of Form -1 for record.
While
processing the proposal in the Ministry it is noted that the public hearing was
not conducted as per the provisions of the EIA Notification 2006 and proposal
referred back to the EAC(I) for review.
The
Committee discussed the matter at length again and the reiterated the decision
however suggested that Ministry may write to the industry to submit the EIA/EMP
as approved by the committee to the SPCB for fresh public hearing as for as
committee is concerned it is satisfied with the public hearing and EIA/EMP. The
committee also suggested that in such case the SPCB may be given instructions
accordingly.
10.4 Applicability of Environmental Clearance
under EIA Notification, 2006 for manufacturing of Aluminium Alloys Ingots (4800
TPA on three shift basis) through rotary furnace by M/s Shree
Balaji Alloys Plot No. 10, Industrial Area, Bai-Attarian,Tehsil Indora,
District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh – Clarification reg.
The
proposal is for manufacturing of Aluminium Alloys Ingots 4800 TPA on three
shift basis with use of rotary furnace and raw materials will be non-toxic
Aluminium scrap. The plant will be located in industrial area. The PAs have informed that raw material will
be non toxic Aluminium scrap and given the composition of the raw material
which contains the heavy metals in minor proportions.
The
committee took the note of the information given by the project authority and
decided that the activity will not come under heavy and toxic metallurgical
activity. Hence being capacity less than 5000 TPA, the proposal does not
attract the provision of EIA Notification 2006.
22nd October, 2008
11.0 New Proposals :
11.1 Integrated Aluminium Smelter Complex (3.25
LTPA & Primary Aluminium) alongwith coal based Captive Power Plant (750 MW)
at Village Orgari, Bargawan, District Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh by M/s Hindalco
Industries Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of
the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as
per Draft Terms of References (TORs) awarded during the 67th Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 4th–6th
June, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Aluminium Smelter projects are
listed at S.N. 3(a) under Primary Metallurgical Industry under Category ‘A’ and
are to be appraised at the Central level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s Hindalco
Industries Ltd. have proposed to set up
a green field Integrated Aluminium Smelter Complex (3.25 LTPA) alongwith coal
based Captive Power Plant (5x150 MW; 750 MW) at at Village Bargawan, District Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh. Out of
Proposal also
involves rehabilation and resettlement of 1,750 families. PAs informed to the
Committee that R & R Plan is prepared and submitted to the District
Authorities. No national park, sanctuary or archeological green monuments
exists within
Coal
(3.5 MTPA) will be sourced from captive Mahan Coal Mines located at
Air quality monitoring was carried out at 8
locations and all the parameters like SPM (59.4-143.7 mg/m3),
RPM (20.7-47.5 mg/m3),
SO2 (6.1-10.2 mg/m3)
& NOx (7.2-10.8 mg/m3) are within the
permissible limits. Main source of air emissions will be Aluminium
smelter and CPP particularly Pot Room, Anode baking furnace, cast house etc.
Gas treatment centers (GTC) will be provided to treat the fumes coming out from
pot line comprising of 336 pots. Bag
filters will be provided. ESPs will be
provided to CPP to control air emissions to 100 mg/Nm3. Closed
Alumina wagon and dense phase conveying for Alumina handling will reduce
fugitive emissions. High efficiency collection hoods, flue gas treatment plant
and dry scrubbers will be provided to keep the Fluoride emissions below 0.7
kgs/ton from Anode bake oven. Internal roads will be paved/asphalted. Calcined
petroleum based dry scrubber, dust suppression and collection system will be
provided to Carbon paste plant. De-dusting system will be provided to control
fugitive emissions. Major pollutants
will be HF, SO2, Spent pot lining.
Total
water requirement from River Gopad will be 4,600 m3/hr instead of
4,500 m3/day proposed earlier for Phase-I and the permission has
been accorded by the Energy Department of Govt. of M. P. Entire process effluent will be recycled
after treatment. All the wastewater will be treated in ETP and treated
wastewater will be used for dust suppression, green belt development and
coal/ash handling. ‘Zero’ discharge will be adopted. Domestic effluent will be treated in STP.
Ash
(1.4 MTPA) will be generated from CPP and will be prepared in high-density
slurry from ash dyke. Flyash will be 100% utilized within 10 years from
commissioning of operations. Aluminium Fluoride (5,475 TPA) will be used which
is hazardous in nature. Spent pot lining
(SPL), Dross, waste oils and Grease will be recycled inhouse after appropriate
treatment or disposed off to authorized vendors. All organic waste from plant
and township will be composted to manure and used for afforestation. A secured
landfill as per CPCB design will be constructed for disposal of SPL. ETP &
STP sludge will be used as a soil conditions for green belt development.
Green belt will be developed in
The Committee deliberated upon the
issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted
by the M.P. Pollution Control Board (MPPCB) on 14th March, 2008. The
major issues included R & R, electricity, water, medical, education,
employment, compliance to pollution control etc. and have satisfactorily been
incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
After
discussion, the Committee desired submission of following information:
1. Commitment
that total land requirement shall not exceed
2. Material
balance for achieving Fluoride emission as 0.7 kg/ton of Aluminium produced
including accountable and nonaccountable Fluoride.
While the minutes were under preparation, PAs vide
their letter dated 24th October, 2008 have submitted commitment for
restricting the land acquisition to
After detailed deliberations, the Committee found the final
EIA/EMP report adequate and recommended project for according environmental
clearance subject to stipulation of following specific conditions alongwith
other environmental conditions after submission of above mentioned information
which will be examined internally without calling PAs :
1. Efforts should be made to reduce RSPM levels in the ambient air
and a time bound action plan shall be submitted. On-line ambient air monitoring
and continuous stack monitoring facilities for all the stacks and sufficient
air pollution control devices should be provided to all the stacks including
captive power plant to keep the emission levels below 100 mg/Nm3.
2. Particulate fluoride emissions should not be more than 0.65 mg/Nm3
and fugitive particulate fluoride emissions from pot room should not be
more than 1.85 mg/Nm3.
2. In plant, control measures for checking fugitive emissions from
spillage/raw materials handling should be provided. Fluoride emissions should
be monitored from the pot room and in the forage around the smelter complex and
the data submitted regularly to the Ministry/ Regional Office at
3. The particulate emissions from the bake oven plant should not
exceed 50 mg/Nm3.
4. The company should install fume extraction system and bag filters
to control the emissions from all melting and casting units. The emissions
shall conform to the standards prescribed by the Ministry/CPCB/MPPCB which ever
is more stringent.
5. The poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from the carbon plant (anode
bake oven) should not exceed 2 mg/Nm3. The data on PAH should be
monitored quarterly and report submitted regularly to the Ministry/Regional
Office at
6. Fluoride consumption shall be less than 10 kg/ton of Aluminium
produced as specified by the CREP guidelines.
Accordingly, Fluoride emission load shall be reduced.
7. Total water requirement should not exceed 4,600 m3/hr
and prior permission from the drawl of 4,600 m3/hr water from river
Gopad from concerned department should be obtained. As reflected in the EIA /EMP, all the process
effluent should be treated in the effluent treatment plant (ETP) and treated
waste water should be recycled and reused to achieve ‘zero’ discharge. Domestic
effluent should be treated in sewage treatment plant (STP).
8. The spent pot lining generated from the smelter should be properly
treated by setting up of spent pot lining treatment plant to remove fluoride
and cyanide and disposed off in a secured landfill site. The location and design of the landfill site
should be approved by the MPPCB as per Hazardous Wastes (Management and
Handling) Rules, 2003 and should be as per CPCB guidelines. The ground water
quality around the landfill site should be monitored and data submitted to the
Ministry/MPPCB. All the used oil and batteries should be sold to the authorized
recyclers/reprocessors.
9. Efforts should be made to find application and use of spent pot
lining generated from the smelter.
10. Proper utilization of fly ash should be ensured as per Fly ash
Notification, 1999 and subsequent amendment in 2003.
11. Green belt should be developed in 33 % area.
12. Occupational Health Surveillance of the workers should be done on
a regular basis and records maintained as per the Factories Act.
13. The company should develop rain water structures to harvest the
run off water for recharge of ground water in consultation with the Central
Ground Water Authority/Board.
14. Land acuisition for the proposed Integrated Aluminium
Smelter Complex (3.25 LTPA & Primary Aluminium) alongwith coal based
Captive Power Plant (750 MW) at Village Orgari, Bargawan, District Sidhi,
Madhya Pradesh should not exceed
15. As proposed, no forest land should be used.
16. Rehabilitation and Resettlement should be implemented as per the R
& R Policy of the State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh. Suitable employment to all
the oustees should be provided. Compensation paid to the land oustees in any
case shall not be less than the norms prescribed under the National
Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, 2007.
17. All the recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate
Responsibility for Environment Protection (CREP) for the Aluminium sector
should be strictly implemented.
18. Recommendations of the State Forest
Department regarding impact of the proposed expansion plant on the surrounding
reserve forests viz. Mohanban RF (
19. Measures shall also be taken to prevent impact of particulate
emissions / fugitive emissions, if any from the proposed plant on the surrounding
forest located within
11.2 Expansion of Copper Smelter Plant (Phase–II) at SIPCOT
Industrial Complex,
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 84th Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 19th-21ST August, 2008 for
preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Primary
metallurgical industries have been kept at S.N. 3(a) under Primary
metallurgical industry under category ‘A’.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s.
Vedanta (M/s. Sterlite Industries (India) Limited) has proposed to set up a Copper Smelter Plant (Phase–II),
SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Madurai Bypass Road, Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu. The total land acquired from SIPCOT, Govt. of
Tamil Nadu is
The
existing plant comprises of Copper smelter (1,200 TPD), Sulphuric acid plant
(4200 TPD), Phosphoric acid plant (800 TPD), Refinery (875 TPD), Rod Plant (410
TPD). Another Copper smelter of capacity (1,200 TPD) will be installed in the
proposed expansion.
PAs have earlier proposed that the main products
from the proposed Copper smelter-II will be as follows:
S. No |
Products |
Proposed
Production Capacity
(TPD) |
I |
Main Product |
|
1 |
Copper
anode |
1200 |
2 |
Copper
cathode (from anodes produced) |
1200 |
3 |
Phosphoric
acid |
800 |
II |
Intermediate Product |
|
1 |
Anode
slime (refinery) |
7.20 |
III |
By-Product |
|
1 |
Sulphuric
acid |
4500 |
2 |
Ferro
sand |
3200 |
3 |
Gypsum |
4000 |
4 |
Hydrofluro-
Silicic acid |
50 |
Now,
PAs have informed that the following products will be manufactured from the
proposed Copper smelter-II.
S. N. |
Products |
Proposed
Production (TPD) |
I |
Main Product |
|
1 |
Copper
anode |
1,200 |
2 |
Copper
cathode |
1,525 |
3 |
Phosphoric
acid |
800 |
4 |
Continuous Copper rod |
800 |
II |
Intermediate Product |
|
1 |
Anode
slime |
3.0 |
2 |
Dore Metal |
0.65 |
3 |
Selenium |
1.2 |
4 |
Bismuth
Bi-sulphate |
1.8 |
5 |
Copper
Telluride |
0.6 |
6 |
Nickel Sludge |
30 |
7 |
Nickel |
1.5 |
III |
By-Product |
|
1 |
Sulphuric
acid |
4,500 |
2 |
Ferro
sand |
3,200 |
3 |
Gypsum |
4,000 |
4 |
Hydrofluro-
Silicic acid |
50 |
PAs
gave a detailed presentation of existing and proposed production details and is
as follows:
S. N. |
Products |
Quantity
(TPD) |
||
Existing |
Expansion
|
Total |
||
I |
Main Product |
|||
1 |
Copper
anode |
1,200 |
1,200 |
2,400 |
2 |
Copper
cathode |
875 |
1,525 |
2,400 |
3 |
Phosphoric
acid |
410 |
800 |
1,210 |
4 |
Continuous Copper rod |
800 |
800 |
1,600 |
II |
Intermediate Product |
|||
1 |
Anode
slime |
1.75 |
3.0 |
4.75 |
2 |
Dore Anode |
-- |
0.65 |
0.65 |
3 |
Selenium |
-- |
1.2 |
1.2 |
4 |
Bismuth
Bi-sulphate |
-- |
1.8 |
1.8 |
5 |
Copper
Telluride |
-- |
0.6 |
0.6 |
6 |
Nickel Sludge |
-- |
30 |
30 |
7 |
Nickel |
-- |
1.5 |
1.5 |
III |
By-Product |
|||
1 |
Sulphuric
acid |
4,200 |
4,800 |
9,000 |
2 |
Ferro
sand |
2,400 |
3,000 |
5,400 |
3 |
Gypsum |
3,200 |
4,200 |
7,400 |
4 |
Hydrofluro-
Silicic acid |
25 |
80 |
105 |
It is
also informed that the environmental clearance has been accorded for all
Intermediate products.
Main
raw material for the production of Cu metal is Sulphidic Copper concentrate
containing about 25-35% copper, 28-35%
Copper
anodes will be produced from the imported copper concentrates through
pyro-metallurigical smelting process. The SO2 generated during the
smelting of Cu will be converted into H2SO4 by Double
Conversion Double Absorption (DCDA) process. Part of H2SO4
will be used for the production of Phosphoric acid from the imported rock
phosphate using a Hemi-hydrate Di-Hydrate process. The casted Cu anodes will be dispatched to
the refinery unit for further electrolytic refining to about 99.99% purity. The
major steps in Cu extraction will include:
1. Blending of different grades of concentrates
2. Smelting of concentrate in ISASMELT furnace to
produce an intermediate copper rich product known as ‘matte’ containing 50-65%
copper and eliminate Iron silicate (Ferro sand) by adding Silica.
3. Converting liquid matte to blister copper (98-99%
Cu) in a Pierce- Smith Converters (PS Converter).
4. Fire refining
of blister copper to produce anode copper (99.5% Cu) in anode furnace and
casting of the anodes
5. Electrolytic refining of anodes to produce copper
cathodes (99.99% Cu)
In the
process of extraction of Copper metal from Sulphidic concentrates, Sulphuric
acid will be recovered as a by-product from smelter & furnace.
WHRB will be provided to ISA. ESP will be provided
to WHRB. ESP dust will be recycled back into ISA furnace. The
primary gas from the ISA smelter and converter will be sent to proposed
Sulphuric acid plant. Fugitive emissions from rotary holding furnace, secondary
emissions from converter will be connected to the scrubber followed by a stack
(
Total water requirement for the
existing smelter is 1.7 MGD and for proposed smelter is revised from 1.8 MGD to
2.4 MGD and will be sourced from
The entire wastewater generated will be
treated and reused. The liquid effluent generated from Sulphuric acid plant,
Refinery section will be reused in the plant after treatment. The other
effluents generated from Phosphoric acid, cooling towers, boiler blow down and
ETP raw water does not require any treatment for reuse/recycle. Similarly, the
scrubbers bleed off, which is in slurry form and will be filtered for solids
only. Gas cleaning effluent and
secondary gas scrubber effluent will be treated in ETP. ‘Zero discharge’ will
be adopted. Domestic effluent will be treated in sewage treatment plant (STP)
and the treated water will be used for green belt. Leachates are also collected
and used in the process. Regarding ground water quality, it is observed that Ph
and Fluoride levels are high.
Scrap
from stores / workshop will be sold to authorized recyclers. Lime grit
generated from Milk of Lime preparation plant will be recycled back into ISA
furnace in place of flux material. ETP cake, ETP slime, Spent Catalyst,
Scrubber cake, Resin from Bismuth plant and toxic metal containing residue from
Ion exchange material in water purification will be stored in secured land
fills designed as per CPCB guidelines. ESP, WHRB and Gas coolers dust will be
recycled back into Smelter. Metal slag from TROF converted of DORE process will
be recycled to smelter. Regarding storage of gypsum, PAs informed to the
Committee that out of 52 Lakhs, 42 Lakhs gypsum is already dispatched to the
concerned organizations and remaining 10Lakhs will be sent in 2009. Spent oil, oil sludge and non-ferrous scrap
will be sold to CPCB registered recyclers.
During
presentation, PAs informed that
PAs
informed to the Committee that environmental clearance was accorded for the the Copper Smelter Plant (Phase–II) at
SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Madurai Bypass Road, Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu and may
be kept in abeyance since further expansion will be carried out in the existing
and new area acquired in the near vicinity. Part of the new area acquired will
be overlapping. PAs have requested for the use of data for EIA/EMP collected in
2006-07 (Winter season) and exemption from public hearing due to location in
notified SIPCOT industrial estate. The
Committee agreed for the use of same data as well as exemption for public
hearing as per Section (iii), Stage (3),
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee agreed for the exemption for public
hearing as per Section (iii), Stage (3),
1. Data
presented regarding continuous ambient air quality monitoring appears to be
improper since minimum value can not be ‘zero’ and suggested to recheck the
data. The committee also desired
submission of the existing ambient air, stack emission and fugitive emission
data collected by TNPCB, approved laboratory and PAs own data generated in
their lab.
2. SO2
values also momentarily go high which PAs were unable to explain.
3. NOX
values are also high.
4. Ground
water quality monitoring data was also not satisfactory.
Based on
the unsatisfactory explanation, the Committee desired that PAs should submit
the above mentioned data which will be reconsidered by the Committee as and
when submitted. The proposal is differed till the above information is
submitted.
11.3 Expansion of Sponge Iron Plant into Steel
Plant (2.00 MTPA) alongwith Captive Power Plant
(25 MW) at Komando, Sundergarh, Orissa by M/s Rungta
Mines Ltd.
(EC)
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 67th Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 4th–6th June,
2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the steel plants are listed at S.N.
3(a)(a) under Primary Metallurgical process and is appraised at Central
level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s Rungta Mines Ltd. have proposed for the expansion
of existing DRI Plant (0.270
MTPA) to expand as per details given below:
Plant/facility |
Product |
Capacity |
DRI Plant (3x350 TPD kilns) |
Sponge iron |
3,15,000
TPA |
Mini blast furnace (2x262 m3) |
Hot metal |
3,82,520
TPA |
Steel melting shop, comprising
|
Steel billets |
2,00,000
TPA |
WHR based CPP |
Electricity |
42 MW |
Coal based CPP |
Electricity |
25 MW |
Total
project area is
Iron ore, coal, coke, Dolomite/limestone,
Silico-Manganese, Scrap iron, Quartzite, HSD and LDO will be used as raw
material.
PAs informed to the Committee that proposed
plant will produce mild steel and finished steel through DRI/BF-IF-LRF-CCM
route. Iron ore (lumps or pellets) will be reduced by heating with carbonaceous
material e.g. coal in a Rotary kiln at 1,0000C. After reduction, product will be cooled,
separated into sponge iron and char by magnetic separation. Scrap/Sponge
Iron/pig iron will be melted in SMS in presence of Silico-Manganese. Ferro
alloys and additives will be heated in Ladle refining furnace. Billet caster
will be produced in continuous casting machine.
Hot metal will be produced in mini blast furnace by converting iron
oxides into ingot metal. Only billets will be manufactured and no long
structures will be manufactured. WHRB
& FBC based power plant will be installed.
Ambient air quality was monitored during
March to May, 2005 at 5 locations and
data submitted indicated SPM (91 - 166 ug/m3), RPM (28 - 50 ug/m3),
SO2 (5.6 – 12.8 ug/m3), NOx levels (8.6 – 18.0 ug/m3)
and are within the permissible limit.
Flue gas from Rotary kiln will pass through dust settling chamber to settle the
dust. The gas will pass through after
Burning Chamber (ABC) and used in WHRB to generate power. ESPs will be provided to DRI kilns, WHRB and
FBC boilers to control air emissions to 100 mg/Nm3. Dust collected from ESP though hopper will be
sent to ash silo by pneumatic conveying system.
Dust collected from ESP through happen will be sent to ash silo by
pneumatic conveying system. Dust
extraction system consisting of suction hood, cyclones wet scrubber etc. with
dusts will be presided to control fugitive emissions in kiln inlet area,
crushing unit, cooling outlet area to suppress SPM level below 50 mg/Nm3
from the induction furnace of SMS. FE
system and cleaning system consisting of bag filters I.D. fans etc. will be provided to the Ladle furnace to control dust less than 50 mg/Nm3. Wet scrubber will be provided to BF to
control emission to 50 mg/Nm3.
Total
water requirement from Karo river or bore wells will be 10,345 m3/day
instead of 80,780 m3/day earlier proposed. ‘Permission’ for the drawl of 10,345 m3/day
from
Fly
ash (81,900 TPA) generated by the FBC Power Plant will be used by cement and
brick manufacturing.
Out
of
Acoustic
enclosures and silencers will be provided. Total
power requirement will be 40 MW which will be met from Captive Power
Plant. 5 DG sets of 2500 KVA each will
also be installed. SEB will provide
33/11 KV electricity to the plant till CPP is installed. Coal will be used as fuel for the reduction
in the kiln as well as CPP. HSD (3450 l/day) will be used as fuel for DG
sets. LDO (10 l/day) will be used for
start up CPP. Char will be used as fuel
in FBC-CPP.
The
Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public
Consultation meeting conducted by the Orissa State Pollution Control Board on
25th June, 2008. The issues like employment, air pollution, health,
irrigation, water supply, ITI establishment were discussed and have
satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report. PAs also informed
that Rs. 17.46 Lakhs are spent to implement various issues raised and Rs. 15.40
Lakhs are kept for 2008-09.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate
and suggested to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other
environmental conditions while considering for accord of environmental
clearance :
11.4 Expansion
of Sponge Iron Plant (60,000 TPA to 90,000 TPA) and installation of Captive
Power Plant (12 MW; 6MW AFBC & 6 MW WHRB) at Sy. No. 899 & 900,
Haraginadoni Road, Veniveerapura Cross, Kudathini Village, Bellary Taluka and
District, Karnataka by M/s Agarwal Sponge & Energy Pvt. Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 73rd Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 24th–26th
October, 2007, 2008 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the Sponge Iron Plants with > 200 TPD Sponge Iron Plant are kept
under Primary Metallurgy Industries under S.N. 3(a) under Category ‘A’. Since total capacity of the sponge iron plant
is 300 TPD, proposal is appraised at Central level.
PAs
informed to the Committee that M/s Agarwal
Sponge & Energy Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Sponge Iron Plant (60,000 TPA to 90,000 TPA) and
installation of Captive Power Plant (12 MW; 6MW AFBC & 6 MW WHRB) at Sy.
No. 899 & 900, Haraginadoni Road, Veniveerapura Cross, Kudathini Village,
Bellary Taluka and District, Karnataka. Total
project area is
Lump
Iron ore (51,000 TPA), Coal (40,000 TPA) and limestone (1,500 TPA) will be used
as raw materials. Direct Reduced Iron
(DRI) method will be used for the reduction of iron ore or pellets in the solid
state i.e. without the material going into the liquid phase which is
conventional route for converting iron ore into iron) which contains 90% metal
and some amount of unreduced iron vide and the gangue in the ore. The iron oxide of the ore will be reduced to
metallic iron by CO generated inside the kiln at 1000oC. It is
mentioned that existing plant was for 3 x 100 TPD kilns and hence virtually no expansion will be carried out.
Air quality monitoring was carried out at 8 locations and data submitted
indicated SPM,
RPM, SO2, NOx & CO
within permissible limits. The
off gases from the rotary kiln e.g. LO, SO2, Carbon particles, fines
of iron ore, coal and limestone will be burnt in After Burning Chamber (ABC). Then, gaseous emissions will be treated in
gas cleaning Plant, ESP and passed through stack.
Total
ground water requirement will be 350 m3/day instead of 30,000 l/day
earlier proposed. CGWA has informed that
proposal is not located in the critically polluted area. All the treated
wastewater will be used for cooling purpose and no water pollution is
anticipated since most of the water will be evaporated. Domestic wastewater will be treated in
Sewerage Treatment Plant and used for green belt development.
Char will be used in
fluidized bed combustion boiler (FBC). Fly ash, sludge from wet scrubber and
bag filter dust will be sold to cement and brick manufacturers.
Out of
The
Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public
Consultation meeting conducted by the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board
on 27th June, 2008. The issues raised included providing medical,
water, electricity, compensation, employment and improvement in roads etc. have
satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate
and suggested to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other
environmental conditions while considering for accord of environmental
clearance :
11.5 Expansion of Integrated Steel Plant, Coal
Washery (1.5 MTPA) and Captive Power Plant (200 MW) at Rengeli,
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 64th Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 28th-30th
March, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the Integrated Steel Plants have been kept in Category ‘A’ and
appraised at the Central level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s
Shyam DRI Power Ltd. have submitted a proposal for the expansion of Integrated
Steel Plant at Rangeli, Sambalpur Forest Division, Sambalpur, Orissa. PAs have
proposed to install 1.0 MTPA Coal Washery, 0.6 MTPA Sponge Iron, 0.7 MTPA Pig
iron, 0.6 MTPA Coke Oven, 0.6 MTPA Pelletization with steel making and
ferro-alloy making facilities and 100 MW Captive Power Plant. Now, it is proposed to revise coal washery to
15,00,000 MTPA and CPP to 200 MW capacity as per details given below:
S.N. |
|
Existing Production (MTPA) |
Proposed Production (MTPA) |
1. |
Sponge
Iron |
2,00,000 |
6,00,000 |
2. |
Billet |
2,00,000 |
- |
3. |
Bars |
60,000 |
- |
4. |
Sinter |
-- |
8,82,000 |
5. |
Pig
iron |
- |
7,87,000 |
6. |
Ferro
alloy |
- |
1,05,000 |
7. |
Steel
making |
- |
11,75,000 |
8 |
Coke
oven |
- |
6,00,000 |
9 |
Pellet |
- |
3,00,000 |
10 |
Coal
washery |
3,00,000 |
15,00,000 |
11 |
Power
(WHRB) (MW) |
25 |
200 |
During presentation, PAs informed that following will be the
capacity of the existing and proposed production:
S.N. |
Shop |
Existing Production
(TPA) |
Proposed Expansion (TPA) |
Ultimate Capacity (TPA) |
1. |
Sponge Iron |
2,00,000 |
6,00,000 |
8,00,000 |
2. |
Billet Caster |
2,00,000 |
- |
2,00,000 |
3. |
Rolling Mill |
60,000 |
6,00,000 |
6,60,000 |
4. |
Sinter plant |
- |
8,82,000 |
8,82,000 |
5. |
Blast furnace |
- |
7,42,500 |
7,42,500 |
6. |
Ferro alloy |
- |
2,50,000 |
2,50,000 |
7. |
SMS |
2,10,000 |
12,34,286 |
14,44,286 |
8 |
Coke oven |
- |
5,50,000 |
5,50,000 |
9 |
Pelletization & beneficiation plant |
- |
3,00,000 |
3,00,000 |
10 |
Coal washery |
3,00,000 |
15,00,000 |
18,00,000 |
11 |
Power (MW) |
25 |
200 |
225 |
12 |
Bloom caster |
- |
3,53,500 |
3,53,500 |
13 |
Lime plant |
- |
60,000 |
60,000 |
The
proposed expansion will be carried out in Sambalpur Forest Division in Gramaya
Jungle. Debrigarh Sanctuary and 22
Iron ore DRI grade, Iron ore BF grade, limestone, lime,
dolomite, coking coal, non coking coal, Manganese ore, Quartzite, Aluminium,
Electrode and refractory will be used as raw material.
PAs informed to the Committee that manufacturing of
steel will involve reducing iron ore to iron by the use of reductant like coal
/ coke. The iron will be processed through the EAF/induction furnace to produce
steel. The steel than will be purified
to different grades and rolled to various sections/sizes as per the
requirement. Pig Iron will be produced
in two blast furnaces. Coke oven plant,
sinter plant and pelletization plant will be installed as ancillaries to charge
the Blast furnace and produce 0.7 MTPA hot metal and then transferred to EAF
for steel making. Sponge iron (0.6 MTPA)
will be produced in rotary kiln out of which 0.385 MTPA sponge iron will be
used in EAF and 0.215 MTPA Sponge iron will be used in EAF and 0.215 MTPA in
induction furnace alongwith scrap for the production of stainless steel. Coal
washery (0.6 TPA) will be installed to meet the annual requirement of coal of
DRI kilns. Ferro alloys like SiMn, FeMn & FeCr will also be
manufactured. FeCr will be used to
manufacture stainless steel.
Gases and
solid fuels generated during the process of iron and steel making generated as
by products will be used to generate power.
Captive power plant of 4x25 MW (100 MW) will be installed to generate
electric power from byproduct gases.
Air
quality monitoring was carried out at 8 locations during Nov. 2007-Jan 2008 and
the parameters are found to vary in the following range: SPM (79.4-162.1 mg/m3), RSPM (16.31-49.5 mg/m3), SO2 (7-16.5 mg/m3) & NOx (7-18.5 mg/m3). Dust suppression
arrangement like dense fog system, water sprinkling system will be provided at
raw material handling areas. Ash conditioners will be installed to avoid
fugitive ash dust pollution at loading and transport points. Dust collectors at
crushers, transfer points of conveyors, raw material and coal yard. Dust
extraction system comprising of suction hood, duct, ESP, fan, stack etc. will
be provided to DR kiln, Sinter plant and Blast furnace. Dust extraction system
comprising of suction hood, duct, bag filters, fan, stack etc. will be provided
to Induction Furnace, DRI screening section and coal crushing & screening
section. Dust suppression with water sprinkling will be provided to control
secondary emissions.
Total
water requirement from Hirakud reservoir for proposed expansion will be 3,238 m3/hr.
instead of 2,050 m3/hr. earlier proposed. Permission has been accorded by the
All
the solid waste generated will be disposed off within the premises or any other
designated area after prior approval from the OSPCB. Slag from blast furnace will be granulated
and will be provided to cement manufacturers. Coal washery middlings will be
used as a fuel in the boiler. Dust from dedusting plant of Sinter plant and
Pellet plant will be recycled to Sinter plant and Blast Furnace respectively.
Bag house dust from SMS will be recycled to Sinter plant. Char from Sponge Iron
plant will be used in FBC boiler as fuel. Slag from SMS and Ferro alloy plant
will be used for road making and land filling, respectively. Dust from Coke
oven, rejects from Coal washery will be used for land filling. Fly ash will be
provided to Cement and brick manufacturers.
Out
of
‘Consent
to Establish has been accorded by the Orissa Pollution Control Board vide
letter no. 11175/Ind-II-NOC-2301 dated 16th May, 2006.
The
Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public
Consultation meeting conducted by the Orissa
Pollution Control Board on 21st May, 2008. The major issues included
plantation, installation of Air Pollution control system, drinking water
supply, no disposal of waste water outside the premises, provision of
ambulance, employment, ITI training institute etc. have satisfactorily been
incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
It has
been brought to the knowledge of the Ministry by the Regional Office at
Bhuvaneshwar that capacity of the coal washery is enhanced from 1.0 to 1.5
MTPA, Captive Power Plant from 100 MW to 200 MW and Ferro Alloy Plant (0.05
MTPA) is also installed changing scope of the project. PAs clarified that all
the above mentioned items have been included in the proposed steel plant.
Regarding construction of rolling mill, PAs clarified that rolling mill
construction is related to the existing plant and no work related to the
expansion is started so far.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate and suggested to stipulate
following specific conditions alongwith other environmental conditions while
considering for accord of environmental clearance :
11.6 Expansion of Ferro Alloy Plant (18,000 to
36,000 TPA), Bloom & Billet (1,29,000 to 3,09,000 TPA), Captive Power Plant
(38 to 61 MW) and installation of Rolling Mill (2,16,000 TPA) at Village
Sonkara & Sondra, Siltara Industrial Growth Centre, District Raipur,
Chhattisgarh by M/s Vandana Global Ltd. (EC)
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 73rd Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 24th–26th
October, 2007 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the structural rolling mill are covered under 3(a) under Category
‘A’ and Ferro Alloy Induction furnace and CPP (33 MW) under category ‘B’ and is
to be appraised at the Central level for Category ‘B’ portion also due to
absence of SEAC/SEIAA at the State level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s
Vandana Global Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Ferro Alloy Plant
(18,000 to 36,000 TPA), Bloom & Billet (1,29,000 to 3,09,000 TPA), Captive
Power Plant (38 to 71 MW) and installation of Rolling Mill (2,16,000 TPA) at
village Sonkara & Sondra, Siltara Industrial Growth Centre, Siltara,
District Raipur, Chhattisgarh as per details given below :
S.N. |
Details |
Capacity
(TPA) |
||
Existing |
Proposed |
Total |
||
1 |
Induction Furnace |
1,29,000 |
1,80,000
|
3,09,000
|
2 |
Ferro Alloy Plant |
18,000 |
18,000 |
36,000 |
3 |
Rolling Mills |
- |
2,16,000
|
2,16,000
|
4 |
Captive Thermal Power Plant |
38 MW |
33 MW |
71 MW |
5. |
Sponge Iron Plant |
2,16,000 |
- |
2,16,000 |
However, the Committee noted that no coal based sponge iron plant is
proposed but coal based captive power plant is proposed which are banned by the
State Govt. in Siltara, C.G. and asked PAs to withdraw coal based CPP from the
proposal until and permission is accorded by the Chhattisgarh Govt. Revised configuration will be as follows
after withdrawing CPP :
S.N. |
Details |
Capacity
(TPA) |
||
Existing |
Proposed |
Total |
||
1 |
Induction Furnace |
1,29,000 |
1,80,000
|
3,09,000
|
2 |
Ferro Alloy Plant |
18,000 |
18,000 |
36,000 |
3 |
Rolling Mills |
- |
2,16,000
|
2,16,000
|
4 |
Captive Thermal Power Plant |
38 MW |
- |
38 MW |
5. |
Sponge Iron Plant |
2,16,000 |
- |
2,16,000 |
Project
is located in
Manganese ore (30,000
TPA) and coal (2,38,000 TPA) will be used as raw material. Iron ore, coal,
dolomite/ limestone will be feed to the rotary kiln for the direct reduction of
iron, cooled and separate d for coal ash and coal char. Sponge Iron will be produced using iron ore
(haematite) and non-coking coal. In
rolling mill, red-hot materials (billets or blooms) will pass through rolling
mill to out various designs on the rolls.
Air quality monitoring was
carried out at 8 locations and the parameters are found to vary in the
following range: SPM (139.1-286.6 mg/m3), RSPM (43.0-89.5 mg/m3), SO2 (9.3-13.6 mg/m3) & NOx (12.6-22.5 mg/m3) and are within
permissible limit. ESP to
control, de-dusting system, bag filters, dust collectors will be provided to
control air emission to 50 mg/Nm3. Total water requirement will be
454 m3/day and sourced from CSIDC / Chhattisgarh Ispat Bhoomi
borewell. DM Plant back wash will be treated in ETP. Ash will be used for brick
manufacturing. ESP dustwill be sold to cement manufacturers. Slag will be sold
to brick manufacturers and also used for road making and land filling.
Green
belt will be developed in
The
Committee (Industry) noted that no public hearing/consultation is required due
to project being located in notified Siltara industrial area as per Section
(iii), Stage (3),
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee has recommended the proposal for
environmental clearance without coal based captive power plant subject to
stipulation of following specific conditions alongwith other environmental
conditions
1.
No coal based captive power plant
should be installed without prior permission from the State Govt.
2.
Efforts should be made to reduce
RSPM levels in the ambient air and a time bound action plan should be
submitted. Continuous stack monitoring facilities for all the stacks should be
provided and sufficient air pollution control devices viz. ESP and bag filters
etc. should be provided to keep the emission levels below 100 mg/Nm3.
3.
Gaseous emission levels including
secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources should be controlled within
the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry and regularly monitored.
Guidelines / Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be followed. New
standards issued by the Ministry for the sponge iron plant in May, 2008 should
be followed.
4.
Hot gases from the existing DRI
kiln should be passed through Dust Settling Chamber (DSC) to remove coarse
solids and After Burning Chamber (ABC) to burn CO completely and used in waste
heat recovery boiler (WHRB). The gas
then should be cleaned in ESP before leaving out into the atmosphere through ID
fan and stack.
5.
Vehicular pollution due to
transportation of raw material and finished product should be controlled. Proper arrangements should also be made to
control dust emissions during loading and unloading of the raw material and
finished product.
6.
Prior ‘Permission’ for the drawl
of 454 m3/day water from CSIDC / Chhattisgarh Ispat Bhoomi should be
obtained.
7.
‘Zero’ effluent discharge should
be strictly followed and no wastewater should be discharged outside the
premises.
8.
All the char from DRI plant
should be utilized in AFBC boiler of power plant and no char should be disposed
off anywhere else.
13. A
time bound action plan should be submitted to reduce solid waste, its proper
utilization and disposal.
14. As
proposed, green belt should be developed in 33 % area.
15. All
the recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate Responsibility for
Environment Protection (CREP) for the Steel plants should be implemented.
16. Prior
permission from the State Forest Department should be taken regarding likely
impact of the expansion of the proposed steel plant on the mangroves located at
a distance of
11.7 Ferro Alloy Plant (12,650 MTPA) at Village
Nakrajoria, P.O. Salanpur, District Burdwan,
Project authorities didn’t attend the meeting due to cardiac
problem and it was decided that proposal should be considered afresh whenever
requested by the PAs.
11.8 Induction Furnace with Continuous Casting Machine
(1,00,000 TPA) Rolling Mill (1,00,000 TPA) and Coal Benefication Plant
(14,40,000 TPA) at Khasara No. 41/3. 3-5, P.H. No.90 Village Siltara, Siltara
Industrial Area, Tehsil and District Raipur, Chhattisgarh by M/s Rashmi Sponge Iron & Power Industries Ltd.
(EC)
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 78th Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 20th to 22nd
February, 2008 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the coal washeries with >1.0 MTPA through put of coal are kept at
S.N. 2(a) in Category ‘A’ and appraised at the Central level. Since capacity of the proposed coal washery is
41.44 MTPA, proposal is kept under Category ‘A’. Proposed Induction Furnace with 3x8 TPH
capacity and Rolling Mills are covered under S.N. 5(k) and 3(a) under Category
‘B’ but appraised at the Central level due to part of the proposal in Category
‘A’.
PAs
informed to the Committee that M/s Rashmi Sponge Iron & Power Industries
Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Induction Furnace with Continuous Casting Machine
(1,00,000 TPA), Rolling Mill (1,00,000 TPA) and Coal Beneficiation Plant
(14,40,000 TPA) at Khasara No. 41/3, 3-5, P.H. No. 90 Village Siltara, Near
Phase-II, Siltara Industrial Area, Tehsil and District Raipur,
Chhattisgarh. Sponge Iron Plant (66,000 TPA) and Power Plant (8 MW) is
already existing. The Committee noted that no coal based sponge iron
plant and captive power plant is proposed which are banned by the Chhattisgarh
Govt. in Siltara, C.G. Following
will be installed :
S.N. |
Details |
Existing Capacity |
Proposed capacity |
Total Capacity |
1 |
Sponge Iron |
66,000 TPA |
-- |
66,000 TPA |
2 |
Induction Furnace with CCM |
21,000 TPA |
79,000 TPA |
1,00,000 TPA |
3 |
Rolling mill |
-- |
1,00,000 TPA |
1,00,000 TPA |
4 |
Power Plant |
8 MW |
-- |
8 MW |
5 |
Coal Beneficiation |
-- |
1.44 MTPA (200 TPH) |
1.44 MTPA (200 TPH) |
Total land acquired is
Coal
(14,40,000 TPA), Sponge Iron (66,000 TPA) Scrap (25,000 TPA) and Ferro Alloys
(790 TPA) will be used as raw material.
Proposed Steel
Ingots / Billets will be manufactured by melting sponge iron, scrap and Ferro
Alloys in Induction Furnace. The molten metal will be poured in ladle furnace
and casted in the form of Billets/Ingots through continuous casting
machine. These Billets/Ingots will be
fed to a Rolling Mill to produce Re-rolled products. Washed coal from coal washery (dry type) will
be partly used for manufacturing sponge iron and partly sold to local parties.
Air
quality was monitored at 8 locations during November 2007-January 2008 and data submitted indicated SPM (98.8-442.9 mg/m3), RSPM (30.3-141.7 mg/m3), SO2 (6.7 – 21.9 mg/m3) & NOx (9.8-28.6 mg/m3). Fume extraction system with bag filters
will be provided to control emissions from IF / SMS. Dust extraction system and bag filter to coal
beneficiation plant will be provided.
Bag filters will also be provided to coal washery. Cleaned gases after
passing through APCS will be let out into the atmosphere through stacks of
adequate height as per CPCB norms. Dust
suppression system will be provided in unloading areas. All the internal roads will be asphalted.
Coal washery will be of dry type and no wastewater will be generated. Bag filters will be provided to coal washery.
Total
water requirement from Chhattisgarh Ispat Bhumi Ltd. will be 250 m3/day
and permission has been accorded by the Chhattisgarh State Industrial
Corporation (CSIDC) on 9th October, 2007. During presentation, PAs informed to the
commttee that 250 m3/day water will be supplied by Chhatisgarh Ispat
Bhumi Ltd. No effluent will be generated
from the SMS and Rolling Mill as closed circuit cooling system will be
adopted. Sanitary wastewater will be
treated in Septic tank followed by soak pit.
Slag
from IF / SMS (24 TPD) will be crushed and Iron content will be recovered and
balance material will be used in road construction. Mill scales (15 TPD) from Rolling Mill will
be used as raw material for Induction Furnace.
Washery middlings and rejects (1500 TPD) will be given to units with
power plants. F.O. sludge will be
provided to approved vendors. Green belt will be developed in
Total
power requirement will be 11 MW out of which 8 MW will be generated in CPP and
balance 3 MW will be sourced from CSEB.
The
Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public
Consultation meeting conducted by the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation
Board on 7th August, 2008. The issues like pollution problem in
Siltara area, water availability, employment, land availability etc. were
discussed and have satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP
report.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate
and suggested to stipulate following specific conditions alongwith other
environmental conditions while considering for accord of environmental
clearance :
1.
Efforts should be made to reduce
RSPM levels in the ambient air and a time bound action plan should be
submitted. Continuous stack monitoring facilities for all the stacks should be
provided and sufficient air pollution control devices viz. ESP and bag filters
etc. should be provided to keep the emission levels below 100 mg/Nm3.
2.
Gaseous emission levels including
secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources should be controlled within
the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry and regularly monitored.
Guidelines / Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be followed. New
standards issued by the Ministry for the sponge iron plant in May, 2008 should
be followed.
3.
Fume extraction system with bag
filters should be provided to control emissions from induction furnace and
steel melt shop. Dust extraction system and bag filter should be provided to
coal beneficiation plant. Bag filters
shouldalso be provided to coal washery.
4.
Adequate pollution control
measures should also be provided to coal
beneficiation plant to control fugitive emissions and crushed coal should be
properly supplied to the concerned industries.
5.
Vehicular pollution due to
transportation of raw material and finished product should be controlled.
Proper arrangements should also be made to control dust emissions during
loading and unloading of the raw material and finished product.
6.
Prior ‘Permission’ for the drawl
of 250 m3/day water water from Chhattisgarh Ispat Bhumi Ltd. should
be obtained.
7.
All the char from DRI plant, coal
washery rejects and middlings should be utilized in AFBC boiler of power plant
and no char should be disposed off anywhere else. All the mill scales from
rolling mill should be used in the induction furnace. SMS slag should also be
properly utilized. All the other solid waste including broken refractory mass
should be properly disposed off in environment-friendly manner.
10. A
time bound action plan should be submitted to reduce solid waste, its proper
utilization and disposal.
11. As
proposed, green belt should be developed in 33 % area.
12. All
the recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate Responsibility for
Environment Protection (CREP) for the Steel plants should be implemented.
11.9 Steel Melting Plant, Rolling Mill &
Ferro Alloys Plant at Paipalaiyam and
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 82nd Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 10th to 12th
June, 2008 for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Primary metallurgical industries
have been kept at S.N. 3(a) under primary metallurgical industry under category
‘A’ and appraised at Central level.
PAs informed to the Committee that M/s J R Steel
Industries (I) Pvt Ltd. has
proposed to set up a Steel melting plant, Rolling mill & Ferro Alloys Plant at
Paipalaiyam and
Vasanadu Village, Kuppam Mandal, District Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh. The
total land area acquired for the proposed plant will be
S. N. |
Proposed units |
Phase I |
Phase
II |
Total |
1. |
Induction furnace for
SMS |
25 TPH |
50 TPH |
75 TPH |
2. |
Rolling mill |
250 TPD |
500 TPD |
750 TPD |
3. |
Ferro alloys plant |
-- |
50 TPD |
50 TPD |
Following will be manufactured:
S. N. |
Product |
Phase I |
Phase
II |
Total |
1. |
M.S. Billets |
75,000
TPA |
1,50,000
TPA |
2,25,000
TPA |
2. |
Long steel products
(TMT bars / Structural steel) |
75,000
TPA |
75,000
TPA |
1,50,000
TPA |
3. |
Producer Gas (By product) (Lakhs m3/day) |
217.5 |
217.5 |
435 |
4. |
Ferro alloys |
-- |
15, 000 TPA |
15,000
TPA |
During presentation, PAs informed that following will be manufactured:
S. N. |
Product |
Phase I |
Phase
II |
Total |
1. |
M.S. Billets |
250 TPD |
500 TPD |
740 TPD |
2. |
TMT bars / Structural
steel |
250 TPD |
250 TPD |
500 TPD |
3. |
Producer Gas |
72,500 m3/day |
72,500 m3/day |
1,45,000 m3/day |
4. |
Ferro alloys |
-- |
50 TPD |
50 TPD |
Manganese ore, Dolomite,
Coal/Coke, Sponge Iron, Pig Iron, Quartz and Recovered Steel scrap will be used
as raw material.
Air quality monitoring was carried out at 8 locations
during December 2007-February 2008 and SPM (76.3 - 99.3 mg/m3),
RSPM (24.2 - 35.3 mg/m3), SO2 (5.3 - 7.6 mg/m3) & NOx (6.1 – 8.7
mg/m3) have been found
to be within the permissible limit. Fume extraction system with cyclones and bag
filters will be provided to control the primary and secondary emissions from
Induction furnaces & submerged arc furnaces. These emissions will be
discharged into the atmosphere through common stacks of height
Total
ground water requirement for the proposed project will be 150 m3/day
instead of 300 m3/day proposed earlier and have applied for the
permission to the State Ground Water Board. Closed circuit cooling system will
be adopted in Ferro Alloys, Steel melting shop & Rolling mill. Hence, no
waste generation from process and cooling. Sanitary wastewater generation will
be 8 KLD, which will be treated in septic tank followed by soak pit. The entire
water treated will be recycled and re-used within the plant.
Induction
furnace slag and Silico Manganese slag will be used for road construction. Mill
scales will be used in the process. Ash
will be used as a base material in the manufacture of construction bricks. High Carbon Ferro-manganese slag will be used
to manufacture Silico-Manganese as it contains high MnO2 and
Silicon. High Carbon Ferro-chrome slag
will be used in cast iron foundries. The dug soil during excavation will be
used for filling of low-lying areas and to refill the excavated areas after
concreting. All the Municipal solid waste will be disposed off as per norms.
Furnace oil sludge will be stored in HDPE drums and disposed off to APPCB
approved vendors.
Out of
total
The sources of noise generation in the plant will be Furnace, generator,
rolling mill etc. Ear plugs will be provided to workers working in the noise
prone areas. Ambient noise levels will be in accordance with MoEF notification
dated 14-02-2000. The power
requirement of the plant will be 47000 KVA supplied by AP Transco / AP Southern
power distribution company. Furnace oil
will be used for reheating the furnace as standby fuel. In the rolling mill
producer gas, which is environment friendly will be used as a primary fuel.
However, furnace oil will be used a stand-by fuel.
The
Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public
Consultation meeting conducted by the A. P. Pollution Control Board on 30th
August, 2008. The issues like employment and welfare measures were discussed
and have satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate and suggested to stipulate
following specific conditions alongwith other environmental conditions while
considering for accord of environmental clearance :
1.
Efforts should be made to reduce
RSPM levels in the ambient air and a time bound action plan should be
submitted. Continuous stack monitoring facilities for all the stacks should be
provided and sufficient air pollution control devices should be provided to
keep the emission levels below 100 mg/Nm3.
2.
Gaseous emission levels including
secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources should be controlled within
the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry and regularly monitored.
Guidelines / Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be followed.
3.
Vehicular pollution due to
transportation of raw material and finished product should be controlled.
Proper arrangements should also be made to control dust emissions during
loading and unloading of the raw material and finished product.
4.
Prior ‘Permission’ for the drawl
of 150 m3/day ground water from the SGWB/CGWA should be obtained.
5.
All the standards prescribed for
the coke oven plants should be followed as per the latest guidelines. Proper
and full utilization of coke oven gases in power plant using heat recovery
steam generators should be ensured and no flue gases should be discharged into
the air.
10. A
time bound action plan should be submitted to reduce solid waste, its proper utilization
and disposal.
11. As
proposed, green belt should be developed in 33 % area.
12. All
the recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate Responsibility for
Environment Protection (CREP) for the Steel plants should be implemented.
11.10 Expansion of steel plant (150,000 TPA) for
manufacturing of rolled products at peria oblapuram village, gummidipoondi
Taluk, Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu by M/s K.L. Concast Private Ltd.
(unit-II) (EC after TOR)
Setting up of Iron Ingots plant (150,000 TPA) for manufacturing of rolled
products at peria oblapuram village, gummidipoondi Taluk, Tiruvallur District,
Tamil Nadu by M/s K.L. Concast Private Ltd. (unit-II) (EC after TOR)
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the EIA/EMP prepared based on the TORs awarded by the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) in its 77th meeting held during 21st
to 24th September, 2008. The project activity is listed at 3(a)
under Primary Metallurgical Industry and is of ‘A’ Category hence considered at
central level.
M/s K. L. Concast Private Limited
(Unit-II) has proposed to set up of Iron
Ingots plant (70,000
TPA) for manufacturing of rolled products at
The raw material for the project
will be Sponge Iron (60,000 T/annum), Melting Scrap (140,000 T/annum), Ferro Alloys (1000 T/annum) and Coal
(4,000 T/annum). Manufacturing process involves induction furnace for steel
melting and billet caster. The billets will be used for rolled products.
The main Source of Air Pollution
will be Melting Furnace and re-heating Furnace. Air Pollution Control Device
like collection hood, settling chamber, bag house, cyclone separator, Wet
scrubber with ID fan and Chimney of height 30m will be provided with induction
furnace and heating furnace as per CPCB norms.
The total water requirement of the
project will be 50 KL/day and it will be sourced from ground water. The
domestic waste water will be treated in sewage treatment plant and utilize the
same for gardening within the premises as per the pollution control norms.
Cooling tower blow down water will be reused for further process.
The Solid Waste generation from the
project will be Slag from Furnace (10.0 T/day) and Sludge (STP – 0.1 T/day).
There will be no hazardous waste from the project. Out of
Total power requirement of the
project will be 12.0 MW per day and it will be sourced from State Electricity
Board. DG set of 1000 KVA will also be installed in the project. The fuel
requirement of the project will be furnace oil (20 lit/Month, Coal (10
Kg/Month) and Diesel (10 lit/hr).
The public meeting held during on 7th
August, 2008 at Ambattur industrial Estate, Tamil Nadu. The committee took the
note of the public hearing proceeding and found satifactory.
The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) found the EIA/EMP
complete and adequate and complete and recommended the proposal for grant of
environmental clearance subject to the following specific conditions along with
other specific and general conditions and submission of details of the ETP,
disposal details of tarry waste from scrubber, Disposal arrangement of solid
waste along with ash from scrubber pit.:
1.
Continuous monitoring facilities for all the stacks
and sufficient air pollution control equipments viz. fume extraction system
with bag filters, I D fan and stack of adequate height to submerged arc furnace
and electrostatic precipitator to captive power plant should be provided to
control emissions below 100 mg/Nm3.
2.
Secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources
should be controlled within the latest permissible limits issued by the
Ministry and regularly monitored. Guidelines / Code of Practice issued by the
CPCB should be followed.
3.
Proper handling, storage, utilization and disposal
of all the solid waste should be ensured and regular report regarding toxic
metal content in the waste material and its composition, end use of
solid/hazardous waste should be submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at
4.
All
the SMS slag should be used for land filling inside the plant or used as
building material only after passing through test for hazardous quality. Otherwise, hazardous substances should be
recovered from the slag and output waste should be disposed in secured landfill
as per CPCB guidelines.
5.
The
company shall obtain permission for drawl of 50 KLD ground water from the
CGWA/SGWB.
6.
The
company shall comply with the commitments made during public hearing held on 7th
August 2008.
11.11 Blast Furnace (0.90MTPA),
Sinter Plant (2MTPA), Coke Plant (0.6MTPA) and Waste Heat Recovery Power Plant
(60 MW) at Village Navelim, Taluka Bicholim, North Goa Dist,
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the draft Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP prepared
based on the TORs awarded by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) in its
76th meeting held during 26th
to 28th December, 2007. All metallurgical industries (ferrous and
non-ferrous) with primary metallurgical process are listed at serial no. 3(a)
under category “A” projects in schedule of EIA Notification, 2006. Proposal was
appraised at centre level.
M/S Sesa Goa Limited have proposed to set up integrated
steel plant with Blast Furnace (0.90MTPA), Sinter Plant (2MTPA), Coke Plant
(0.6MTPA) and Waste Heat Recovery Power Plant (60 MW) at Village Navelim,
Taluka Bicholim, North Goa Dist, Goa. Total Cost of the project is Rs.1104.00 Crores. Capital cost
proposed for the Environmental Protection and Social Cost is Rs.22.00 Crores. Total land required by the plant will be
The project is having following Product and production facilities:
The raw
materials required for the plant are as given below:
S.No |
Raw Material Requirement |
At Sinter Feed (80%) in MT |
Source |
1 |
Sinter |
1188000 |
Own |
2 |
High
Grade |
X |
|
3 |
High
Grade |
53910 |
Karnataka
|
4 |
Low Grade
Local Lumps |
268185 |
|
5 |
Siliceous
|
162058 |
|
6 |
High
Grade Fines |
X |
|
7 |
High
Grade |
219799 |
Hospet |
8 |
Siliceous
|
X |
|
9 |
Low Grade
Local Fines |
969996 |
|
10 |
Limestone
Lumps |
X |
|
11 |
Dolomite
Lumps |
X |
|
12 |
Limestone
Fines |
137220 |
Karnataka |
13 |
Dolomite
Fines |
138476 |
Karnataka |
14 |
Coke (20- |
448753
MT/ Annum |
Own |
15 |
Coke
Breeze |
98179
MT/Annum |
Own |
16 |
Coal for
PCI (120 kg/THM) |
108000MT/Annum |
Imported |
The project Comprises of 9,00,000 TPA Blast Furnace in
Naveli village next to the existing plant of the company. This furnace will be
a modern Blast Furnace equipped with Hot Blast Stoves,
The proposed power plant will have capacity of 60 MW which
will utilize the waste heat from Coke ovens and the excess gas available from
the proposed 900,000 TPA Blast Furnace.
The financial viability of the project takes into consideration the
revenue that will accrue from the sale of CER’s that will be realized from the
Power plant being a CDM project.
Total water requirement for the plant will be 16632 KL/Day.
This will be met from Government Water Supply Bhandara (check dam) and Rain
Water Harvesting (Fresh water 6,700
KL/day) along with the saline water drawn (10,000 KL/day) from Mandovi
estuary. Details of water consumption are as given below:
Operations/ Plant |
Water Requirement
Quantity in KL/day |
Blast
Furnace |
4,800 |
Sinter
Plant |
1,560 |
Power
Plant |
9,000 |
Coke Oven
|
1,200 |
Domestic |
72 |
Total |
16,632 |
The wastewater generated from the plant will be treated and
recycled/reused/consumed within the plant and zero discharge condition will be
maintained.
Blast furnace, Hot blast stove, coke oven plant, Sinter
plant and power plant are the point emission sources besides the fugitive
emissions from material handling and preparatory areas. Details of sources of
emission and proposed air pollution control arrangements are given below:
Source |
Control Method |
Emissions
from the Blast Furnace and PCI |
Gas
cleaning System |
Emission
from Hot Blast Stove Stacks |
Stack of
adequate height as per CPCB |
Fugitive
Dust Emissions from Hot Metal & Raw Material Handling System |
Dust
Suppression system (Dry Fog type) |
Coke Oven
Plant |
For
Fugitive Dust Emissions, Dust Suppression System and stacks will be connected
to Waste Heat Recovery Boiler |
Sinter
Plant |
Dust
Extraction System and Dust Suppression System and A stack of adequate height
as per CPCB norms for proper dispersion of flue gases |
Power
Plant |
Stack of
adequate height as per CPCB |
Solid waste will be generated in the form of Blast Furnace
slag (770 TPD), Raw Material Fines (245 TPD) and dust/sludge from gas cleaning
system (80 TPD). Slag will be sold off
to the cement industry. Raw Material Fines, process dust, dry sludge from Blast
Furnace will be used as raw material in Sintering process.
Total Power Requirement will be 35 MW and will be met from the Captive Power Plant of capacity 60 MW. DG Set of capacity 10 MW (4x2.5 MW) will be installed. No fuel
will be used except 385 Lts /hr/DG set. The other fuels used will be coke and
coal which are the raw material in the process.
The project authorities presented the compliance of TORs
given and during presentation PAs and their consultant could not explain the CO
concentration, Material balance for the various products, details of the
wastewater and treatment from the coke quenching unit, solid waste management
disposal details etc. The Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) decided the PAs
may be ask to submit the above information for reconsideration and deferred the
proposal.
11.12 Manufacture of TMT Bars with installation of 2x15 T Induction Furnace,
240 TPD CCM and 200 TPD Rolling Mill at Sy. No. 147, 80/2, 80/1, 20/2, of
Mangaldoddi Village, Vasanadu post, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra
Pradesh. M/s. Dhanya Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., - (EC after TOR)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and details
of environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the EIA/EMP
report already prepared based on the TOrs awarded by the SEIAA. The primary
metallurgical processes are kept in 3(a) under ‘A’ category of EIA Notification
2006.
M/s. Dhanya Steel Industries Pvt.
Ltd proposed to set up plant for manufacturing of TMT Bars with installation of 2x15 T
Induction Furnace, 240 TPD CCM and 200 TPD Rolling Mill at Sy. No. 147, 80/2,
80/1, 20/2, of
S.No |
Description |
Capacity
(TPD) |
Capacity
(TPA) |
1 |
MS
Billets |
240 |
72000 |
2 |
TMT Bars |
200 |
60000 |
Raw Material
Requirement
S.No |
Raw Material |
Requirement |
|
TPD |
TPA |
||
1 |
Sponge
Iron scrap |
60 |
18000 |
2 |
Hot
metal Scrap |
108 |
32400 |
3 |
Turnings/Bundles |
72 |
21600 |
4 |
Ferroalloy
|
80 |
24000 |
The proposed plant will produce steel
in the form of billets and rolled products through IF-CCM-RM route. Steel
making will be done using induction furnace. The steel formed is molded into
billets and rolled products by casting mills and rolling mills.
Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried out for SPM,
RPM, SO2 and NOx during December 2007 to March 2008 at six locations
including the project site. The highest reported value for these parameters are
88 mg/m3, 9mg/m3 and 10mg/m3 respectively. Values conform to the
prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality.
The sources of air pollution from the plant are Induction Furnace,
Rolling mill and DG set of 750 KVA capacity. For control of air pollution
stacks and nuisance bag filters at various departments will be installed. The total
water requirement for the proposed unit is met from bore well located within
plant premises. The net water
requirement after implementation of the project will be 90 KLD. The unit will generate 15.0 m3/day
of cooling tower and 12.0 m3/day of domestic effluent during
operation. The unit operations are equalization/neutralization tank, clarifier,
collection tank and sludge drying beds.
The treated water shall be used for on land irrigation. Domestic
effluents shall be sent to septic tank followed by soak pit.
The solid waste generated from the
plant is mill scales from CCM & Rolling Mill and slag from Induction
Furnace will be sold to cement manufacturers. The total power requirement is 1800 KVA which will be met from APTRANSCO.
The public hearing meeting was held on 25th June
2008. The committee took the note of the public hearing proceeding and found
satisfactory. PAs have incorporated the same in the EIA/EMP.
After detailed
deliberation the Committee found EIA/EMP report complete and adequate. The
Committee recommended the proposal for grant of environmental clearance subject
to the specific and general conditions.
11.13 Sbmerged
Electric Arc Furnace(Phase-I 6 MVA & Phase II-9 MVA), Phase II- Induction
Furnace 2X15 TPC,Continuous Casing Machine -240 TPD and Rolling Mill 200TPD) at
Survey No. 1301-1305 of Thurupupalli, Ananthrajpeta Panchayat, KOduru Mandal,
Distt. Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Manishreni Feroalloys Pvt.ltd. (EC after
TOR).
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the EIA/EMP prepared based on the TORs awarded by the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) in its 81st meeting held during 13th May,
2008. The project activity is listed at 3(a) under Primary Metallurgical
Industry and is of ‘A’ Category hence considered at central level.
The plant has proposed Steel Plant Sbmerged Electric Arc Furnace(Phase-I 6 MVA & Phase II-9
MVA), Phase II- Induction Furnace 2X15 TPC,Continuous Casing Machine -240 TPD
and Rolling Mill 200TPD) at Survey No. 1301-1305 of Thurupupalli, Ananthrajpeta
Panchayat, KOduru Mandal, Distt. Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh.
No forest land acquisition and
R&R is involved. The company has
already acquired
S.No |
Description |
Capacity
(TPA) |
|||
Phase-I |
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
Total |
||
1 |
Silico Manganese (Si Mn) |
9570 |
14355 |
23925 |
|
2 |
Ferro Manganese( Fe Mn) |
14190 |
21285 |
35475 |
|
3 |
Ferro Silicon (Fe Si) |
4290 |
6435 |
10725 |
|
4 |
MS Ingots |
-- |
72000 |
72000 |
|
5 |
TMT Bars |
-- |
60000 |
60000 |
|
The required raw materials are Managanese ore, Dolomite, manganese slag,
reductants, quartz, charcoal, iron scrap, electrode paste in the case of ferro
alloys and sponge iron, scrap metal for the induction furnace.
Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried out for SPM,
SO2 and NOx during March 2008 to May 2008 at eight locations
including the project site. The highest reported value for these parameters are
114mg/m3, 9mg/m3, and 10mg/m3 respectively. Values conform to the
prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The sources of air pollution from
the plant are Induction Furnace, Rolling Mill Furnace, 6000 and 9000 KVA
submerged EAF and 125 KVA DG Set. The
company has proposed to install stacks and nuisance bag filters at various
departments for emissions. The total water requirement for the proposed unit is
met from bore well located within plant premises. The net water requirement after
implementation of the project will be 155.5 KLD; 46.5 KLD (Phase-I) & 109
KLD (Phase-II). The unit will generate
39 KLD (10KLD: Phase –I & 29 KLD: Phase-II)
of Cooling tower blow down and 11.5 KLD((3.5KLD: Phase –I & 8 KLD:
Phase-II) of domestic effluent during
operation. The unit operations for ETP will be equalization/neutralization
tank, clarifier, collection tank and sludge drying beds. The treated water shall be used recycled to the cooling tower and also used for
green belt development. Domestic effluents shall be sent to septic
tank followed by soak pit.
The slag generated from the production of
Ferro Manganese will be used as a raw material for Silico Manganese and the
slag generated from Silico Manganese &
Ferro Silicon will be used as a construction material, base layer for
roads laying and for land filling. The mill scales obtained from CCM and
Rolling Mill shall be sold to brick manufacturers.
The total power requirement will
be 18 MVA and will be met from
APTRANSCO.
The Committee deliberated upon the
issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted
by the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 6th August, 2008
satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP report. After detailed deliberations, the
Committee has recommended the proposal for environmental clearance subject to
stipulation of following specific alongwith other specific and general
conditions:
11.14 Expansion of the cement plant
Capacity by clinker production from 0.40 MTPA to 0.55 MTP, cement grinding from
0.40 MTPA to 1.20 MTPA and limestone production from existing 0.633 MTPA to
1.025 MTPA at Mysore Cement existing unit in Ammasandra, District Tumkur,
Karnataka by M/s Mysore Cements Limited
(EC after TOR)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the
EIA/EMP prepared based on the TORs awarded in 75th meeting of the
EAC(I) held during 28th – 30th November 2007. All cement
plant more than 1.0 MTPA covered under Category ‘A’ as per para 3(b) of the
Schedule of the EIA notification 2006. Instant case comes under category ‘A’
and appraised at central level.
M/s Mysore Cements Limited have proposed for expansion of
the clinker plant capacity from 0.40 MTPA to 0.55 MTPA by internal
de-bottlenecking and optimizing equipment usage; expansion of cement plant by
expanding the grinding capacity from 0.40 MTPA to 1.20 MTPA and expansion of
limestone production from existing 0.633 MTPA to 1.025 MTPA {Yerekatte
limestone mine-ML-I(
The committee during presentation
observed that the plant does not have valid mining lease and proposal of lease
is pending since last 8 years for approval from the state government. The
project authorities failed to explain the reason. The committee considering the
seriousness of the issue rejected the proposal.
11.15 Expansion of
Clinker manufacturing plant from 1.2 MTPA to 3.1 MTPA and Captive Mines of
Narsingarh Limestone mine(1.49 MTPA) and Patharia Limestone(0.75 MTPA to 4.5
MTPA) at Narsingarh, District Damoh, Madhya Pradesh by M/s Diamond Cement Ltd. (Narsingarh Clinkerisation Plant). (EC
after TOR)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft
Term of References for the preparation of EIA/EMP. All cement plant more than
1.0 MTPA covered under Category ‘A’ as per para 3(b) of the Schedule of the EIA
notification 2006. Instant case comes under category ‘A’ and appraised at
central level.
M/s Diamond Cement Ltd. have proposed expansion of Clinker plant from 1.2 MTPA to 3.1 MTPA
and Captive Mines of Narsingarh
Limestone mine1302.70 ha-1.49 MTPA(no change in capacity and ML area) and
Patharia Limestone0.75 to 4.50 MTPA-
The production capacity of proposed expansion includes the
following:
1.
clinker
production: 1.2 MTPA to 3.1 MTPA
2.
Expansion
of Patharia Limestone mine 7500 TPD to 15000 TPD(1247.267Ha)
3.
Narsingarh
Mine 6000 TPD(
For expansion of clinkerisation a new line for clinker
manufacturing capacity of 1.9 MTPA will be installed. The manufacturing process involves
calcinations by State of Art 5 stage pre-heater/precalciner, rotary kiln, great
cooler and for control of pollution ESP.
Lime stone consumption will increase from 1.8 MTPA to 4.8
MTPA . The limestone required for
producing clinker shall be sourced from Mysore Cements existing captive
limestone quarry at Patharia. The high
grade limestone (if required) for producing clinker shall be sourced from Katni
MP, by rails/trucks. Laterite
consumption will increase from 0.04 MTPA to 0,10 MTPA. Laterite is also proposed to be sourced from
Katni MP and shall be transported by trucks to the clinkerisation unit. Coal consumption will increase from 0.25 MTPA
to 0.60 MTPA and the same shall be sourced from coalaries of South Eastern Coal
Field. Facilities will be provided for
the storage of explosives and fuel 1x20 Kl capacity fuel tank at Narsingarh and
2x20 Kl capacity tank at Patharia Mining lease area.
Clinker manufacturing is an air polluting process. The source of air pollution are limestone
crusher, coal crusher, raw mill, kiln , clinker cooler and other various
material transfer points. For new line
following air pollution control equipment have been proposed:
1.
Kiln/raw
mill-Bag House.
2.
Calciner
or kiln burner-low NOx technology
3.
Cooler
vent ESP
4.
Coal
mill Bag filter.
5.
Storage
and transfer points – bag filters
6.
Limestone
crushers – bag house
Water consumption for the existing plant is around 2500m3. Water requirement is proposed to be met from
the existing water sources like old mining pits or nearby river water. Additional pumps & pipes will be
installed to meet the additional water requirement, which is estimated to be
around 2000m3/day. An application has been sent to Irrigation
Department Mahdya Pradesh for additional requirement of water to be drawn from
The water requirement for mine operation will be about 300m3
/day and 215 m3/day respectively for Patharia and Narsingarh
limestone mines. It will be sourced from
accumulated rain water from the excavated pits.
Electrical power is
presently received from the MPSEB on single circuit 132 KV line grid with a 132 KV Switchyard at plant
premises. The existing contract demand
with MPSEB is 12 MVA. The existing
captive power plant is already generating 12 MW. Additional power demand due to the
installation of the new clinkerisation unit will be around 15 MW and planned to
be sourced from the local power grid of MPSEB.
3.96 MTPA over burden will be generated and proposed to be
back filled after extraction of limestone .
The public hearing meeting was held on 28th June
2008. The committee took the note of the public hearing proceeding. The issue
raised during public hearing have been satisfactorily addressed and
incorporated in the EIA/EMP.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee did not found EIA/EMP complete and adequate and deferred the
proposal. The committee desired the following information for
reconsideration:
1.
Complete
assessment report regarding water sources, water consumption, wastewater
generation, rain water harvesting, water table depth etc. with statistical/
analytical calculations.
2.
Water
conservation scheme along with zero discharge.
3.
Details
of arrangements for safety of water pond in mining area
4.
Detailed
design of protection arrangement for river passing through mine area.
5.
The
scheme for mitigation of Fluoride in water
6.
The
concentration of chlorides required to rechecked and details provided
7.
Details
of mining benches and operations.
8.
Mining
area reclamation scheme and progress till date
9.
Scheme
for
10. Details of ground vibration study
11. Dust suppression plan with latest
technology
11.16 Cement Plant (Cement Plant 1.91 MTPA; 1.50
Clinker), Coke Oven Plant (1.5 LTPA) and Captive Power Plant (50 MW) near
Village Padhiarka, Taluka Mahuva, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by M/s Nirma Ltd.
(EC)
The project authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Draft Terms
of References (TORs) awarded during the 77th Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry) held during 21st to 24th
January, 2008 for preparation of EIA/EMP.
All the Cement plants are listed S.N. 3(b) under Category ‘A’ and is
appraised at the Central level.
PAs
informed to the Committee that M/s Nirma Ltd. has proposed for the cement Plant
(Cement Plant 1.91 MTPA; 1.50 Clinker), Coke oven plant (1,50,000 TPA) and
Captive Power Plant (
Limestone
(6,935 TPD) from captive mine (Padhiarka); Clay (110 TPD) from Goga, Gujarat,
Sand 71 (TPD) from Bhavnagar Gujarat, Gypsum (390 TPD) from Barmer, Rajasthan,
Coal (300 TPD, Import), Lignite (500 TPD) from Kutch, Fly ash (1,370 TPD) from
CPP and Gandhinagar,
Out of 1.91 MTPA Cement, 2,350 TPD OPC and 3,450 TPD
PPC will be manufactured. Cement manufacturing will involve raw meal grinding,
blending, pre-calcining, clinker burning and cement grinding. The clinker will be ground with gypsum and /
or fly ash to a fine product called cement. Dry process technology will be
adopted. Pre-calcination with rotary kiln and 6-stage cyclone pre-heater
technology will be adopted for manufacturing OPC/PPC cement.
PAs informed to the Committee that coke oven
(non-recovery type) of proven technology will be adopted for coke manufacturing
which will be used to generate power for the cement plant and also as fuel for
lime plant. No solid waste and liquid effluent will be generated from the coke
oven plant. No by-products will be generated from the coke oven plant. Energy will be recovered through WHRB and
used for the power generation. Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion (CFBC)
boilers 2x25 MW Turbo-alternators with water-cooled condensers will be
installed in CPP.
Air quality
monitoring was carried out at 5 locations during March-May 2007 indicating SPM
(76-166 mg/m3),
RPM (31-67 mg/m3),
SO2 (5.0-10.4 mg/m3)
& NOx
(6.5 – 10.7 mg/m3). ESP will be
provided to cooler, WHRB and CPP boiler.
Bag house will be provided to kiln/Raw mill and Lignite/Coal mill,
cement mill to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3. Bag filters will be provided to crusher, coal
mill and packing plant to control fugitive dust from the Cement plant. Dust suppression will be provided at transfer
points and coal/lignite handling area. Fly ash and clinker will be stored in
silos.
Total water requirement from Sea
through desalination plant will be 8,500 m3/day for the process and
20,000 m3/hr sea water for the CPP.
PAs also informed to the Committee that 1.50 MGD water will be sourced
from
Green
belt will be developed in 33 % area. Power (
The
Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public Hearing / Public
Consultation meeting conducted by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board on 9th
September, 2008. The issues like salinity control, employment, social
development, road construction, CRZ clearance, mine clearance etc were
discussed and have satisfactorily been incorporated in the final EIA/EMP
report.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate and suggested to stipulate
following specific conditions alongwith other environmental conditions while
considering for accord of environmental clearance :
1. Continuous
stack monitoring facilities to monitor gaseous emissions from all the stacks
should be provided. After expansion,
limit of SPM should be controlled within 50 mg/Nm3 by installing
adequate air pollution control system.
2. Proper
and full utilization of coke oven gases in power plant using heat recovery
steam generators (WHRB) should be ensured and no flue gas shall be discharged
into the air.
3. The
prescribed emission standards for coke oven plants as notified vide
notification no. GSR 46 (E) dated 3rd February, 2006 should be
complied with.
4. Secondary
fugitive emissions should be controlled and should be within the prescribed
limits and regularly monitored. Guidelines / Code of Practice issued by the
CPCB in this regard should be followed.
5. The company
should install adequate dust collection and extraction system to control
fugitive dust emissions from different sources. All the raw material stock
piles should be covered. All conveyers
should be covered with GI sheets. Covered sheds for storage of raw materials
and fully covered conveyers for transportation of materials should be provided
besides coal, cement, fly ash and clinker shall be stored in silos. Pneumatic system should be used for fly ash
handling.
6. Asphalting/concreting
of roads and water spray all around the stockyard and loading/ unloading areas
in the cement plant should be carried out to control fugitive emissions.
Regular water sprinkling should be carried out in critical areas prone to air
pollution and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and
unloading points, transfer points and other vulnerable areas. It should be
ensured that the ambient air quality parameters conform to the norms prescribed
by the Central Pollution Control Board in this regard.
7. Efforts should
be made to reduce impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products
on the surrounding environment including agricultural land. All the raw
materials including fly ash should be transported in the closed containers only
and should not be overloaded. Vehicular
emissions be regularly monitored.
8. Total
water requirement for cement plant from Gujarat Water Infrastructure Ltd.
should not exceed 1,50 MGD as per the permission accorded. All the treated wastewater should be recycled
and reused in the process and/or for ash quenching, dust suppression, green
belt development and other plant related activities etc. No process wastewater
should be discharged outside the factory premises and ‘zero’ discharge shall be
adopted.
9. All the
bag filter dust, raw meal dust, coal dust, clinker dust and cement dust from
pollution control devices should be recycled and reused in the process and used
for cement manufacturing. Coal and coke fines should be recycled and reused in
the process. The waste oil shall be properly disposed off as per the Hazardous
Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989 and subsequent amendments and
should be sold to authorized recyclers / reprocessors only.
10. All the
fly ash should be utilized as per Fly ash Notification, 1999 subsequently
amended in 2003. Efforts should be made to use fly ash maximum in making
Pozollona Portland Cement (PPC).
11. Efforts
should be made to use low grade lime, more fly ash and solid waste in the
cement manufacturing.
12. An effort
should be made to use of high calorific hazardous waste in the cement kiln and
necessary provision should be made accordingly.
13. As
proposed, green belt should l be developed in at least 33 % area.
14. All the
recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate Responsibility for Environment
Protection (CREP) for the Cement and Coke Oven Plants should be implemented.
15. CRZ
clearance for laying the pipeline in coastal area under the CRZ Notification
should be obtained from the concerned department/authority.
16. An impact
assessment study should be carried out for the disposal of treated effluent
into the seawater and all the recommendations should be implemented.
11.17 Steel plant (Sponge Iron 3,00,000 TPA; CPP 72
MW; MS Billets 5,00,000 TPA; Coal Washery 2 MTPA) at Village Ukam, Tehsil
Rairangpur, Mayarbhanj, District Orissa by M/s. Dagara Minerals & Alloys
Limited. (TOR)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a presentation on the features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft Term of References for
the preparation of EIA/EMP. All sponge iron manufacturing units more than 200
TPD capacity are listed at serial no. 3(a) (b) under category “A” projects in
schedule of EIA Notification, 2006. Hence the instant case will come under
category “A” and will be appraised at centre level.
M/s Dagara Minerals and Alloys
Limited has proposed for setting up of integrated steel plant Sponge iron (3
lakh TPA), MS billet/Ingots (5 lakh TPA), power (72 MW), coal Washery (20 lakh
TPA), pig iron (2.5 lakh TPA), coke oven (2 lakh TPA), sinter plant (
The product and production
capacity are as given below:
S. No. |
Details |
Capacity |
1.
|
Sponge Iron |
300000 TPA |
2.
|
M.S. Billets/ingots |
500000 TPA |
3.
|
Power (I)
WHRB (II)
FBC Total |
30 MW 42 MW 72 MW |
4.
|
Coal washery |
2.00 MTPA |
5.
|
Pig Iron |
250000 TPA |
6.
|
Coke oven |
200000 TPA |
7.
|
Sinter Plant |
|
The various raw materials will be
used in proposed project are Iron Ore 480000 TPA, Coal 2390000 TPA (inclusive
of washery), Dolomite-15000 TPA.
The emission from SMS will be
controlled by providing a Fume Extraction System with bag filters and then let
out into the atmosphere through stacks of 30m height. Dust suppression system
will be provided in unloading areas. Dust extraction system with bagfilters
will be provided in coal crushing and screening, cooler discharge area, product
separation areas etc. All conveyors will be covered with GI sheets. All
internal roads will be asphalted.
The water required for the plant
will be met from khadakhi suleipit reservoir. The total water requirement for
the proposed project will be 975 cum/hr. No waste water generation from the
DRI, SMS, MBF, Sinter Plants as closed circuit cooling system will be adopted.
GCP blow down from MBF will be recycled back. DM plant regeneration water &
boilers blowdown will be neutralized in a neutralization tank and will be mixed
with CT Blowdown in a central monitoring basin and will be used for dust
suppression, ash conditioning and for green belt development. Sanitary waste
water will be treated in septic tank followed by soak pit.
The solid waste generated will be
Dolochar -90000 TPA, Accretion slag - 750 TPA, Slag from SMS - 50000 TPA
and Ash/Dust - 100000 TPA. The entire dolochar generated from sponge iron
kilns will be completely utilized in AFBC boiler as fuel. Slag from SMS will be
used in road construction/filling of low lying areas. Accretion slag will be
used for filling of low lying areas. Ash generated from ESP of FBC Boiler &
WHRB will be given to cement plants/brick manufactures in the area. Bag filter
dust will be given to brick manufacturers and Agarbathi manufacturers in the
area.
The
committee noted that the project a village is coming in the project area which
should excluded from the project area. After deliberating on the facts
presented the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal
for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs :
1. Evaluation of the site vis-à-vis
alternate site.
2. Exclusion of the village area
falling within the proposed site
3. Orientation of the layout to
minimize the impact of air polluting units on the nearby village and forests.
Complete and final layout should be incorporate
4. Present land use should be prepared
based on satellite imagery for study area of
5. Location of national parks /
wildlife sanctuary within
6. Site-specific micro-meteorological
data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and
rainfall should be collected.
7. List of raw material required and
source should be included.
8. Manufacturing process for each
products should be included.
9. Details of land and its utilization
breakup with justification.
10. Fuel analysis, quantity of fuel
required, its source and transportation.
11. One season ambient air quality data
(except monsoon) at 8 locations within the study area of
12. The suspended particulate matter
present in the ambient air must be analysed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of
RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
13. Determination of atmospheric
inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level
concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features. Air quality modelling for steel and cement plant for
specific pollutants needs to be done.
14. Plant-wise air pollution control
measures proposed for the control of gaseous emissions from all the sources
should be incorporated.
15. A note on control of fugitive and
secondary emissions from as per CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be
incorporated.
16. One season data for gaseous
emissions during winter season is necessary.
17. Impact of the transport of the raw
materials and end products on the surrounding environment should be assessed
and provided. Details of layout plan of railway siding should be provided with
EIA.
18. Permission for the drawl of water
from Reservoir from the concerned department of Orissa department and should be
provided with the EIA report.
19. Water balance data including
quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be
provided. Details of the Methods to be adopted for the water conservation.
20. Surface water quality of nearby
rivers and dam (
21. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
22. A note on treatment of wastewater
from different plants including coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for
different purposes should be included.
23. Action plan for solid/hazardous
waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly tailings,
slag, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of ash should be
included.
24. Detailed plan of ash utilization /
management, evacuation of ash, ash pond impermeability and whether it would be
lined, if so, details of the lining etc. and MOU signed with the Cement
manufacturers for utilizing granulated BF slag should be included.
25. Generation and utilization of
waste/fuel gases from plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be set
out.
26. Risk assessment and damage control
needs to be addressed.
27. Occupational health of the workers
needs elaboration.
28. Green belt development plan in 33 %
area and a scheme for rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
29. Socio-economic development
activities need to be elaborated upon.
30. Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R
& R) plan as per the policy of the State Govt. and National Rehabilitation
& Resettlement Policy, 2007 as applicable in the instant case. All the
details including land acquired / to be acquired, number of families affected,
provision of land for land; compensation, facilities, employment, training etc.
including time bound action plan should be included.
31. Details of programmes for the
establishment of educational, graduate, ITI,
32. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
33. An Action Plan for the
implementation of the recommendations made for the Steel and Cement Plants in
the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
34. Conservation plan for the reserve forests
within
35. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be
included.
36. A tabular chart for the issues
raised and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be
provided.
37. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposed land/proposal should also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry)
decided that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of
EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP
report is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III
and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to
the Orissa Pollution Control Board (OPCB) for conducting public hearing
as per EIA Notification, 2006. On
finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns set out
EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
11.18 Expansion of Sponge Iron to Integrated
Steel plant at Plot No. 98, Industrial Estate, Kalunga, District Sundergarh,
Orissa by M/s. Nixon Steel & Power
limited. (TOR)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a presentation on the features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft Term of References for
the preparation of EIA/EMP. All sponge iron manufacturing units more than 200
TPD capacity are listed at serial no. 3(a) (b) under category “A” projects in
schedule of EIA Notification, 2006. Hence the instant case will come under
category “A” and will be appraised at centre level.
M/s Nixon Steel and Power Limited
has proposed for expansion of sponge iron from (350 TPD to 700 TPD) and setting
up of coal Washery (0.35 MMTPA), power plant (36 MW), induction furnace (8 No.
X 12 T), Ladle refining furnace (2 No. X30 T), VOD/AOD (2 No. X 30 T),
Continuous casting machine (6/11 double strand 2 No.) at plot No. 98,
Industrial Estate, Kalunga, District Sundergarh, Orissa. No eco-sensitive areas are located
within
Details of the raw material used
for different process including existing 350 TPD DRI Kiln are given below:
Iron ore
: 3,
69,600 TPA
Coal
: 3,
50,000 TPA through coal washery and 1, 00,000 ROM
Dolomite : 14
TPD
Briquettes : 57000 TPA
Quartzite : 6000 TPA
Coke
: 18000 TPA
Electrode Paste : 650 TPA
For control of air pollution ESPs,
Bag filters and fumes extraction system will be provided. Water requirement
will be 210 cum/hr including existing
use of 41 cum/hr. The water will be supplied by IDCO. In addition during non
availability of IDCO supply surface water from River Sankh / River Brahmani
which is at about 4 to
Dolo Char, Fly Ash, Furnace slag
and Sludge from water Re-circulation System wil be the solid/hazardous waste.
And sludge from water treatment plant is disposed off at designated disposal
site.
The power requirement will be 65 MW which will be
met from captive generation (36 MW) and 29 MW from State Electricity Grid.
After
deliberating on the facts presented the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry)
recommended the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following
TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared
based on satellite imagery for
2. Location of national parks /
wildlife sanctuary within
3. Site-specific micro-meteorological
data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and
rainfall should be collected.
4. List of raw material required and
source should be included.
5. Details of the manufacturing
processes.
6. Details of the products alloys along
with annual production of stainless steel, alloys etc
7. Details of the specifications of
Re-rolling mill, VOD/AOD etc
8. Fuel analysis, quantity of fuel
required, its source and transportation.
9. One season ambient air quality data
(except monsoon) at 8 locations within the study area of
10. The suspended particulate matter
present in the ambient air must be analysed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of
RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
11. Determination of atmospheric
inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level
concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features. Air quality modelling for steel and cement plant for
specific pollutants needs to be done.
12. Plant-wise air pollution control
measures proposed for the control of gaseous emissions from all the sources
should be incorporated.
13. A note on control of fugitive and
secondary emissions from as per CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be
incorporated.
14. Existing emission data for the
ambient air. Stack emissions and fugitive emissions.
15. One season data for gaseous
emissions during winter season is necessary.
16. Impact of the transport of the raw
materials and end products on the surrounding environment should be assessed
and provided.
17. Alternate modes of transportation of
coal for the project should be examined and their relative merits and demerits
in terms of environmental impacts should be provided.
18. Permission for the drawl of water
from Riverground from the concerned department and permission should provided
with EIA report.
19. Consent of IDCO for supply of
additional water for expansion should be incorporated.
20. Water balance data including
quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be
provided. Details of the Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water
conservation.
21. Surface water quality of nearby
rivers and dam (
22. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
23. A note on treatment of wastewater
from different plants including coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for
different purposes should be included.
24. Action plan for solid/hazardous
waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly tailings,
slag, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of ash should be
included.
25. Detailed plan of ash utilization /
management, evacuation of ash, ash pond impermeability and whether it would be
lined, if so, details of the lining etc. and MOU signed with the Cement
manufacturers for utilizing granulated BF slag should be included.
26. Generation and utilization of
waste/fuel gases from plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be set
out.
27. Risk assessment and damage control
needs to be addressed.
28. Occupational health of the workers
needs elaboration.
29. Green belt development plan in 33 %
area and a scheme for rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
30. Socio-economic development
activities need to be elaborated upon.
31. Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R
& R) plan as per the policy of the State Govt. and National Rehabilitation
& Resettlement Policy, 2007 as applicable in the instant case. All the
details including land acquired / to be acquired, number of families affected,
provision of land for land; compensation, facilities, employment, training etc.
including time bound action plan should be included.
32. Details of programmes for the
establishment of educational, graduate, ITI,
33. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
34. An Action Plan for the
implementation of the recommendations made for the Steel and Cement Plants in
the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
35. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be
included.
36. A tabular chart for the issues
raised and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be
provided.
37. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposal should also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry)
decided that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of
EIA/EMP. As soon as the EIA/EMP report
is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and
IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
MOEF for prior environmental clearance. Public hearing is not required as per
para 7(i)IIIStatege(3)(b) of the EIA Notification 2006.
11.19 Expansion of Sponge Iron plant (200 TPD to
400 TPD), Induction furnace (2 x 8T) along with CCM (1x2 strands), Captive
power Plant (8 MW-WHRB+8MW-AFBC) & Ferro alloy plant (2 x 9 MVA) at
Village Sahebdhi, P.S. Barjora, District Bankura, West Bengal by M/s. Govinda Impex Ltd. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed
presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft TORs for preparation
of EIA/EMP report. All the Primary metallurgical processing industries are
listed at serial no. 3(a) under category “A” project. In instant case the
project is covered under category “A” and appraised at the centre.
M/s Govinda Impex Ltd. has proposed for expansion of Sponge
Iron Plant and setting up of Induction furnace (2 x 8T) along with CCM (1x2 strands), Captive power
Plant (8 MW-WHRB+8MW-AFBC) & Ferro alloy plant (2 x 9 MVA) at Distt. Bankura,
The main raw materials are
required for this plant is
For control of air polution ESPs
to DRI Plant & AFBC Boiler and Bag filters to Induction Furnace and Ferro
Alloys Plant will be provided. The total water requirement for existing plant
is 1140 KLD. 100 KLD for Sponge Iron Plant, 1000 KLD for Steel melting Shop
& 40 KLD for Ferro Alloys Plant. The source of water will be Barjora
Panchayat Samiti.
The details of the solid and
hazardous wastes are as given below:
Waste |
Quantity |
Utilization |
Char |
24,000 TPA |
Will be utilized in AFBC Boiler
& sold to other end users |
Slag |
20640 TPA (Fe Mn Slag) |
Will be used in the production
of Si Mn |
Slag |
25,806 TPA (Si Mn Slag) |
Will be used as boulders for
road / land development |
Slag |
4260 TPA (induction furnace
Slag) |
Land leveling, compacting of
roads etc. |
Bag filter dust |
300 TPA |
Will be sent to sinter plants |
Mill scale |
50 TPA |
Land development |
Steel scrap |
640 TPA |
Reused in steel melting shop |
The power requirement will 8 MW
for Induction Furnace, 16 MW for Ferro Alloy Division and 1.6 MW for Sponge
Iron Division and will be sourced from CPP and from West Bengal State
Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (WBSEDCL)
After
deliberating on the facts presented the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry)
recommended the proposal for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following
TORs :
1. Present land use should be prepared
based on satellite imagery.
2. Location of national parks /
wildlife sanctuary within
3. Site-specific micro-meteorological
data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and
rainfall should be collected.
4. List of raw material required and
source should be included.
5. Fuel analysis, quantity of fuel
required, its source and transportation.
6. One season ambient air quality data
(except monsoon) at 8 locations within the study area of
7. The suspended particulate matter
present in the ambient air must be analysed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of
RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
8. Determination of atmospheric
inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level
concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features. Air quality modelling for steel and cement plant for
specific pollutants needs to be done.
9. Plant-wise air pollution control
measures proposed for the control of gaseous emissions from all the sources
should be incorporated.
10. A note on control of fugitive and
secondary emissions from as per CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be
incorporated.
11. Existing emission data for the
ambient air. Stack emissions and fugitive emissions.
12. One season data for gaseous
emissions during winter season is necessary.
13. Impact of the transport of the raw
materials and end products on the surrounding environment should be assessed
and provided.
14. Alternate modes of transportation of
coal for the project should be examined and their relative merits and demerits
in terms of environmental impacts should be provided.
15. Permission for the drawl of water
from River from the concerned department and water balance data including
quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be
provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.
16. Surface water quality of nearby
rivers and dam (
17. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
18. A note on treatment of wastewater
from different plants including coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for different
purposes should be included.
19. Action plan for solid/hazardous
waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly tailings,
slag, char and fly ash. Copies of agreements regarding utilization of ash
should be included.
20. Detailed plan of ash utilization /
management, evacuation of ash, ash pond impermeability and whether it would be
lined, if so, details of the lining etc. and agreement signed with the Cement
manufacturers for utilizing granulated BF slag should be included.
21. Generation and utilization of
waste/fuel gases from plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be set
out.
22. Risk assessment and damage control
needs to be addressed.
23. Occupational health of the workers
needs elaboration.
24. Green belt development plan in 33 %
area and a scheme for rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
25. Socio-economic development
activities need to be elaborated upon.
26. Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R
& R) plan as per the policy of the State Govt. and National Rehabilitation
& Resettlement Policy, 2007 as applicable in the instant case. All the
details including land acquired / to be acquired, number of families affected,
provision of land for land; compensation, facilities, employment, training etc.
including time bound action plan should be included.
27. Details of programmes for the
establishment of educational, graduate, ITI,
28. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
29. An Action Plan for the
implementation of the recommendations made for the Steel and Cement Plants in
the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
30. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be included.
31. A tabular chart for the issues
raised and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be
provided.
32. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposal should also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry)
decided that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of
EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP
report is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III
and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to
the West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB) for conducting public
hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006.
On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns
set out EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental clearance.
11.20 Manufacturing of Pig Iron (15,000 TPA), Ingots (15,000 TPA),
Silico Manganese (9,000 TPA) and Cement grinding unit (18,000 TPA) at Paiki,
P.O Marar, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand by M/s. Radha Casting & Metallic (P) Limited. (TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed
presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft TORs for preparation
of EIA/EMP report. All the Primary metallurgical processing industries are
listed at serial no. 3(a) under category “A” project. In instant case the
project is covered under category “A” and appraised at the centre.
M/s. Radha Casting & Metallic (P) Limited
has proposed for setting up of Pig Iron plant
(15,000 TPA), Ingots (15,000 TPA), Silico Manganese (9,000 TPA) and Cement
grinding unit (18,000 TPA) at Paiki, P.O Marar, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand .
The land requirement will be
- Pig Iron : 15000 TPA
- M.S. ingot : 15000 TPA
- Silico Manganese : 9000 TPA
- Cement Grinding Unit : 18000 TPA
The Gas Cleaning System will be
provided with Mini Blast Furnace; Dust Collection System will be provided with
MS Ingot Plant; Bag Filters will be provided in Silico Manganese Plant and
Cement grinding unit for control of air pollution. Water spraying will be done
in all the unloading & dust generation areas for dust suppression. The
water requirement will be 130 m3/day. There will not be
generation of any process effluent. Only domestic effluent about 2 m3/day
will be generated which will be disposed of through septic tank and soak pit.
Slag (7500
TPA) generated from Pig Iron Plant will be utilised in cement grinding unit.
SMS Slag (2250 TPA) and slag from ferro
alloy (4500 TPA) will be used for road making and land development.
The
committee observer that the prefeasibility submitted was not up to the mark.
The description of manufacturing process, raw materials and other details were
not matching with the proposed products. After deliberating on the facts
presented the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) recommended the proposal
for the preparation of EIA/EMP as per the following TORs :
1. Fresh form 1and prefeasibility
report should be provided with EIA/EMP
2. Present land use should be prepared
based on satellite imagery.
3. Location of national parks /
wildlife sanctuary within
4. Site-specific micro-meteorological
data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and
rainfall should be collected.
5. List of raw material required and
source should be included.
6. Fuel analysis, quantity of fuel
required, its source and transportation.
7. One season ambient air quality data
(except monsoon) at 8 locations within the study area of
8. The suspended particulate matter
present in the ambient air must be analysed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of
RSPM and for incorporating of RSPM data.
9. Determination of atmospheric
inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level
concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features. Air quality modelling for steel and cement plant for
specific pollutants needs to be done.
10. Plant-wise air pollution control
measures proposed for the control of gaseous emissions from all the sources
should be incorporated.
11. A note on control of fugitive and
secondary emissions from as per CPCB guidelines from all the sources should be
incorporated.
12. Existing emission data for the
ambient air. Stack emissions and fugitive emissions.
13. One season data for gaseous
emissions during winter season is necessary.
14. Impact of the transport of the raw
materials and end products on the surrounding environment should be assessed
and provided.
15. Alternate modes of transportation of
coal for the project should be examined and their relative merits and demerits
in terms of environmental impacts should be provided.
16. Permission for the drawl of water
from the concerned department and water balance data including quantity of
effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged should be provided.
Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation.
17. Surface water quality of nearby
rivers and dam (
18. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
19. A note on treatment of wastewater
from different plants including coke oven plant, recycle and reuse for
different purposes should be included.
20. Action plan for solid/hazardous
waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly tailings,
slag, char and fly ash. Copies of agreements regarding utilization of ash
should be included.
21. Detailed plan of ash utilization /
management, evacuation of ash, ash pond impermeability and whether it would be
lined, if so, details of the lining etc. and agreement signed with the Cement
manufacturers for utilizing granulated BF slag should be included.
22. Generation and utilization of
waste/fuel gases from plant and their utilization in the CPP have to be set
out.
23. Risk assessment and damage control
needs to be addressed.
24. Occupational health of the workers
needs elaboration.
25. Green belt development plan in 33 %
area and a scheme for rainwater harvesting have to be put in place.
26. Socio-economic development
activities need to be elaborated upon.
27. Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R
& R) plan as per the policy of the State Govt. and National Rehabilitation
& Resettlement Policy, 2007 as applicable in the instant case. All the
details including land acquired / to be acquired, number of families affected,
provision of land for land; compensation, facilities, employment, training etc.
including time bound action plan should be included.
28. Details of programmes for the
establishment of educational, graduate, ITI,
29. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
30. An Action Plan for the
implementation of the recommendations made for the Steel and Cement Plants in
the CREP guidelines must be prepared.
31. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be
included.
32. A tabular chart for the issues
raised and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be
provided.
33. Any litigation / court case pending
against the proposal should also be included.
The Expert Committee (Industry)
decided that PAs may be communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of
EIA/EMP. As soon as the draft EIA/EMP
report is prepared as per the ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III
and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006, the same may be submitted by the PAs to
the Jharkhand Pollution Control Board (Jharkhand PCB) for conducting
public hearing as per EIA Notification, 2006.
On finalization of EIA/EMP prepared as per TORs addressing all concerns
set out EIA/EMP should be submitted to the MOEF for prior environmental
clearance.
11.21 Ferro alloys manufacturing unit at Industrial
Estate, Sofi Nagar, APIIC, Nirmal, Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh by M/s. Sushma Ferro alloys India Pvt. Ltd.
(TOR)
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed
presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the EIA/EMP report already
prepared. All the Primary metallurgical processing industries are listed at
serial no. 3(a) under category “A” project. In instant case the project is
covered under category “A” and appraised at the centre.
M/s. Sushma Ferroalloys Pvt Ltd., proposed Primary
metallurgical industry manufacturing Ferroalloys in an area of
S.No |
Description |
Capacity (TPA)* |
||
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
Total |
||
1. |
Ferro Manganese OR |
2370 |
10350 |
12720 |
2. |
Ferro Silicon
OR |
1100 |
3300 |
4400 |
3. |
Silico Manganese OR |
2200 |
7500 |
9700 |
4. |
Pig Iron |
2370 |
10350 |
12720 |
*Maximum capacity of each alloy, manufacturing the above
alloys on annul campaign basis.
The
requirement of raw materials forvarious products are as given below:
Silico Manganese
S.No |
Material Consumed |
Phase- I (Approx per day) |
Phase- II (Approx per day) |
1 |
|
13 |
39.00 |
2 |
Coke/coal |
5.0 |
15.00 |
3 |
Quartz |
1.7 |
5.10 |
4 |
Electrode Paste |
0.2 |
0.80 |
5 |
Casing Sheet |
0.03 |
0.12 |
6 |
M.S. Rod |
0.08 |
0.32 |
Ferro Manganese
S.No |
Material Consumed |
Phase- I (Approx per day) |
Phase- II (Approx per day) |
1 |
|
18 |
54.00 |
2 |
Coke/coal |
5.8 |
17.00 |
3 |
Dolomite |
3.0 |
9.00 |
4 |
Electrode Paste |
0.1 |
0.30 |
5 |
Casing Sheet |
0.02 |
0.08 |
6 |
M.S. Rod |
0.12 |
0.48 |
Ferro
Silicon
S. No |
Raw Material |
Requirement |
||
kg/t |
TPD |
|||
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
|||
1 |
Quartz |
2000.0 |
6.7 |
20.1 |
2 |
Charcoal |
1500.0 |
5.0 |
15.00 |
3 |
Iron scrap |
350.0 |
1.2 |
3.6 |
4 |
Electrode paste |
60.0 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
5 |
Casing sheet |
5.0 |
0.017 |
0.051 |
6 |
M. S. Round |
25 |
0.08 |
0.24 |
7 |
Lancing Pipe |
5 |
16.6 |
49.8 |
8 |
Oxygen |
|
|
|
Pig Iron
S. No |
Raw Material |
Requirement, TPD |
||
kg/t |
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
||
1 |
|
2000.0 |
14.4 |
43.2 |
2 |
Coke |
700.0 |
5.02 |
15.06 |
3 |
Dolomite |
700 |
5.02 |
15.06 |
4 |
Electrode paste |
15.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
5 |
Casing sheet |
5.0 |
0.017 |
0.051 |
6 |
M. S. Round |
25 |
0.08 |
0.24 |
7 |
Lancing Pipe |
5 |
16.6 |
49.8 |
8 |
Oxygen |
|
|
|
The emission from submerged
Electric Arc Furnace will be controlled by pulse jet filter bag house to bring
down the particulate emission to less than 100 mg/ Nm3. Fume
extraction system with bag filters and then let out into the atmosphere through
a stack of 3o m height. Dust suppression system will be provided in unloaded
areas. Dust curtains will be provided all round the work area to prevent the
dust emissions. Water spraying will be done to prevent the dust emanation due
to vehicular movement. Ambient
air quality monitoring has been carried out for SPM, SO2 and NOx
during March 2008 to May 2008 at six locations including the project site. The
highest reported values for these parameters are 124 mg/m3, 9 mg/m3, and 11 mg/m3 respectively. Values conform to the
prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality.
The daily total water requirement for the plant shall be 25 KLD (6 KLD:
Phase -I & 19 KLD: Phase-II) which is supplied by APIIC. The unit will
generate 3.4 KLD (0.9 KLD: Phase –I & 2.5 KLD: Phase-II) of Cooling tower
blow down and 6.7 KLD ((2.5 KLD: Phase –I & 4.2 KLD: Phase-II) of domestic effluent during operation. The
unit operations are equalization/neutralization tank, clarifier, collection
tank and sludge drying beds. The
treated water shall be used recycled to
the cooling tower and also used for green belt development. Domestic
effluents shall be sent to septic tank followed by soak pit.
S.No
|
Description |
Quantity |
Remarks |
|
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
|||
1. |
Ash from furnace |
0.25 TPD |
0.75 TPD |
Sold to
brick manufacturers |
2 .(i) |
Slag from
Si Mn |
5.3 TPD |
15.9 TPD |
Used as
construction material, land filling |
(ii) |
Slag from
Fe Mn |
7.2 TPD |
21.6 TPD |
Used as
raw material for SiMn |
(iii) |
Slag from
Fe Si |
0.13 TPD |
0.39 TPD |
Used as
construction material, land filling |
3. |
Slag from
Pig Iron |
3.23 TPD |
9.69 TPD |
Used as
construction material, land filling |
4. |
Bag
filter dust |
21.6
kg/day |
64.8
kg/day |
Sold to
brick manufacturers |
5. |
Waste oil |
|
|
Sent to
Authorized Recyclers |
The total power requirement is 6.7
MVA which will be met from APTRANSCO.
PAs informed to the Committee that
they have already prepared EIA/EMP and is circulated to the Committee
members. The committee after detailed
deliberations found EIA/EMP complete and adequate and recommended the proposal
for grant of environmental clearance subject to specific and general
conditions. No public hearing is required due to location of the plant in
notified industrial as per para 7(i) III, Statge (3)(b) of EIA Notification
2006.
11.22 Induction furnace (2 x 12 TPH) for
manufacturing of MS Ingots (66,000 TPA) at Gopalpur, P.O. Badaposi, District
Keonjhar, Orissa by M/s. Kalinga
Metallic & power Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
PAs did not attend the meeting. The committee
deferred the project.
11.23 Expansion of the Man made Fibre-Partially
Oriented Yarn (POY) plant at Survey no. 46/1/3/1 and 37, Village Rakholi District
Silvassa by M/s Bhilosa Industries Pvt.
Ltd. (TOR)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the TORs
for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the man made fiber manufacturing units are listed
at serial no. 5 (d) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and all projects
other than rayon are categorized as “B” category. In the instant case the plant
is located with
M/s. Bhilosa Industries private Limited has proposed for
expansion of manufacturing of man made fiber-Partially Oriented Yarn (POY) at
Survey no. 46/1/3/1 and 37, Village Rakholi Distt. Silvassa, U.T. Total plot
area of the project is
Sr. No. |
Name of the products |
Capacity(MT/Day) |
1 |
Synthetic Texturised yarn (Existing) |
66.67 |
2 |
Partially Oriented Yarn (Proposed) |
350 |
The details of raw-materials for proposed product are as
given below:
Sr. No. |
Name of raw materials |
MT/MT |
Source of supply |
1 |
Purified terepthalic
acid |
0.858 |
Reliance, MCPI, IOCL, Imports |
2 |
Mono Ethylene glycol |
0.328 |
Reliance, Indian, Glycol, Imports |
3 |
Antimony trioxide |
0.003 |
Chemico, Indian oxides, Imports |
4 |
Titanium Dioxide |
0.030 |
Sachtlben chemie, |
There is no fuel consuming utilities installed in the
existing plant hence there is no flue gas emission generated. The company
proposes to install 1 No. of steam boiler of 4 MT/Hr capacity and 3 Nos of Thermic
Fluid Heater each having capacity of
Hazardous Waste generation & Disposal Method - After
Proposed Expansion as given below:
Types of Waste |
Qty |
Method of Disposal |
ETP Waste |
5MT/Month |
Will be sent to GEPIL Site, Silvassa for final disposal . |
Polymer waste |
52.5 MT/ Month |
Will be sold to actual users |
POY waste |
4 MT/ Month |
Will be sold to actual users |
PTA sweeping waste |
4 MT/ Month |
Will be sold to actual users |
Used Oil |
500 lits/month |
Will be sold to registered recycler/ repprocessor |
Empty bags |
1260 Nos/Month |
Will be sold to authorized scrap vendor |
Empty PP Liners |
7370 Kgs/Month |
Will be sold to authorized scrap vendor |
Empty drums |
65 Nos/Month |
Will be sold to authorized reconditioner |
The Power requirement will be 4.2 MW which will be sourced
from the State Electricity Board. Fuel requirement will be for Boilers, Thermic
fluid heaters and dual fuel fired power engine.
The PAs requested the committee to
consider the proposal for grant of environmental clearance as per para 7(ii) of
the EIA Notification 2006 considering expansion case and backward integration
of the plant and there will not be any emission from the plant & wastewater
will be treated and recycled back for cooling and cooling tower bleed will be
used for green belt development. The members were concerned about the
wastewater quality, disposal of the wastewater, details of the new ETP and VOC
level. After detailed deliberations, the EAC(I) satisfied with the proposed
pollution control measures taken by the project authorities and recommended the
proposal for grant of environmental clearance subject to specific and general conditions as per para7(ii) of EIA Notification 2006
requiring no public hearing and EIA/EMP
subject submission of following information for record and circulation to the
committee members for perusal:
1.
The details of the wastewater quality
2. Detailed
disposal plan of the wastewater along with the area in which it will be used.
The water holding capacity of the area (duty-KLD/ha/day).
3. The
details of the new ETP
4. VOC level
in the similar plants
11.24 Expansion of Agro based paper plant from 20
TPD to 150 TPD & 4 MW co-generation plant at A-1 Industrial area, Village:
Advenia Grant, Tehsil: Sitapur, Dist: Sitapur, Uttar Pradesh by M/s. J B Daruka Papers Limited (TOR)
PAs did not attend the meeting. The committee
deferred the project.
11.25 Cement Plant (OPC/PPC 2.25 MTPA), Clinker
(1.50 MTPA) Coal based Captive Thermal Power Plant (1x20 MW) at Village Amilia,
Taluk Maihar, District Satna. Madhya Pradesh by M/s KJS Cement Pvt. Ltd. (TOR)
The project
authorities and their consultant
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed
environmental protection measures to be undertaken alongwith the draft TORs for
preparation of EIA/EMP. All cement plant more than 1.0 MTPA and mines area more
than
M/s KJS Cement Pvt. Ltd.
Cement Plant (OPC/PPC- 2.25 MTPA), Clinker (1.50 MTPA) Coal based
Captive Thermal Power Plant (1x20 MW) at Village Amilia, Taluk Maihar, District
Satna Madhya Pradesh. The
The various raw materials are
required for the proposed plant will be Lime Stone : 1.392.T/T of clinker,
Sweetner : 0.16 T/T of clinker, Iron Ore : 0.048 T/T of clinker, Coal: 0.22 T/T
of clinker, Gypsum : 0.05 T/T of cement, Power 95 kWh/T of Cement, Flyash 0.25
T/T of cement (PPC), Clinker 0.95 T/T of Cement (PPC), 20% clinker to be used
for OPC, 80% clinker to be used for PPC.
ESP will be installed with clinker cooler and at other air
pollution points bag filters will be provided. Particulate emission from
various stacks and material transfer points is the main pollution from a cement
plant. Adequate preventive measures to keep the pollution level of particulate
emissions within 50 mg/Nm3 shall be provided in the plant. The total
water requirement for the proposed plant is 2400 KLD. The water will be
obtained by drilling bore wells near to Tamas river bed and harvested rain
water in worked out pit of proposed limestone mine as raw material at
The total power requirement of 33 MW will be met from Madhya Pradesh Power
Transmission Company Ltd. (13 MW) and proposed coal based Captive Power Plant
(22 MW). The fuel requirement will be
600 TPD of Coal which will be sourced from SECL.
The committee discussed the location of the Sharda temple
from the plant, PAs informed that it is at a distance of
1
Present
land use based on satellite imagery. Study area should be 10Km radius from the
boundary of plant and mines.
2
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data including inversion height and mixing height.
3
Collection
of baseline data on air, water, soil, noise, flora, fauna etc. for one season
other than monsoon.
4
Atleast
one ambient air monitoring station should be set up near the Sharda temple.
5
Layout
plan should be oriented in such a way to keep maximum distance of the plant
from the Sharda temple and maximum plantation area should be in the direction
the temple.
6
Details
of the raw materials and manufacturing process.
7
Ambient
air quality monitoring modeling for cement plant and mines. Cumulative impact
of cement plant and mines should be assessed and incorporated.
8
Sources
of secondary emissions, its control and monitoring as per the CPCB guidelines.
9
Chemical
characterization of RSPM and incorporation of RSPM data. Location of one AAQM
Station in downwind direction.
10 A full chapter on fugitive emissions
and control technologies should be provided.
11 Water balance cycle data including
quantity of effluent to be generated, recycled and reused and discharged.
12 Efforts should be made to minimize
use of ground water and prior permission for drawl of 2400 KLD water will be
obtained & an action plan should be provided. A chapter on hydrology study
by the State Govt. may be included. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations.
13 Action plan for surface as well as
roof top rainwater harvesting and ground water recharge.
14 Scheme of proper/closed storage of
fly ash, gypsum, clinker, coal.
15 A write up on use of high calorific
hazardous wastes in kiln and commitment regarding use of hazardous waste.
16 Risk assessment and damage control.
17 Occupational health of the workers.
18 Green belt (33%) development plan as
per CPCB guidelines. EMP should include a clear map/layout for plantation/green
belt.
19 Socio-economic development
activities.
20 Need based assessment study for the
villagers.
21 Scheme for compliance to the
recommendations mentioned in the CREP guidelines for cement plants.
22 Details of location of wildlife
sanctuary and national parks within
23 Detailed Environment management Plan
(EMP) with specific reference to details of air pollution control system, water
& wastewater management, monitoring frequency, responsibility and time
bound implementation plan for mitigation measure should be provided.
24 EMP should include the concept of
waste-minimisation, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and
natural resource conservation.
25 A tabular chart of the issues raised
and addressed during public hearing/public consultation should be provided.
Besides the above, the general points mentioned below should also to be followed during preparation of EIA/EMP:
1.
All documents to
be properly referenced with index, page numbers and continuous page numbering.
2.
Where data are
presented in the report especially in tables, the period in which the data were
collected and the sources should be indicated.
3.
Where the
documents provided in a language other than English, an English translation
should be provided.
The Expert Committee (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the
draft EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the
M.P. Pollution Control Board (MPPCB) for conducting public hearing/public
consultation as per EIA Notification,
11.26 Setting up of
The project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient
features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be
undertaken along with the EIA/EMP prepared based on the TORs awarded during 81st
meeting of the EAC(I) held on 13th May 2008. Mineral beneficiation (³ 0.1million ton/annum mineral
throughput) are listed in para 2(b) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006
covered under category “A” and appraised at central level.
M/s Eurobond Industries Pvt. Ltd. has proposed for setting
up an Iron Ore Beneficiation and Palletisation plant (1.0 MTPA) at Gram
Panchayat, Dhrampura, Tehsil, Sihora, District Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. The
The details of the Annual requirement of raw material
and their source are as given below:
Sr. No. |
Raw
material |
Quantity
in MT |
01 |
|
17,40,000 |
02 |
Bituminous
Coal |
42,000 |
03 |
Limestone |
15,000 |
04 |
|
10,000 |
05 |
Bentonite |
10,000 |
06 |
Furnace
Oil |
As and
when needed |
Iron ore available between
52-57 % Fe content are mixed with water to make slurry and fed into classifier
to separate by the size and coarser material below
Concentrated iron ore are mixed with additive (Bentonite)
and other inputs lime and coke breeze and are converted into green balls of
required size in Disc Palletizer machines. These green balls are baked by heat
first in traveling grate and then in rotary kiln. Baked pallets are cooled in
the cooler and the heat is reused into rotary kiln and traveling grate. Rotary
kiln has coal firing system for the heat required in the process. Spent hot air
from traveling grate is put into ESP (Electrostatic Precipitators) to be
cleaned to prescribed standard before being discharged from chimney of required
height.
Total requirement of water
is 35246 KLD and process water requirement will be 1040 KLD. Water will be
sourced from
Sr. No. |
Area |
Control Equipment |
1 |
Crushing
Plant |
Bag Filter |
2 |
Crusher
Transfer Point |
Spot Bag Filter |
3 |
Dewatering
of Slurry |
Press filter |
4 |
Traveling
Grate/ Kiln |
ESP |
5 |
Raw
Coal Storage Hopper |
Spot Bag Filter |
6 |
Coal
/ Petcoke Mill system |
Bag Filter |
7 |
Additive
Mill System |
Bag Filter |
The solid waste consisting of impurities of naturally
available with iron ore. The solid waste will be used for filling of the
abandoned mines in the vicinity. Solid waste is also suitable for brick making
and would be delivered to local brick makers. The Process will not generate any
hazardous waste, as there is no Hazardous Chemical involved in the process. The
collector Katni has asked the PAs to submit application for disposal of 1.5
Lakh tonne/annum slurry in to abandoned mines vide his letter no.
1547/Khanij/2008 dated 24th March 2008.
The company has requirement of
15000 KVA of power which will be sourced from M P State Electricity Board for
the power availability. Bituminous
coal (51000 MT/A) is required as fuel including some quantity of furnace oil
for back up DG sets.
The Committee deliberated upon the issues raised during the Public
Hearing / Public Consultation meeting conducted by the Madhya Pradesh Pollution
Control Board on 20th August, 2008 and found same were incorporated
in the final EIA/EMP report.
The committee after detailed deliberations found the EIA/EMP complete and
adequate. The committee recommended the proposal for grant of environmental
clearance subject to specific and general conditions.
11.27 Expansion
of Cement Plant – Increase of Clinker Production from 1.485 to 3.3 MTPA, Cement
production from 2.25 MTPA to 5.0 MTPA, installation of 2 x 35 MW coal based
Captive Power Plant and increase of limestone production from 2.25 to 5.0 MTPA
at District Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Raghuram Cements Limited (TOR)
The
project authorities and their consultant gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
alongwith the EIA/EMP prepared on the basis of the TORs awarded during 81st
meeting of the EAC(I) held on 14th May 2008. All the cement
manufacturing and clinker grinding units are listed at Sl. No. 3(b) of the
Schedule of EIA Notification of 2006.
More than 1.0 MTPA Cement production capacity is kept under category
‘A’. The instant case also falls under
Category ‘A’ and was appraised at the centre.
M/s Raghuram Cements Limited have proposed for expansion of
Cement Plant – Increase of Clinker Production from 1.485 to 3.3 MTPA, Cement
production from 2.25 MTPA to 5.0 MTPA, installation of 2 x 35 MW coal based
Captive Power Plant and increase of limestone production from 2.25 to 5.0 MTPA
at District Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh. Seasonal river Pageru (
The raw material for the project will be limestone (5 MTPA)
and will be sourced from the captive mine.
Coal mill, and cement mill will be provided with Bag filter
and Kiln/Raw mill will be provided with bag house to control the air emission.
Cooler will be provided with ESP. Bag house and bag filter will be installed to
control the dust emission from transfer points of belt and bucket conveyors.
Fugitive dust generated due to clinker transportation will be controlled by
water sprinkling. Electrostatic precipitator will be installed to control the
fly ash generated from the boiler of CPP. The total water requirement for the
project will be 8500 KLD which will be sourced from Sarvarayasagar
reservoir/borewells. The total industrial wastewater of 1800 KLD will be
recycled for use in cement plant and green belt development. A full fledge
sewage treatment plant will be installed to treat the domestic waste water
generated from the plant.
The solid waste from the sewage treatment plant will be used
as manure in plantation. Spent oil and grease generated from the plant will be
disposed off through licensed vendors. Ash (0.177 million tonnes/year)
generated from power plant will be used for cement production. The sludge
generated from the ETP will be 1.1 tonnes/day. The fly ash collected from ESP
will be used in the cement manufacturing process.
Power requirement will be met from the captive power plant
and from State Electricity Board. Coal (1440 tonnes/day) will be used as fuel
for CFBC boilers of 160 TPH capacity.
The prject authorities informed
that no mining lease area will be increased and cement plant will be installed
within existing premises.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee found the final EIA/EMP report adequate. The committee recommended
the proposal for grant of environmental clearance subject to following specific
conditions alongwith other environmental conditions:
1. Continuous stack monitoring
facilities to monitor gaseous emissions from all the stacks should be provided
and limit of SPM should be controlled within 50 mg/Nm3 from cement
plant and captive power plant respectively by installing adequate air pollution
control system.
2. Secondary fugitive emissions should
be controlled within the prescribed limits and regularly monitored. Guidelines
/ Code of Practice issued by the CPCB in this regard should be followed.
3. Efforts should be made to reduce
impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the
surrounding environment including agricultural land.
4. All the fly ash should be utilized
as per Fly ash Notification, 1999 subsequently amended in 2003.
5. An effort should be made to use of
high calorific hazardous waste in the cement kiln and necessary provisions
should be made accordingly.
6. As proposed, green belt should be
developed in 33 % in and around the plant as per the CPCB guidelines.
7. The company shall make the
arrangement for protection of nallah/river passing nearby the mines. Detailed
action plan in this regards shall be submitted to the Ministry’s Regional
Office at
8. The project proponent shall modify
the mine plan of the project at the time of seeking approval for the next
mining scheme from the Indian Bureau of Mines so as to reduce the area for
external over burden dump by suitably increasing the height of the dumps with
proper terracing. It shall be ensured that the overall slope of the dump does
not exceed 280.
9. Topsoil, if any, shall be stacked
with proper slope at earmarked site(s) only with adequate measures and should
be used for reclamation and rehabilitation of mined out areas.
10. The project proponent shall ensure
that no natural water course shall be obstructed due to any mining operations.
11. The inter burden and other waste
generated shall be stacked at earmarked dump site(s) only and should not be
kept active for long period. The total height of the dumps shall not exceed
12. The void left unfilled shall be
converted into water body. The higher benches of excavated void/mining pit
shall be terraced and plantation done to stabilize the slopes. The slope of
higher benches shall be made gentler for easy accessibility by local people to
use the water body. Peripheral fencing shall be carried out along the excavated
area.
13. Catch drains and siltation ponds of
appropriate size should be constructed for the working pit, inter burden and
mineral dumps to arrest flow of silt and sediment. The water so collected
should be utilized for watering the mine area, roads, green belt development
etc. The drains should be regularly desilted, particularly after monsoon, and
maintained properly.
14. Garland drain of appropriate size,
gradient and length shall be constructed for both mine pit and inter burden dumps
and sump capacity should be designed keeping 50% safety margin over and above
peak sudden rainfall (based on 50 years data) and maximum discharge in the area
adjoining the mine site. Sump capacity should also provide adequate retention
period to allow proper settling of silt material. Sedimentation pits should be
constructed at the corners of the garland drains and desilted at regular
intervals.
15. Dimension of the retaining wall at
the toe of inter burden dumps and inter burden benches within the mine to check
run-off and siltation should be based on the rain fall data.
16. Regular monitoring of ground water
level and quality should be carried out by establishing a network of existing
wells and constructing new piezometers at suitable locations by the project
proponent in and around project area in consultation with Regional Director,
Central Ground Water Board. The frequency of monitoring should be four times a
year- pre-monsoon (April / May), monsoon (August), post-monsoon (November), and
winter (January). Data thus collected should be sent at regular intervals to
Ministry of Environment and Forests and its Regional Office Bangalore, Central
Ground Water Authority and Central Ground Water Board.
17. Suitable conservation measures to
augment groundwater resources in the area shall be planned and implemented in
consultation with Regional Director, Central Ground Water Board.
18. Blasting operation should be carried
out only during the daytime. Controlled blasting should be practiced. The
mitigative measures for control of ground vibrations and to arrest fly rocks
and boulders should be implemented.
19. The project proponent shall adopt
wet drilling.
20. The company shall comply with the
commitments made during public hearing.
12.0 Any other
item:
12.1 Request
for Extension of time for implementation of Bio-Methanization in three
Distillery units each of capacity of 160 KLPD at Gangnauli (Sahranpur),
Khambarkheda (Lakhimpurkheri) and at Rudauli (Basti) in Uttar Pradesh by M/s.
Bajaj Hindustan Limited.
M/s Bajaj Hindustan Ltd, has sought
extension of time from the Ministry for installation of Bio-methanation plant
in three Distillery units each of capacity 160 KLPD at Gangnauli (Sahranpur),
Khambarkheda (Lakhimpurkheri) and at Rudauli (Basti) in Uttar Pradesh. The request
was referred to the Committee by the Ministry for consideration.
The company has urged that pursuant to
rejection of its plaint to accept the Flubex technology as a substitute and its
discussions thereafter with technology providers, it would take 12 months time
to install the Bio-methanation plant. As per the pert chart furnished by the
company, the activity will start in October, 2008 and plant will start
functioning and be stabilized in September, 2009. Further, they have also committed bank Guarantees
of Rs. 5 lakhs for each of the three distillery units for installation of
bio-methanation plant as per the project implementation schedule.
The Expert Appraisal Committee (I)
recommended change in treatment
technology from concentration of spent wash followed by incineration to
bio-methanation and composting. And was of the view that a time limit of one
year and no more under any circumstances may be granted for the purpose from
the date of accepatance of its recommendation, 20th October 2008.
Regarding furnishing of bank guarantee, the committee submits that the mode of securing due
assurances from the party is for the government to decide. The State Pollution
Control Board must ensure that the milestones for implementation are achieved
and should monitor the progress of construction of biomethanation plant.
Further, the CPCB being a central agency should keep a close watch on the
progress of events as per the project implementation schedule submitted by M/s
Bajaj Hindustan Limited.
Next meeting
It was decided to hold
the next meeting on 25-26th
November, 2008.
The meeting ended with a
vote of thanks to the chair.
LIST OF
PARTICIPANTS
Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry) : |
|||
1. |
Dr. T. S. Vijayaraghavan |
Chairman |
P |
2. |
Prof. B. Pitchumani |
Member |
P |
3. |
Dr. B. Sengupta |
Member |
P |
4. |
Dr. Sajid Hussain |
Member |
A |
5. |
Prof. S. Mohan |
Member |
P |
6. |
Shri V. Balakrishnan |
Member |
A |
7. |
Shri R. K. Garg |
Member |
P |
8. |
Prof. N. R. Neelakantan |
Member |
p |
9. |
Shri M. A. Vaidyalingam |
Member |
A |
10. |
Shri. T. K. S. Elangovan |
Member |
A |
11. |
Dr. S. D. Attri |
Member |
P |
12 |
Representatives of CPCB |
|
P |
MOEF Officials
: |
|||
13.
Dr. (Mrs.) P.L. Ahujarai |
Member Secretary & Director |
||
14.
Dr. P. B. Rastogi |
Director |
||
15.
Shri H S Malviya |
Joint Director |
||
16.
Shri P. Sakhare |
Research Officer |
*******