Tribals suffer
barely a month before panchayat elections in Jharkhand were to be held, after a 28-year gap, a judgment of the Ranchi High Court (hc)on September 02, 2005 led to their being called off. The court responding to a long-standing demand by non-tribals, stated that 100 per cent reservation of seats for tribals for the post of head of local bodies, in the state's scheduled areas, was "excessive' and "unreasonable'. Organisations supporting tribal interests, such as the Bharat Jan Andolan and the cpi (m) Jharkhand state committee, have filed Special Leave petitions (slps) challenging the order in the Supreme Court. The Union ministry of panchayati raj (mopr) will also submit an slp .
The Ranchi High Court's judgment concerned 112 out of the 212 blocks of the state for which pesa (the panchayati raj extension to scheduled areas act, 1996) provides that "all seats of chairman...at all levels shall be reserved for the Scheduled Tribes'. It declares this pesa proviso, and sections of the Jharkhand Panchayati Raj Act, 2001
Related Content
- Community forest rights and the pandemic: Gram Sabhas lead the way
- Dignity not destitution
- Tribal health in India: report of the expert committee on tribal health- executive summary and recommendations
- More than 250 tribal women gherao police station, demand toilets at home
- Question raised in Lok Sabha on Malnutrition among women and children, 11/12/2015
- Implementing the Forest Rights Act: lack of political will?